DDENDUM EDUCATION VILLAGE PD AMENDMENT · 2014. 6. 10. · Page Page 22 ZON2014-00012 —Education Village PD Amendment ZON2014 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL-00012 —Education Village PD

Property Location: The subject property is

located at west of Narcoossee Road, south of

Central Florida Greeneway (SR 417), north of

Tyson Road (±220.2 acres, District 1).

Applicant’s Request: Planned Development

(PD) amendment to combine the Education Vil-

lage PD and Education Commerce Center PD

into one PD, and to amend the overall boundary

of the consolidated PD to eliminate the Primary

Conservation Network (PCN) to west of the sub-

ject property.

Staff’s Recommendation:

Approval of the request, subject to the condi-

tions in this report.

S U M M A RY

Location Map

Owner

James L. Zboril

Narcoossee Land Holding

Two, LLC

Applicant

Heather Isaacs

Tavistock Development Co.

Project Planner

Colandra Jones

Staff Report to the

Municipal Planning Board

June 17 ,2014

ED U CATION V ILLAG E PD AM END M EN T

Subject Site

Z O N 2 0 1 4 - 0 0 0 1 2

I T E M # 7

A D D E N D U M

Addendum: This addendum is to amend lan-

guage for City Planning Condition #9, and Trans-

portation Planning Conditions #1, #7, and #14.

Updated: June 16, 2014

NA

RC

OO

SS

EE R

D

ZON2014 -00012 —Educat ion Vil lage PD Amendment Page 2

CO N D IT IO NS OF APP RO VAL

ZON2014-00012 —Educat ion Vi l lage PD Amendment

City Planning

9. PERSONAL STORAGE FACILITIES

Personal Storage Facilities shall be allowed within this PD. It will have to meet a minimum 500 foot setback from Narcoossee

Road and would not allow for any outdoor storage. A reduced setback of 250 feet from Narcoossee Road may be allowed if

LDC Chapter 68 Traditional Design standards are met.

Transportation Planning

1. SIGNALIZATION AGREEMENT

The party or parties responsible for development on the properties east and west of Narcoossee Road must enter into a signaliza-

tion agreement with the City for the purpose of establishing proportionate fair share payments for warranted full access traffic

signalization, associated with traffic generation attributed to the properties’ development.

7. WELLER BOULEVARD EXTENSION SEGMENTS 2, 3, & 4 DEDICATION

Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy on adjacent properties, the owner/developer shall dedicate the right-of-way for

the Weller Boulevard extension (Segments 2, 3, and 4) from its current terminus to the southwest PD boundary line where it is

proposed to connect to the Nemours Parkway extension.

14. MULTI-USE TRAIL EASEMENT

Prior to, or concurrent with, the recording of the first plat that is adjacent to the 25 ft. upland buffer area along the western

boundary of the subject property, the owner/applicant will dedicate a 12 ft. wide multi-use trail easement to the City. The ease-

ment may be located within the 25 ft. upland buffer area or such other location within the Planned Development (PD), such that

there is a continuous north-south trail corridor through the PD connecting existing or planned trail segments that are part of the

City's adopted trail system. The owner/applicant shall provide the City or its designee appropriate temporary construction ease-

ments, when and if necessary.

Property Location: The subject property is

located at west of Narcoossee Road, south of

Central Florida Greeneway (SR 417), north of

Tyson Road (±220.2 acres, District 1).

Applicant’s Request:

Planned Development (PD) amendment to com-

bine the Education Village PD and Education

Commerce Center PD into one PD, and to

amend the overall boundary of the consolidated

PD to eliminate the Primary Conservation Net-

work (PCN) to west of the subject property.

Staff’s Recommendation:

Approval of the request, subject to the condi-

tions in this report.

S U M M A RY

Location Map

Owner

James L. Zboril,

Narcoossee Land Holding

Two, LLC

Applicant

Heather Isaacs,

Tavistock Development Co.

Project Planner

Colandra Jones

Staff Report to the

Municipal Planning Board

June 17 ,2014

Subject Site

Z O N 2 0 1 4 - 0 0 0 1 2

I T E M # 7

Public Comment

Courtesy notices were mailed to property owners

within 400 ft. of the subject property on June 6,

2014. As of the published date of this report, staff

has not received any comments from the public

concerning this request.

Updated: June 10, 2014

EDUCAT I ON V I LL AGE PD AME NDME NT

NA

RC

OO

SS

EE R

D

ZON2014-00012—Educat ion Vi l lage PD Page 2

ZO N IN G MA P


PR O JE CT AN A LYS IS Project Description

The subject site is generally located west of Narcoossee Road, south of Central Florida Greeneway (SR 417), north of Tyson Road

and is approximately 220 acres. The site is currently designated Urban Village on the Official Future Land Use Map and is zoned

PD. This property is also within the Southeast Orlando Sector Plan. This proposed PD amendment will combine the development

programs from the Education Village PD and the Education Commerce Center PD to create the new Education Village PD with an

updated and unified development plan for the entire property. This amendment also will amend the boundary of the PD to eliminate

the Primary Conservation Network (PCN) located on the west side. The PCN areas are being transferred and incorporated into the

Lake Nona DRI/PD through a recent DRI amendment (Case #DRI2012-00002)

Previous Actions for Education Village PD:

May 2004—City Council approved the initial zoning of PD (Case #ZON2003-00014) to allow for 500 residential units, a high

school, and a park. This project was known as Narcoossee Groves PD.

February 2006—City Council approved a PD amendment for the Narcoossee Groves PD (Case #ZON2005-00031) which added

10,000 square feet of retail, 20,500 square feet of office, and 75,000 square feet of personal storage to the previously approved

development plan.

May 2010—City Council approved a PD amendment for Narcoossee Groves by renaming the PD Education Village and allowed

for 176 multi-family residential units, 115,000 square feet of office use, 191,400 square feet of civic use, 306 assisted living

units, 141,500 square feet of mixed use in addition to the already constructed Lake Nona High School.

There is currently some existing development within the Education Village PD. This includes the Valencia College Lake Nona Cam-

pus, Lake Nona High School, and Primrose Daycare. There are also projects which have been approved by the Southeast Town De-

sign Review Committee (SETDRC) but have not been constructed yet.

Previous Actions for Education Commerce Center PD:

February 2006—City Council approved the initial zoning of PD (Case #ZON2004-00042) to allow for 450 residential units,

399,500 square feet of retail space and 50,000 square feet of office space. This project was known as Fountains at Narcoossee

PD.

August 2010—City Council approved a PD amendment for Fountains at Narcoossee by renaming the PD Education Commerce

Center and allowed for 106,750 square feet of mixed use, 315,150 square feet of retail and 288 multi-family residential units.

There is currently no existing development or Specific Parcel Master Plan (SPMP) approvals on the Education Commerce Center

PD.

Project Context and Land Use Compatibility The subject property is located in the southeast section of Orlando. Several parcels within the boundary of the subject property are

currently developed. This includes Valencia College Lake Nona Campus, Lake Nona High School, and Primrose Daycare. Sur-

rounding future land use designations and existing uses are shown in the table below. The proposed PD will be compatible with the

surrounding uses.

Conformance with the GMP

The Urban Village future land use designation is assigned to the subject site. According to Future Land Use Element Policy 2.4.4,

“The Urban Village future land use designation provides for a mixture of land uses and intensities within a development site in order

to preserve conservation areas, to reduce public investment in provision of services, to encourage flexible and creative site design

and to provide sites for schools, recreation and other public facilities which provide and area-wide benefit to the community. The

Urban Village future land use designation is specifically intended to provide a means of streamlining the development review proc-

ess where a DRI, a Sector Plan, and/or Master Plan, have already fully accounted for the impacts of development.”

Table 1—Project Context

Future Land Use Zoning Surrounding Use

North Urban Village & Conservation PD & C Gas Station, Vacant Land &

Wetlands

East Planned Development &

Rural Settlement (Orange County)

PD & A-2 KOA Campground, Residential,

Vacant Land

South Conservation (City of Orlando)

Rural/Agricultural (Orange County)

C (City of Orlando)

A-2 (Orange County)

Wetlands and Vacant land

West Conservation C Wetlands


PR O JE CT AN A LYS IS The proposed PD amendment is consistent with the GMP Policies related to the Southeast Orlando Sector Plan, including Future

Land Use Element Policy 2.4.4 (Urban Village policy), Subarea Policies S.35.2 and S.35.4, along with Goal 4 and its associated

goals, objectives and policies.

Conformance with the LDC

Section 65.366 of the LDC requires that all rezonings and/or initial zonings be in conformance with any applicable substantive re-

quirements for Chapters 58 through 66 of the LDC. The subject property is with the Southeast Orlando Sector Plan and is therefore

required to also conform to Chapter 68 of the LDC which outlines development criteria for the Southeast Sector Plan.

PD—Planned Development District

Section 58.361 of the LDC identifies the purpose of the PD district as follows: “The PD District is intended to provide a process for

the evaluation of unique, individually planned developments which are not otherwise permitted in the zoning districts established by

Chapter 58. The PD District is to be a voluntary process commenced by an applicant for such zoning designation. The standards and

procedures of this district are intended to promote flexibility of design and permit planned diversification and integration of uses and

structures, while at the same time retaining in the City Council the absolute authority to establish such limitations and regulations as

it deems necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare.”

The table below depicts the current Education Village and Education Commerce Center PD Development Plans.

The chart below depicts the consolidation of both PDs to create a new Education Village PD Development Program. Since the Lake

Nona High School is designated Civic on the Southeast Orlando Sector Plan Map, its acreage is not considered part of the Village

Center for the purposed of calculating distribution of uses.

Education Village PD Education Commerce Center PD

Multi-Family Residential 176 du Multi-Family Residential 288 du

Office 115,000 sq. ft. Mixed Use 106,750 sq. ft.

Civic 191,400 sq. ft. Retail 315,150 sq. ft.

Assisted Living 306 du

Mixed Use 141,500 sq. ft.

High School 1

Parcel Acres Land Use Program Max FAR % of Total Acreage

of Entire

Development

% of Total Acreage

of Village Center

Designation

A 39.5 Residential

Apartments

Assisted Living

464 du

306 du

N/A

19.5 %

27.1%

B 23.4 Civic

Valencia College

255,500 sq. ft. 0.25

39.4%

16%

C 56.4 Civic

Lake Nona High School

High School N/A N/A

D 10.1 Commercial/Retail/Service 88,000 sq. ft 0.20

41.1 %

56.9%

E 17 Commercial/Retail/Service 148,000 sq. ft. 0.20

F 38 Commercial/Retail/Service

Big Box Community Level Retail

420,000 sq. ft. 0.25

G 18 Commercial/Retail/Service

Intensive Retail

70,000 sq. ft. 0.10

Total 202.4 Residential

Commercial/Retail/Service

Civic

770 du

726,000 sq. ft.

255,500 sq. ft.

100% 100%


PR O JE CT AN A LYS IS Comparison to Existing and Proposed PD Development Plans

If the existing and proposed PD Development plans are compared, the number of residential (which includes the assisted living facil-

ity units) remains the same at 770 units. However, the Civic uses increases from 191,400 square feet to 255,500 square feet. There

was a Planning Official Determination dated May 12, 2010 (Case #LDC2010-00099) which allowed for a conversion of land uses

within the development program. That determination allowed a modification by reducing the amount of Office uses from 115,000

square feet to 30,500 square feet and increasing the amount of civic uses from 191,400 square feet to 255,500. Therefore the same

amount of Civic uses will be transferred to the new PD. With this conversion, the Commercial/Retail/Service uses for both PDs now

is 593,900 square feet. However, with the proposed PD requests 726,000 square feet of Commercial/Retail/Service uses, which is an

increase of 132,100 square feet of these uses.

Chapter 68—Southeast Orlando Sector Plan

In order to be consistent with the Southeast Orlando Sector Plan, specific parcel master plan applications must be reviewed for com-

pliance with LDC Chapter 68, which lays out the detailed development guidelines and standards for the Southeast Plan area. The

proposed development will retain the “Village Center” and “Civic” designations. The “Civic” portion of the development is cur-

rently developed with Lake Nona High School.

According to LDC Section 68.200 (a) (2), Village Center/Urban Transit Center (VC/UTC District) is described as such: “Village

Center districts shall be developed as important destinations for each Residential Neighborhood, providing a variety of shops, ser-

vices, restaurants, and civic facilities that serve the needs of the surrounding neighborhoods.”

The properties within this subject area which are not currently developed or have approvals shall be required to submit SPMPs to the

SETDRC to determine if the development is consistent with LDC Chapter 68.

Composition of Land Uses

According to Future Land Use Policy 4.1.9, there are detailed guidelines and standards for various Southeast Sector land uses. The

chart below outlines the composition of mix requirements for the Village Center land use. It also compares the new consolidated

Education Village PD to those standards. The applicant has taken into account the office uses and public parks/green space require-

ment and is depicted in Note 1 and Note 2 below this chart.

As noted in the chart above, the proposed overall non-residential exceeds the maximum land area required by 12.9%. At the time of

the adoption of the Education Village and Education Commerce Center PDs, it was noted that satisfaction of the minimum land area

requirements was the more important of the standards in Policy 4.1.9. It was determined at that time that final composition of mix-

ture of uses would be reviewed by the SETDRC to allow for greater flexibility in the overall development program. Also, Policy

4.1.9 was recently amended to allow flexibility in these percentages.

Land Use Minimum Land Area

Required

Maximum Land Area

Required

Consolidated Education

Village PD

Residential 25% 40% 27.1%

Commercial/Retail/

Service

20% 60% 56.9%

Office 10% 25% See Note 1

Public and Civic 10% No Maximum 16%

Overall Non-Residential 30% 60% 72.9%

Public Parks/Green Space 5% No Maximum See Note 2

Note 1—Office uses are planned to be developed in connection with the development of the commercial, retail, and service

uses and are not called out specifically in the overall development plan.

Note 2—Considerable area for public gathering and open space is designed into the Valencia College master plan. As

development of the PD evolves, other areas set aside for parks/green space will be identified by individual SPMP.


PR O JE CT AN A LYS IS Transportation

The applicant is requesting with this new development plan note that will allow for the reconsideration of the distribution of land

uses provided the net external PM peak hour trip generation of the overall project is not exceeded. This note currently exists in both

PDs and is requested to be part of this new unified Education Village PD. According to Transportation Planning review, the subtotal

of PM Peak Hour Trips that will be generated is 3,713 vehicles per hour (vph). The existing and approved development generates

592 vph PM Peak Hour Trips. The net balance of PM Peak Hour Trips for the new Education Village PD is 3,121 vehicles per hour.

Therefore, the remaining development (which does not have Specific Parcel Master Plans yet) shall not exceed this PM Peak Hour

Trip generation of 3,121 vehicles per hour in its mix of land uses.

Specific Uses

Currently in both the Education Village and Education Commerce Center PDs there are a list of prohibited uses. The applicant is

requesting that two of those prohibited uses not be transferred to this new PD. Those uses include automobile washing establish-

ments and personal storage facilities. With the rapid development of residential area within this area, such as Laureate Park, it is

believed that these type of uses would be beneficial by serving a need to these nearby residential communities. In terms of personal

storage facilities, it will also have to meet a minimum 500 foot setback from Narcoossee Road and would not allow for any outdoor

storage.

ITE Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition (*) Excluding Lake Nona High School; this has been already constructed. (**) Development impacts using rates for ITE code 820 (Shopping Center).

Land Uses Entitlements(*) ITE Land

Use Code

Average Daily

Trips (ADT)

PM Peak

Hour Trips

Residential 464 multi-family units 220 3,086 vpd 288 vph

Assisted Living 306 units 251 1,135 vpd 83 vph

Commercial (retail/services) 726,000 sq. ft. 820(**) 31,000 vpd(**) 2,693 vph(**)

Civic (Valencia State College) 255,500 sq. ft. 540 7,024 vpd 649 vph

Subtotal 42,245 vpd 3,713 vph

Existing / Approved Development(*)

Parcel D – Primrose School 11,660 sq. ft. 565 864 vpd 144 vph

Parcel D – (Racetrac) +1.90 acres – 20 Pumps 945 3,256 vpd 270 vph

Parcel D – (Wendy’s) +1.00 acres – 3,400 sq. ft. 934 1,687 vpd 111 vph

Parcel D – (ABC Liquors) +1.27 acres – 10,080 sq. ft. 820(**) 430 vpd 37 vph

Parcel D – (Starbucks/Retail) +1.5 acres – 10,783 sq. ft. 820(**) 460 vpd 40 vph

Parcel B – (Valencia) 80,000 sq. ft. 540 2,199 vpd 203 vph

Racetrack Average Pass-By Trips (+62%): -2,006 vpd -166 vpd

Wendy’s Average Pass-By Trips (+42%): -709 vpd -47 vpd

Subtotal: 6,181 vpd 592 vph

Net Balance: 36,064 vpd 3,121 vph


AE R IA L PHO TO


CU R RE NT ED U CAT I ON V ILL A GE PD


CU R RE NT ED U CAT I ON COMM ERC E CE NTE R PD


CO N SO LI DATE D PD DE VE LO PMEN T PLA N


PR OP OS ED CO N SO LI DATE D PD EX H I BIT


PR OP OS ED C I R CU LATIO N PL AN


PR OP OS ED RO A D CR OS S SE CT I ON S

Weller Boulevard (Segment 1 existing)

Suttner Avenue & Northern portion of

Vickery Place (existing)

Andric Lane (a portion existing)

Vickery Place (Southern portion existing)



Weller Boulevard (Segment 2 future)

Tagore Place (portion existing)



Tagore Place (existing)

ZON2014 -00012—Educat ion Vil lage PD Page 16 ZON2014-00012—Educat ion Vi l lage PD

F I N DI N GS Subject to the conditions contained herein, the proposed PD amendment is consistent with the requirements for approval of the pro-

posed:

1. The proposed PD amendment is consistent with the objectives and policies of the City’s adopted Growth Management Plan

(GMP); particularly, Future Land Use Element Policy 2.4.4, Subarea Policies S.35.2 and S.35.4, along with Goal 4 and its asso-

ciated goals, objectives and policies.

2. The proposed PD amendment is consistent with the purpose and intent of the requirements of the Land Development Code.

3. The proposed PD amendment is compatible with the surrounding development and neighborhood pattern.

4. The proposal will not result in demands on public facilities and services that exceed the capacity of such facilities and services

since it is subject to Chapter 59 of the City Code, the Concurrency Management Ordinance.

Staff recommends approval of the PD amendment subject to the conditions below:

CO N D IT IO NS OF APP RO VAL City Planning

1. GENERAL CODE COMPLIANCE

The proposed project shall be developed consistent with the conditions in this report, the attached development plan, and all

codes and ordinances of the City of Orlando, the State of Florida, and all other applicable regulatory agencies.

2. CONCURRENCY

All elements and components of this development shall be subject to Chapter 59, the Concurrency Management Ordinance of

the City of Orlando. Approval of this application shall not be deemed to provide any vested rights.

3. DEFAULT ZONING DISTRICT

For any requirements not specifically addressed in the PD ordinance, the regulations of the Village Center zoning district shall

apply.

4. PROHIBITED USES

The following uses shall be prohibited:

a. Treatment/Recovery Facilities;

b. Tattoo, body art or body piercing establishments;

c. Fortune telling, tarot card reading, palm reading and psychic services establishments;

d. Check cashing facilities (facilities which deal primarily in the issuance of cash advances based upon receipt of future wages,

commonly known as "payday loans" or "payday advances.");

e. Funeral Home;

f. Adult Entertainment;

g. Flea Markets;

h. Bottle Clubs;

i. Car title loan facilities;

j. Temporary Labor Facilities;

k. Whole Blood Facilities;

l. Wholesale/Warehouse;

5. MODIFICATIONS

Major modifications to the development plan or standards set forth herein shall follow the amendment procedures for Develop-

ment Plans as set forth in Chapter 65, Part 2E, LDC. The Planning Official or his designee shall be authorized to permit minor

changes to the Development Plan in conformance with the intent and purpose of the GMP and the LDC without further review

by the Municipal Planning Board (MPB) or City Council. The changes shall not exceed the maximum standards of the GMP and

LDC.

6. ORDINANCE PREPARTION

MPB recommendation of the conditions contained herein is subject to review by the City Attorney's Office for legal sufficiency

and drafting of implementing documents.


CO N D IT IO NS OF APP RO VAL City Planning (cont.)

7. SOUTHEAST ORLANDO SECTOR PLAN

All development shall be reviewed by the SETDRC through the Specific Parcel Master Plan process. All elements and compo-

nents of this development shall be subject to Chapter 68, the City of Orlando‘s Southeast Sector Plan, unless otherwise stated or

approved by the SETDRC.

8. COMPOSITION OF USES

Final composition of mixture of uses would be reviewed by the SETDRC to allow for greater flexibility in the overall develop-

ment program. The remaining development (which does not have SPMP approval) shall not exceed the PM Peak Hour Trip

generation of 2,675 vehicles per hour in its mix of land uses.

9. PERSONAL STORAGE FACILITIES

Personal Storage Facilities shall be allowed within this PD. It will have to meet a minimum 500 foot setback from Narcoossee

Road and would not allow for any outdoor storage.

10. APPEARANCE REVIEW

Appearance Review shall be required to ensure the project is developed in general conformance with the approved building ele-

vations and landscaping as proposed during SPMP review.

11. CONFOFMANCE WITH PD REQUIRED

Construction and development of the property shall conform to approved site plans, elevations, and landscaping plans on file

with the City Planning Division and all conditions contained in this report, or as modified by the SETDRC, Municipal Planning

Board, and/or City Council to be reflected in the PD ordinance.

12. CROSS SECTIONS

Revise Section D-D and I-I to include sidewalks on both sides, unless an alternative is provided in the SPMP that provides suffi-

cient pedestrian circulation.

13. TAGORE PLACE

Extend Tagore Place in order for Parcel G to meet the street frontage requirement. This can be a private street.


1. SIGNALIZATION AGREEMENT

Before approval of the first SPMP for the combined properties, the party or parties responsible for development on the proper-

ties east and west of Narcoossee Road must enter into an agreement with the City for the purpose of establishing proportionate

fair share payments for warranted full access traffic signalization, associated with traffic generation attributed to the properties'

development.

2. NON –MOTORIZED CIRCULATION

Each specific SPMP must provide adequate pedestrian and bicycle circulation facilities in accordance with adopted City guide-

lines and plans.

3. ORANGE COUNTY APPROVAL

Any proposed driveway to Narcoossee Road will require Orange County permits and approval. The owner/applicant shall pro-

vide a copy of the permits and approval (or letter of intent of approval) from the approving agency to the City of Orlando prior

to final permit/construction plans approval.

4. PHASING PLAN

Any SPMP application must include a transportation circulation plan serving such development and shall be consistent with the

rest of the combined PD properties.

5. INTERNAL ROAD CROSS SECTIONS

Cross section design of all internal roadways is subject to review and approval by the SETDRC during the review and approval

process for the respective SPMPs. Revisions to the cross-sections shown in the PD my be required as part of SPMP review if

needed to accommodate proposed development.


CO N D IT IO NS OF APP RO VAL Transportation Planning (cont.) 6. DRIVE-THROUGH USES

Drive-through uses on the combined properties may be approved by the SETDRC, subject to applicable Land Development

Code regulations.

7. WELLER BOULEVARD EXTENSION SEGMENTS 2,3 & 4 DEDICATION

Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy on adjacent properties, the owner/developer shall record a right-of-way dedi-

cation for the Weller Boulevard extension from its current terminus to the southwest PD boundary line.

8. WELLER BOULEVARD EXTENSION SEGMENTS 2,3 & 4 CONSTRUCTION

The owner/developer, in coordination with other developers, shall be 100% responsible for the cost of design and construction

of Weller Boulevard from its current terminus to the southwest PD boundary line. Segment 2 of the Weller Boulevard extension

shall be completed prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy for Parcel A. Segments 3 and 4 of the Weller Boulevard

extension shall be completed when Nemours Parkway is extended to this area..

9. INTERNAL ROADWAYS

All internal primary streets and the cross-sections of all internal roadways are subject to review and approval by the SETDRC.

10. NARCOOSSEE ROAD VEHICULAR ACCESS

Full vehicular access onto the property shall be consistent with the Narcoossee Road Corridor Access Management Plan. The

location of directional vehicular access (right-in / right-out driveways and left-in / left-out median openings) onto Narcoossee

Road is subject to review and approval by the City's Transportation Engineer or his/her designee, and shall be consistent with

the Narcoossee Road Corridor Access Management Plan.

11. WELLER BOULEVARD TURN LANES

If and when Weller Boulevard is extended beyond the PD's western boundary, and when warranted based on traffic increases,

the party or parties responsible for development of the project that triggers the need for the improvement shall be fully responsi-

ble for the design and construction of an additional eastbound left turn lane at the east approach to Narcoossee Road.

12. VICKREY PLACE TURN LANES

When warranted based on traffic increases, the party or parties responsible for the SPMP development project that triggers the

need for traffic operations improvement shall be fully responsible for the design and construction of an additional eastbound left

turn lane at the Vickery Place eastbound approach to Narcoossee Road.

13. TAGORE PLACE TURN LANES

When warranted based on traffic increases, the party or parties responsible for the SPMP development project that triggers the

need for traffic operations improvement shall be fully responsible for the design and construction of an additional eastbound left

turn lane at the Tagore Place eastbound approach to Narcoossee Road.

14. MULTI-USE TRAIL EASEMENT

The owner/applicant is required to dedicate a minimum 12 ft. wide multi-use trail easement; such easement can be shown adja-

cent to or within the 25 ft. upland buffer area along the entire the western property boundary or can be shown along the entire

eastern property line on Narcoossee Road. If shown along the eastern property line on Narcoossee Road., the easement area

shall include the area already reserved for on-street sidewalks. Regardless as to where the trail is located, the owner/applicant

shall reserve an additional construction easement area for use by the City (or designee) during the construction of such trail.

15. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR

Any solid waste container(s) shall not be located adjacent to any single family houses or directly adjacent to the public street.

Dumpsters shall be located to provide a minimum 50 feet of clear backup space and constructed per Orlando Engineering Stan-

dards Manual (ESM) requirements, OR documentation shall be provided from the City's Solid Waste Division indicating curb

pick-up or other approved arrangement.


CO N D IT IO NS OF APP RO VAL Transportation Planning (cont.)

16. CROSS-ACCESS CORRIDORS

The subject property is adjacent to a major thoroughfare, Narcoossee Road. Orlando Land Development Code (LDC), Chapter

61 (Sections 61.108 - 61.113), provides the minimum requirements for cross-access corridors. The combined properties shall

provide cross-access easements and/or joint driveways within adjacent developments to ensure that the parking, access and cir-

culation may be easily tied in to create a unified system.

17. PARKING LOT TRAFFIC CONTROL

Parking lot traffic control shall be shown per Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) standards (stop signs, stop

bars, "Do Not Enter" signs, pavement arrows, etc.) at internal driving aisle intersections. Stop signs and stop bars shall be

shown at all exits from the property. Stop signs and stop bars shall be located in-line and 4 feet behind sidewalks/crosswalks.

18. PEDESTRIAN ACCESS

The Specific Parcel Master Plan for each parcel shall show the proposed bicycle and pedestrian circulation system, including

general location and dimensions of private rights-of-way and travel surfaces. Bicycle and pedestrian circulation system shall be

shown at the time of Specific Parcel Master Plan (SPMP) submittal.

19. PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS

The main pedestrian crossing areas between the buildings and the parking areas shall be clearly marked with pavement markings

and maintained at all times.

20. ON-SITE SIDEWALK REQUIREMENT

Paved pedestrian ways shall be provided from the public sidewalk(s) to the main building entrance(s).

21. HANDICAP RAMPS AT STREET INTERSECTIONS

Handicap (HC) ramps shall be constructed at the street intersection(s) and driveway connection(s) to comply with the Americans

with Disability Act (ADA). Pedestrian ramps at street corners shall be designed to provide a separate ramp in each direction.

22. DRIVEWAY SIGHT DISTANCE

At all project entrances, clear sight distances for drivers and pedestrians shall not be blocked by signs, buildings, building col-

umns, landscaping, or other visual impediments. No structure, fence, wall, or other visual impediment shall obstruct vision be-

tween 3 feet and 8 feet in height above street level. The street corner/driveway visibility area shall be shown and noted on con-

struction plans and any future site plan submittals. The applicant shall design site plans as necessary to comply with the street

corner visibility requirements (Chapter 60, Sections 60.141 through Sections 60.143) and the driveways and curbcuts require-

ments (Chapter 61, Sections 61.101 through Sections 61.107) of the Orlando Land Development Code (LDC).

23. BIKE PARKING REQUIREMENTS

Bicycle parking shall be provided as required in accordance with the standards of Chapter 61, Part 3D of the Orlando Land De-

velopment Code, and shall be made available prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy/Completion for the use being

served. Parking facilities that comply with the standards for long-term bicycle parking may also be used to meet the short-term

bicycle parking requirements. Covered bicycle parking is encouraged wherever the design of the building or use being served

by the bicycle parking facility includes a covered area that could accommodate such facilities either as proposed or through eco-

nomical redesign.

24. TRANSIT

The owner/applicant shall contribute towards the cost and installation of bus shelters on Narcoossee Road; contributions shall be

assessed when transit service is available along this roadway. Such contribution is described in LDC Chapter 59, the Mobility

Plan, and may be eligible for impact fee credits.


IN FO RM AT IO N AL COMM EN TS Transportation Impact Fees

Any new construction, change in use, addition, or redevelopment of a site or structure shall be subject to a review for Transportation

Impact Fees. A Transportation Impact Fee assessment will be done at the time of building permit review. This fee will be calculated

based on the proposed building's use and gross square footage, as submitted in the final permit set of plans. Any additional Trans-

portation Impact Fees assessed on this project shall be due prior to building permit issuance.

For a copy of the complete ordinance or impact fee rate chart, you may reference our website at: http://www.cityoforlando.net/

planning/Transportation/ifees.htm

Any exemptions or credits against the Transportation Impact Fee must be reviewed prior to permit issuance. All Transportation Im-

pact Fee Credits shall be initiated and processed by the Transportation Impact Fee Coordinator. Credit shall be available for the pre-

vious use located on the subject site.

Police

The Orlando Police Department has no objections to the rezoning request for the Education Village PD located west of Narcoossee

Rd. and south of SR 417. A full CPTED plan review will be completed as specific detailed plans are submitted to the City. We en-

courage developers and property owners to incorporate CPTED strategies in their projects in an effort to reduce the opportunity for

crime. Contact the Police Department for an electronic copy of a document entitled, "Crime Prevention Through Environmental

Design, Your Guide to Creating a Safe Environment".

Fire

1. DEPARTMENT ACCESS

Every building constructed shall be accessible to fire department apparatus by way of access roadways with all-weather surface

of not less than 20 feet of unobstructed width, adequate roadway turning radius, capable of supporting the imposed loads of fire

apparatus, and having a minimum vertical clearance of 13 ft. 6 in. [NFPA 1: 18.2.3]

2. DEPT ACCESS DEAD END

A dead-end in the fire department access road in excess of 150' will require an approved turnaround or cul-de-sac. [NFPA 1:

18.2.3.4.4]

3. FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE

Be advised that any new construction must adhere to the requirements of the Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2010 Edition, and

The City of Orlando Fire Prevention Code.

4. FIRE CODE REVIEW

TRC fire code review is preliminary in nature, and is intended to expose or prevent evident design deficiencies with State and

City Fire Codes. The design will be reviewed in detail for State and City Fire Code compliance at the time of permit application.

5. FIRE PERMITS REQUIRED

Underground main contractor must apply for a Fire permit for the installation or modification of any underground mains serving

fire hydrants and/or fire protection systems prior to any installation. If the water distribution system and fire hydrants are located

in a right-of-way or recorded easement and owned/installed/maintained by the water purveyor, we will only require installation

to the water purveyor's standards for underground components and connections. However, hydrants must be in compliance with

hydrant spacing, location, distribution, color coding, and needed fire flow minimums as specified in City Fire Code. Under-

ground main and fire hydrant installations on private property will require an FIR permit and full compliance with NFPA 24.

[City Fire Code, Section 24.13(t)(13)]

6. CONSTRUCTION PHASE

Please inform contractor that where underground mains and hydrants are to be provided, they shall be installed, completed, and

in service prior to storage of combustibles on site. [NFPA 1: 16.4.3.1] Fire department access shall be provided at the start of

the project and shall be maintained throughout construction. [NFPA 1: 16.1.4] In all buildings more than one story in height, at

least one stairway shall be provided that is in usable condition at all times and that meets the requirements of 7.2.2 of the Life

Safety Code, NFPA 101. [NFPA 1: 16.3.4.5.1]


CO N TAC T IN F ORM AT IO N City Planning

For questions regarding City Planning review, please contact Colandra Jones at 407.246.3415 or [email protected].


For questions regarding Transportation Planning review, please contact Gus Castro at 407-246-3385 or

[email protected]

Transportation Impact Fees

For questions and information regarding Transportation Impact Fee Rates you may contact Nancy Ottini at (407)246-3529 or

[email protected]

Police

For questions regarding Orlando Police Department plan reviews, please contact Audra Nordaby at 407.246.2454 or

[email protected].

Fire

For any questions regarding fire issues, please contact Jack Richardson at 407.246.3150 or at [email protected]. To

obtain plan review status, schedule/cancel an inspection and obtain inspection results, please call PROMPT, our Interactive Voice

Response System at 407.246.4444.

Building Plan Review

For questions regarding Building Plan Review issues contact Don Fields at (407) 246-2654 or [email protected].

RE V IE W /AP PR O VA L PR O CE SS—NE XT STE PS 1. City Council approves the MPB minutes.

2. Staff forward PD Zoning ordinance request to the City Attorney’s Office.

3. First reading of the PD amendment ordinance.

4. Second reading of the PD amendment ordinance.

IN FO RM AT IO N AL COMM EN TS Fire (cont.)

7. FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS TO BUILDING

A fire department access road shall extend within 50 ft of a single exterior door providing access to the interior of the building.

Fire department access roads shall be provided such that any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first

story of the building is located not more than 150 ft (450 ft for sprinkler protected structures) from fire department access roads.

[NFPA 1: 18.2.3.2]

8. REQUIRED FIRE FLOW

All structures must be protected by fire hydrants in accordance with City Fire Code 24.30(f). A determination will be made at

the time plans are submitted for permitting. We will need a Required Fire Flow calculation in accordance with the ISO method

demonstrating the water distribution system and new/existing fire hydrant(s) can deliver the demand.

ZON2014-00012 Education Village PD AddendumZON2014-00012 Education Village PD Amendment MPB

Documents

DDENDUM EDUCATION VILLAGE PD AMENDMENT · 2014. 6. 10. · Page Page 22 ZON2014-00012 —Education Village PD Amendment ZON2014 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL-00012 —Education Village PD