57
D D E EV VE EL LO OP PM ME EN NT T O O F F V V I IL LL LA AG GE E K K N NO OW WL LE ED DG GE E M MA AN NA AG GE EM ME EN NT T S S Y YS ST TE EM M : : M MI IT TI IG GA AT TI IN NG G E E X XT TR RE EM ME E S S O OC CI IO O - -E E C CO ON NO OM MI IC C S S T TR RE ES SS S C C A AU US SI IN NG G S S U UI IC CI ID DE E A A M MO ON NG G F F A AR RM ME ER RS S 2009 Prof. Anil K Gupta Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad Gujarat, India

DDEEVVVEELLOOOPPPMMMEEENNNTTT … triggered by the enquiry committee set up after Deccan riots more than hundred years ago. The food for work programme

  • Upload
    buitu

  • View
    222

  • Download
    6

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

DDDEEEVVVEEELLLOOOPPPMMMEEENNNTTT OOOFFF VVVIIILLLLLLAAAGGGEEE KKKNNNOOOWWWLLLEEEDDDGGGEEE MMMAAANNNAAAGGGEEEMMMEEENNNTTT

SSSYYYSSSTTTEEEMMM::: MMMIIITTTIIIGGGAAATTTIIINNNGGG EEEXXXTTTRRREEEMMMEEE SSSOOOCCCIIIOOO---EEECCCOOONNNOOOMMMIIICCC

SSSTTTRRREEESSSSSS CCCAAAUUUSSSIIINNNGGG SSSUUUIIICCCIIIDDDEEE AAAMMMOOONNNGGG FFFAAARRRMMMEEERRRSSS

2009

Prof. Anil K Gupta Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad

Gujarat, India

2

LIST OF ANNEXURES

ANNEXURE I (A)

List includes the 31 distressed districts identified by the government where the prime

minister‟s special rehabilitation package is being implemented.

ANNEXURE-I (b)

List of 100 Agriculturally Less Developed and Distressed Districts

ANNEXURE-II

A Socio-Economic Study Of The Farmers In The Suicide Prone Districts of India: A

Departmental Project Report

Proposal received from Dr Manoranjan Pal and others, ISI Kolkata in consultation with

other colleagues

ANNEXURE-III

An approach note on Financial Services in Village Knowledge Management System

Proposal received from a team including NABARD and other institutions, Mr Jiji

Mammen and others

ANNEXURE IV

Education, Health and Nutrition situation analysis of families in distress districts of India

and strategies to mitigate them, proposal received from Dr Sumathi Sura and others, AP

Agri university

ANNEXURE-V

Minutes of two of the six meetings held in April and July, 2008

3

DEVELOPMENT OF VILLAGE KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM:

MITIGATING EXTREME SOCIO-ECONOMIC STRESS CAUSING SUICIDE

AMONG FARMERS

Department of Science and Technology, GOI is extremely concerned about the persistent

problems being faced by the farmers in certain parts of the country causing some of them to even

commit suicide1,2,3,4,5,6

. Without long term and short-term measures, which eliminate or

considerably reduce the factors contributing to the stress, one cannot convert the situation of

desperation into hope. Accordingly, it has been decided that a systematic effort be mounted in a

time bound manner to use available knowledge and information about land use, whether, other

ecological factors coupled with socio economic and cultural information so as to generate

location specific solutions. This will require linkage among soil, crop, livestock and human

factors to not only be synergistic but also conducive to long term productivity, and sustainability

in an equitable manner.

A detailed project report (DPR) has been prepared with the following objectives:

a. To integrate where available and develop where there is a gap, the Village Information

System (VIS) and the Land Information System (LIS) into a Village Knowledge

Management System (VKMS).

b. To ensure that future alternatives maximise the blending between peoples‟ own

knowledge, innovations and practices with formal or institutional science and technology.

c. To assimilate online weather information by creating a widespread network of weather

stations in household and village level expert systems for generating viable land and water

use options.

d. To develop indicators in a participative manner so that communities can themselves

monitor their emergent situation and take necessary actions.

e. To create precise measures of accountability among public and private institutions,

particularly dealing with credit and commodity markets so that historic institutions of

exploitation causing deprivation and distress can be transformed.

f. To create peoples‟ knowledge database through Village Knowledge Register (VKR)

integrated with National Register maintained at National Innovation Foundation (NIF) so

as to trigger lateral learning, experimentation and generation of self-reliant entrepreneurial

knowledge based alternatives.

1 Numbers of farmers‟ suicides grew to 182,936 in 2007, constituting 14.4% of the total suicides in the country in

2007 according to National Crime Record Bureau, New Delhi in its report, Accidental Deaths and Suicide Report-

2007. Five worst-affected States (“Big Five”) are Maharashtra (4,238), Andhra Pradesh (1,797), Karnataka

(2,135), Madhya Pradesh (1,375), & Chhattisgarh (1,593) accounting for two-third of all agrarian suicides in the

country. Two other states that crossed thousand marks are Kerala (1,232) & West Bengal (1102). Of these,

Maharashtra alone accounted for over 38% with Vidarbha region as focal point. 2 Hon. Mumbai High Court treating the letter as petition written by the All India Biodynamic & Organic Farming

Association in connection with the Farmers‟ suicides, directed The Tata Institute of Social Science to conduct a

pilot study on farmers‟ suicides in Maharashtra in 2006. 3 Government of Maharashtra (GOM) assigned the Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research (IGIDR),

Mumbai, a study on farmers‟ suicide in Maharashtra‟ for identifying important risk factors and in providing some

suggestions to the GOM for avoiding the same. 4 Vidarbha Jan Andolan Samiti, a farmers‟ movement in Maharashtra (Nagpur) has been addressing the plight of the

farmers‟ suicides in the Vidarbha region for many years (VJAS, 2007a-c). 5 Study by Centre for Developmental Studies, Trivendrum, Kerala, forms part of an ongoing project on "Economic

Globalization and State Decentralization: Coping Strategies of farm households in South India", sponsored by

NCCR (North-South), Swiss National Science Foundation, Berne and the Department of Geography, University

of Zurich, Switzerland. 6 Keynote paper for the theme “Risk Management in Agriculture/Rural Sector” presented at the 67th Annual

Conference of the Indian Society of Agricultural Economics (ISAE), held under the auspices of Bankers Institute

of Rural Development, Lucknow, Nov, 2007.

4

THE PROBLEM:

The history of distress7 on account of drought or other natural or man-made calamities is

quite old in India. The first institutional intermediation for improving productivity was in

fact triggered by the enquiry committee set up after Deccan riots more than hundred years

ago. The food for work programme8 actually started as a means to mitigate the distress and

create purchasing power in the hands of the poor when other means of employment were

not available. In the last decade, particularly after 2001, the cases of farmers committing

suicide have been reported from various parts of the country in large numbers (Vasavi,

1998; 1999; Assadi, 1998; Revathi, 1998; Reddy 1998; Parthasarathy and Shammen,

1998; CES, 1998; Shetty 1999; Iyer 1999; Patil, 2002; Deshpande, 2002, 2003; Sagar and

Chandra, 2003; Vyas, 2004; Rao and Gopalappa, 2004; Rabade, 2004; Mohanty and

Shroff, 2004; TISS, 2005; Sainath, 2005; Mohanty, 2005; Sridhar, 2006; Srijit et al.,

2006; Rao and Suri, 2006; Vaidyanathan, 2006; Mishra, 2006c/d; Mishra, 2006;

Mohankumar and Sharma, 2006; Kurup, 2006; Gajalakshmi and Peto., 2007; Nair and

Menon, 2007; Gill and Singh, 2006; Nair and Ramakumar, 2007; Nair et al., 2007;

Bunsha, 2007; Chowdhury et al., 2007). Most of the time the reasons have been either

crop failure (on account of drought9, and/or pest or disease incidence) or indebtedness

10,11

along with other economic or social crisis which farmer could not bear from existing

resources or external support system (Kannan and Pushpangadan, 1988; Assadi 1998;

Vasavi, 1999; Iyer and Manick, 2000; Deshpande, 2002; Satish, 2006; Gill and Singh,

2006; GOI, 2006; Sahu, 2008; Das, 2008; Vanitha and Kumar, 2008; Bagchi, 2008).

In a report submitted to Mumbai High Court (March 15, 2005), a study by TATA Institute

of Social Science2 (henceforth, the Study) concluded that the crop failure, indebtedness

and rising cost of cultivation contributed to the suicides. While many other farmers faced

the same constraints, only a few took this extreme step. The study found that many lenders

7 Miller (1993) defined a distressed community as one in which economic, social, and educational

indicators reveal a decline and deterioration of the social and physical infrastructure that facilitate

community renewal and sustainability, thus leading to a loss of the psychological sense of community.

According to Durkheim (1952) suicide is not an impulsive act by an individual but various

circumstances leading to it can be categorised as “events”, “stressors”, “actors/catalysts” and “triggers”.

“Trigger” is the one which forces the final act. Also see Gupta, 1983, 1985, 1989, 1995) for studies on

drought, and other sources of distress and various social effects including migration, asset sale,

indebtedness, reduced consumption etc., Some of these studies have looked at the knowledge and

innovation based approaches to survival ( Gupta, 1988, 1989. 2006). 8 Food for Work programme was launched in Nov. 2004 in 150 most backward district of the Country,

identified by the planning commission in consultation with the ministry of rural development and the

state government. Objective of the programme was to provide additional resources available under the

Sampoorna Grameen Rozgar Yojna so that generation of supplementary wage employment and

providing of food security through creation of need based economic social and community assets in

these districts are further intensified. The scheme was 100% centrally sponsored. The programme has

since been subsumed in the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act-2000, identified districts of the

country including 150 NFFWP districts. 9 Bundelkhand region covers 13 districts, six in Madhya Pradesh and 7 in Uttar Pradesh, cyclical

phenomenon of drought, failure of agriculture and agricultural production, distress and suicides and

migration are common here. 10

According to the Parthasarathy and Sameem (1998), indebtness is aggravating by the changes in the

social and structural characters of the money lenders i.e. from professional money lenders to

agriculturist money lenders, who unlike the professional is a native of the village and powerful in the

structure of the village and village economy. However, studies have shown that in informal markets, it

matters little whether the money lender is a man or a woman ( Gupta, 1995). 11

According to the 59th round of surveys of NSSO, 48.6 per cent of households were indebted and of the

total number of indebted farmers, 61 per cent had operational holding below 1 ha. 57.7 per cent of the

outstanding amount was sourced from institutional channels (including government) and the balance

42.3 per cent from moneylenders, traders, relatives and friends.

5

family who had leased in land for short-term cultivation and taken loan for the same also

suffered and committed suicide.

The resistance to pests in cotton12

,13

and many other crops as led to excessive expenditure

for the purpose (King, 1994; Bharathan 2000; Jayaraman 2001; 2004; Shiva et al., 1999;

Sahai, 2002; Sahai and Rehman, 2003; 2004; Gupta and Chandak, 2004;

Narayanamoorthy and Kalamkar, 2006; Iyengar and Lalitha 2002; Reddy and Galab,

2006). The land productivity has been declining and the response to fertilisers has also

been declining (Reddy and Galab, 2006; Horrigan et al., 2002).

The Study found that access to alternative technologies, extension machinery and other

sources of information was quite limited in such places. The non-farm options were also

limited. The lack of irrigation and uncertainty of rainfall added to this stress. More than 75

per cent farmers were found to have loan commitments to non-formal sources. The Report

of the Expert Group on Agriculture Indebtedness (2007), Ministry of Finance,

Government of India considered the problem of indebtedness essentially caused by,

“stagnation in agriculture, increasing production and marketing risks, institutional

vacuum and lack of alternative livelihood opportunities”.

The report advocated appropriate technological innovations, creation of new institutional

alternatives and design of new instruments of intervention. It also suggested that the debt

burden to the informal sources should be reduced by transferring these debts to formal

institutions. In addition to the credit arrangements, the report recommended insurance

against natural calamity, social security14

, and health insurance. There were many other

recommendations for organisation of farmers and providing them support for skill

formation, education, training, etc. In the 31 distress affected districts (see annexure one)

spread over Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala and Maharashtra, several steps were taken

besides the relief measure by Government of Punjab.

The report also felt that the Prime Minister‟s package15

suffered from deficiency in design

and implementation such as (a) lack of correspondence with the felt needs, (b) absence of

location and household specificity, and (c) weakness in implementation and monitoring

(Sainath, 2008; Vaidyanathan, 2008). Way back in 1983, Gupta had recommended several

measures for complementing Credit Arrangements for Drought Prone regions including

built in rescheduling and rehabilitation mechanisms, establishment of contractual, curative

and consultative mechanisms at district level, linking credit with technology, etc.

It is imperative that the problem of farmers‟ suicide is seen in socio-ecological,

institutional, technological and cultural contexts. While some variables can only be

appreciated, some can be influenced and only a few can be manipulated, we have to build

a Knowledge Management System, which will link all three kinds of variables (Gupta;

1981a; 1981b; 1981c; 1982a; 1982b; 1983a; 1983b; 1984; 1985; 1986; 1987; 1989a;

1989b;1991; 1985; 1991; 1994; 1996; 1995; 2003, 2006; 2007; 2008; 2008b; 2008c.

12

Suri, 2006; Rao and Suri, 2006 13

According to the latest report of the Cotton Corporation of India, India is now the second in term of

production replacing USA and next only to China. 14

According to the Commission on Human Security, New York, “Human Security is to protect the vital

core of all human life in ways that enhance human freedom and human fulfilment”(Hebber, 2007). 15

It was announced in the budget 2007-2008 that the total value of overdue loans being waived for

marginal (up to 1 ha) and small farmers (1-2 ha) was estimated at Rs 50,000 crore, and the one-time

settlement relief for other farmers was estimated at Rs 10,000 crore, the entire amount would be

provided over three years..

6

Gupta and George, 2007; Gupta et al., 1990; 1992; 1995; 1994; 1997: 2001; Gupta and

Shroff, 1987; 1990).

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK:

The productivity of land invariably influences the productivity of crops, livestock, trees

and other associated biological systems. The risks in the environment (climatic, market,

institutional or otherwise) can be adjusted at the level of household (intra and inter),

community and public interventions. Intra household risks adjustments refer to modified

consumptions (and consequent nutritional implication), decision to dispose of assets or

migrate. Inter household risks adjustments include tenancy, borrowing and labour

contracts. The community level options include gruel kitchen, common property

resources, and various other collective mechanisms. Public interventions include access to

institutional credit, employment programme, relief in cash or kind, etc.

Most of the allocations by the government are made sectorally even if aimed at specific

districts. There is no mechanism, which can ensure that spatial allocation of sectoral funds

to appropriate socio-economic groups or individuals can be objectively targeted,

monitored and mentored. While general understanding about declining productivity of

land exists, mechanisms to monitor it at field and plot level in the villages through a land

based information system does not exist. Similarly, a Village Information System, which

can help in interpreting grassroots development indicators of education, employment,

health and nutrition16,17

does not exist. The database on farmers‟ innovations in managing

risks for various kinds successfully does not exist at village level. Without blending formal

and informal science, sustainable solutions cannot be developed.

This report identifies the gaps in the available knowledge, which can mitigate farm level

distress. For instance, there are very few studies, which show empirical connection

between soil health, crop and livestock health and human health18

(Albrecht, 1966;

Masironi et al., 1973; Schrauzer, 2002; Nair, 2007, Campbell,1995, Williamson and

Wyandt, 2000, Paustenbach, Rinehart and Sheehan, 1991, Audibert, Mathonnat, and

henry, 2002). The systematic variation in short term nutritional gaps19,20,21

at different

16

According to the Ramalingaswamy et al., (1996) nearly half of all malnourished adult women reside in

the few South Asian countries and India being the largest which is described as Asian enigma and

hunger and deprivation affect about 260 million people in the country. 17

Hidden hunger or micro-nutrient deficiency is a big problem See Tarun, 2006, Masironi et al, 1973, and

several ICMR/NIN surveys. Selenium affects immune function, vulnerability to several diseases and its

role in stressed communities may be amplified ( Campbell, 1995). 18

In a global meet on zinc “Zinc Crops 2007” at Istanbul, Turkey, agronomists, soil scientists,

physiologists and plant and human nutritionalists and medical experts debated the crucial role zinc plays

in human nutrition vis-à-vis agriculture, focusing on the developing countries. On the high alert list is

India that has among the most Zn deficient soils in the world (91 million hectare). Role of lithium in

populations prone to suicides has also been studied. 19

The International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)‟s in its 2008 Global Hunger Index put India

into alarming serious state in terms of hunger and malnutrition. In this report Madhya Pradesh is the

only state that falls in the extremely alarming category corresponding to that of Chad and Ethiopia,

twelve states fall in the alarming category, and Punjab, Kerala, Haryana and Assam falling in the

serious category. 20

'Extent of Chronic Hunger and Malnutrition' report of United Nations in 2006 criticised the Indian

government for the rising number of farmer suicides. According to the latest report by National Crime

Record Bureau, New Delhi, Fourty-six farmers commit suicide every day in this country even as

packages were rolled out in a bid to bailout the debt-ridden community from crisis.

21 Survey were carried out by National Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad in 2002-03 in nine drought

affected states to assess the impact of drought on diet and nutritional status of the community. A large

scale, eight-state community based survey was carried out to study the prevalence of micronutrient

deficiency disorders involving both clinical and biochemical forms of vitamin A deficiency, iodine

7

growth stages and their long term impact on human productivity and ability to take risks

has not been studied adequately (Dorin, 1999; Bamji, 2003; Bamji and Bhat, 2003;

Sivakumar, 2003; Vijayaraghavan, 2003; NIN, 2003; Radhakrishna and Ravi, 2004;

Shanti, 2006; Tarun, 2006; Shivakumar, 2007). The lessons from the efforts of those

distressed farmers who are able to manage successfully and overcome the problem are also

not catalogued ( Manuel et al, 2008). A Sri Lankan study found that suicide rates were not

high among the least income groups of society, a finding which may have some parallel in

Indian samples too (ibid, 2008). The use of GIS, GPS, other ICTs in cataloguing and

communicating the knowledge to and from the farmers is highly limited. The

incorporation of micro level agro meteorological information in decision support system

for farm level land and input use remains to be demonstrated at large scale. But

technology for small-scale meteorological stations is being developed in the country and

therefore large-scale pilot projects for the purpose can be envisaged. The linkage between

microclimate and pest and disease profile have been studied but not amplified at the farm

level adequately.

The VKMS will aim at equipping farmers, to deal with the risks through online support

from formal as well as informal science and technology systems. It will also generate early

warning indicators of resource, institutions or technology related stresses. The linkage will

be established with the socio-economic institutions including the institutional credit

system so as to ensure farm level response in a time bound manner. The peer monitoring

of stress and community level initiatives sometimes can be more meaningful than any

external intervention. However, given the sensitive nature of informal lending and

associated pledge or mortgage of assets, it would not always be easy to get such signals

easily unless a conversion option from informal debt to formal debt is available, as

recommended by the Expert Group 2007.

The development of Village Knowledge Register linked with VKMS might herald a self-

help initiative reinforced by lateral learning through National Register.

It will be useful if different stakeholders take responsibility for action research and

interventions during next five years in the proposed DPR.

CRITICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR VILLAGE KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT

SYSTEM:

NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT:

1. Land information systems: Village level land use maps, showing soil

characteristics, fertility, location and status of water sources and their quality,

indicators of soil productivity status (Same, better or worse compared to the

benchmark, GPS based grid system to encourage precision farming to

economise on external inputs and move towards low external physical inputs

based sustainable agriculture. The GIS will incorporate farmer based plot level

information with the ability to monitor the state and the utilisation of future

investments and their effect on risks mitigation.

deficiency disorders and iron deficiency anaemia. Food Security was not found encouraging and mean

intakes of foodstuffs in almost all the states were low and the households in all these states were not

consuming the recommended levels of cereals and millets.

8

2. Agro meteorological information base: Village level network of recording type

automatic weather stations with appropriate analytical tools to convert

observations into indicators and inputs for decision support system.

3. On-farm research and technology development: Development of contingency

crop and livestock options, blending farmers‟ innovations from different

regions to generate low costs affordable and adaptable solutions.

4. Pests, disease and nutrient management at farm level: Incorporating non-

chemical pests management strategies to reduce, if not eliminate application of

chemicals.

SOCIO-ECONOMIC INDICATORS:

5. Monitoring system for socio-economic indicators: Anticipating household level

to stress due to market and non-market based fluctuations and their varying

effects on different classes of farming in different villages.

6. The monitoring of household level access to formal credit and flexibility in its

rescheduling and rehabilitation in the event of market or environment based

risks.

7. Creating platform for informal lenders to share their terms and by legitimising

competition among them, improving conditions of delivery.

8. Preventing fore closure of properties of small farmers through debt and

providing insurance cover.

9. Tracking markets and their effects on farmers under stress: Social reporting

system will need to be developed so that anybody noticed under excessive

stress and facing closure of most options is reported to the District Emergency

Response System. The distress becomes despair after other options are

exhausted.

EDUCATION, HEALTH AND NUTRITION:

10. Monitoring educational and health status of various family members,

particularly under economic stress, outside formal institutional lending or

under default to the moneylenders.

11. Developing linkage between soil, crop and human health, anticipating

implications of changing food habits because of grains distributed through PDS

or otherwise.

12. Monitoring chronic nutritionally deficit regions and households: Special

measures to be initiated for providing relief in such regions in a manner that

women and children do not suffer excessively contributing to the family

distress.

13. Providing emergency health response in case of attempted suicide or other

socio-psychological indicators of depression: In the post crop failure and other

such disasters, special counselling would be needed to avoid distress becoming

despair. It is understood that mere counselling may not help. But, it might

create room for manoeuvre for absorbing institutional slackness or inertia in

responding to household level critical situations.

14. Monitoring special health indicators in 31 or 40 districts from where maximum

suicides have been reported.

KNOWLEDGE MANGEMENT SYSTEM:

9

15. Creating maps of peoples‟ knowledge linked to spatial and sectoral insights:

There are several ways in which time bound mapping of resources,

opportunities, skills and ideas can be done. If out of hundred days of

employment provided under Employment Guarantee Scheme, only ten or

twenty days were spent for mapping biological, physical and other resources, a

complete inventorisation can be achieved in all the villages affected with the

distress. Similar attempt can be made to document the traditional knowledge

as well as contemporary innovations in the same areas.

16. Creating MIS (Management Information System) linking Village Information

System, Village Knowledge Register, health education and other

developmental indicators, etc., with the physical and biological resource based

information system.

17. Development of decision support system (DSS) for incorporating innovations

and other knowledge from informal or formal sectors in day-to-day decision

making by the households.

PROPOSAL FOR ACTION RESEARCH AND PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION:

A. Natural Resource Management:

1. Land information systems: NSDI proposes to develop 1:10000 scale map for the

country which would provide the most exhaustive information base for developing

land resource base GIS. Some attempts have been made to develop prototype LIS

but these are not in the condition that these may be taken up for implementation

right away. It is proposed that a country wide pilot project may be taken up in

affected districts in each agro ecological zone (15 pilot projects) for demonstrating

the viability of LIS (Rs.75 lacs).

2. Agro meteorological information base: Village level network of recording type

automatic weather stations with appropriate analytical tools to convert observations

into indicators and inputs for decision support system.

A wide network of automatic weather stations with functional GSM connectivity

will help in providing real time weather data to the farmers to plan their activities,

make mid course corrections and use knowledge based approaches for pest and

disease management and other input management.

IIT, Madras has developed such stations costing about Rs.25000 per station with

additional cost of servers and maintenance. There are several other models

available, which can also be evaluated through a tendering process. One would

need at least 100 weather stations in a district to generate reliable information

accessible through SMS to the Village Knowledge Management Centre. This will

provide the input into the MIS/DSS at village level. Additional cost of server and

maintenance may be around Rs.8 lacs per district. Total cost for 100 weather

stations and district wise servers would be Rs.33 lacs per district.

3. On-farm research and technology development: Development of contingency crop

and livestock options, blending farmers‟ innovations from different regions to

generate low costs affordable and adaptable solutions.

10

One of the major problems facing farmers in rainfed regions [where distress is

most] is lack of location specific contingency options for managing crops and

livestock in real time. This will require on farm research with the help of KVKs,

civil society organisations and farmers organisations. These options can also be

enriched by drawing upon farmers‟ innovations from Honey Bee database at

SRISTI and NIF (sristi.org and nifindia.org). Per district at least 20 on farm trials

should be taken up for at least three years for different crops / livestock species

drawing upon farmers‟ innovations and institutional findings for developing

contingency options keeping in mind the major trends in weather variations. Cost

per district is Rs. 6.25 lacs at the cost of Rs.25000/= per trial on three to five

farmers fields.

4. Pests, disease and nutrient management at farm level: Incorporating non-chemical

pests management strategies to reduce, if not eliminate application of chemicals.

Non-sustainable pest management is one of the major reasons for getting into debt

traps. In none of the districts visited in connection with field work22

, did we come

across any effort to provide access to non-chemical pest management information

to the people. Multimedia, multi language database (MMDB) packages of

information need to be prepared for disseminating integrated pest management

techniques based on institutional research as well as Honey Bee database on

farmers‟ innovations. The MMDB on pest and nutrient management would include

guide to identify different pests as well as friendly insects, approaches to manage

the problem using agronomic, micro climatic manipulations, herbal pesticides,

vermiculture, etc. Cost for each crop and livestock species for MMDB may be

around Rs.8.00 lacs. Such MMDBs need to be made for nine major crops [cotton,

soybean, paddy, sugarcane, millets, sorghum, pulses and plantation crops like

cardamom and pepper].

B. SOCIO-ECONOMIC INDICATORS:

5. Monitoring system for socio-economic indicators: Anticipating household level to

stress due to market and non-market based fluctuations and their varying effects on

different classes of farming in different villages.

A sample survey by institutions like Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata may be

undertaken (see annexure two) to assess the socio-economic parameters of distress

so that an early warning system can be developed. It may also lead to develop of

vulnerability index based on farmers‟ own perceptions. Cost Rs.37.92 lacs.

6. The monitoring of household level access to formal credit and flexibility in its

rescheduling and rehabilitation in the event of market or environment based risks.

The assessment of financial needs may be included in the survey proposed in point

5 followed by workshops of bankers, insurance companies and farmers and

extension workers in each district to arrive at operational plan for alleviating

distress. These plans must be made every year before the cropping season and

monitored every month so that real time relief can be provided. It should be noted

that in many cases of suicide affected families, the debt relief did not reach because

the mutations of the land record had not taken place. Many small farmers did not

22

19 -22 September 2008.

11

have separate land holdings recorded in their name and were therefore deprived of

relief. Credit system will not work if updating of land record does not take place on

priority and in a time bound manner. Likewise, many cooperative and commercial

banks do not offer credit for rainfed crops and if they offer, it is at very low scale

of finance not really in sync with market realities. Per district four such workshops

should be organised during the monsoon season with clear mandate to sort out the

problems collected from affected villages. Civil society organisations can be

involved in collecting the farmers‟ problems around sample bank branches. The

Village Panchayat members should be invited to send their grievances to the

coordinating institution a week before every workshop. This way the problems can

be solved before they become source of deep distress, causing suicides in many

cases. The cost of four workshops during six months [June to December]

accompanied by sample survey of grievances collected through Village Panchayats

as well as primary surveys may be around Rs.5.00 lacs per district.

7. Creating platform for informal lenders to share their terms and by legitimising

competition among them, improving conditions of delivery.

This can be done by mobilising the informal lenders to share their offerings with

the self-help groups as well as Village Knowledge Management Centres. It will

not have any cost implications except to input their offerings in the VKMS kiosks

in each village or group of villages.

8. Preventing fore closure of properties of small farmers through debt and providing

insurance cover.

This is a policy measure, which can be monitored in the workshops proposed in

item six above.

9. Tracking markets and their effects on farmers under stress: Social reporting system

will need to be developed so that anybody noticed under excessive stress and

facing closure of most options is reported to the District Emergency Response

System. The distress becomes despair after other options are exhausted.

A District Emergency Response System (DERS) needs to be developed in all the

affected districts incorporating the data from surveys, workshops and media

besides direct appeals by the distressed farmers. This will require updating of data

every day at the district level under the direct supervision of the District Collector

supported by Project Director, DRDA and anybody else authorised for the purpose.

District Collector should post the action taken on every case of distress on the

district portal. National Informatics Centre may be advised to develop DERS

linking VKMS centres with the DERS. Various kinds of emergencies ranging

from factors affecting crop, livestock or labour resulting in distress may be taken

note of and action informed through the people at large at DERS portal. The data

on health, migration, dropout, etc., indicating stress [see point 10 below] will also

be incorporated in the DERS. The cost of portal design and management in each

district may be Rs.10.00 lacs per year.

C. EDUCATION, HEALTH AND NUTRITION:

12

10. Monitoring educational and health status of various family members, particularly

under economic stress, outside formal institutional lending or under default to the

moneylenders.

Apart from the data on distress received from the surveys, workshops and directly

through DERS, indicators may be developed using existing data which can be

monitored for generating early warning signals. For instance, after the recent

economic slowdown, dropping of attendance in schools due to withdrawals of

students indicated the stress caused by layoffs. Similarly, migration of workers in

large numbers may also indicate severe stress. The sudden rise in railway/bus

ticket sales for outbound journeys might also indicate movement of people away

from the region. A study may be commissioned to be pursued by eminent social

scientists involved in grassroots studies to help in developing such indicators.

Alternatively, a task force may be constituted to pursue this study, through

interactions with local communities and district officials in at least six to eight

worst affected 31 districts. It will involve two rounds of consultation, one to

generate feed-forward for developing indicators and second to get the feedback and

test the indicators. Cost may be Rs.30.00 lacs.

11. Developing linkage between soil, crop and human health, anticipating implications

of changing food habits because of grains distributed through PDS or otherwise.

This is an extremely important area of research and action since sustainability

outcomes will be directly affected. There are practically no studies, which have

systematically studied the linkage between the health of soil, crops, animals and

human beings. It is well known that adverse health episodes lead to debt and

consequent distress among the small farmers and labourers. Preventive health is

more democratic, affordable and accessible. If applying certain nutrients to soil can

convey these to consumers at lesser cost than otherwise, then such an approach has

to be preferred. National Institute of Nutrition, Indian Council of Medical Research

and agricultural and livestock scientists have to be involved in a research

programme of this kind. Initially, a few villages need to be taken up from different

agro climatic regions from among the distressed districts to prove the efficacy of

this approach. At least 200 households from each of the 5 villages from a sample

of five districts may be taken up to map the soil fertility [micro and macro

nutrients] plot-by-plot, study the consumption patterns and nutrient profile of

livestock as well as human beings besides analysing the staple food of the studied

households. The nutritional and the health status may be collected through primary

clinical camps in each village. By mapping the parameters of soil, crop, livestock

and human health, early warning indicators may be developed. These may be

monitored in future to identify the problem situations so that timely remedial

measures can be taken. This study will also have a significant sustainability payoff.

The analysis of at least 4000 plots of agriculture land, 1000 households and at least

800 livestock samples may be analysed for micro and macro nutrients as well as

other health parameters. The cost may be Rs.10 crores.

12. Monitoring chronic nutritionally deficit regions and households: Special measures

to be initiated for providing relief in such regions in a manner that women and

children do not suffer excessively contributing to the family distress.

13

Various surveys mentioned above can be used to identify chronically deficit

households and regions to provide priority in extending relief. This can be linked

to the District Emergency Response System.

13. Providing emergency health response in case of attempted suicide or other socio-

psychological indicators of depression: In the post crop failure and other such

disasters, special counselling would be needed to avoid distress becoming despair.

It is understood that mere counselling may not help. But, it might create room for

manoeuvre for absorbing institutional slackness or inertia in responding to

household level critical situations.

Various studies have revealed that counselling in time can be very meaningful for

averting most desperate step of attempt to suicide. However, despite having the

information of such calamities, which can cause depression, steps are not initiated

in this regard. It is proposed that survey of socio psychological indicators of

depression may be undertaken to test the efficacy of this approach through Tata

Institute of Social Sciences (TISS) or (National Institute of Mental Health and

Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS) or other such reputed institutions. The cost may be

Rs.20 lacs for a sample study and counselling workshops in five villages in each of

the five districts.

14. Monitoring special health indicators in 31 or 40 districts from where maximum

suicides have been reported.

Development of health indicators can be one of the outputs of the studies and

surveys mentioned above in point 11 to 13.

D. KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM:

15. Creating maps of peoples‟ knowledge linked to spatial and sectoral insights: There

are several ways in which time bound mapping of resources, opportunities, skills

and ideas can be done. If out of hundred days of employment provided under

Employment Guarantee Scheme, only ten or twenty days were spent for mapping

biological, physical and other resources, a complete inventorisation can be

achieved in all the villages affected with the distress. Similar attempt can be made

to document the traditional knowledge as well as contemporary innovations in the

same areas.

Mapping people‟s knowledge about resources, skills and sectoral activities is very

crucial to generate alternative livelihoods in the regions affected by the failure of

primary economic activities. These maps can also be used to pool the best practices

to develop new products to generate market approach for alleviating distress. NIF

and SRISTI have tried to use this approach in some parts of Kerala and elsewhere.

Systematic studies can be taken up in at least five villages from each of the five

districts to demonstrate the applicability of the idea. If the pilot demonstrates

convincing results, it may be scaled up as a part of NREGA for the entire country.

The cost of the pilot may be Rs.10 lacs.

16. Creating MIS (Management Information System) linking Village Information

System, Village Knowledge Register, health education and other developmental

indicators, etc., with the physical and biological resource based information

system. This may be supported by development of decision support system (DSS)

14

for incorporating innovations and other knowledge from informal or formal sectors

in day-to-day decision making by the households.

Developing MIS is one of the most important contributions along with DSS to

provide ICT enabled support system for the people in distress regions. This will

have both hardware and software components apart from the testing and

operationalisation. The inputs from various surveys, studies and weather stations

will be incorporated in the DSS linking LIS, VIS and MIS.

The format of Village Knowledge Register, and other inputs will have to be

tailored to the capacity of the local communities. The key tasks are:

a. Hardware and bandwidth including server at national, regional and

district level [Rs.25 lacs]

b. Village Knowledge Centre having computer, tele network capability,

projection facility for multimedia and multi language database may be

created at district and followed by block level [Rs.1lac per village].

c. Mobile technology and innovation dissemination exhibition [Rs.10 lacs

per district].

d. Software development for DSS, MIS and integration of LIS [Rs.2.5

crores].

e. Data entry and creation of database [Rs.15 lacs per district].

f. Testing and operationalisation [Rs.2 lacs per district].

15

ANNEXURE I (a)

LIST INCLUDES THE 31 DISTRESSED DISTRICTS IDENTIFIED BY THE

GOVERNMENT WHERE THE PRIME MINISTER’S SPECIAL

REHABILITATION PACKAGE IS BEING IMPLEMENTED

No State District

1 Andhra Pradesh Adilabad*

2 Andhra Pradesh Anantapur*

3 Andhra Pradesh Chitoor*

4 Andhra Pradesh Cuddappah*

5 Andhra Pradesh Guntur*

6 Andhra Pradesh Karimnagar*

7 Andhra Pradesh Khammam*

8 Andhra Pradesh Kurnool*

9 Andhra Pradesh Medak*

10 Andhra Pradesh Mehabubnagar*

11 Andhra Pradesh Nalgonda*

12 Andhra Pradesh Nellur*

13 Andhra Pradesh Nizamabad*

14 Andhra Pradesh Prakasam*

15 Andhra Pradesh Ranga Reddy*

16 Andhra Pradesh Warangal*

17 Karnataka Belgaum*

18 Karnataka Chikmangalur*

19 Karnataka Chitradurga*

20 Karnataka Hassan*

21 Karnataka Kodagu*

22 Karnataka Shimoga*

23 Kerala Kasargod*

24 Kerala Palakkad*

25 Kerala Wyanad*

26 Maharashtra Akola*

27 Maharashtra Amravati*

28 Maharashtra Buldhana*

29 Maharashtra Wardha*

30 Maharashtra Wasim*

31 Maharashtra Yavatmal*

16

ANNEXURE-I (b)

LIST OF 100 AGRICULTURALLY LESS DEVELOPED AND DISTRESSED

DISTRICTS

No State District

1 Andhra Pradesh Adilabad*

2 Andhra Pradesh Anantapur*

3 Andhra Pradesh Chitoor*

4 Andhra Pradesh Cuddappah*

5 Andhra Pradesh Guntur*

6 Andhra Pradesh Karimnagar*

7 Andhra Pradesh Khammam*

8 Andhra Pradesh Kurnool*

9 Andhra Pradesh Medak*

10 Andhra Pradesh Mehabubnagar*

11 Andhra Pradesh Nalgonda*

12 Andhra Pradesh Nellur*

13 Andhra Pradesh Nizamabad*

14 Andhra Pradesh Prakasam*

15 Andhra Pradesh Ranga Reddy*

16 Andhra Pradesh Warangal*

17 Bihar Banka

18 Bihar Bhagalpur

19 Bihar Darbhanga

20 Bihar Jamui

21 Bihar Lakhisarai

22 Bihar Madhubani

23 Bihar Saran

24 Chattisgarh Bilaspur

25 Chattisgarh Janjgir

26 Chattisgarh Jashpur

27 Chattisgarh Kanker

28 Gujarat Dahod

29 Gujarat Patan

30 Jammu & Kashmir Baramulla

31 Jammu & Kashmir Doda

32 Jammu & Kashmir Kargil

33 Jammu & Kashmir Kupwara

34 Jammu & Kashmir Udhampur

17

No State District

35 Jharkhand Deoghar

36 Jharkhand Gumla

37 Jharkhand Hazaribag

38 Jharkhand Lohardaga

39 Jharkhand Pakaur

40 Jharkhand Sahibganj

41 Jharkhand Seraikela

42 Jharkhand Simdega

43 Karnataka Belgaum*

44 Karnataka Chikmangalur*

45 Karnataka Chitradurga*

46 Karnataka Hassan*

47 Karnataka Kodagu*

48 Karnataka Shimoga*

49 Kerala Kasargod*

50 Kerala Palakkad*

51 Kerala Wyanad*

52 Madhya Pradesh Anuppur

53 Madhya Pradesh Ashoknagar

54 Madhya Pradesh Balaghat

55 Madhya Pradesh Barwani

56 Madhya Pradesh Betul

57 Madhya Pradesh Burhanpur

58 Madhya Pradesh Chhatarpur

59 Madhya Pradesh Chhindwara

60 Madhya Pradesh Dindori

61 Madhya Pradesh Jhabua

62 Madhya Pradesh Katni

63 Madhya Pradesh Mandla

64 Madhya Pradesh Panna

65 Madhya Pradesh Rewa

66 Madhya Pradesh Seoni

67 Madhya Pradesh Shahdol

68 Madhya Pradesh Sidhi

69 Madhya Pradesh Umaria

70 Maharashtra Akola*

71 Maharashtra Amravati*

72 Maharashtra Buldhana*

73 Maharashtra Gadchiroli

74 Maharashtra Gondia

18

Note: The above list includes the 31 distressed districts identified by the Government where the Prime

Minister‟s special rehabilitation package is being implemented (these districts are marked with *). The

remaining 69 districts have been included on the following criteria: (i) the district ranks low on the three-

year average land productivity for 2001-02 to 2003-04, (ii) the credit-deposit ratio of the district is less than

60 per cent for 2006, (iii) the proportion of urban population in the district is less than 30 per cent in 2001.

Districts in Goa, North-Eastern states other than Assam, and union territories are not considered due to lack

of data on land productivity. The list may be firmed up to accommodate the spirit of the recommendations.

Source: Data on district-wise land productivity has been provided by Dr. Gurmail Singh of Punjab

University, Chandigarh. Data on credit-deposit ratios has been provided by the Economic and Political

Weekly Research Foundation. Data on urban population are based on CensusInfo 1.0, Census 2001.

No State District

75 Maharashtra Nanded

76 Maharashtra Nandurbar

77 Maharashtra Osmanabad

78 Maharashtra Wardha*

79 Maharashtra Wasim*

80 Maharashtra Yavatmal*

81 Orissa Boudh

82 Orissa Koraput

83 Orissa Malkangiri

84 Orissa Nawapara

85 Rajasthan Churu

86 Rajasthan Dungarpur

87 Rajasthan Jaisalmer

88 Rajasthan Nagaur

89 Rajasthan Pali

90 Rajasthan Rajsamand

91 Rajasthan Sikar

92 Rajasthan Udaipur

93 Tamil Nadu Sivaganga

94 Uttar Pradesh Banda

95 Uttar Pradesh Chitrakoot

96 Uttar Pradesh Hamirpur

97 Uttaranchal Almora

98 Uttaranchal Pauri Garhwal

99 Uttaranchal Rudraprayag

100 Uttaranchal Tehri Garhwal

19

ANNEXURE-II

A SOCIO-ECONOMIC STUDY OF THE FARMERS IN THE SUICIDE PRONE

DISTRICTS OF INDIA: A DEPARTMENTAL PROJECT REPORT

1. INTRODUCTION

It was the initiative of Professor Anil Kumar Gupta of IIM (A) that made us actively

concerned about the problems of suicides by the farmers on a mass scale in the recent past.

He invited many scientists from different Institutions and Universities, convened a one day

workshop at IIM on 10 July 2008 and discussed the problem. Professor Gupta narrated the

grave situations of the farmers prevailing in some of the districts. One cannot remain idle

and become indifferent when farmers commit suicide on a mass scale. It is an important

matter which affects the peace, order and stability of the society. Professor Gupta urged us

to share our knowledge in identifying the nature of the problem along with the associated

factors and chalk out plan of actions to eradicate the problem in near future.

There are 31 affected districts. Professor Gupta also gave us a list of 100 agriculturally

less developed and distressed districts, including these 31 districts. 16 of these 31 districts

are in Andhra Pradesh, the rest 15 of these districts are spread over three states namely,

Karnataka (6), Kerala (3) and Maharastra (6). The Prime Minister‟s special rehabilitation

package is being implemented in these 31 districts. The remaining 69 districts are from

Bihar (7), Chattisgarh (4), Gujarat (2), Jammu & Kashmir (5), Jharkhand (8), Madhya

Pradesh ((18), Maharastra (5), Orissa (4), Rajasthan (8), Tamilnadu (1), Uttar Pradesh (3)

and Uttaranchal (4). These 69 districts have been chosen on the basis of (i) average land

productivity being low, (ii) the credit deposit ratio being less than 60 percent and (iii) the

proportion of urban population in the districts being less than 30 percent.

The reasons for committing suicide by farmers, as came out from the discussions held on

10 July 2008, are mainly the crop failure, indebtedness and rising cost of cultivation.

These are the reasons pointed out also in the report submitted by the Tata Institute of

Social Sciences (TISS) to Mumbai High Court (March 15, 2005). Besides, it is pointed out

in the discussion that the farmers‟ aspiration also plays an important role in the

commitment of suicide. Thus it appears that the problem should be looked upon from

socio-cultural, economic, health, ecological, technological and institutional angle.

It is felt that an early warning system should be developed so that the district authorities

can become aware of the farmers‟ status with respect to each of these aspects mentioned

above before such calamities occur. This system should be based on some summary

figures, or more precisely, indices, developed from the village level data. One may also

think of overall vulnerability index combining the indices of each aspect. For this, it is

necessary to know the weights to be given to these indices for a sensible output. These

weights should come from the villagers themselves.

Five teams have been formed in the meeting. Each team has been given charge of

preparing a departmental project report (DPR) on one specified aspect from the above list.

The information collected by these teams should be collated to get the aspect wise indices

and the overall index.

The whole process should be on a continuing basis. It should sustain. For this it is

necessary to have involvement of villagers. A system should be developed such that the

villagers will give the data to the person assigned by the villagers themselves. The data so

collected is to be compiled by the assigned person and submitted to the Panchayat.

Panchayat in turn will submit it to the higher authority and ultimately it should go to the

20

State Government through district authority. At each stage, somebody should be

responsible for the work to be done.

So far as the socio-cultural and economic aspects are concerned a team consisting of five

members have been constituted. The team may be augmented or modified depending on

the expertise needed in the specific fields.

Associated with every farmer, who has committed suicide, there are many more who are

in distress. Every incidence of suicide or any similar incidence is characterised by its own

distinct features with respect to the specific problems faced by the farmer and the

associated family. But it is not our aim to get information at such minute level. The risk

factors to be identified are not specific only to the farmers‟ families who have committed

suicide. All the villagers should be taken into consideration for any meaningful analysis to

be carried out.

From the above discussion, it follows that we should take information at two levels: micro and

macro. Micro level data refers to the information at household level whereas macro level data

are for a set of households. The smallest feasible macro level data in this case are the village

level data for our analysis. Data on some characteristics should be collected from each of the

sampled households in a given village. Data on village level characteristics such as number of

schools, tube wells or even total area under specific crops etc. should be collected from village

head or from a knowledgeable person from the village. Micro- and macro- data are to be

combined to get the complete picture. Data may already exist on many of the characteristics at

some aggregate level. One must identify such data and find out the data gap that exists. The

aim of the micro and macro level survey is to fill up the data gap.

In our socio-cultural and economic study, it is necessary to carry out both macro and

micro level survey. Some of the relevant macro level data in our analysis are as follows:

Need and sources of irrigation and use of fertilizers and pesticides

Type of land and land productivity and land use pattern

Infrastructural facilities on education, health, markets, finance etc.

Employment and income scenarios including cottage and small scale industries etc.

The information which can be gathered and pooled from micro level data may be as

follows:

Dependence on agriculture (from sources of income)

Level of poverty, Standard of living

Loans taken from different financial agents, extent of mortgage of lands or other

capital items

Extent of knowledge of farmers on the availability (and use) of seeds, loans,

technology etc.

Importance given by the villagers on the risk factors, etc.

We have to list out all the available knowledge baselines, databases, information sources

on innovations from formal and informal sectors and then see the way these can be

gainfully utilized in the affected regions through Decision Support System to be developed

and deployed at village/mandal/block level.

To summarise: We have to develop indicators using socio-economic data, already existing

or to be collected, at the Panchayat level so that early warning system can be implemented.

Among the indicators, we should include social and community level stresses also. In

order to sustain the system, necessary responsibility should be given to the appropriate

persons. Active involvement of the villagers is a must for the system to be successful.

21

THE SAMPLING SCHEME:

It is necessary to fix the population first. Should we take only the 31 affected districts or

the set of 100 districts identified as vulnerable? To bring the variability in the data, we

have decided to take all the 100 districts as population. All the districts, however, cannot

be surveyed because of the time and cost constraints.

We have separate sampling scheme for micro and macro level studies.

The Sampling Scheme for Selecting Districts for Micro Level Study

Name of the State No. of affected

districts

No. of districts to

be sampled

No. of other

vulnerable districts

No. of districts

to be sampled

Andhra Pradesh 16 8 0 -

Bihar 0 - 7 2

Chattisgarh 0 - 4 1

Gujarat 0 - 2 1

Jammu & Kashmir 0 - 5 1

Jharkhand 0 - 8 2

Karnataka 6 4 0 -

Kerala 3 2 0 -

Madhya Pradesh 0 - 18 4

Maharashtra 6 4 5 1

Orissa 0 - 4 1

Rajasthan 0 - 8 2

Tamil Nadu 0 - 1 1

Uttar Pradesh 0 - 3 1

Uttaranchal 0 - 4 1

Total 31 18 69 18

For macro level study at the district level we shall try to collect information from all the

100 vulnerable districts.

Next we select the villages according to the following sampling scheme.

The Sampling Scheme for Selecting Villages for Micro Level Study

Name of the State

Affected districts Other vulnerable districts

No. of sampled

districts

No. of villages to

be sampled

No. of sampled

districts

No. of villages to

be sampled

Andhra Pradesh 8 16 - -

Bihar - - 2 4

Chattisgarh - - 1 2

Gujarat - - 1 2

Jammu & Kashmir - - 1 2

Jharkhand - - 2 4

Karnataka 4 8 - -

Kerala 2 4 - -

Madhya Pradesh - - 4 8

Maharashtra 4 8 1 2

Orissa - - 1 2

Rajasthan - - 2 4

Tamil Nadu - - 1 2

Uttar Pradesh - - 1 2

Uttaranchal - - 1 2

Total 18 36 18 36

22

In each of the affected districts which are sampled, we shall choose one affected village

and one unaffected village. Similarly from the list of sampled districts of unaffected states

two villages will be selected.

For macro level study we shall take all the villages sampled for micro level study and try

to take as many villages as possible from the rest of the villages of the 100 vulnerable

districts.

For micro level study we shall make a list of all the households, group them into farmers

and non farmers according to principal source of earning and take about 10 households

with principal source of earnings from agriculture and 10 households with principal source

of earning other than agriculture.

We have 72 villages for micro level study spread over 36 districts from 15 states. The no.

of sampled households is 72*20 = 1440. Besides, all the affected households in the

sampled villages will be taken for our micro level analysis. Thus the number of sampled

households is not fixed.

THE DATA

In the socio-cultural and economic study we plan to collect data on different aspects

namely, demographic, social and economic. The following is the tentative list of data to be

collected under different headings.

(A) Demographic:

(i) Age, sex, occupation, religion and caste, education etc. of each member in

the household.

(ii) No. of deaths occurred during last 5 years. Detail descriptions with causes

of death, amount spent for rituals after death etc. in case of deaths.

(iii) no. of unmarried daughters if any in the household.

(iv) Health situation of the household (Any member suffering from chronic

ailments, any acute disease, expenditure incurred on health and medicines

etc.)

(B) Social:

(i) Social Participation (Cooperatives, Gram Panchayats, Political Parties,

Farmer‟s organization, other NGOs etc.)

(ii) Attitudes and awareness on cropping patterns, technology, inventions of

new seeds etc.

(iii) Attitudes towards male and female members in the family, intra-household

relationships, attention to vulnerable members like children, aged members,

pregnant members etc.

(iv) Habits (Alcohol, Bidi, Cigarettes, Gambling etc.)

(v) Media Exposure (Newspapers, Magazines, TVs, Outside Cinemas etc.)

(vi) Group Interactions (Attending training programmes, Krishi Vigyan Kendra,

Krishi Mela, etc.)

(vii) Attending functions (Marriage and other religious functions, Drama and

other functions organised or arranged by the local bodies etc.)

(viii) Spending leisure time (How? Describe)

23

(C) Economic:

(i) Total monthly expenditure, Food insecurity

(ii) Family assets (TV, Radio, Cycle, motor cycle or scooter, 4 wheelers,

Fridge, Electronic gadgets including Computer, music system, vcd, vcr etc.)

(iii) Infra structural facilities (Type and size of building with approximate

valuation if possible, electricity, storage facility, garage etc.)

(iv) Poultry, Dairy, fishery or other agricultural activities

(v) Amount of land possessed, used, leased in and leased out.

(vi) Loan taken/given (institutional or non-institutional, when, amount, purpose,

repayment procedure, whether being repaid regularly, etc.)

Macro level Information:

(A) Infra-structure facilities

(i) Roads and Communication (Metalled road, Bus stop, railway station, Ferry

services etc. and distances from the village)

(ii) Education (Schools, colleges, vocational training centre etc.)

(iii) Health (Primary Health Centre, Private and Govt. Hospitals, Nursing Home)

(iv) Tele-communication (Post office, Public call office (PCO), etc.)

(v) Service Centre (BDO, Agricultural service Centre, Veterinary Hospitals,

Artificial Insemination Centre, etc.)

(vi) Financial Institutions (Land Devt. Bank, Regional rural Bank, District Central

Cooperative Bank, Primary Cooperative Agricultural Credit Societies,

Commercial Banks, etc.)

(vii) Shops, Hatts and Markets (Daily Bazar, Weekly/Biweekly Hatts, Fair price

shop, Animal fair, Cold storage, etc.)

(B) Land (Total Geographical Area, Area under forest, Area not available for

cultivation, net area sown, area sown more than once, gross cropped area, etc.)

(C) Animal Husbandry (No. of cattle‟s,, buffaloes etc.)

(D) Water for Irrigation (sources of irrigation–Taps, Other lift irrigations/Sprinklers,

Tubewells, Open well, Tank, etc.,)

(E) Area under different crops (cereals, pulses, oilseeds, food-crops, sugarcane,

fruits and vegetables, spices, cotton, tobacco, drugs and narcotics)

(F) Educational Set Up (Schools by grades, no. of students, etc.)

(G) Different Devt. Schemes running within the village (Govt. And nongovt.)

(H) Electrification (for Domestic consumption, for small, medium or cottage

industries, conventional and non-conventional sources of energy) Other

information like agro-meteorological information, farm research and technology

devt., pests, disease of plants, plant nutrient management, agricultural resource

management, etc.

Duration of the Project:

Formulation of Schedule, Drawing of Samples etc. – 3 months

Pilot Survey and Revision of Schedule – 3 months

Canvassing of schedules – 9 months

Data entry and analysis – 6 months

Report writing – 3 months

Total: 2 years

24

Budget:

SL. NO. ITEM ESTIMATED COST

1. Preparation of Schedule Rs. 80,000/-

2. Data collection (2000 schedules @ Rs. 500 per

schedule)

Rs. 10,00,000/-

3. Secondary Data Rs. 1,00,000/-

4. Travel Rs. 15,00,000/-

5. Project Linked Persons (Rs. 10,000/- × 2 persons × 20

months)

Rs. 4,00,000/-

6. Stationeries, Dispatch and other miscellaneous

expenditures

Rs. 80,000/-

7. Overhead charges Rs. 6,32,000/-

TOTAL Rs. 37,92,000/-

25

ANNEXURE-III

AN APPROACH NOTE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES IN VILLAGE

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

1. Introduction

Financial services would be a key input for the development of a viable Village

Knowledge Management System to be developed for distressed areas. One of the

major complaint arising from such distressed districts is the lack of adequate and

timely credit and other financial support to the farmers and their dependence on

unscrupulous money lenders for meeting their credit needs. Many suicides in the

distressed districts are attributed to the debt trap in which the farmers are in, due to

lack of effective mechanism to mitigate their financial problems.

Government of India, realising the need to make available timely and adequate credit,

had initiated many programmes over the last 4 to 5 years, such as doubling of

agriculture credit in three years ( the doubling was completed in two years itself), issue

of Kisan Credit cards (a flexible credit product) to all farmers, financing 100 new

farmers by each rural and semi urban branches of Commercial Banks and Regional

Rural Banks, initiating programmes for Financial inclusion, debt relief packages for

distressed farmers, sanction of special package by Prime Minister for acutely

distressed 31 districts etc. But the problem of distress still continues in many of these

districts. Therefore, the reasons for suicides have to be something more than the mere

delivery of credit alone. In order to understand the situation, it is necessary that a

proper assessment of each distressed area is done to study their financial needs

including credit, which include assessment of credit potential in their area, type credit

products required and also the credit delivery mechanism suited to the area.

In order to understand the financial services required by the villagers in the distressed

district and to include them as part of the Village Knowledge mechanism, a detailed

study of the past, present and future situations has to be carried out. Probably such a

study can be carried out with the help of outside agencies, preferably a Community

Based Organisations, placed at the districts. A detailed analysis of the information will

enable better appreciation of the financial needs of the villagers. The study has to be

time bound and should be completed within two months.

2 Source of Information

Sources of information for any such study can be based on primary and secondary

data. Collection of primary data will be more cumbersome process and involve time,

energy and resources. But such an initiative will provide more accurate data base for

making better analysis and proper planing. The collection of such data can be based on

a house to house survey in each village or by PRA technique exercises to be carried

out for the village as a whole. A house to house survey based on a structured

questionnaire will give more accurate data. Such survey can be entrusted to People‟s

organisations in the village or NGOs/ Voluntary agencies working in the area.

Engaging educated youngsters from the villages by providing remuneration based on

the number of such surveys, would be a viable option. Such survey can be combined

with data collection for other aspects of the VKMS report, such as mapping socio

economic conditions of the people etc. A PRA technique will also provide a fairly

good data base on natural endowments of the villages, present cropping pattern,

potential for changing cropping pattern, credit related information such as debt status

of the villagers, the potentials for purveyance of credit, the sectors which can absorb

26

credit, the mechanism for credit purveyance etc. which can also be made use of for

making suitable plans.

The source of secondary data for the districts as a whole can be accessed from

Potential Linked Credit Plans prepared by NABARD for each district in the country,

District Credit Plan prepared by Lead District Manager, Annual Action Plan of

DRDA/ DIC, Annual Action Plans of Zilla/ Block/ Gram Panchayats, District Plans of

District Agriculture Office/ other line departments etc. Village profiles and Service

Area Plans prepared by the Service Area Banks, under Service Area Approach, will

provide micro level data with respect to the villages. Village level data regarding each

village can also be sourced from the village offices or related agencies.

3 Financial Services required

The financial services required by the villagers include saving facility, credit,

insurance, fund transfer/remittance, payment, scholarship etc. Infact, the Financial

Inclusion programme of GoI/ RBI is aiming to achieve provision of these services to

all the house holds in the rural areas. Under the Financial Inclusion Programme, as the

first step, RBI has asked the Banks to open “no frill” accounts to all excluded house

holds, which will provide facility for saving. Thereafter, it is expected that the banking

relationship will lead to meeting the credit needs and other financial services of the

people.

Savings

The first and the most important service required by villagers is to have a place to keep

their thrift safely. It can‟t be at a place about 10 to 15 KMs away from their dwelling

and cannot be such system which will not encourage small amounts, in ones or tens.

The mechanism for saving has to be more rural friendly, tune with the needs of the

rural poor and at their door step. That‟s where the informal mechanisms like SHGs or

even Branchless Banking concept has been receiving wide acceptance and they can be

very handy in any such programmes being planned under VKMS. The postal network

can also be used effectively to provide savings facility.

Credit

Credit is a complex matter. The credit requirement of a villager or a farmer may not be

exactly the same as is being offered by the formal credit institutions at present. That‟s

why many a time they prefer to approach an informal system like money lenders, even

if they are charging exhorbitant interest rates. The need of the hour is to understand

and develop flexible credit products suiting to the needs of the villagers. Again, the

needs of the farmers may not be exactly the same as is being offered by the bank, in

the nature of production purpose like Short term agricultural activities or long term

investment purposes. Their requirement will include a lot of consumption needs. Also,

there is a needs for housing, which forms a priority. But the housing loan requirements

may not be the same as is being offered by the Banks. Their needs could be for

constructing a kutcha house, or just a small extension or improving the existing

amenities etc. for which many a time the formal credit institutions may not be able to

provide credit. Similarly, the aspirations of the villagers for better life may also tempt

them go for certain „luxury‟ goods like Televison, telephone, motor cycle etc. The

formal banking system may not find them as credit worthy for such loans leading them

to the mercy of the informal system. Therefore, the credit products to be offered to the

villagers has to be sensitive to such needs. A family credit plan approach would be

more practical, based on a cash flow which take into account of all receipts and

27

expenditure, rather than fixing credit limit only for certain purposes. A detailed study

will provide better insights to such products.

Insurance

Insurance is another important financial service which is still eluding the villagers. A

large segment of rural India is still untouched by insurance because of long distances,

poor distribution and high return costs. It is said that the life insurance premium in

India is just 1.8% of the GDP as against 5.2% in US and 8% in South Korea.

Considering the fact that 70% of the population is in rural areas, the present coverage

is too less and need to be enhanced.

What are the insurance products needed by the villagers? The villagers need products

for covering their life, health and accidents. In addition there has to be a proper risk

mitigation mechanism to insure their crops and also their livestock.

Some of the Self Help Group promoting institutions in some parts of the country are

providing limited insurance coverage to their members, either by devising products of

their own or by having tie up with existing insurance companies. They include a small

compensation, ranging from Rs10,000 to Rs 20,000, for accidental deaths and also

some medical insurance for hospitalisation and maternity needs. Recently, GoI has

also announced some sort of insurance cover to members of Self Help Groups. It is

necessary that a proper assessment of the insurance needs of the villagers are made

and suitable products are offered to them.

The crop insurance and agriculture assets insurance are needed to be more effective.

Although there is an Agriculture Insurance Company (AIC) providing crop insurance

and several General insurance companies offering asset insurance, many a time they

are not effective and the farmers do not get the full benefit. The major reason for the

distress is due to the failure of weather leading to loss of crops and assets, thereby

unable to honour the repayment commitments to the loans taken from lenders, both

formal and informal. The farmers distressed when they are unable to meet their

commitments from the lenders, more so the loan taken form from informal sources.

Thus an effective risk mitigation mechanism for the crops and livestock is very much

essential under the Village Knowledge Management System.

Remittance and Payment facilities

These are also needed for the villagers. Especially if they have to send their children

away to far off places for studies or if they have their near and dear ones working else

where. Right now the Post offices does this activity but its effectiveness is a big

question.

Scholorships

This is more so for the students persuing their studies. Such support will enable the

villagers to provide better education to their children in far off places.

4 Agencies for credit purveyance

We have a multi agency approach in credit purveyance in our country. They include

Commercial Banks, Regional Rural Banks, Cooperative Banks consisting of Short

term and Long term structure. Since 1989, a Service Area Approach has been in vogue

whereby rural or semi urban branches of each Commercial Bank and RRB is allotted a

specific area, consisting of few villages, for taking care of the credit needs of the area.

As per this, the Service Area Branch has to prepare a Service Area Credit plan for each

28

village, based on a data base maintained by them in the from of „Village profile‟,

which is required to be updated regularly. The Village Plans add up to the service area

plans of the Service Area Branch, which are aggregated at Block, District and State

level to prepare the Block, District and State Credit Plans for an year. The Service

Area Approach has been diluted in the recent past and only the Government sponsored

programmes are now financed based on the Service Area Approach. Otherwise,

farmers have the option to approach different banks and the banks have the option to

finance in different areas.

Apart from these Service Area Bank branches, the villages are also covered by

Primary Agriculture Cooperative Societies (PACS), affiliated to District Central

Cooperative Banks. But in many places the PACS are defunct or not in good health

thereby reducing their role as an effective credit purveyor. But, the recent initiatives by

the Government of India to implement Prof Vaidyanathan Committee - I Report,

which envisage revival of Cooperative Banks, coupled with the recent massive loan

waiver scheme, will enable the Cooperative Banks to become more stronger and play

an effective role in the near future. Similar is the case with Long term Cooperative

Credit structure, which include Primary Cooperative Agriculture and Rural

Development Banks at the Taluk level and State Cooperative Agriculture and Rural

Development Banks. Barring a few states, this structure is also very weak. A revival

programme of Long Term Cooperative Credit Structure is also under consideration of

GOI based on the recommendation of Prof Vaidyanatan Committee-II.

The RRBs, which were hitherto weak in many places have since improved their

financial strength and have become effective purveyors of credit in rural area. With the

amalgamation of about 150 RRBs to form 45 amlgamated entities, along with 43 stand

along, the financial strength of most of these RRBs has enhanced and they can play an

important role in purveyance credit in the rural areas.

This apart, there is a strong micro finance movement across the country facilitating the

credit needs of the rural poor. The pilot programme of SHG Bank linkage initiated by

NABARD in 1992, has since grown as a massive movement and has enabled financing

more than 4 crore rural poor through this mechanism. Over the last 15 years, the Banks

have financed close to 4 million Self Help Groups (SHGs) across the country.

Self Help Groups formed mostly by the women folk are an excellent support

mechanism which also help in meeting the thrift and credit needs of the rural poor.

The concept propagated by NABARD involves formation of informal groups of rural

poor with homogeneous background and working together in the group by having a

regular thrift collection which are used for internal lending to meet the urgent credit

needs of the members. Subsequently, after assessing the maturity level of the group,

the groups are financed by banks based on the savings level for meeting the larger

credit needs of the members. The mechanism has been working very well for the last

16 years or so and provide an excellent support mechanism to villagers.

More SHGs for women need to be ensured through a campaign mode so that

dairy/poultry/farming activities can be financed through SHGs.

There are also several variants of this credit innovation which are also working well.

One such innovation is the concept of Joint Liability Groups (JLGs). The concept has

been borrowed from South East Asian countries and also by taking a cue of the

success of the SHG Bank Linkage programme. The concept is to form a credit group

of 5 to 10 persons, involved in similar vocation, for the purpose of borrowing from the

banks. The concept is based on the mutual guarantee being provided by the members

29

and also the peer pressure acting for timely repayments. The scheme has been

extended to finance farmers who are otherwise unable to provide security like tenant

farmers and oral lessees since 2006.

For landless farmers, oral lessees and tenant farmers, there is an urgent need to create

joint liability groups or Rythu Mitra Sanghas, as in Andhra Pradesh, which are

basically self-help groups of farmers. With the help of Agriculture

Department/NGO‟s such groups can be formed for easy accessing of agricultural

credit.

In addition to these there are also micro finance institutions in certain parts of the

country providing loan to poor people directly or through group mode.

Further, the GoI/ RBI have also permitted bankers to deploy Business facilitators and

Business Correspondences for reaching the unreached. Both these mechanisms involve

use of identified agencies for facilitating credit from the formal banking system

With the introduction of Financial Inclusion programme, some of the banks have also

initiated use of technology for purveying credit in rural areas. The brancheless banking

adopted by banks like SBI, Corporation Bank use Information and Communication

Technology for accepting thrift and providing credit. In these models, computer

enabled hand held device connected to Bank‟s Servers are operated from the villages,

by the designated Business facilitators, for accepting thrift and providing credit, by

using smart cards provided to the village folks.

Inspite of all these, the dependence on informal credit sources likes money lenders is

also very high. The NSSO (2003) survey indicate that around 45% of the credit availed

of by the farmer household is from informal sources. Such loans are at usurious rates

and causes difficulties to farmers.

The informal credit sources offer some advantages to the villagers like availability of

credit at the door step at any time of the day, very few formalities, without any

„approved‟ purposes etc. It may be worthwhile to explore the possibility of formalising

such creditors with some controls??

Another institutions which can play a role in purveying credit is the post offices. In

India, Postal department has made a footprint in almost all the villages. India has the

largest number of postal network. There are over 1.55 lakh post offices in our country,

of which 89% are in rural areas. On an average, in 2004, a post-office in India served

an area of 21.13 sq. km and a population of 6,585. Although, there are a few financial

services provided by post office at present, it can be further strengthened with suitable

legal backing and other support so as to convert them into an efficient purveyor credit

in the rural areas.

5 Committee on Financial Inclusion

Committee on Financial Inclusion under the Chairmanship of Dr. C Rengarajan has

given a road map for Financial Inclusion in the country. Accordingly, 50% of the

financially excluded have to access financial services by 2012 and the remaining 50%

by 2015. The Committee has also recommended steps like opening 250 new accounts

per branch per year by rural and semi urban branches of Commercial Banks and

RRBs, setting up of National Mission on Financial Inclusion, preparing State Level

Rural Financial Inclusion Plans/ District level plans etc. The GOI has accepted some

of these recommendations and advised Banks to implement the same. This could

enable better, outreach of financial services to all people in the country.

30

6 Financial Inclusion Fund/ Financial Inclusion Technology Fund

As part of Financial Inclusion Programme, GoI has set up two funds viz. Financial

Inclusion Fund and Financial Inclusion Technology Fund, with Rs 500 crore corpus

each. The Funds are operate are operated by NABARD and can be made use of for

newer initiatives on Financial Inclusion by using Technology or otherwise in the

Villages/ districts under VKMS.

7 IT enabled financial services

The use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) for extending financial

services is necessary to built and efficient Village Knowledge Management System.

First and the foremost is to built a computer data base of all the families in the village.

The data base should evolve into a credit bureau so as to enable credit institutions and

other financial service providers to extend their service without any hassles. The rural

credit information bureau should be attempted using a technology platform so that it

becomes easier to access bank loans for farmers, depending upon their

transaction/banking history. This will also reduce the processing time taken for

agricultural loan. The data base should also enable proper monitoring of the credit

utilization and its repayment. It would be ideal to survey all the family members and

issue a smart card to each family which can act as a storage of their data base and also

enable financial transactions with the banks.

Bio-metric cards should be issued to each of the farmers in the identified districts so

that all subsidy/relief payment could be smoothly passed on to the individual farmers

through their bank accounts. The bio metric smart cards should enable the villagers to

access their bank account, make payments and monitor their insurance services. This

can also be used for making payments under NREGP and other similar programmes.

Kisan Credit Cards may be issued to all farmers having land holdings irrespective of

defaulter status and efforts may be made to cover all farmers. The Kisan Card could

also be IT enabled and can be integrated with the Biometric smart card.

The use of ICT in creating the data base should also enable the villagers/ farmers

availing of credit, to approach any bank without having the necessity of obtaining

NOC certificates from their earlier banks. The IT enabling should also help in

accessing the land documentation thereby making the loan process much more simpler

process.

Further the use of Technology should also enable the farmers to access information

regarding their crops including proper package of practices, discovering future prices,

suggestions for change in cropping pattern etc. The experimentation of e-sagu (e

farming ) being practiced by IIIT, Hyderabad, in solving the problems of the farmers

on-line and getting advisory on a weekly basis, could also be adopted, by entrusting

suitable agencies such as Agriculture Universities/ Colleges or Agriculture Research

Stations or agencies on a PPP mode, for providing weekly the advisory to the farmers,

may be on a payment basis.

The installations of ware houses and cold storages in the villages, as part of VKMS

could also benefit the farmers in storing their produce safely and also accessing credit

through pledge. Such warehouse receipts should be used for even as negotiable

instruments by making suitable legislation.

Further, through the use of technology, the farmers should also be able to trade their

produce through multi commodity exchange platforms like NCDEX and MCX. May

be VKMS can act as aggregators for enabling such trade.

31

8 Credit plus approach

As mentioned earlier credit alone is not the only solution to the farmers. There has to

be a credit plus approach which enable the farmers to be educated on the use of credit,

its timely repayments, building saving habits etc. There can be farmers clubs which

can take care of such activities, benefiting the farmers. Farmers Clubs to be started by

all branches of DCCBs/RRBs/Commercial banks, with a minimum of one active club

per branch. Such forums can also be used in disseminating knowledge on new farming

technique, diversification of agriculture activities, practices like organic farming/

integrated farming etc. Further, the forum can also help in the socio economic well

being of the farmers/ villagers.

With a view to strenghten the Cooperative Banks in the selected districts, the

Vaidyanathan Committee Reports I and II, on restructuring Short term and Long term

cooperative structures, may be implemented on a priority basis as the cooperatives are

the most farmer-friendly institutions and revival of PACS/PCARDBs shall be given

utmost priority.

Since marketing play an important role in ensuring better returns to farmers, Rural

haats and market yards should be made more farmer-friendly so that farmers‟ access to

market facilities and market prices, are assured.

As done in two pilot projects in Wardha and Amravati districts, 5 villages in each

district, NABARD initiated a Village Development Programme to augment the income

level of farmers using organic/Vermi-composting methods and to offer counselling

services through NGOs. In 3 of the 5 pilot villages in Wardha, need based village

credit plans have been prepared on a participatory mode with the involvement of

bankers to ensure credit flow for crop cultivation, investment in capital assets,

subsidiary occupation. Similar rural village development schemes on adoption mode,

need to be done by banks/corporates under their corporate social responsibility

schemes.

Jiji Mammen N P Mohaptra Sai Prinny Santosh

DGM/ FM, NABARD AGM Project Director

Regional Training College Financial Inclusion Dept. Transformational

Mangalore -575004 NABARD, HO, Mumbai Social Change

09845466948 Anantapur, AP

32

ANNEXURE-IV

EDUCATION, HEALTH AND NUTRITION SITUATION ANALYSIS OF FAMILIES

IN DISTRESS DISTRICTS OF INDIA & STRATEGIES TO MITIGATE THEM

The nutrition, heath & well being of human beings are mainly dependent on plant foods

since they represent the bulk of food consumed by people. It is well recognized that the

quality of food is just as important as the quantity of food. During early 1950‟s due to

various economic and social reasons, pregnant and lactating women and their infants in

India did not receive a balanced diet which resulted in protein calorie malnutrition. This

situation compromised their immune system, resulting in their vulnerability to number of

communicable diseases such as pneumonia, malaria, diarrhoea, tuberculosis, small pox,

chicken pox etc. Due to an increase in population growth and decreased food production

commensurate with this growth during the early 1960‟s, there was an increased pressure

on a fixed land base to produce more food. Hence there was an extensive research to

increase the cereal productivity which resulted in Green revolution. Various policies of

Government, such as providing food subsidies and strong nutrition education component

and public health programs like universal immunization, providing iron & folic acid

tablets for pregnant mothers, and vitamin A prophylaxis programs, the severe forms of

protein calorie malnutrition and the other major nutritional deficiency disorders were

reduced in the country.

Green revolution technology was shown to be capable of achieving increases in

productivity needed to provide adequate food energy for the country. The technology

included new cultivars, chemicals ranging from mineral fertilizers to pesticides to

synthetic plant hormones and machines to supplement and replace the labor force. India

has benefited immensely from this agricultural revolution as the problems of inherently

infertile soils were resolved by the development of nitrogen, super phosphate etc, creating

a surplus of food that has endured since the early 1980‟s. However, there was also concern

that the emphasis on agricultural production was threatening the resource base of land,

soil, air and water through processes such as loss of soil fertility by erosion, acidification,

salinisation and desertification. During the green revolution‟s push toward food security,

little thought was bestowed to nutritional value and human health, and certainly almost

none to the content of micronutrients in the new cereal cultivars being bred, or to the

micronutrient content of the resultant changing diets. Micronutrient levels in cereals are

low and because of less focus on the yield improvement of nutrient-rich crops like

legumes, fruits & vegetables, the new problems that have risen now are due to

micronutrient malnutrition in human beings.

Micronutrient malnutrition, often called‟ Hidden Hunger‟, is more conspicuous in India

since the introduction of green revolution. Today, micronutrient malnutrition diminishes

the health, productivity and well being of over half of Indian community, with impact

primarily on women, infants and children from low income families. Micronutrient

malnutrition not only compromises the immune system, but can irreversibly retard brain

development inutero and for up to two years postpartum. This means that deficiency of

micronutrients in a pregnant or lactating woman can result in mentally and physically

handicapped child that will never achieve its genetic potential in cognitive abilities. Such

children may be less fit to control their environment and to provide for their own food

security in later life to compete for better education and for higher level jobs within their

society. All together micronutrient deficiencies greatly contribute to the degenerative cycle

of poverty as they limit the capacity of parents to earn an adequate income that limits the

level of nutrition they can provide to their children, in turn limiting their children‟s work

33

and cognitive potential. To cope up with the increased economic needs of the families,

even small and marginal farmers have ended up taking ambitious programs to earn more

while their knowledge levels were not adequate with respect to that activity. While the

impact of agricultural research has been immense, the outcome, however, has created even

more daunting challenges for agricultural scientists, nutritionists, health care specialists

and policy makers.

To tackle this micronutrient malnutrition, policy makers have viewed it as a disease that

must be treated and accordingly the strategy of supplementation that stressed only on food

fortification intervention programs. While many of these programs have been successful in

case of individuals who were covered, they are all too often unsustainable for various

reasons. Hence our ultimate objective is to have sustainable food systems that provide

adequate nutrient output, potentially achievable by an alliance between agricultural,

nutritional and health related sciences. Additional investment in agricultural research is

necessary to promote improved micronutrient output of agricultural systems and

agriculture must address this issue if we are to find sustainable solutions to micronutrient

malnutrition that degrades human health, productivity and well being. Therefore there is a

need to educate the farmers on their nutritional needs, importance of balanced diets,

impact of using insecticides, fertilizers, pesticides etc on their health, soil and crop health,

environmental sanitation, importance of proper post harvest management issues for better

economic returns.

With this background the project is proposed with the following objectives

Objectives

1. To assess the health and nutritional status of vulnerable rural population in distressed

districts

2. To coordinate the services of various Government departments in capacity building of

rural families

3. To impart the necessary knowledge and skills to increase nutrition and health

awareness among people

4. To identify and establish (if any) a link between Agronomical practices, soil health and

nutrient composition of major food crops specially with reference to micronutrients

through research

5. To establish soil health clinics

6. To educate people on the impact of Agronomic practices on food value of crops

through Village level knowledge centers.

Action plan: This involves the following activities.

Basic research

1. Assessment of soil health and nutritional status of population subsisting mostly on

the foods grown in the region

2. Study the association between micronutrient levels of soil and the major crops

grown in that soil (especially cereals, millets and legumes) which form the bulk of

human food and their availability invitro and invivo

3. Identify the link/s between soil-plant-livestock-human health; identify the

interaction between various micronutrients in absorption and utilization and also

study the consequences on human health.

4. Assess the nutrient composition of organic foods in comparison to other foods and

availability of critical nutrients

5. Establishment of soil health clinics

34

Operational research

I . Capacity building and Counseling

1. Physical capacity – health monitoring

a) Prevention of diseases & health management

Public health concepts - creating awareness about Immunization, health & hygiene,

environmental sanitation etc

Dietary & pharmaceutical management of diseases such as Diabetes, Hypertension,

Cardiovascular diseases, Arthritis, Flourosis, Cancer, HIV/AIDS, Goitre etc.

Providing necessary diet & nutrition counseling for prevention of physical and

nutritional stress, disease occurrence & management of diseases.

Monitoring health indicators

b) Prevention & Management of

Epidemics such as Gastrointestinal disorders, Tuberculosis, Malaria, Chikungunya,

Dengue, viral fevers, Japanese encephalitis etc.

Emergency health situations

c) Economic burden of illness of family members

2) Economic capacity: Appropriate technology intervention for income generation

3) Decision making and management capacity of the family specially women: Introduce

appropriate timely interventions to build the family capacity to make right decisions

4) Psychological capacity: Counselling to cope up with stress situation

5) Knowledge support: through community ,NGOs, and building awareness

6) Government, Social and Community support: Information and resources made

available from government department to manage a new crop /to manage a new agriculture

practice; through social organizations, through Community ;

II Develop data base on knowledge of Agriculture, Food, Nutrition &Health

situation in distressed districts

Knowledge data base regarding agricultural practices

Knowledge data base regarding post harvest management practices

Knowledge data base regarding dietary habits

Knowledge data base regarding indigenous methods of disease management

III Equip VKMS with Nutrition Education material

Pooling up the available material and developing the necessary material about

Balanced diet for different age groups

Calculation of Nutritive value of foods

Weaning foods and supplementary feeding

Care during pregnancy & lactation

Breast feeding

Child care services and practices

Geriatric care

Dietary management in common health problems

Early detection of health problems : prevention & cure

35

ANNEXURE V

Department of Science & Technology

(NRDMS & NSDI Divisions)

Minutes

Subject: Minutes of the meeting – Development of LIS – Framework

Project development meeting was held under the Chairmanship of Prof Anil K Gupta, IIM

Ahmedabad, on 22nd

April 2008. The following officers attended the meeting.

1. Dr. J.P.Sharma, Principal Scientist & Head, NBSS & LUP (ICAR) New Delhi

2. Prof.M.Anji Reddy, JNT University, Hyderabad

3. Dr.T.Vijaya Lakshmi, JNT University, Hyderabad

4. Dr.D.Martin, Scientist, NBSS & LUP (ICAR) New Delhi

5. Dr. Tamilvanan, Research Fellow, IIM, Ahmedabad

6. Dr.K.R.Murali Mohan, DST, New Delhi

1. Initiating the discussions, the DST representative has outlined the genesis and the

background of the meeting. He brought the major issues discussed during the

meetings of the Secretary, DST and Hon‟ble Minister for Science & Technology,

held on 14th

& 15th

of April 2008. The DST is contemplating the development of

LIS for entire country in order to address the issues related to village level

developments through decision support system. However, considering the gamut of

work and complexities, it was decided that LIS will be developed for 33 districts

initially, where agrarian crisis is rampant. Accordingly, the geospatial industry was

consulted and it was decided to develop LIS in association with the geospatial

industry on „PPP mode‟. The industry was asked to come out with a generic

approach with in 4 weeks of time. The DST has to prepare a DPR consisting the

scope of work, operational methodologies, the data sources, spatial and non-spatial

attribute information products, system architecture, the deliverables and the

technical output so as to collate the governmental requirements with the proposed

system.

36

2. The objective of the meeting was to prepare broad contours of DPR, identifying

themes, network of institutes and scientists to involve in preparation of complete

DPR and Terms of Reference (TOR). The time lines set for the activity are around

6- 8 weeks from the date of approval of the proposal for preparation of DPR.

3. Prof. M.Anji Reddy and Dr.T.Vijaya Lakshmi, made a detailed presentation on the

results of the Village Information System (VIS) project for Prakasam District of

A.P. The methodology adopted for VIS specifically on integration of parcel level

information with in the village boundary was presented. The concept more or less

standardized, could be explored for extension and possible adaptation in the

proposed project. However, this methodology needs modifications based on R &D

efforts, which can be carried out before adopting.

4. Dr. J.P. Sharma and Dr. D. Martin, made a detailed presentation on various non

spatial components of the LIS.

5. Elaborative discussion were carried out on the purpose and applicability of LIS in

various sectors like health, education & employment, agriculture, farm trading,

meteorology, veterinary and livestock, flora and fauna, socio- economic, cultural

and other related issues for the development of rural India.

6. Keeping, the major sectoral themes, complexity of the issues at micro level, the

importance of creation of interactive knowledge information and management

centers in view, it is proposed to rename the LIS as Village Knowledge

Management System (VKMS), which encompasses the LIS and VIS.

7. After elaborative discussion, a generic and broad approach paper for preparation of

DPR was arrived at (Annexure 1).

8. The recommendations of the meeting are :

a) A detailed DPR will be prepared by Prof. Anil K.Gupta, IIM Ahmedabad.

He will submit a proposal to DST for the same.

37

b) IIM, Ahmedabad shall involve sectoral institutes like

Agriculture sector- NBSS& LUP(ICAR) , New Delhi

Nutrition Sector – NIN, Hyderabad

Health & all other aspects – ICMR, Kolkata

Statistical Analysis-ISI Kolkata,

Spatial data components– JNTU, Hyderabad.

Gender Issues- JNU, New Delhi

Socio-economic – NCAP New Delhi and

other relevant components- suitable agencies.

MINUTES OF VKMS DISCUSSION in july, 2008

Date : 10th

July 2008

Venue : Wing 11, IIMA

Following participants were present in the meeting:

1. Dr. P Adhiguru

2. Dr.A Dhandapani

3. Prof. V R Gaikwad

4. Prof. P Geervani

5. Dr. Ranendu Ghosh

6. Dr. N Gopalakrishnan

7. Dr.P S Guhar

8. Dr. B K Kikani

9. Dr. K T Krishne Gowda

10. Dr. P V S Kumar

11. Dr. Nandini K Kumar

12. Shri Jiji Mammen

13. Dr. D Martin

14. Dr. Murali Mohan

15. Shri N Mohaptra

16. Shri M Moni

17. Dr. Mruthyunjaya

18. Dr. Manoranjan Pal

19. Dr. (Mrs.) Sushma Panigrahy

20. Dr. Ramanbhai B Patel

21. Dr. S A Patil

22. Dr. T N Prakash

23. Dr. Anji Reddy

24. Dr. Baldev Sahai

25. Mr B V N S Santosh

26. Dr. N Seetharama

27. Dr. J P Sharma

28. Dr. Baldeo Singh

29. Dr. Bhoop Singh

30. Dr. (Mrs.) Sumathi

38

1) Prof Anil K Gupta started the discussion by briefly introducing the topic to the

participants of VKMS. The alarming rate of farmer‟s suicides in recent years has

caused resentment among the people. Though several institutional and policy

interventions are taken time to time to mitigate the distress there is not even a

single interdisciplinary approach involving Science and Technology, LIS,GIS,

nutrition, live stocks and other related fields. There is only one paper available in

India for studies on linkages between Soil-Crops-Livestock-Human healths in the

last 50 years. Institutes like ICMR,ICAR,and NIN are undertaking researches in

human health, agriculture and nutrition respectively. But we need a system that can

put all these aspects together with analytical information, which would empower

the farmers to take their decision. Does nutrition gap at different growth stages of

an individual have irreversible effects on him or her to bear the stress? In a region

mostly all farmers undergo same stress but why do some commit suicide and not

others? What are all the determinants that drive them to the forceful fatal decision?

We should look into these issues earnestly. There are 33 districts and some reports

mention about 40 districts having high stress and resultant suicidal deaths. If

farmers are empowered to take decisions for each plot of their holding it solves the

purpose of VKMS. We should be able to provide all necessary information to the

farmer at one place. This is possible only when agriculture, medical, land

information communities come together and work out the plan. Only when we

achieve the Farmer Level Decision Making System we would be sure that no

suicides would occur again.

2) Dr. Mruthyunjaya, National Director NAIP (National Agricultural Innovation

Project) explained that his organization currently undertakes 24 projects in 150

most backward districts on rural livelihood security. The major problem

encountered is characterizing the rural livelihood security. NAIP can play a

complementation role to search for interventions that can help establishing rural

livelihood security. Interventions can be technological, institutional and policy

levels. Once the data is available from VKMS it can be used by NAIP to fine-tune

its existing programmes.

3) Dr S A Patil, Director IARI, reasoned out that distress as well as suicides among

farmers is due to the result of very low level of knowledge management in small

and marginal farmers. This was experimentally proved by Dharwad Agricultural

39

University where, in one village, revenues were increased from 37 lacs to 2 crores

in one year by employing several knowledge-based interventions. He further felt

that diffusion of IARI technology to SAUs and further to farmers is very low. In

some cases, SAUs are reinventing the same technology again. This duplicates the

work and wastage of funds, which should strictly be avoided.

4) Prof. P Geervani, former Vice-chancellor wished that VKMS should be

strengthened with authentic information sources because nowadays many people

having no basic knowledge about nutrition makes big statements that mislead the

people. This should not be allowed to happen.

5) Dr B K Kikani, Vice-chancellor JAU talked about the reasons for present

conditions of farmers like debt, monsoon failures, lack of access to formal credit

facilities and absence of efficient transfer of technologies from research institutes.

Though farmers in Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat grow similar kind of cotton

varieties suicides are more in A P than of Gujarat. The reason was that farmers of

Gujarat take up seed production and circulate the material among them. State

agricultural machineries did not interfere in those activities.

6) Shri M Moni DDG, NIC opined that educational institutions and ICAR research

institutes should be brought forward to generate data at grassroots level if “e

governance” programs to be successful. We should also map entire village and all

these information must be made digital to make ICT to have profound impact on

the lives of rural people. The pathetic situation is several schemes of similar nature

are implemented by central, state governments, district administration and village

panchayats to address the same problem, which increases the complexities in

identifying beneficiaries. Most importantly all agricultural web sites should be

made available in 22 official languages and to screen the content there should be a

responsible editorial board. Government should also come up with a dedicated

24x7 Agriculture TV channel to disseminate all the recent improved technologies.

7) Dr N Seetharama, Director NRCS (National Research Centre for Sorghum)

advocated that sorghum is a good dry land crop and several new opportunities are

emerging in value addition and nutritional improvements. Currently NRCS is

involved in product specific breeding aspects. Sorghum is established as a

40

beneficial supplement to alleviate diabetics and other related problems. So it would

be better to include sorghum in Public Distribution System (PDS) with the existing

commodities. This will somehow answer the malnutrition problem among the

people.

8) Dr K T Krishne Gowda, Project Coordinator (Small Millets) stressed that Finger

Millet is emerging the most important crop among the millets group. It is proved to

have several beneficial nutrients but the consumption of it is decreasing even in

rural households. Further he laid emphasis on steps to increase its value addition

and ways to encourage people to take more of its products to be healthier.

9) Dr Nandini K Kumar,Deputy Director General ICMR discussed about tele

medicine and sope of utilising it for ruarl households. But the problem of non-

availability of health database at village level hinders the progress. Further it was

said that though suicides among farmers mainly take place due to crop failures,

psychological factors also play a role in their fatal decision. Hence provision of

counseling to the distressed farmers would certainly ease their stress and help them

to take a positive approach to life.

10) Dr Baldev Sahai, Ex deputy Director (SAC) had shared his view that all the

existing problems among farmers are basically due to lack of education.

Moneylenders play with them, as the indebted farmers are illiterate and lacked

awareness. Hence the proposed VKMS should also address the problem of

education and awareness among rural people among many other issues.

11) Dr Baldeo Singh, Joint Director IARI had expressed a concern that mindset of the

people is most important to achieve any good results from interventions that are

taken up. Hence mindset of the people to be positively changed. They should be

educated about recent happenings in agricultural sector particularly about

marketing. Our policies should also stress on the role of village panchayats in

farming aspects. Villgae panchayat is the nodal agency for all amenities in the

village but it is not entrusted with any kind of agricultural activities.

41

12) Dr J P Sharma, Head NBSS&LUP Delhi discussed about the need for collecting

resource data on which we can work. First, all the traditional village maps to be

changed into digital maps and later high resolution data can be superimposed upon

them. People are not adopting optimum land use system on their lands based on

their capability or they do not grow suitable crops on them resulting in under

utilization of soil resources. Sometimes this mistake leads to salinity problems.

Alternate land use system should be suggested in VKMS to help farmers. Issuing

soil health cards also a possible solution to address these issues.

13) Dr N Gopalakrishnan, Project Coordinator for Cotton improvement (CICR)

negated the cultivation of Bt cotton as the sole reason for farmers‟ suicides.

Unscrupulous application of pesticides caused the resurgence of sucking pest and

created the havoc. CICR is working for control of mealy bug in cotton. Further

with the help of NATP it has adopted some villages in Tamilnadu, Maharastra and

Karnataka to increase their income level. More emphasis should be given on value

addition of this crop. Instead of growing any variety and supply to textile mills

farmers should be encouraged to grow specific varieties preferred by mill owners

to get premium price for their product. Further there is lot work going on for better

extraction of cottonseed oil.

14) Dr Ramanbhai B Patel, Director Extension NAU opined that level of farmers‟

expectation had increased as never before.When farm specific technology is

providede they ask for free inputs, on spot advice and marketing supports. There is

no bottom- up approach for solving the farmers‟ problem. Our earlier extension

models like Training & Visit system, ATMA have not yielded good results. Failure

of government‟s delivery mechanism is also the part of reasons for farmers‟

suicides.

15) Dr (Mrs.) S Sumathi voiced her concern that despite fifty years of independence

we have not achieved nutritional security as compared to food security. At present,

the fast emerging problem is increased micronutrient malnutrition among people

and this is mainly due to changing food habits especially deviation from millet

consumption. Most of the health problems even in rural areas are traced back to

soil. We can correct this at source itself and prevent diseases. Source correction

42

can be done either by manipulating the physical and chemical properties of soil to

release the nutrients in available form to crops or applying necessary fertilizers to

the soil.

16) Dr P S Guhar, UAS Dharwad discussed about the referral services taken up by

KVKs around Dharwad region. This had transformed many lives of farmers by

empowering them with new technologies in day-to-day activities of farming. There

exists a forum called “Farmer to farmer” where especially during distress period

successful farmers will be introduced to failure farmers and discussion takes place

among them. This will help in boosting the confident of losers and keeps them in

positive approach.

17) Prof Manoranjan Pal from ISI talked about two projects namely “Development of

database for decentralized planning in Howrah district of West Bengal” and

“National Resource Data Management system”. The former project provided only

the framework for data collection but the latter engaged in data collection from

each village. For the proposed VKMS, several parameters like education, drinking

water availability, energy situation and road network to be taken into account to

form an index. Later we can decide about which variables should be given more

weightage or less. He wished to have strong database at village level so that ISI

can develop a strong research component for the proposed VKMS.

18) Dr T N Prakash, expressed that the traditional knowledge existing with one

community should be exchanged freely with other farming communities in

different regions so as to enable them knowing about the indigenous solutions for

their problems. There should be some mechanism like HBN (Honey Bee Network)

to document and disseminate all existing traditional knowledge system among

farmers.

19) Dr P V S Kumar talked about characterizing indicators for rural livelihood

research. Sociological aspects of rural households also play an important role in

decision making of farmers when they are facing distress situations.

20) Dr (Mrs.) Sushma Panigrahy,Group Director ISRO discussed about forecasting,

soil moisture mapping and other surveying activities that are taken up by ISRO. A

43

disease/pest affected field can be identified through infra red camera from the

satellite and this would be useful for many purposes like measuring the extent of

damage by pathogens/insects, settling the insurance claims and if need arises

farmer can use this as a authentic information for any of othre purposes.

21) Dr Ranendu Ghosh, Scientist SAC discussed about a project initiated by

Department of Space called “National Information System”. Today GIS database is

available for 16 states at 50,000 scale. But to have meaningful data at field level

we need to have high-resolution data, which is possible only by 5.8 m resolution

camera. We have to have a system in place, which could tell us the status of soil

moisture balance and rate of depletion of moisture level so as to enable us devising

contingency plans well ahead of time. At present we are not in a position to

provide this information on daily basis to our farmers. Further he also explained

about services like “Teleconsultation” by Apollo hospitals and online advisory by

Anand Agricultural University to farmers regarding soil testing and requirement of

fertilizers.

22) Dr Anji Reddy JNTU explained about the problems of mapping boundary of the

villages. No software viz., Google Earth, LISS data and Quick Bird is useful for

this purpose. There should be some base data on which one can work. He also

stressed the need for utilizing the lands according to their capability without which

sustainable farming will become impossible.

23) Dr D Martin from NBSS&LUP discussed about essentiality of having detailed

village level maps for at least those 100 districts where distress and suicides was

prevalent. We also have to move from just projecting the traditional maps to

adding values by integrating them with other useful parameters like availability of

micronutrients and trace elements. Mapping of micro nutrients like Mg, Mn, Zn

and Lithium in different regions and soil types is most important as they cause

several health problems to the rural households and pushes them into dept trap.

24) Dr Murali Mohan, DST explained about two studies viz., RAWS (Rural Automatic

Weather Station) and VIS (Village Information System). RAWS is designed in

collaboration with IIT Madras to record weather parameters in villages, which was

not being done all these years. Currently these stations are installed in 500 coastal

44

villages and the recorded data is transmitted to a central hub in IIT, which would

be interpreted and displayed in web. Further DST is also pursuing research

activities to develop a low cost sensor to estimate micro nutrient availability on

spot in farmers‟ fields. In VIS, ten villages each selected separately from drought

hit and flood affected areas to study the sustenance level of those villages if the

existing condition prevails.

25) Dr Bhoop Singh, DST explained about the details and methodology of developing

Village Information System.

26) Dr P Adhiguru was of the view that unavailability of authentic data from grass root

level is the main obstacle for taking up any interventions in rural livelihood

security. This gap should be filled up by the proposed VKMS.

27) Dr Dhandapani, NCIPM voiced a concern about not having any reliable database

about past incidences of pest and disease outbreaks in the country. This seriously

hampers the development of forecasting models that could alert us about

impending epidemic. He also explained about “e-pest surveillance” programme

that is currently undertaken by NCIPM where hand held devices with data entry

softwares are given to field staff to register day to day changes in field itself. This

is currently taken up in 10 disrticts of Andhra Pradesh on pilot scale. Mealy bug is

emerging as serious pest in cotton nowadays and government has started an

awareness campaign in state of Punjab allocating 1.8 crores for this purpose.

28) Shri Jiji Mammen, DGM NABARD informed that each district has District

Development Manager who will be the repository of information at macro level i.e.

up to block level but this is not sufficient. We must be able to get the information

up to household level in a village. Later he also explained about two projects “e-

sahu” (on-line advisory for farming problems) and “Prgadhibandhu groups”

(sharing voluntary labor among a group of farmers) that were taking up several

initiatives in Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka.

29) Shri N P Mohapatra, AGM NABARD, recollected that credit to agriculture sector

has grown up to 1,80,000 crores and this is ever increasing but the results are not

seen as per the expectation. ICT must play an important role in the development of

45

rural economy like fund transfer, health/asset/life insurance at every point of sale

are to be established. Other aspects like Smart card technology, mobile banking

technology are to be utilized maximum to reap the benefits of ICT to rural house

holds. LIC and IRDA specifies that loan can only be given to a group which has

atleast 25 members but this is not possible in hills. So we should sensitize them

about this and the guidelines should be similar to NABARD policies. Telecom

service providers should be brought in the service of rural people by forecasting

the weather parameters through mobile phones.

30) Mr B V N S Santosh, Project Director TSC expressed the importance of infusing

responsibility to the concerned officials. To emphasis the point two models were

discussed namely “Sanita Kendra” and EPIC (Electronic Police Information

Centre). In Sanita Kendra rural people can ineract with the District Collector

through video conferencing once in a week and get their issues addressed.

46

REFERENCES

1. Abrol, I. P. and Sangar, S. 2006 Sustaining Indian agriculture–conservation

agriculture the way forward. Current Science, 91(8), 1020-1025.

2. Alagh, Y.K. 1988. Pesticides in Indian Agriculture. Economic and Political Weekly,

23(38), September 17, 1959-164.

3. Albrecht, W.A. 1966. Plant, animal and human health vary with soil fertility.

Modern Nutrition, 19(2), 18-20.

4. Assadi, M. 1998. Farmers‟ Suicides: Signs of Distress in Rural Economy. Economic

and Political Weekly, 33(14), 747-749.

5. Assadi, M. 1998. Farmers‟ Suicides: Signs of Distress in Rural Economy. Economic

and Political Weekly, April 4.

6. AWARE. 1998. Report on Farmers‟ Suicides in Andhra Pradesh, Development

Research Advisory Group, Hyderabad.

7. Bamji, M.S. 2003. Early nutrition and health-Indian perspective. Current Science,

85(8), 1137-1142.

8. Bamji, M.S. 2007. Nutrition-secure India – How do we get there? Nutrition conclave

discusses the way forward. Current Science,, 93(11), 1473-1475.

9. Bamji, M.S. and Bhat, R.V. 2003. Nutrition is the key to health and nation‟s

development. Current Science, 84(12), 1501-1503.

10. Behere, P.B. and Behere, A.P. 2008. Farmer‟s suicide in Vidarbha region of

Maharashtra state: A myth or reality. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 50(2), 124-127.

11. Bharathan, G. 2000. Bt-Cotton in India: Anatomy of a Controversy. Current Science,

79(8), 1067-1075.

12. Browning, S.R., Westneat, S.C., McKnight, R.H. 2008. Suicides among farmers in

three southeastern states, 1990-1998. J Agric Saf Health, 14(4), 461-742.

13. Brunetti, J. 1999. The soul of soil: basics for beginners. Presented at the

Pennsylvania association for sustainable agriculture‟s farming for the future

conference, 13 February 1999, state college, P.A.

14. Bunsha, D. 2001. A Can of Bollworms. Frontline, 18(24), November 24-Dec 7.

15. Bunsha, D. 2007. In Vibrant Gujarat. Frontline, Dec 24.

16. Bunsha, D. 2007. Mirage in Vidarbha. Frontline, August 10.

17. CACP. 2004. Report of the Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices,

Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices, Ministry of Agriculture, New Delhi.

18. Causes of farmers suicides in Maharashtra: an enquiry. Final report submitted to the

Mumbai high court. 2005. Tata Institute of Social Science. India.

19. CCI. 2008. 38th

Annual Report -2007-08. Cotton Corporation of India Ltd., Govt. of

India. Kapas Bhavan, Navi Mumbai-400 614

20. Chand, R. 2006. India‟s Agricultural Challenges and Their Implication for Growth

and Equity. Seminar on Perspectives on Equitable Development: International

Experience and What Can India Learn? Centre for Economic and Social Studies,

Hyderabad, January 7-9.

47

21. Chowdhury, A.N., Banerjee, S., Brahma, A. and Weiss, M.G. 2007. Pesticide

practices and suicide among farmers of the sundarban region in India. Food Nutr

Bull. 2007 28(2 Suppl), S381-391.

22. Daniel, A.R.; Sridhar, K.; Ambadipudi, A.; Lanting, H.; Brenchandran. 2005. Case

study on organic versus conventional cotton in Karim nagar,Andhra Pradesh, India.

Second International Symposium on Biocontrol of Arthropods Davos, Switzerland.

23. Darling, M.L. 1925. Punjab Peasant in Prosperity and Debt. Oxford University Press,

London.

24. Das, T.K. 2008. Causes and implications of indebtness among marginal farmers cum

agricultural labourers of Assam-a case study of Barpeta district. In Agrarian crises,

farmer’s suicides, livelihood security of rural labour in India. Volume II. Livelihood

security issues and resolutions. (ed. K.K. Bagchi,). Abhijeet Publications, New

Delhi. Pp 196-222.

25. Deshpande R.S 2003. Suicide by Farmers in Karnataka: Agrarian Distress and

Possible Alleviatory Steps. Economic and Political Weekly, 37 (26), 2601-2610.

26. Deshpande, R.S. 2002. Suicide by Farmers in Karnataka: Agrarian Distress and

Possible Alleviatory Steps. Economic and Political Weekly, 37(26), June 29, 2601-

10.

27. Deshpande, R.S. 2002. Suicides by Farmers in Karnataka: Agrarian Distress and

Possible Alleviatory Steps. Economic and Political Weekly, 37(26), June 29, 2601-

2610.

28. Deshpande, V. 2006. Farmers‟ suicides: a media perspective a view of main factors

leading to Vidarbha‟s agrarian crisis. Suicide of Farmers in Maharashtra:

Background Papers. Submitted to the Government of Maharashtra. Pp 85-98.

29. Dhandekar, A., Narwade, S., Rathod, R. and Satteppya, Y.D. 2005. Indian

agriculture and farmers‟ suicides: some issues. Financing Agriculture, 37(3), July.

30. Dong, H., Li, W., Tang, W. and Zhang, D. 2004. Development of Hybrid Bt-Cotton

in China: A Successful Integration of Transgenic Technology and Conventional

Techniques‟, Current Science, 86(6), 778-82.

31. Dorin, B. 1999. Food policy and nutritional security: unequal access to lipids in

India. Economic and Political Weekly, June 26, 1709-17187.

32. Durkheim, E. 1952. Suicide: A Study in Sociology. Routledge and Kegan Paul,

London.

33. Gill, A. and Kaur, G. 2004. Informal Agrarian Credit Markets and Public Policy:

Empirical Evidence from Punjab. The Global Journal of Finance and Economics,

1(2).

34. Gill, A. and Singh, L. 2006. Farmers‟ Suicides and Response of Public Policy:

Evidence, Diagnosis and Alternatives from Punjab. Economic and Political Weekly,

June 30, 2762-2768.

35. Gill, Anita 2000. Rural Credit Markets: Financial Sector Reforms and the Informal

Lenders, Deep and Deep Publishers, New Delhi.

36. GoI. 1998. Report of the High Level Committee on Indebtedness among Farmers of

Punjab and Haryana. Ministry of Agriculture, New Delhi.

37. GoI. 2002. Agricultural Statistics at a Glance, Directorate of Economics and

Statistics, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, New Delhi.

48

38. GoI. 2005. Millennium Development Goals: India Country report 2005. Ministry of

Statistics and Programme Implementation. Central Statistical Organization, New

Delhi.

39. Gokhale, Y., Gadgil, M., Gupta, A., Sinha, R. and Achar, K.P. 2006. Managing

People‟s Knowledge: An Indian Case Study of Building Bridges from Local to

Global and from Oral to Scientific Knowledge, in Bridging Scales and Knowledge

Systems: Concepts and Applications in Ecosystem Assessment (Eds., Walter V.Reid,

Fikret Berkes, Thomas Wilbanks and Doris Capistrano), Washington, London,

Covelo, Island Press, Chapter 13, p.241-253

40. Gupta A.K, 2003. Unrecognized Foods, unrewarded diversity: Linking food,

nutrition and health of ecosystems and communities, CFTRI, Mysore, 2003.

41. Gupta, 1989. Initiatives and Innovations for Making Banking Accessible to Poor in

Backward Regions, Presented at National Seminar on Poverty Control Through Self-

Help at NIBM, Pune, April 10-12 1989, p 45.

42. Gupta, A.K 1982. Drought-Deficit-Indebtedness: Deprivational and Developmental

Alternatives before small Farmer p.79, 1981 included in “SFAA” Annual Meet 1982

Symposium, „Coping with Scarcity‟ in International Agricultural Development,

SFAA, March 10-14, 1982, Lexington, Kentucky, USA. -- C5

43. Gupta, A.K 1983. Impoverishment in Drought Prone Regions: A view from within:

(Joint field study SDC/NABARD/IIM-A) CMA, IIM, Ahmedabad, 1983, p.573. --

D8

44. Gupta, A.K 1984. Agenda for Research in Dry Regions: Socio- ecological

perspective, IIM Working Paper No.537, November, 1984.

45. Gupta, A.K 1985. Socio-Ecological Paradigm for Analyzing Problems of Poor in

Dry Regions, Ecodevelopment News, (Paris) No.32-33, March 1985,pp 68-74.

46. Gupta, A.K Drought and Deprivation: Socio-Ecology Of Stress, Survival and

Surrender, Seminar on Control of Drought Desertification and Famine, IIC, New

Delhi; IIM-Bangalore; INTACH, May 1986 and revised draft at World Congress of

Sociology, New Delhi, 1986. G3

47. Gupta, A.K. 1981a. A Note on Internal Resource Management in Arid Regions

Small Farmers-Credit Constraints: A Paradigm, Agricultural Systems (UK), 1981,

Vol.7 (4) 157-161.

48. Gupta, A.K. 1981b. Monitoring of Rural Projects Through People‟s Participation,

Ekistics, 1981, 291, pp.434-442 extended version published as Social Effects of

Rural Projects Monitoring Through People‟s Participation, in International Review

of Administrative Sciences, No.3, 1981, Vol.XLVII, pp.241-251.

49. Gupta, A.K. 1981. Viable Projects for Unviable Farmers - An Action Research

Enquiry into the structure and Processes of Rural Poverty in Arid Regions,

Symposium on Rural Development in South Asia, IUAES Inter Congress,

Amsterdam, 1981. -- B7

50. Gupta, A.K. 1982. Seasonality, Stratification and Staying on Process in Semi-Arid

Regions” June 1982, IIM Working Paper No.428.

51. Gupta, A.K. 1985. Rediscovering the lost goals: a participatory institution building

exercise involving a voluntary agency in a dry region, IIM-Mimeo, 1985.

52. Gupta, A.K. 1987. Organising and Managing the Poor Client Responsive Research

System: Can Tail Wag the Dog? Paper presented in a Workshop on Farmers and

Agricultural Research: Complementary Methods, Institute of Development Studies

49

at the University of Sussex, U.K., 26-31 July, 1987. Presented at International

Advisory Committee of ISNAR, meeting on-farm Client oriented Research at the

Hague, Oct.

53. Gupta, A.K. 1989. The Design of Resource-delivery Systems: A Socio-ecological

Perspective, Int. Studies of Management and Organization, Vol-18, no-4.pp 64-82,

1989. – J12

54. Gupta, A.K. 1991a. Banking For Rural Transformation: Issues for the Nineties. IIM,

Ahmedabad. W.P. No.886, 1990. p.47, National Seminar on Banking, IDS Jaipur.

Published in Rural Credit: Issues for the Nineties (Ed.Surjeet Singh, IDS, Jaipur),

Oxford & IBH Publishing Co.Pvt.Ltd.

55. Gupta, A.K. 1991b. Drought, Deprivation and Sustainable Development: Why are

the Public Policies so weak?,April 1991, IIMA Working Paper No.931. An earlier

version was invited for contribution for Engineering Science Section, 78th Indian

Science Congress, Indore, Jan 3 - 8, 1991.

56. Gupta, A.K. 1994a. Indicators as Indigenous Ecological Knowledge: „Lamp Posts‟,

„Crossroads‟ and „Turning Points‟, paper presented at International Workshop on

Indicators, IDRC, Uganda, 1994 – N38.

57. Gupta, A.K. 1994b. Transferring Science For Development and Diffusion of

Technology: Agenda For Recasting Extension Science Research For

Drylands/Rainfed Regions. IIM, Ahmedabad. October 1989, P 45., also presented at

International Conference in „Making the Link‟, ISNAR, The Hague, November

1989, Excerpts published in Indian Farming; published under the title, Development

and Diffusion of Technology: Recasting Extension Science for Drylands, in Dryland

Farming in India: Constraints and Challenges, (Ed.) Dr.J.L.Raina, Jaipur, 1994, pp

No.310-340.

58. Gupta, A.K. 1995a. Grassroots to creativity: building upon people‟s knowledge:

Background paper for a workshop organised for the top management of International

fund for agricultural development (IFAD), Rome, April 1995.

59. Gupta, A.K. 1995b. Suggested Ethical Guidelines for Accessing and Exploring

Biodiversity - A Pew Conservation Scholars Initiative, October 21, 1994 (A

collective effort of Pew Conservation Scholars based on three background notes

including G 16 and G 17), published in Eubios Journal of Asian and International

Bioethics 5 (Japan), March 1995, pp.38-40.

60. Gupta, A.K. 1996a. Accessing biological dievsrity and associative knowledge: can

ethics influence equity. IIM-A WP No. 1340, Nov., India.

61. Gupta, A.K. 1996b. Patents of Neem: will they deprive Indian Farmers of their right

to use it as a pesticide. 15 Biotechnology Law Report, Number 1, January-February.

62. Gupta, A.K. 1997. Managing Ecological Diversity, Simultaneity, Complexity and

Change: An Ecological Perspective. W.P.No. 825. IIM Ahmedabad. P 115, 1989,

Third survey on Public Administration, Indian Council of Social Science Research,

New Delhi. Published in “A Public Survey of Research in Public Administration,

1980-1990 (Ed.V.A.Pai Panandiker), 1997, pp.431-495.

63. Gupta, A.K. 2001. Proceedings of the International Training Workshop, "Criteria

and Indicators of Sustainability in Rural Development: A Natural Resource

Perspective." New Delhi and Calcutta: Oxford & IBH Publishing Co.Pvt.Ltd., 2001,

424 p.

50

64. Gupta, A.K. 2003. Rewarding conservation of biological and genetic resources and

associate traditional knowledge and contemporary grassroots creativity. IIM-A WP

No. 2003-01-06, India.

65. Gupta, A.K. 2006. Is a just system also fair? Traversing the domain of knowledge,

institutions, culture and ethics. Published in “Who Owns Knowledge? Knowledge

and the Law” (Eds. Nico Stehr and Bernd Weiler), London, Transaction Publishers,

2008, p.87 – 97, presented at the International Conference on Is Knowledge

Justiciable? Essen, Germany, 21 – 23 March, 2005, IIMA W.P.No: 2006-04-05

66. Gupta, A.K. 2007a. From Farmers‟ First to Labourers‟ First: Why do we still know

so little? Presented at the Workshop on Farmer First Revisited: Farmer Participatory

Research and Development Twenty Years on, 12-14 December 2007, Institute of

Development Studies, University of Sussex, London

67. Gupta, A.K. 2007b. Learning from creative people: scouting and documentation of

grassroots innovations and traditional knowledge. Paper presented at the APCCT

Conference on scouting and documentation, June 4-5, Nanjing, China.

68. Gupta, A.K. 2008a. G2G - Grassroots to Global: The Knowledge Rights of Creative

Communities, keynote lecture delivered at Globalization and Justice Conference,

Seattle University, USA, February 21, 2008.

69. Gupta, A.K. 2008b. Meeting the unmet needs of the majority: A grassroots

innovation perspective from Honey Bee Network, presentation made at the Inter-

American Development Bank Annual Meeting on April 5, 2008 in Miami, USA.

70. Gupta, A.K. 2008c. Rethinking the Priorities for Indian Agricultural Research,

Institutions and Policy: Learning from the Grassroots, Dr. B.P.Pal Memorial

Lecture delivered at Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi on 24th May

2008.

71. Gupta, A.K. and Chandak, V. 2004. Agricultural biotechnology in India: Business

and Politics. Paper presented at the international workshop on Agricultural

Biotechnology in the developing world: perceptions, politics and policies. Swiss

Federal Institute of technology, Zurich. 12 March, pp 22.

72. Gupta, A.K. and George, A. 2007. Building capacity at community level for

protecting the intellectual property rights in genetic resources and associated

knowledge systems and cultural expressions, presented in the roundtable on Building

Community Capacity: A Roundtable on Practical Initiatives on Intellectual Property

and Traditional Cultural Expressions, Traditional Knowledge and Genetic

Resources, organised by WIPO, Geneva, 10-12 December 2007, Geneva

73. Gupta, A.K. and Patil, S.T. and Singh, R. 1992. Designing an Accessible &

Accountable Administrative System: Why Do Not People Protest? - A Case Study

of Grievance Redressal Cell in a Drought-prone District, CMA Monograph 153,

Oxford-IBH, New Delhi.

74. Gupta, A.K. and Shroff, M. 1987. Rural Credit: How Do the Poor See It? Vikalpa,

Vol.12(4), October, December, 1987.

75. Gupta, A.K. and Shroff, M. 1990 Rural Banking: Learning to Unlearn - An Action

Research Enquiry, New Delhi: Oxford &IBH, 1990.

76. Gupta, A.K. Indigenous knowledge: Ways of knowing, feeling and doing, mimeo.

77. Gupta, A.K., Ramakrishnan, P.S. and Malhotra, K.C. 2001. An Operational

Framework for Developing Indicators of Sustainability, published in the book,

Criteria and Indicators of Sustainability in Rural Development: A Natural Resource

51

Perspective. New Delhi and Calcutta: Oxford & IBH Publishing Co.Pvt.Ltd., 2001,

pp. 421 – 424.

78. Gupta, A.K. 1983b. Credit Arrangements for Drought Prone Regions: Policy

Prescriptions and Planners‟ Reaction, September 1983, IIM Working Paper No.478,

background paper for National Seminar organised by NABARD on author‟s research

findings.

79. Gupta, A.K., Capoor, J. and Shah, R.N. 1990. Inventory of Peasant Innovations for

Sustainable Development- an annotated bibliography on Farmers: Innovations from

all over the world, Presented at International symposium on Sustainability, ISA, New

Delhi , Feb,

80. Hanamaratti, N. G., Prashanthi, S. K., Salimath, P. M., Hanchinal, R. R.,

Mohankumar, H. D., Parameshwarappa, K. G.and Raikar, S. D. 2008. Traditional

land races of rice in Karnataka: Reservoirs of valuable Traits. Current Science,

94(2), 242-247.

81. Harrington, L. and Olaf, E. 2005. Conservation agriculture and resource conserving

technologies – A global perspective. In Conservation Agriculture – Status and

Prospects (eds Abrol, I. P., Gupta, R. K. and Mallik, R. K.), Centre for Advancement

of Sustainable Agriculture, New Delhi, 2005, pp. 1–12.

82. Hebber, R. 2007. Human security and the case of farmers‟ suicides in India: an

exploration. Paper presented in a panel on rethinking development in a conference

on mainstreaming human security –an Asian perspective, October 3-4, 2007,

Chulalong Korn University, Bangkok.

83. Horrigan, L., Lawrence, R.S. and Walker, P. 2002. How sustainable agriculture can

address the environmental and human health harms of industrial agriculture. Environ

Health Prespect, 110, 445-456.

84. Huang, J., Hu, R., Fan, C., Pray, C.E. and Rozelle, S. 2002. Bt-Cotton Benefits,

Costs, and Impacts in China. AgBioForum, 5(4), 153-66.

85. India – National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), Report, International Institute of

Population Sciences, Mumbai, 2000–04.

86. Ismael, Y., Bennett, R. and Morse, S. 2002. Benefits from Bt-Cotton Use by

Smallholder Farmers in South Africa‟, AgBioForum, 5(1), pp 1-5.

87. Iyengar, S. and Lalitha, N. 2002. Bt-Cotton in India: Controversy Visited. Indian

Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57(3), July-September, 459-66.

88. Iyer, G.K. and Manick, M.S. 2000. Indebtedness, Impoverishment and Suicides in

Rural Punjab, Indian Publishers and Distributors, Delhi.

89. Iyer, K.G. 1999. Impoverisation, Indebtedness and Suicides in Rural Punjab. Action

Aid, Bangalore.

90. Jathar, D. 2008. Grapes of Wrath, after Vidarbha, of Maharashtra turn suicidal. The

Week, January, 27.

91. Jathar, D. 2008. Last Straw: Ineligibility for loan waiver drives more than 100

Vidarbha farmers to suicide. The Week, May, 4.

92. Jayaraman, K. S. 2001. Illegal Bt-Cotton in India Haunts Regulators. Nature

Biotechnology, 19(12), 1090.

93. Jayaraman, K. S. 2004. India Produces Homegrown GM Cotton. Nature

Biotechnology, 22(3), 255-56.

52

94. Kannan, K.P. and Pushpangadan, K. 1988. Agricultural Stagnation in Kerala.

Economic and Political weekly, September 24, A-120-A-128.

95. Koppikar, S. 2008. Saving Vidarbha: Maharashtra works on supplementary waiver

package for this crisis-hit region. Outlook, March 24.

96. Kumar, P. and Sharma, S.L. 1998. Suicides in Rural in Punjab. Institute for

Development and Communication, Chandigarh.

97. Kurup, K.K.N. 2006. Agriculture Debt and Suicides in Wayanad. Deshabhimani,

Onam Special Issue, 175-177.

98. Maitra, P.K. 2007. No end to the Vidarbha farmer‟s problems: 50 percent defaulted

on loans, 4 more end life. Hindustan Times, Tuesday, July 3.

99. Malhan, I.V. and Rao, S. 2007. Impact of globalization and emerging information

communication technologies on agricultural knowledge transfer to small farmers in

India. World library and information congress: 73rd IFLA General conference and

Council, 19-23 August 2007, Durban, South Africa.

100. Mann, J.J. 2003. Neurobiology of suicidal behaviour. Nature Reviews Neuroscience,

4, 819-828.

101. Masroni, R., Miesch, A.T, Crawford, M.D. and Hamilton, E.I. 1973. Geochemical

environment and cardiovascular disease. PAHO Bulletin, 7(3), 53-64.

102. Mayee, C.D., Singh, P., Dongre, A. B., Rao, M.R.K. and Raj, S. 2002. Transgenic

Bt-Cotton. Central Institute For Cotton Research, Nagpur, July 20, pp 1-30.

103. Menon, M. 2008. More suicides in Vidarbha region. The Hindu. April, 15.

104. Menon, M. 2008. Vidarbha farmers are still in red: PM package provide little relief.

The Hindu, January 13.

105. Miller, B.A. 1993. Rural Distress and Survival: The School and the Importance of

Community. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 1993, 9 (2), 84-103.

106. Mishra, S. 2006a. Farmers Suicides in Maharashtra. Economic and Political Weekly,

41(16), 1538-1545.

107. Mishra, S. 2006b. Suicides of farmers‟ in Maharashtra. Report submitted to the

Government of Maharashtra. Indira Gandhi Institute of Development research,

Mumbai, India. January 26.

108. Mishra, S. 2006c. Farmers‟ Suicides in Vidarbha, Mahrashtra, in Alternative Survey

Group Alternative Economic Survey, India 2005-06: Disempowering Masses, Danish

Books, Delhi.

109. Mishra, S. 2006d Suicides in India: Some Observations, in K. S. Bhat and S. Vijaya

Kumar (eds.) Undeserved Death: A Study on Suicide of Farmers in Andhra Pradesh

(2000-2005), Council for Social Development, Hyderabad.

110. Mishra, S. 2007. Risks, farmer‟s suicides and agrarian crises in India: is there a way

out. Indira Gandhi Institute of Development research, Mumbai, India. Working paper

No. WP-2007-014.

111. Mohankumar, S. and Sharma, R.K. 2006. Analysis of Farmer Suicides in Kerala.

Economic and Political Weekly, 41, 1553-1558.

112. Mohanty, B.B. 2005. We are Like the Living Dead: Farmers Suicides in

Maharashtra, Western India. Journal of Peasant Studies, 32(2), 243-276.

113. Mohanty, B.B. and Shroff, S. 2004. Farmers‟ Suicides in Maharashtra. Economic

and Political Weekly, December 25, 5599-5607.

53

114. Nair K.N., Vinod, C.P. and Menon, V. 2007. Agrarian Distress and Livelihood

Strategies: A Study in Pulpalli Panchyat,Wayand District, Kerala. Working Paper

No., 396. Centre for Development Studies, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.

115. Nair, K.N. and Menon, V. 2007. Distress debt and suicides among agrarian

households: Findings from three village Studies in Kerala. Working Paper-397.

Centre for Developmental Studies, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.

116. Nair, K.N. and Ramakumar, R. 2007. Agrarian Distress and Rural Livelihoods: A

Study in Upputhara Panchayat, Idukki District, Kerala. Working Paper No., 392.

Centre for Development Studies, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.

117. Nair, K.P.P. 2007. Zinc: more than a micronutrient. The Hindu, Business Line,

Friday, June 29.

118. Narayanamoorthy, A. and Kalamkar, S.S. 2006. Is Bt-Cotton Cultivation

Economically Viable for Indian Farmers? An Empirical Analysis. Economic and

Political Weekly, June 30, 2716-2724.

119. National Commission on farmer‟s (finding and recommendations) Consortium of

Farmer‟s Associations. New Delhi. http:/www.indianfarmers.com.

120. National Institute of Nutrition (NIN). 2003. Annual Report 2002-03. Hyderabad,

India.

121. National Sample Survey Organisation. 2005. Some Aspects of Farming, Situation

Assessment Survey of Farmers, Report No 496; Indebtedness of Farmer Households,

Situation Assessment Survey of Farmers, Report No 498; Household Assets and

Liabilities in India, Report No 500, Ministry of Statistics and Programme

Implementation, Government of India, New Delhi.

122. Padmaja, V. and Kaur, G. 2001. Use of Fungus Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuill

(Moniliales: Deuteromycetes) for controlling termites. Current Science, 81(6), 645-

647.

123. Panda, R. 2008. Growth of Indian Agriculture: a great dilemma of new economic

policy. In Agrarian crises, farmer’s suicides, livelihood security of rural labour in

India. Volume II. Livelihood security issues and resolutions. (ed. K.K. Bagchi,).

Abhijeet Publications, New Delhi.

124. Paper gives insight about the scope and potential of biopesticides against the

chemical substitutes. Biopesticides and biofertilizers are briefly discussed.

125. Parthasarathy, G. and Shameem. 1998. Suicides of Cotton Farmers in A.P: An

Exploratory Study. Economic and Political Weekly, 33 (13), 720-726.

126. Patil, R.R. 2002. An investigative report on circumstances leading to death among

Indian cotton farmers. Int J Occup Med Environ Health, 15(4), 405-407.

127. Pattnayak, S. 2006. Vidarbha farmers: genocide not suicide. Sunday September 6.

http:/www.saswat.com/blog/vidarbha_farmers_genicide.html.

128. Prasad, R. 2005. Organic farming vis-à-vis modern agriculture. Current Science,

89(2), 252-254.

129. Pray, C., Ma, D., Huang, J. and Qiao, F. 2001. Impact of Bt-Cotton in China‟, World

Development, Vol 29, No 5, 813-25.

130. Prevent widespread suicides of farmer‟s.

http:/www.acpp.org/uappeals/uaupdate/2004/up041008089.html.

131. Qaim, M. and Zilberman, D. 2003. Yield Effects of Genetically Modified Crops in

Developing Countries. Science, 299, 900-902.

54

132. Rabade, P. 2004. 22 Maharashtra Farmers Commit Suicide. Deccan Herald, July 18.

133. Radhakrishna, R. and Ravi, C. 2004. Malnutrition in India: Trends and

Determinants. Economic and Political Weekly, Vol 39(7), February 14, pp 671-76.

134. Rai, M. 2005. Employment generation through entrepreneurship development in

agriculture. Financing Agriculture, 37(2).

135. Ramalingaswamy, V., Jonsson, U. and Rhode, J. 1996. The Asian enigma. The

process of nations, UNICEF. Pp 11-17.

136. Ramannam, A. 2006. Farmers‟ Rights in India: A Case Study. The Fridtjof Nansen

Institute, Norway. FNI report 6/2006.

137. Rao, P.N. and Suri, K.C. 2006. Dimensions of Agrarian Distress in Andhra Pradesh.

Economic and Political Weekly, April 22, 1546-1551.

138. Rao, S.S. 2006. Indigenous knowledge organization: an Indian scenario.

International Journal of Information Management, 26, 224-233.

139. Rao, V.M. and Gopalappa, D.V. 2004. Agricultural Growth and Farmer Distress:

Tentative Perspectives from Karnataka. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(52),

5591-5598.

140. Reddy, S. et al. 1998. Gathering Agrarian Crisis-Farmers‟ Suicides in Warangal

District (AP), Citizens report, Voluntary Organisations of Warangal.

141. Reddy, S.A. and Rao, B.V. 1998. Gathering Agrarian Crisis: Farmers‟ Suicides in

Warangal District. Citizens‟ Report, Warangal.

142. Reddy, V.R. and Galab, S. 2006. Agrarian crisis: Looking beyond the Debt Trap.

Economic and Political Weekly May 13, 1838-1841.

143. Reijntjes, C. and Haverkort, B. and Waters-Bayer, A. 1992. Farming for the future:

An introduction to low-external input and sustainable agriculture. London:

Macmillan.

144. Revathi, E. 1998. Farmers‟ Suicide: Missing Issues‟, Economic and Political

Weekly, May 16.

145. Ritambhara Hebbar , R. 2007. Human Security and the Case of Farmers‟ Suicides in

India: An Exploration. Paper presented in a panel on Rethinking Development in a

Conference on „Mainstreaming Human Security- an Asian Perspective‟ (October 3-

4, 2007) organised by Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok.

146. Sagar, R.V. and Chandra, K.S. 2003. Farmers‟ Suicides in Andhra Pradesh and

Karnataka. Centre for Social Development, National Institute of Rural Development,

Hyderabad.

147. Sahai, S 2002. Bt-Cotton: Confusion Prevails. EPW Commentary. Economic and

Political Weekly, May 25.

148. Sahai, S. 2002. Bt cotton: confusion prevails. Economic and Political Weekly, May,

25.

149. Sahai, S. 2002a. The Bt-Cotton Case. Economic and Political Weekly, 37(18), April

20, 15-17.

150. Sahai, S. 2002b. Bt-Cotton: Confusion Prevails. Economic and Political Weekly,

37(4), May 25, 1973-74.

151. Sahai, S. and Rahman, S. 2003. Performance of Bt-Cotton: Data from First

Commercial Crop‟, Economic and Political Weekly, 38(30), July 26, 3139-41.

55

152. Sahai, S. and Rehman, S. 2004. Bt-cotton 2003-04: field swamped with illegal

variants. Economic and Political Weekly, 2673-2674.

153. Sahu, B.K. 2008. Agrarian distress and indebtness in Orissa: nature, dimension and

people resilience. In Agrarian crises, farmer’s suicides, livelihood security of rural

labour in India. Volume II. Livelihood security issues and resolutions. (ed. K.K.

Bagchi,). Abhijeet Publications, New Delhi. Pp 155-195

154. Sainath, P. 2007. Farm suicides rising, most intense in 4 States. The Hindu, 12

November.

155. Sainath, P. 2007. The farm crisis: why have over one lakh framers killed themselves

in the past decade? The Hindu. Speaker‟s lecture series: Parliament House, Sept, 6.

156. Sainath, P. 2008. Broad trends remain dismal; Maharashtra crosses 4,000-mark.

http://www.hindu.com/2008/12/12/stories/2008121257740100.html.

157. Sainath, P. 2008. Oh! What a Lovely Waiver‟, The Hindu, March 10.

158. Sainath, P. Vidarbha: packaging an anniversary. The Hindu, Friday, August 31,

2007.

159. Sandmann, L.R. 1988. Why economic development is not enough: Need for a

comprehensive community approach to assist distressed communities. ERIC

Document Reproduction Service No. ED 304 544.

160. Sangar, S. and Abrol, I. P., 2005. Conservation agriculture for transition to

sustainable agriculture. Current Science, 88, 686–687.

161. Sangar, S., Abrol, I. P. and Gupta Raj, K. 2005. Conservation agriculture: conserving

resources and enhancing productivity. Conference report, 22–23 September 2004,

Centre for Advancement of Sustainable Agriculture, New Delhi. pp. 19.

162. Satish, P. 2006. Institutional Credit, Indebtedness and Suicides in Punjab. Economic

and Political Weekly, June 30, 2754-2761.

163. Schrauzer, G.N. 2002. Lithium: Occurrence, dietary intake, nutritional essentiality. J.

American College of Nutrition, 21(1), 14-21.

164. Sengupta, J. 2008. Why framers commit suicides. The Tribune. New Delhi,

Saturday, February 16.

165. Shah, T. 2004. Water and Welfare Critical Issues in India‟s Water Future. Economic

and Political Weekly March 20, 1211-1213

166. Shameem, G.P. 1998. Suicides of cotton farmers in Andhra Pradesh. Economic and

political Weekly, March 28, 720-726.

167. Shanti, G. 2006. Food Dole or Health, Nutrition and Development Programme,

Economic and Political Weekly, Vol XLV, No 34, August 26, pp 3364-65.

168. Sharma, M.K. 2001. Bt-Cotton Biosafety: A Case Study. Relevance of Genetically

Modified Plants to Indian Agriculture, 161-62.

169. Sharma, V.P. 1998. Cotton Production in India: Performance, Prospects and

Constraints. Productivity, 39(3), 483-98.

170. Shergill, H.S. 1998. Rural Credit and Indebtedness in Punjab. Institute for

Development and Communication, Chandigarh.

171. Shetty, P.K. 1999. Ecological Crisis and Agrarian Distress in Bidar‟, National

Institute of Advanced Studies Report R6-99, Bangalore.

56

172. Shiva, V., Emani, A. and Jafri, A.H. 1999. Globalisation and Threat to Seed

Security: Case of Transgenic Cotton Trials in India. Economic and Political Weekly,

34(10), March 6-13, 601-613.

173. Shivakumar, A.K. 2007. Why Are Levels of Child Malnutrition Not Improving?

Economic and Political Weekly, Vol XLII, No 15, April 14, pp 1337-45.

174. Simkin, S., Hawton, K., Yip, P.S., Yam, C.H. 2003. Seasonality in suicide: a study

of farming suicides in England and Wales. Crisis. 24(3), 93-7.

175. Singh, R. V. 2002. India‟s Green Light to Bt-Cotton Opens up a Whole New Can of

Worms. Down to Earth, 10(23), April 30, 7-9.

176. Singh, S. 2000. Crisis in Punjab agriculture. Economic and Political Weekly, 35(23).

177. Singh, S. 2005. Changing structure of agriculture and small industries in India.

NIRD foundation day seminar, Rural Development and Social Change. 9-10

November.

178. Sivakumar, B. 2003. Assessment of vitamin a status. In “Proc. IX Asian Congress of

Nutrition: Nutrition goals for Asia-Vision 2020”, held on Feb‟23-27, 2003 at New

Delhi, Nutrition Foundation of India. PP 297-308, 2003.

179. Sridhar, V. 2006. Why Do Farmers Commit Suicide? The Case of Andhra Pradesh.

Economic and Political Weekly, April 22, 1559-1605,

180. Srijit Mishra, S., Shroff, S., Shah, D., Kulkarni, A. P., Deshpande, V. and Bhatkule,

P. R. 2006. Suicide of Farmers in Maharashtra Background Papers (Submitted to the

Government of Maharashtra). Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research,

Mumbai. 26 January 2006.

181. Stark, C., Gibbs, D., Hopkins, P., Belbin, A., Hay, A. and Selvaraj S. 2006. Suicide

in farmers in Scotland. Rural Remote Health, 6(1), 509.

182. Suri, K,C. 2006. Political Economy of Agrarian Distress. Economic and Political

Weekly, April 22, 1523-1529

183. Swaminathan, M.S. 2007. Dealing with the agrarian crisis.

http://www.thehindu.com/2007/05/28/stories/2007052802081000.htm. 28 May.

184. Talule, T. and Rasal, O. 2008. How Can Post Reforms Neglect of Agriculture And

Farmers Suicides Assure Rural Economic Sustainability in India? IGNOU,

International Conference, 2008.

185. Tarun, G. 2006. Hidden Hunger: The Problem and Possible Interventions, Economic

and Political Weekly, Vol XLV, No 34, August 26, pp 3666-70.

186. The political economy of farmer‟s suicides. Centre for Environment and Food

Security. http:/www.cefindia.org.

187. Thirtle, C., Irz, X., Lin, L., Mckenzie-Hill, V. and Wiggins, S. 2001. Relationship

between changes in agricultural productivity and the incidence of poverty in

developing countries. DFID Report No. 7946, February 27.

188. Thomas, H.V., Lewis, G., Thomas, D.R., Salmon, R.L., Chalmers, R.M., Coleman,

T.J., Kench, S.M., Morgan-Capner, P., Meadows, D., Sillis, M. and Softley, P. 2003.

Mental health of British farmers. Occup Environ Med, 60(3), 181-186.

189. Times of India. 2007. 3 farmers commit suicide in Vidarbha. Nov. 1.

http:/www.timesofindia.com/articleshow/msid-2508330,prtpage-1.cms.

57

190. TISS. 2005. Causes of Farmer Suicides in Maharashtra: AN ENQUIRY, Final

Report Submitted to the Mumbai High Court, MARCH 15, 2005. Tata Institute of

Social Sciences, Rural Campus, Tuljapur, Dist. Osmanabad.

191. Vaidyanathan, A. 2006. Farmers‟ Suicides and the Agrarian Crisis. Economic and

Political Weekly, September 23, 4009-4014.

192. Vaidyanathan, A. 2006. Farmers‟ suicides and agrarian crisis. Economic and

Political Weekly, 41(38), 4009-4013.

193. Vaidyanathan, A. 2008. „Farm Loan Waiver: A Closer Look and Critique‟, The

Hindu, March 6.

194. Vanitha, K. and Kumar, D. 2008. Agrarian crisis in Indian Agriculture. In Agrarian

crises, farmer’s suicides, livelihood security of rural labour in India. Volume II.

Livelihood security issues and resolutions. (ed. K.K. Bagchi,). Abhijeet Publications,

New Delhi. Pp 94-107.

195. Vasavi, A.R. 1999. Agrarian Distress in Bidar Market, State and Suicides. Economic

and Political Weekly, August 7, 2263-2268.

196. Vasavi, A.R. 1999. Agrarian Distress in Bidar: Market, State and Suicides.

Economic and Political Weekly, April

197. Vasavi, A.R. 1999. Agrarian Distress: Market, State and Suicides. Economic and

Political Weekly, 34(32), April 7, 2263-68.

198. Vidarbha Jan Andolan Samiti. 2007. Farmers commit suicide as Indian PM asks for

economic equity. Thursday, May 24.

http:/www.andolan.bolgspot.com/2007/05/farmers-commit-suicides-as-Indian-

pm.html.

199. Vidarbha Jan Andolan Samiti. 2007a. Dying cotton fields in India: Vidarbha being

first eviction of the crisis. Study and report on cotton scenario.

http:/www.andolan.bolgspot.com/2007/07/5000-farms-suicides-in-vidarbha-

hindu.html.

200. Vidarbha Jan Andolan. 2007b. President of India Dr. A.P.J. Kalam meets Vidarbha

farm widows. Tuesday, July 03.

http:/www.andolan.bolgspot.com/2007/07/president-of-Indiadrapjkalam-meets.html.

201. Vidarbha Jan Andolan. 2007c. Six more framers commit suicide. Thursday, July, 05.

http:/www.andolan.bolgspot.com/2007/07/5000-farms-suicides-in-vidarbha-

hindu.html.

202. Vidarbha Jan Andolan. 2007d. Six more Vidarbha framers commits suicides-vjas

urged prime minister to revisit dying land. Wednesday, July 4.

http:/www.andolan.bolgspot.com/2007/07/six-more-vidarbha-farmers-commits.html.

203. Vijayaraghavan, K. 2003. Diet and nutritional status during drought in India - time

trends. In “Proc. IX Asian Congress of Nutrition: Nutrition goals for Asia-Vision

2020”, held on Feb‟23-27, 2003 at New Delhi, Nutrition Foundation of India. PP

737-745.

204. Vyas, V.S. 2004. Agrarian distress: Strategies to protect vulnerable sections.

Economic and Political Weekly, 39(52), 5576-5581.

205. Warren, D.M. and Rajasekaran, B. (n. a) Putting local knowledge to good use.

International Agricultural Development, 13(4), 8-10.