18
1 government contracting @DHG_GovCon DCMA Guidance Upon Compensation Blending Clarifications, Questions and Concerns Bill Walter, Partner DHG David Eck, Director DHG Issues in Focus Webinar Series

DCMA Blending Guidance Clarifications Questions and ... · Discussion Topics @DHG_GovCon ... (GD vs. USG, 47 Fed Cl. 514) ... DCMA Blending Guidance Clarifications Questions and Concerns

  • Upload
    votram

  • View
    215

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1government contracting

@DHG_GovConDCMA Guidance Upon Compensation Blending Clarifications, Questions and ConcernsBill Walter, Partner DHGDavid Eck, Director DHG

Issues in Focus Webinar Series

2government contracting

@DHG_GovCon@DHG_GovConSpeaker Information

DavidEck,DirectorDHG(703)[email protected]

BillWalter,PartnerDHG(703)[email protected]

@DHG_GovCon

Date:May5th,2016Location:HyattRegencyinTysonswww.dhgllp.com/government-contracting-annual-update

3government contracting

@DHG_GovCon@DHG_GovConDiscussion Topics

• Historyofexecutivecompensationceilings• Priorchallengeswithusingblendedrates• Backgroundofcurrentcompensationceilings• Currentguidanceandpotentialchallenges• Questionsthatneedtobeanswered

4government contracting

@DHG_GovCon@DHG_GovConHistory from the 1990’s• ExComp wasquestionedinmanyDCAAaudits

– Nospecificcapsinregulation– Acaplimitstheamountofcompensationthatcanbeallocated– Acapdoesnotlimittheamountofcompensationacontractorcanpay

• CapswerefirstimplementedthroughDoDappropriationlaws

• FY1995Congressestablishedthefirstcap- $250k– Applicabletotop5executivesateachsegmentofcontractor– FutureNDAA’sintroduceddifferentcaps– in2013- $952k– LawimplementedinFAR31.205-6(p)

• ContractclauseatFAR52.216-7appliestheversionofFAR31.2ineffectatthetimeofcontract

• Retroactiveapplicationabreachofcontract(GDvs.USG,47FedCl.514)

5government contracting

@DHG_GovCon@DHG_GovConPrior Challenges with Using Blended Rates

• DCAAApril2,1997Guidance• ProvidedGuidanceonacceptablemethodsfordealingwithmultiplecompensationcaps

• Allowedfor– MultipleRates– RepresentativeRatewithAdjustments

• BlendedRateMethodwasconsideredunacceptable

6government contracting

@DHG_GovCon@DHG_GovCon2012 Changes to Cap Application

• NDAAFY2012retainedcapmethodbutexpandedapplication– Changedapplicabilityofcompensationcapfromtop5toallcontractoremployees

– Capamountestablishedfor2012($952k)retained– FinalFARRule(5/30/2014)implementednewlawwhichbroadenedapplicabilitytoallemployeesapplicabletoDoD,NASAandtheCoastGuardforcontractsawardedonorafterDecember31,2011

– Retroactiveapplicationisa“bigdeal”– RevisiontoFARapplicabletocontractsawardedafter6/26/2013

7government contracting

@DHG_GovCon@DHG_GovCon2013 Changes

• BipartisanBudgetActof2013:– ReducedthecompcapforDoDandNASAcontractsto$487kwithanannualescalationfactor(ECI)

– InterimFARRule(6/24/2014) implementedstatutorychangeforcontractsawardedonorafterJune24,2014forcompensationcostsincurredonorafterJune24,2014.

– RevisiontoFARonlyapplicabletocontractsawardedafter6/24/2014

8government contracting

@DHG_GovCon@DHG_GovConIn summary…

• Contractorswillbesubjecttomultiplecapsoncurrentcontractssimultaneouslybasedoncontractawarddateandagency:– Before2012:

• AllUSGcontractsenteredintopriorto12/31/11subjectto$763,029capforFY2011and$693,951capforFY2010ontop5employees

– 2012,2013,partial2014(onlysomeagencies):• DoD,NASAandCoastGuardcontractsenteredintoafter12/31/11butbefore

6/24/2014subjectto$952kcaponallemployees($763,029for2011)• Nochangeforciviliancontracts,samerulesasbefore2012

– Partial2014andlater:• AllU.S.GovernmentcontractsenteredintoafterrevisedFARimplementing

BBA(June24,2014)subjectto$487kcaponallemployees

• OFPPhasnotyetpublished2013and2014(priortoJune24)limitations

9government contracting

@DHG_GovCon@DHG_GovConDPAP Pricing Memo

• October24,2014• Recognizedthechallengesofmultiplecompensationcaps

• Objectiveto“simplifycompliancewhilecontinuingtoprotecttheinterestsoftheGovernment”

• Allowedacontractortoproposeablendedrateforinterimbillingandthenforestablishingactualrates

• RequiredadvanceagreementsperFAR31.109• Notmuchtraction

10government contracting

@DHG_GovCon@DHG_GovConImplementing the FAR Provisions

• Potentialforsignificantadministrativeburden(andrelatedcosts)forboththecontractorandthegovernment

• Situationisagreatcandidateforastreamlinedregulatoryimplementationconsistentwithseveralcurrentgovernmentinitiatives– UseofatransitionmethodwillnotcreateanAntiDeficiencyAct

exposurebecausenoneofthecurrentcompcapsisbasedonstatutorylanguagelimitingtheuseofappropriatedfunds(asexistedpriorto1998)

• Industryrecommendsallowingcontractorstouseatransitionalimplementationthroughblendedrates– DoDGuidanceshouldbeissuedexpresslyprovidingforthismethod

• Establishdetails/optionswhichareconsistentacrosscontractors

– RecommendAdvanceAgreements(AA)forcontractorsselectingtheblendedmethod

11government contracting

@DHG_GovCon@DHG_GovConDCMA 1/29/2016 Guidance

• Follow-uptoDPAP10/24/14PricingMemo• GuidancedevelopedincoordinationwithDCAA• Allowsforuseofblendedratesatthecontractorsdiscretion

• Appliestofinaloverheadrates,andinterimbillingandforwardpricingrates

• Contractorrequiredtodemonstrateaccuracyofcalculationsandidentifyuniverseofcontracts

• ContractorsandCO’swill enterintoadvancedagreements.

12government contracting

@DHG_GovCon@DHG_GovConBlended Rate Methodology

• Calculateacompositecapamountforeachyeartobeusedindeterminingthewithdrawalofcomppriortocalculatingtheallowableindirectratestobeappliedtocontracts– Capamountforeachyearwouldbedeterminedbasedupon theweighted

averageoftheUSGbusinessvolumeatthecontractorbeforeandafter6/24/2014

– Therelativepercentagethatthenew$487kcapamountcontributestothecompositecapwould increaseovertimeasthebusinessmixshiftsfromoldcontracts(prior to6/24/14) tonewcontracts(after6/24/14)

– Allowsforanorderly transitionfromoldtonewcapinproportion tothecontractor’sshift inbusinessvolume

– Requiresdevelopmentofonlyonesetofratesandreliesonexistingprocessesatthecontractortoapplytheratestoallcontracts

– ProtectstheinterestsoftheGovernmentwhilekeeping theprocessassimpleaspossible

13government contracting

@DHG_GovCon@DHG_GovConIllustration – Final Rates

YearContractbefore

6/24/14Contractonorafter6/24/14 %old %new

Oldcap($k)

Newcap($k)

Blendedcap($k)

2014 900,000$ 100,000$ 90% 10% 952$ 487$ 906$

FinalOverheadRates

14government contracting

@DHG_GovCon@DHG_GovConIllustration – Forward Pricing

YearBacklogAlready

PricedContractbefore

6/24/14Contractonorafter6/24/14 %old %new

Oldcap($k)

Newcap($k)

Blendedcap($k)

2015 750,000$ 10,000$ 190,000$ 5% 95% 952$ 487$ 510.25$2016 500,000 10,000 490,000 2% 98% 952 487 496.302017 300,000 10,000 740,000 1% 99% 952 487 493.202018 150,000 10,000 840,000 1% 99% 952 487 492.472019 - 10,000 990,000 1% 99% 952 487 491.65

ForwardPricingRates

15government contracting

@DHG_GovCon@DHG_GovConQuestions that need to be answered

• Isblendingacostaccountingchange?• Mustallcontractorsusetheblendedratemethod?

• Istheblendedratealwaysofthe$952,308and$487,000amounts?

• Whichcontractsandsubcontractsareconsidered“affectedcontracts”?

• Howoftenwillblendedcompensationratesbecalculatedbythecontractor?

16government contracting

@DHG_GovCon@DHG_GovConQuestions that need to be answered

• HowareblendedratescalculatedforBasicOrderingAgreementsandIDIQcontracts?

• Howareblendedratescalculatedforcontractmodificationsandcontractoptions?

• WhatcoordinationisneededwithDCAA?• Whencanwestartusingblendedrates?

17government contracting

@DHG_GovCon

Questions?@DHG_GovCon

Issues in Focus Webinar Series

18government contracting

@DHG_GovCon@DHG_GovConJoin Us For..

• “FalseClaimsActCasesBeforetheSupremeCourt”onWednesday,April13th,11:00am

• The21st AnnualGovernmentContractingUpdate- NavigatingtheIssues:ARoadmaptoSuccessonMay5th,alldayCPEevent