Dcdc Converter Simulations

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 Dcdc Converter Simulations

    1/7

    Avaibable online at: www.sci-journals.com

    International Journal of Advanced

    Power Electronics

    www.sci-journals.com

    1 | P a g e

    Science-International Journal of Advanced Power Electronics

    SIMULATION OF BUCK, BOOST AND BUCK-BOOST POWER

    CONVERTERS FOR SOLAR PANEL

    Chandani Sharma1

    , Anamika Jain2

    1Department of Electronics and Communication Engg. Research Scholar, Graphic Era University, Dehradun2Department of Electronics and Communication Engg. Professor, Graphic Era University, Dehradun

    e-mail: [email protected], [email protected]

    Abstract: Power systems design, layout and computation for Photovoltaics forms the basis of nationalaction plan for Solar India. Power switching converters are used in numerous solar based appli cations.The rapid increase in standalone and gr id based structures employ cir cuit regulation using Buck, Boost and

    Buck-Boost Converters. I n th is perspective, electri city generation and supply is requir ed to adapt changes

    relat ive to duty cycle for continuous and discrete time systems. An eff ort is made in thi s paper to visual ize

    potential of converters in meeting global energy requi rements. Analysis of power electronic converters iscarr ied out in continuous and discrete Simu li nk envir onment considering eff ect of phase delay. Duty cycle

    and effi ciency calculations for 60W panel using 36 solar cell s are compared.

    Keywords: Solar India, Power switching converters, standalone and grid structures, Duty cycle,

    Efficiency, Simulink.

    1.INTRODUCTION

    Solar being abundant, distributed, pollution less and

    recyclable appear as primary source of energy to

    meet global demand in power engineering. However,

    converters form an important interface between panel

    and load for applications. Since direct connection ofpanel with load raises installation costs, converters

    are used. There is therefore a need to systematically

    analyze and understand how solar and converters

    operate together as an optimal system.

    DC/DC converters are described as power electronic

    switching circuits since they convert one form ofvoltage to other. These may be applicable for

    conversion of different voltage levels. Generally

    three basic types of converters are accountable as per

    their use. They either step up by boosting voltage at

    output known as Boost converter or by stepping

    down reducing voltage known as Buck converters.

    There is another class of converters used for both

  • 8/10/2019 Dcdc Converter Simulations

    2/7

    Chandani Sharma/ Science Journals 08(2014) , 1408-1(1)

    2 | P a g e

    Science-International Journal of Advanced Power Electronics

    stepping up or down the voltage output described as

    Buck-Boost converters. Buck-Boost converters

    reverse polarity of output voltage, as such they are

    sometimes known as inverters.

    Unlike AC we cannot step up or step down DCdirectly. Power flow through components need to be

    determined. The nonlinear components connected in

    the network produce harmonic components at output

    of waveform. These may affect efficiency and duty

    cycle. Expressions may be given by following

    assumptions for ideal case,

    PIN= POUT+ PLOSS (1)

    VOUT/VIN= IIN/IOUT (2)

    (%) = POUT/PIN (3)

    VOUT/VIN= D, (4)

    Where,

    Power fed into Converter from panel: PIN

    Power output of Converter: POUT

    Power lost into Converter: PLOSS

    Voltage input from panel to Converter: VIN

    Voltage output from Converter: VOUT

    Current input from panel to converter: IIN

    Current output from Converter: IOUT

    Efficiency: Duty cycle: D

    Efficiency of converters is about 80-90%. The DC

    output voltage that appears across the load is an

    integral value or a fraction of the input voltage which

    turns out to be equal to the duty cycle. Duty cycle is

    also defined as ratio of TON/T, where T is complete

    time period described by inverse of the operatingfrequency.

    2.SIMULINK MODELING OF CONVERTERS

    The equations of PV cell are simulated using

    simulink MATLAB software [6], [7]. Output of PV

    panel is fed to converter and used to drive gate

    voltage. Four main components are used in designing

    converters. These include switching power MOSFET

    symbolically Q, flywheel diode D, inductor L and

    filter capacitor at output C. MOSFET gate is

    connected to PV panel. A control circuit is used to

    monitor the output voltage from converter and

    maintain it at the desired level. This is done by

    switching MOSFET on and off at a fixed rate known

    as converters operating frequency. By varying duty

    cycle based on proportion of each switching period Q

    is turned on and operation of system can beidentified.

    Various simulated circuits for continuous and

    discrete GUI blocks showing waveforms for with and

    without phase delay are determined for three

    different converters. The Power GUI simulink blocks

    help to run circuit for variable solver using

    continuous GUI or find a solution for fixed time steps

    using discrete GUI. However to vary duty cycle

    prior to switching MOSFET on and off states phase

    delay block is used. Outputs are presented for

    different converters in succeeding sections.

    2.1 BUCK CONVERTER

    Buck converters are used to buck or reduce output

    from solar panel. Panel output voltage is fed into gate

    of MOSFET. On switching MOSFET, current flows.

    As inductor starts building up oscillations by

    developing magnetic field across it due to which

    voltage is buck up or reduced. When MOSFET is

    turned off, EMF is suddenly reversed in the inductor

    that opposes further drop in current. It supplies

    current to the load itself via Diode.

    The basic circuit configuration used in the buckconverter for continuous GUI is shown in Fig.1.

    Fig. 1 Buck Converter without Phase Delay forContinuous GUI Circuit

    To determine output ti input voltage fraction, duty

    cycle is calculated given by expression,

    VOUT/VIN= D, (5)

    or VOUT = VINx D (6)

  • 8/10/2019 Dcdc Converter Simulations

    3/7

    Chandani Sharma/ Science Journals 08(2014) , 1408-1(1)

    3 | P a g e

    Science-International Journal of Advanced Power Electronics

    Thus Buck Converter output voltage can be varied in

    proportion to input voltage varying the switching

    duty cycle. Resulting output is represented by

    following waveform.

    Fig. 1.1 Buck Converter Output without PhaseDelay for Continuous GUI Circuit

    The circuit is simulated with phase delay that causes

    more oscillations in output.

    Fig. 1.2 Buck Converter with Phase Delay for

    Continuous GUI Circuit

    Fig. 1.3 Buck Converter Output with Phase Delay

    for Continuous GUI CircuitTo determine steady state behavior under regulated

    time intervals converter circuit was experimented

    using discrete GUI as detailed below for delay and no

    delay circuits,

    Fig. 1.4 Buck Converter without Phase Delay For

    Discrete GUI Circuit

    Fig. 1.5 Buck Converter Output without Phase

    Delay for Discrete GUI Circuit

    Fig. 1.6 Buck Converter with Phase Delay for

    Discrete GUI Circuit

    When above circuit is simulated, outputs obtained

    from Discrete GUI matches exactly similar tocontinuous GUI using no phase delay. However,

    introduction of phase delay results more oscillations

    in output waveforms giving reduced output for

    discrete circuit in comparison to continuous. The

    delay factor incorporates this change as represented

    in Fig. 1.7.

  • 8/10/2019 Dcdc Converter Simulations

    4/7

    Chandani Sharma/ Science Journals 08(2014) , 1408-1(1)

    4 | P a g e

    Science-International Journal of Advanced Power Electronics

    Fig. 1.7 Buck Converter Output with Phase Delay

    for Discrete GUI Circuit

    2.2 BOOST CONVERTER

    The components arrangement appears different for

    boost converter as in Fig.2.

    Fig. 2 Boost Converter without Phase Delay for

    Continuous GUI Circuit

    This is used to step up the voltage. It consists of highspeed switch MOSFET, with output voltage control

    by variation of switching duty cycle. Current flows

    via inductor L and MOSFET Q when connected from

    the input source. The energy is stored in Magnetic

    field developed across L. There is no current flowingpresently through D. However load current is

    supplied by the charge in C. L opposes current by

    immediately reversing EMF when Q is turned off.

    Thus inductor voltage adds i.e., boosts the source

    voltage, and through L current is directed to flow

    across D and the load, recharging C.

    The voltage step-up ratio for circuit is,

    VOUT/VIN= 1/ (1-D) (7)

    Where 1-D is actually the proportion of the switching

    cycle when Q is off, rather than on. So the step-upratio is also,

    VOUT/VIN= T/TOFF (8)

    Working of circuit is given through waveforms

    plotted in Fig 2.1.

    Fig. 2.1 Boost Converter Output without Phase

    Delay for Continuous GUI Output

    When simulating diagrams in Matlab scope for delay

    using GUI model, outputs result higher overshoot

    with increased responses as in Fig 2.2 and 2.3.

    Fig. 2.2 Boost Converter with Phase Delay for

    Continuous GUI Circuit

    Fig 2.3 Boost Converter with Phase Delay for

    Continuous GUI Circuit

    Performing different orientations for discrete GUI

    circuits, results match performances of boost

    converter circuit using no phase delay but with

  • 8/10/2019 Dcdc Converter Simulations

    5/7

    Chandani Sharma/ Science Journals 08(2014) , 1408-1(1)

    5 | P a g e

    Science-International Journal of Advanced Power Electronics

    slightly raised outputs. These are shown below,

    Fig. 2.4 Boost Converter without Phase Delay for

    Discrete GUI Output

    Fig. 2.5 Boost Converter Output without Phase

    Delay for Discrete GUI Output

    Discrete GUI formulate reduced outputs for delay

    circuits with sloping stretches as indicated in

    diagrams to follow.

    Fig. 2.6 Boost Converter with Phase Delay for

    Discrete GUI Output

    Fig. 2.7 Boost Converter Output with Phase Delay

    for Discrete GUI Output

    2.3 BUCK-BOOST CONVERTER

    The configuration of Buck and Boost converters is

    implemented in a different way as in Fig 3.

    Fig. 3 Buck-Boost Converter without Phase Delay

    for Continuous GUI Circuit

    The voltage could be either step up or step down,

    depending on the duty cycle. Inductor L directly

    stores energy by developing magnetic field whenMOSFET is in on state. Diodes being reverse biased

    results in no current flow through load. Capacitor C

    works during this Ton phase. But as MOSFET is

    turned off, L is disconnected from the source. It

    opposes current to drop by instantly reversing EMF.

    Hence output is available for phase delay making

    circuit functional on and off frequently and not for

    circuit without delay. This switching generates a

    voltage that forward biases Diode and current flows

    into the load charging C. But this occurs for phase

    delay circuit causing variations in waveforms as in

    Figures below.

    Fig. 3.1 Buck-Boost Converter Output without

    Phase Delay for Continuous GUI Circuit

  • 8/10/2019 Dcdc Converter Simulations

    6/7

    Chandani Sharma/ Science Journals 08(2014) , 1408-1(1)

    6 | P a g e

    Science-International Journal of Advanced Power Electronics

    Fig. 3.2 Buck-Boost Converter with Phase Delay

    for Continuous GUI Circuit

    Fig. 3.3 Buck-Boost Converter Output with Phase

    Delay for Continuous GUI Circuit

    With this configuration, ratio between the output and

    input voltages can be expressed as,

    VOUT/VIN= - D/ (1-D) (9)

    This equates to

    VOUT/VIN= - TON/TOFF (10)

    So buck-boost converter can be concluded to step

    down voltage when the duty cycle is less than 50%

    (i.e., Ton < Toff). For step up duty cycle is greater

    than 50% (Ton > Toff). Further results are

    determined using discrete GUI that results output forno phase delay condition too in Fig. 3.5.

    Fig. 3.4 Boost Converter without Phase Delay for

    Discrete GUI Output

    Fig. 3.5 Boost Converter Output without Phase

    Delay for Discrete GUI Output

    On introducing delay in circuit outputs appear

    inverse to origin just similar to continuous GUI

    model. Succeeding Figures highlight modeling andsimulations using delay.

    Fig. 3.6 Boost Converter with Phase Delay for

    Discrete GUI Output

    Fig. 3.7 Boost Converter Output with Phase Delay

    for Discrete GUI Output

  • 8/10/2019 Dcdc Converter Simulations

    7/7

    Chandani Sharma/ Science Journals 08(2014) , 1408-1(1)

    7 | P a g e

    Science-International Journal of Advanced Power Electronics

    3.COMPARISONS

    The modelling performance of three different

    converters is studied based on four modelling

    constraints. It can be concluded that prior to voltage

    boosting, reducing or both actions Boost, Buck orBuck-Boost converter is selected. Phase delay affects

    the results by introduction of oscillations. Since for

    variable step solver in continuous systems output is

    not available the behaviour of circuits in discrete

    steps becomes compulsory. By analyzingperformance it can be determined that Buck

    converter output is almost same for delay or no delay

    circuit for 36 cells solar panel. Boost converter

    reduces output of phase delay circuit. Buck-Boost

    converter can help in achieving dual purpose with

    inverted outputs. Thus while choosing converter for a

    specified application, choice of model must beselective to achieve appropriate responses.

    4.

    FUTURE WORK

    Solar Converters work as best renewable power

    sources for charging battery or operation of

    appliances. Studies could be made prior to analyse

    efficiency and determine losses in converters. Designand development of advanced lossless converters

    with appropriate duty cycle can be considered for

    further research in varying panel sizes.

    5.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    Acknowledgements may be made to those

    individuals or institutions not mentioned elsewhere inthe paper that made an important contribution.

    REFERENCES

    [1] Tarak Salmi, Mounir Bouzguenda, Adel Gastli,

    Ahmed Masmoudi MATLAB/Simulink Based

    Modelling Of Solar Photovoltaic Cell,International Journal of Renewable Energy

    Research Tarak Salmi Et Al., Vol.2, No.2, 2012.

    [2] Jaw Kuen Shiau, Min Yi Lee, Yu Chen Wei, and

    Bo Chih Chen, Circuit Simulation for Solar

    Power Maximum Power Point Tracking with

    Different Buck-Boost Converter Topologies Ist

    International Conference on Energies, March

    2014www.sciforum.net/conference/ece1/paper/2

    339.

    [3] Robert W. Erickson, DC-DC Power

    Converters Wiley Encyclopedia of Electrical

    and Electronics Engineering June 2007

    [4]

    Dr.P.Sangameswar Raju, Mr. G. Venkateswarlu,Simscape Model Of Photovoltaic cell,

    International Journal of Advanced Research in

    Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation

    Engineering, Vol. 2, Issue 5, May 2013.

    [5] Savita Nema, R.K.Nema, Gayatri Agnihotri,

    Matlab / simulink based study of photovoltaiccells / modules / array and their experimental

    verification, International Journal of Energy

    and Environment, Volume 1, Issue 3, 2010

    pp.487-500.

    [6] M.A Islam, N Mohammad, P.K.S Khan,

    Modeling and performance analysis of ageneralized photovoltaic array in Matlab Joint

    International Conference IN 2010 on Power

    Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems byIEEE.

    [7] Chandani Sharma, Anamika Jain; Solar PanelMathematical Modelling using Simulink in

    International Journal of Engineering Research

    and Applications, Vol. 4, Issue 5( Version 4),

    May 2014, pp.67-72.

    [8] Chandani Sharma, Anamika Jain; Simulink

    Based Multi variable Solar Panel Modeling in

    Telkominika Indonesian Journal of ElectricalEngineering, Vol. 12, Issue 8, Aug 2014.

    [9] Chandani Sharma, Anamika Jain; Maximum

    Power Point Techniques: A Review in

    International Journal of Recent Research in

    Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Vol. 1,

    Issue 1, April-June 2014, pp.25-33.