Day 2Session 1: Starting the CPF

Phase 1 – StartingInstitutional Arrangements

Government and FAO agreement • Formal government request NOT mandatory (except in case

of TCPf)

Resource mobilization for formulation (funds and staff)

Establishment of a CPF Core Team• Country level• FAO level (SRO, RO, HQ)• Management arrangements

The right team is in place

Phase 1 – StartingConcept note & Roadmap

Provides the rationale for the CPF formulation:

• Context analysis• Stakeholders to be involved in the process• Brief overview of FAO record in the country• Initial mapping of resource partners• Elements of communication strategy• Roadmap• Resources required for the CPF formulation

Get the CPF Cycle in Motion

Concept note can be used for TCPf request

Phase 1 – StartingValidation

Concept note & Roadmap are circulated to CPF focal points at SRO/RO/HQ:

• to describe the approach• to facilitate adequate planning of human and

financial support • to promote coordination and integration

Day 2 Session 2: Setting priorities

Strategic focus of FAO support

Situation analysis

Comparative Advantage assessm

ent & O

ption Analysis

... go to the Guide at page 28

… what should not be forgotten

Phase 2 – Setting PrioritiesSituation Analysis

Understanding challenges and opportunities

Group exercise (30’ minutes)Review the situation analysis:

•Have key challenges been clearly assessed?•Have national strategies and policies been analyzed?•Have national priorities been clearly identified? If yes, indicate the national priorities in the Priority Matrix template

•Are UN programming principles and DRR/DRM issues taken into consideration?

Day 2 Session 3: Comparative advantages

Comparative Advantages

Actual CA at

country level

Mandate to act

Capacity to act

Position to act

FAO Global GoalsFAO

Strategic Objectives/

ORsCore Functions

Resources

InfluencePartnership

s

Revealed CAPerceived

CAGaps

FPMIS Charts Ethiopia Historical

0

2,000,000

4,000,000

6,000,000

8,000,000

10,000,000

12,000,000

14,000,000

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 (May)

Delivery of Emergency and Non- Emergency projects in US Dollars

Technical Cooperation Emergencies

FPMIS Charts

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 (May)

-2,000,000

0

2,000,000

4,000,000

6,000,000

8,000,000

10,000,000

12,000,000

14,000,000

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 (May)

Delivery by Funding Source in US Dolllars

SPFS TCP TF Others TF/UTF UNDP

FPMIS Delivery by Sector2007-2011

-100,000

0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000

[211] Natural Resources

[213] Livestock

[221] Nutrition

[223] Food and Agricultural Monitoring, Assessments and Outlooks

[256] Food Production in Support of Food Security in LIFDCs

[2C ] Diseases and pests of animals and plants

[2K ] Sustainable natural resources management

[4C ] Food security, poverty reduction and other development cooperationprogrammes

Group exercise (20’)

• Complete/revise your Priority Matrix!

Day 2 Session 4: Problem Tree Analysis

Sub-regional common prioritiesCountry Priority Source

Djibouti Production agricole, agriculture, élevage, pêche, ressources forestières incluan les éléments transversaux, genre, climat et environnement CPF

Somalia Increasing and stabilizing agricultural production and productivity and rural families incomes CPF

Burundi Professionalisation et intensification du secteur agricole CPF

Ethiopia Agricultural productivity and production CPF

Rwanda Intensification et développement des systèmes de production durable PSTA II

Kenya Agricultural productivity development

AGRICULTURAL SECTOR DEVELOPMENT strategy (ASDS)2009 - 2020

Uganda Increased and sustainable production and productivity strengthened CPF

Group exercise (30’)

Develop your Problem Tree!

Develop Cause-effect Analysis on the issue

“Agricultural Agricultural production and production and

productivityproductivity”