Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
DAVIS JUNIOR HIGH. Academic Achievement Meeting November 9, 2010. Davis Junior High School. Davis Junior High School MEAP 2005-2009 7 th & 8 th Grade. 7 th Grade increased 8% UCS increased 3% Cohort increased 4% UCS Cohort increased 4%. 8 th Grade increased 2% UCS increased 5%. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
DAVIS JUNIOR HIGH
Academic Achievement Meeting
November 9, 2010
Davis Junior High School
0
200
400
Davis Junior High Demographics
Economic Dis
LFAY
Black
Hispanic
Asian
Special Education
Economic Dis 33 116 166 188 178 266
LFAY 20 32 28 78 79
Black 7 36 28 46 45 41
Hispanic 8 19 25 25 24 21
Asian 3 23 21 22 23 18
Special Education 90 91 90 92 97 128
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
92
Davis Junior High SchoolMEAP 2005-2009 7th & 8th Grade
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2014
7th Grade
77 85 73 80 88 100
8th Grade
78 82 82 82 84 100
UCS 7th Grade
83 86 78 85 88 100
UCS 8th Grade
83 83 84 84 89 100
10
30
50
70
90
Davis Junior High MEAP7th & 8th Grade Reading
7th Grade
8th Grade
UCS 7th Grade
UCS 8th Grade
8th Grade increased 2%
UCS increased 5%
7th Grade increased 8%
UCS increased 3%
Cohort increased 4%
UCS Cohort increased 4%
Davis Junior High SchoolMEAP 2005-20097th & 8th Grade
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2014
7th Grade
62 75 59 75 75 100
8th Grade
65 61 71 77 82 100
UCS 7th Grade
67 73 57 75 80 100
UCS 8th Grade
68 66 69 70 83 100
10
30
50
70
90
Davis Junior High MEAPEconomically Disadvantaged
7th/8th Grade Reading
7th Grade
8th Grade
UCS 7th Grade
7th Grade remained the same
UCS 7th Grade increased 5%
Cohort increased 7%
UCS Cohort increased 8%
8th Grade increased 5%
UCS 8th Grade increased 13%
Davis Junior High SchoolMEAP 2005-20097th & 8th Grade
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2014
7th Grade 38 52 31 58 71 100
8th Grade 19 45 50 48 52 100
UCS 7th Grade
42 41 38 52 62 100
UCS 8th Grade
35 40 45 46 70 100
10
30
50
70
90
Davis Junior High MEAP7th/8th Grade Reading
Students with Disabilities
7th Grade8th GradeUCS 7th Grade
7th Grade increased 13%
UCSincreased 10%
Cohort decreased 6%
UCS Cohort increased 18%
8th Grade increased4%
UCS increased 24%
Davis Junior High SchoolMEAP 2005-2009 7th & 8th Grade
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2014
7th Grade 74 77 76 84 85 100
8th Grade 73 87 84 84 79 100
UCS 7th Grade
75 77 81 88 89 100
UCS 8th Grade
79 82 84 84 81 100
10
30
50
70
90
Davis Junior High MEAP7th & 8th Grade Mathematics
7th Grade
8th Grade
UCS 7th Grade
UCS 8th Grade
8th Grade decreased 5%
UCS decreased 3%
7th Grade increased 1%
UCS increased 1%
Cohort decreased 5%
UCS cohort decreased 7%
AYP 8th grade
54%
Davis Junior High SchoolMEAP 2005-2009 7th & 8th Grade
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2014
7th Grade 48 61 59 81 81 100
8th Grade 63 80 64 68 78 100
UCS 7th Grade
50 61 62 77 80 100
UCS 8th Grade
70 64 70 70 72 100
10
30
50
70
90
Davis Junior High MEAP7th/8th Grade MathematicsEconomically Disadvantaged
7th Grade
8th Grade
UCS 7th Grade
UCS 8th Grade
7th Grade remained the same
Cohort decreased 3%
UCS increased 3%
UCS Cohort decreased 5%
8th Grade increased 10%
UCS Increased 2%
AYP 8th grade 54%
Davis Junior High SchoolMEAP 2005-20097th & 8th Grade
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2014
7th Grade 18 36 40 53 78 100
8th Grade 27 41 52 54 42 100
UCS 7th Grade
26 25 38 50 62 100
UCS 8th Grade
33 40 36 49 44 100
10
30
50
70
90
Davis Junior High MEAP7th/8th Grade MathematicsStudents with Disabilities
7th Grade8th GradeUCS 7th Grade
7th Grade increase 25%
UCS increase 12%
Cohort decreased 11%
UCS cohort decreased 6%
8th Grade decreased 12%
UCS decreased5%
AYP 8th grade
54%
Davis Junior High SchoolMEAP 2005-2009 8th Grade
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2014
8th Grade
88 86 88 77 77 100
UCS 8th Grade
89 84 86 83 81 100
8th Econ Dis
78 57 80 57 68 100
UCS 8th Grade Econ Dis.
74 67 72 68 73 100
10
30
50
70
90
Davis Junior High MEAP8th Grade Science
8th Grade
UCS 8th Grade
8th Econ Dis
8th Grade economically dis. remained the same
UCS 8th Grade decreased 2%
8th Grade economically dis. increased 11%
UCS 8th Grade economically dis. increased 5%
Davis Junior High SchoolMEAP 2005-20098th Grade
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2014
8th Grade 58 63 67 36 30 100
UCS 8th Grade
53 49 46 49 47 100
10
30
50
70
90
Davis Junior High MEAP8th Grade Science
Students with Disabilities
8th Grade
UCS 8th Grade
8th Grade decrease 6%
UCS 8th Grade decreased 2%
Davis Junior High SchoolMEAP 2005-2009 9th Grade
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2014
9th Grade 86 84 80 80 70 100
UCS 9th Grade
86 86 84 81 79 100
9th Econ. Dis
71 66 66 59 58 100
UCS Econ.Dis
67 71 67 64 64 100
10
30
50
70
90
Davis Junior High MEAP9th Grade Social Studies
9th GradeUCS 9th Grade9th Econ. DisUCS Econ.Dis
9th Grade decreased 10%
UCS 9th Grade decreased 2%
9th Grade economically dis. decreased 1%
UCS 9th Grade economically dis. stayed the same
Davis Junior High SchoolMEAP 2005-2009 9th Grade
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2014
9th Grade 56 67 49 48 30 100
UCS 9th Grade
50 58 48 45 44 100
10
30
50
70
90
Davis Junior High MEAP9th Grade Social StudiesStudents with Disabilities
9th GradeUCS 9th Grade
9th Grade decreased 18%
UCS 9th Grade decreased 1%
Tier II Indicators
Reading Tier II Indicator
Indicator 1.8: All junior high students will meet or exceed standards and be identified as proficient on the MEAP tests in reading, writing, math,
science and social studies.Reading Tier II Indicator: Increase the number of students who score at proficient or higher in
Reading.S.M.A.R.T. Goal: The percentage of Davis 7th, 8th and 9th grade students scoring proficient or higher in Reading will increase as measured by the school-wide expository assessment from ____% to _____%.
Reading Tier II Indicator
7th Grade GeographyBased on a variety of reading assessments, the 7th grade teachers have identified several deficiencies in comprehension of informational text:
MEAP – Inference, Locating Supporting EvidenceExplore Test – Identifying Main Ideas, Generalizations, Locating Supporting Evidence, VocabularySchool-wide Expository Test – Identifying Main Ideas, Inference, Locating Supporting Evidence
Reading Tier II Indicator
MEAP GRAPH
Reading Tier II Indicator
8th Grade U.S. HistoryBased on a variety of reading assessments, the 8th grade teachers have identified several deficiencies in comprehension of informational text:
MEAP – Generalizations, Identifying Main IdeasExplore Test – Identifying Main Ideas, Generalizations, Locating Supporting Evidence, VocabularySchool-wide Expository Test – Identifying Main Ideas, Inference, Accessing Prior Knowledge, Metacognition, Vocabulary, Cause and Effect
Reading Tier II Indicator
• 9th Grade World Histriry• Based on a variety of
reading assessments, the 9th grade teachers have identified several deficiencies in comprehension of informational text:– MME – Generalizations,
Identifying Main Ideas, Inference
– Explore Test – Identifying Main Ideas, Generalizations, Locating Supporting Evidence, Vocabulary
– School-wide Expository Test – Inference, Chronological Order, Cause and Effect, Identifying Main Ideas.
Reading Tier II Indicator
Reaching Higher
By 2014, all students in the Utica Community Schools will meet or exceed proficiency standards in English language arts (reading and writing), math, science, social studies, fine arts and career and technical education, as defined by national, state and UCS standards.
Reaching Higher
Davis Junior High Action Plan 2010-2011
Indicator 1.8: All junior high students will meet or exceed standards and be identified as proficient on the MEAP tests in reading, writing, math,
science and social studies.Writing Tier II Indicator: Increase the number of students who score at proficient or higher in
writing.
7th Grade Writing
S.M.A.R.T. GoalPercentage of 7th grade students who achieve a score of 4 (out of a 6 point scale) or higher on the HRW Online Expository Essay assessment will increase from __% to __% by June 2011.
8th Grade Writing
S.M.A.R.T. GoalPercentage of 8th grade students who achieve a score of 4 (out of a 6 point scale) or higher on Compare/Contrast Essay assessment will increase from __% to __% by June 2011.
9th Grade Writing
S.M.A.R.T. GoalPercentage of 9th grade students who achieve a score of 4 (out of a 6 point scale) or higher on the ACT Persuasive Essay assessment will increase from 30% to 60% by June 2010.
Math Tier II Indicator
Science
Tier II Strategies Persons Responsible Implementations, Resources, Start and End Dates
Progress Monitoring
All science teachers will use the 6+1 writing rubric to assess the students’ written lab report conclusions.
Persons Responsible: Science TeachersResources: 6+1 rubric Sept. 7, 2010-June 17, 2010
All students will complete one written lab report conclusion per marking period.
All science teachers will review and demonstrate multiple choice test taking strategies to interpret tables, charts, and graphs.
Persons Responsible: Science TeachersResources: MEAP Review and ACT Review PacketsSept. 7, 2010-June 17, 2010
All teachers will include interpreting tables, charts, and graphs on all quizzes and test.Also use sample questions as bell ringers.
All science teachers will model and demonstrate reading strategies mini lessons to help the students understand the textbook.
Persons Responsible: Science TeachersResources: RA Binder and science textbookSept. 7, 2010-June 17, 2010
All teachers will model and demonstrate reading strategies weekly.
Science
Special Education
