24
Legal Issues in Search Europe and America David Mirchin

David mirchin legal panel

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: David mirchin legal panel

Legal Issues in SearchEurope and America

David Mirchin

Page 2: David mirchin legal panel

2

Page 3: David mirchin legal panel

Overview

1. The Issue2. US Experience3. EU Experience4. Practical Tips

3

Page 4: David mirchin legal panel

Keywords?

4

Page 5: David mirchin legal panel

The Issue

This issue has been considered

by the Courts in

America and the EU (and also Israel)

5

Purchase and Use of Trademark Protected KEYWORDS?

Page 6: David mirchin legal panel

LiveU: Portable video transmissions

Page 7: David mirchin legal panel

7

ORGANIC RESULTS and ADVERTISEMENTS

When you Google “buy liveu” or just “liveu” in the sponsor link on the right you will have an ad of TVU

Ad

Organic results

Page 8: David mirchin legal panel

Who Faces Liability?

8

Search Engine Providers ?

– e.g.:

Advertisers ?

Page 9: David mirchin legal panel

USA

Search Engine Provider

GEICO v GoogleGovernment Employees Insurance Co. v Google, Inc., No. 1:04cv507 (E.D. Va. Aug. 8, 2005)

•not liable for trademark infringement for making available registered trademarks as keywords•does not cause likelihood of confusion

9

Page 10: David mirchin legal panel

Wentworth CaseJ.G. Wentworth v. Settlement Funding (E.D. Pa. 2007)

Wentworth and Settlement Fundingare competitors Finance Companies Settlement Funding Bought “Wentworth” Keyword

Standard: To win a Trademark Infringement Claim in US:

(1) Use of Trademark in Commerce(2) Creates Likelihood of Confusion10

USA

Page 11: David mirchin legal panel

Wentworth cont…

11

HOLDING:

Using trademark-protected words to trigger internet advertising does not violate trademark law

PRACTICAL RULE:

Use of keyword-triggered ads will not confuse consumers if the resulting ads do not display the plaintiff's trademarks

Page 12: David mirchin legal panel

Rosetta Stone v. Google

Page 13: David mirchin legal panel
Page 14: David mirchin legal panel

EU

Page 15: David mirchin legal panel

EU

Page 16: David mirchin legal panel

EU

Search Engine Provider

Google France v Louis Vuitton CaseEuropean Court of Justice (2010)

Background:

Competitors Buy “Louis Vuitton” Keyword from Google

Can Louis Vuitton Stop Google or their Competitors?

16

Page 17: David mirchin legal panel
Page 18: David mirchin legal panel

Not liable for trademark infringement. Why? Because offering registered

trademarks as keywords is not “use in the course of trade” But not a complete win for Google:

could still be liable for contributory infringement under national law

Page 19: David mirchin legal panel

Competitors?

Their use of Keywords IS a “use in the course of trade”.

Huh? Key: Ad Text. Liable if:

– Use Louis Vuitton in the Text of Sponsored Ad, or– “Normally informed and reasonably attentive

internet users” cannot tell from the Ad Textwhether Louis Vuitton and the competitor are economically linked

– Vague as to the origin of the goods

Page 20: David mirchin legal panel

Interflora v. Marks & Spencer CaseEuropean Court of Justice (September 2011)

EU

20

Page 21: David mirchin legal panel

Marks & Spencer cont…

EU Court of Justice = guidance

National Courts determine issues on facts of each case

21

Page 22: David mirchin legal panel

Practical Tips

Summary of US and EU standard:

No liability provided that users are not confused by the text of the sponsored ad.

Recommendations:

1. Do not use 3rd party trade marks in the ad text

2. Do not mislead users from ad text

3. Do not imply you are connected to the trademark owner (whose keyword you purchased)

22

Page 23: David mirchin legal panel

Remember the Standard:

Page 24: David mirchin legal panel

Thank youDavid Mirchin

[email protected]