David Laidler on Monetarism - Nber

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 David Laidler on Monetarism - Nber

    1/31

    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES

    DAVID LAIDLER ON MONETARISM

    Michael Bordo

    Anna J. Schwartz

    Working Paper 12593

    http://www.nber.org/papers/w12593

    NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH1050 Massachusetts Avenue

    Cambridge, MA 02138

    October 2006

    This paper has been prepared for the Festschrift in Honor of David Laidler, University of Western

    Ontario, August 18-20, 2006. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily

    reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research.

    2006 by Michael Bordo and Anna J. Schwartz. A ll rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to

    exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including

    notice, is given to the source.

  • 7/30/2019 David Laidler on Monetarism - Nber

    2/31

    David Laidler on Monetarism

    Michael Bordo and Anna J. Schwartz

    NBER Working Paper No. 12593

    October 2006

    JEL No. E00,E50

    ABSTRACT

    David Laidler has been a major player in the development of the monetarist tradition. As the monetarist

    approach lost influence on policy makers he kept defending the importance of many of its principles.

    In this paper we survey and assess the impact on monetary economics of Laidler's work on the demand

    for money and the quantity theory of money; the transmission mechanism on the link between money

    and nominal income; the Phillips Curve; the monetary approach to the balance of payments; and monetary

    policy.

    Michael Bordo

    Faculty of Economics

    Cambridge University

    Austin Robinson Building

    Siegwick Avenue

    Cambridge

    ENGLAND CD3, 9DD

    and NBER

    [email protected]

    Anna J. Schwartz

    NBER365 Fifth Ave, 5th Floor

    New York, NY 10016-4309

    and NBER

    [email protected]

  • 7/30/2019 David Laidler on Monetarism - Nber

    3/31

    1

    !"

    #$

    "

    %%

    %%

    !%&!'!

    %"()%*

    %

    "

    %

    +,!-./01!%

    &!2

    '!%%!%

    %%)

    ",

  • 7/30/2019 David Laidler on Monetarism - Nber

    4/31

    2

    ),)+,

    3-)41-+516)4%

    )7

    %%

    )8,

    -%

    -1%

    -71/

    %

    3"%%

    %

    +

    6-'91+,

    :;

    +3

  • 7/30/2019 David Laidler on Monetarism - Nber

    5/31

    3

    ,!-

    17+,

    %2>,-5?1

    %

    %

    @(#

    !&!+,

    3,

    3.-1

    $

    .,

    A%

    $

    &!%/

    2

    Meltzer (1963) using wealth instead of permanent income obtained similar results.3

    A large number of studies surveyed in various editions of LaidlersDemand for Money found powerful evidence

    on the long-run stability of money demand. This evidence, as well as the case made by Friedman and others,

    including Laidler for the UK (1976) of the role of monetary expansion in explaining the great inflation of the late

    1960s and 1970s led to the adoption of monetary aggregate targeting in the US and many countries (to be discussed

    below).

  • 7/30/2019 David Laidler on Monetarism - Nber

    6/31

    4

    +%

  • 7/30/2019 David Laidler on Monetarism - Nber

    7/31

    5

    :

    %3

    -&'%'91

    "()

    %

    %3

    +%

    "

    3%33

    (%

    (%%

    6

    7

    3%

    "%

  • 7/30/2019 David Laidler on Monetarism - Nber

    8/31

    6

    %7"

    "()%7

    3

    37

    "5!!%

    %A'!

    3

    77,%

    -'9%5&1;

    %

    @(.A%"()

    @(

    73

    %

    7

    5!"()1"

    321

  • 7/30/2019 David Laidler on Monetarism - Nber

    9/31

    7

    "

    21"

    ."()%

    %"

    %

    %

    3

    "%%

    3

    3

    -'9%5!16

    7%

    7*

    "

    D3%

    3

    33%

    "+9%%(%A%,

  • 7/30/2019 David Laidler on Monetarism - Nber

    10/31

    8

    %6"

    %

    3

    E3%

    33

    %

    -''1

    B7

    (

    +7

    7$3

    67

    ,377

    "7%

    %

    7

    63

    %

  • 7/30/2019 David Laidler on Monetarism - Nber

    11/31

    9

    336

    %

    7

    6

    33"

    "

    %%

    3

    -&51

    %

    7

    B77

    %

    *,-'1

    7

    %

    76

    37

    "*,-'1%

    3"%%

    -*&&1

  • 7/30/2019 David Laidler on Monetarism - Nber

    12/31

    10

    "),-&1%

    %%

    %

    %

    %$

    7-

    &5%&'%!1

    -&5%&517

    "()77

    3

    7

    37

    7

    %%7

    3

    "77

    %

    6

  • 7/30/2019 David Laidler on Monetarism - Nber

    13/31

    11

    %%%

    6%%

    7

    7

    7"%7%

    D

    2

    3

    "

    3

    %

    63%%

    %7%

    3"

    %%%

    "%

    7

    %

    77"

  • 7/30/2019 David Laidler on Monetarism - Nber

    14/31

    12

    %

    -&51,3

    7

    7"

    7

    7

    7

    2

    6

    ,%"

    %

    2%7

    %

    7%

    %7

    D%

    7%

  • 7/30/2019 David Laidler on Monetarism - Nber

    15/31

    13

    ;%3%

    %%

    %%$

    0

    77

    7

    -'9%#?#51

    ;,

    %7

    %7

    7

    %7+

    %7

    "77

    %

    %3

    3

    %

    77B

  • 7/30/2019 David Laidler on Monetarism - Nber

    16/31

    14

    7%7

    7%7

    7

    3

    (

    E

    073

    %%

    7

    (

    3

    !"#"$

    %&'()#'*"

    )

    3

    *.%+-&!%991%

  • 7/30/2019 David Laidler on Monetarism - Nber

    17/31

    15

    73

    76

    -&51

    %

    3

    7

    %:

    %

    7

    :

    *D

    %7*

    +3

    %

    D%

    *%

    "+

    -'9%1*

    $"

    *%

  • 7/30/2019 David Laidler on Monetarism - Nber

    18/31

    16

    7

    7%$E

    A,-'!1

  • 7/30/2019 David Laidler on Monetarism - Nber

    19/31

    17

    7;

    6%

    -'9%&1

    %

    %+F6%+

    %-!1

    77

    3%

    %%

    %7

    E7%%

    $

    3%

    %

    "%7

    3

    %%

    6'!%%

  • 7/30/2019 David Laidler on Monetarism - Nber

    20/31

    18

    E%!%

    %

    -'9%#?#51

    +(''#%&)$

    (

    )@(%A%

    %

    7

    %

    "%

    %

    7*

    @(%%AE

    7

    @&@(%

    %$

    @:5!!%

    %

    %

  • 7/30/2019 David Laidler on Monetarism - Nber

    21/31

    19

    6*

    %@:

    &

    @:7D

    77%%

    B7

    E

    !%7A7

    *37%

    7

    @:5!!

    3,:

    AE%@:,%

    ;%

    7%77%

    -'%'51

    :%

    77%

  • 7/30/2019 David Laidler on Monetarism - Nber

    22/31

    20

    %

    E7

    &!

    )%%@:

    &!7

    77

    6

    A,%

    @(7!

    AE-.&1

    7&!

    67

    %

    37

    77

    "

    6

    7-'1

    ,#

  • 7/30/2019 David Laidler on Monetarism - Nber

    23/31

    21

    )+,-!1

    A

    +

    -)913

    $

    -

    +G;

    @:&!#!H

    7-&1

    @:@(&!

    G-9H1

    -'91

    D7A

    %

    %

  • 7/30/2019 David Laidler on Monetarism - Nber

    24/31

    22

    =-&%'!1

    G

    8

    -&1

    7'!

    +%

    &!'!%%

    -$1

    3

    7-&1

    6A.

    0

    %

  • 7/30/2019 David Laidler on Monetarism - Nber

    25/31

    23

    %7

    -&&%&167

    %

    ,7

    -&%9!!#1

    %

    ;

    )%

    7

    %

  • 7/30/2019 David Laidler on Monetarism - Nber

    26/31

    24

    *

  • 7/30/2019 David Laidler on Monetarism - Nber

    27/31

    25

    .$

    A%)I-'1

  • 7/30/2019 David Laidler on Monetarism - Nber

    28/31

    26

    +%)-51

  • 7/30/2019 David Laidler on Monetarism - Nber

    29/31

    27

    %-&1

  • 7/30/2019 David Laidler on Monetarism - Nber

    30/31

    28

    %-'1

  • 7/30/2019 David Laidler on Monetarism - Nber

    31/31

    %-1