10
David Crelley Prof. Stephen Lea Dr. Peter Fischer University of Exeter, UK [email protected]

David Crelley Prof. Stephen Lea Dr. Peter Fischer University of Exeter, UK [email protected]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: David Crelley Prof. Stephen Lea Dr. Peter Fischer University of Exeter, UK dc270@ex.ac.uk

David CrelleyProf. Stephen LeaDr. Peter FischerUniversity of Exeter, [email protected]

Page 2: David Crelley Prof. Stephen Lea Dr. Peter Fischer University of Exeter, UK dc270@ex.ac.uk

What is Ethical Consumption and Investment? Typically defined: Fair trade, locally sourced,

recycled goods, free range, organic… My definition: Favouring products that are for the

greater good Most consumers do not consistently buy ethical

branded products (Altman, 2001, Thøgersen, 2006)

Economic incentives often outweigh moral motives (Fransson & Gärling, 1999, De Pelsmacker et al., 2005)

Page 3: David Crelley Prof. Stephen Lea Dr. Peter Fischer University of Exeter, UK dc270@ex.ac.uk

Spending Conflict

Ethical spending can be considered a ‘Social Dilemma’ with two components:

1. Social conflict: Motivationally demanding 2. Temporal conflict: Cognitively demanding

Hardin (1968) Tragedy of the commons Some people will only act in accordance with

self interest (free ride) Why continue to act morally when others do

not? Can we indefinitely resist temptation?

Page 4: David Crelley Prof. Stephen Lea Dr. Peter Fischer University of Exeter, UK dc270@ex.ac.uk

Self Regulation and Ego Depletion Self regulation constrains undesirable urges (Alberts et

al., 2007) Ensure behaviour is inline with our long term goals Decision making, self-presentation, and intellectual

performance (Alberts et al., 2007; Baumeister & Vohs, 2007)

Via regulating Thoughts (taking others perspective / Long term impact) Emotions (warm fuzzy feeling vs guilt) Self restraint is a limited cognitive resource (Baumeister

et al., 1998)

Page 5: David Crelley Prof. Stephen Lea Dr. Peter Fischer University of Exeter, UK dc270@ex.ac.uk

Self Regulation and Ego Depletion Self-regulation is impaired by prior self-

regulation Ego depletion results in self serving attitudes

(Hofmann et al., 2007) Ego depletion should lead to self serving and

short term economic decisions No study has previously investigated ego

depletion at the group level

Page 6: David Crelley Prof. Stephen Lea Dr. Peter Fischer University of Exeter, UK dc270@ex.ac.uk

Current Study

Ego depletion and a social dilemma game. 40 u/g students 2 conditions (high vs. low ego depletion) Ego depletion manipulation : the white bear

manipulation (Baumeister et al. 1998; Muraven, Tice, and Baumeister 1998).

Sheldon and McGregor (2000) forest game 4 players per game 200 hectare forest. Cut down

10 hectares' per player per round Forest regenerates up to 10%

Page 7: David Crelley Prof. Stephen Lea Dr. Peter Fischer University of Exeter, UK dc270@ex.ac.uk

Forest Left Round by Round

Page 8: David Crelley Prof. Stephen Lea Dr. Peter Fischer University of Exeter, UK dc270@ex.ac.uk

Forest Left Round by Round

Page 9: David Crelley Prof. Stephen Lea Dr. Peter Fischer University of Exeter, UK dc270@ex.ac.uk

Results Tree Years

Low Ego Depletion M 2170.67 High Ego Depletion M 1197.99 t(9) 2.661, P =0.012

PANAS Ego depletion resulted in negative emotion But no mediation effect

Informal exit interviews High ego depletion condition = distrustful Low ego depletion condition = notions of

fairness

Page 10: David Crelley Prof. Stephen Lea Dr. Peter Fischer University of Exeter, UK dc270@ex.ac.uk

Conclusion First study to show

Group based effect of ego depletion An effect of self regulation fatigue public goods

games

Next stages Real life spending Fatigue effects in prolonged shopping

Thank you for listening [email protected]