Upload
guianue
View
285
Download
5
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/27/2019 David Aguila vs Melecio Genato Digest
1/1
David Aguila vs Melecio Genatoon November 26, 2012
103 SCRA 380Law on Public OfficersNo Vested Right to a Public OfficeContinuing Eligibility
Dominador Borje was an elected member of the Board of Directors of the Misamis Occidental Electric
Cooperative, Inc. (MOELC). While still serving as a director for MOELC, he ran for an elective position to
the Sangguniang Bayan of Ozamiz City. Therafter, David Aguila of the National Electrification
Administration issued a memorandum which states that all officials and employees of electric
cooperatives who run for public office, win and assume office, shall be considered resigned. Borje won in
the elections. The other directors of MOELC then sought to enforce the memorandum against Borje.
Borje filed a petition in court questioning said memorandum. Borje claimed that the memorandum is not
applicable to him because when he assumed the Directorship in MOELC he was already qualified and so
he must be allowed to continue holding office. Judge Genato agreed with Borje and so he issued a TRO
against MOELC from considering Borje as resigned.
ISSUE: Whether or not the ruling is correct.
HELD: No. The court has no jurisdiction over the said matter. PD 269 which created NEA provides that
electric cooperatives (like MOELC) have the right to prescribe qualifications of its directors and their
manner of election and removal. MOELC has to comply with the memorandum of NEA, a superior office
under which MOELC is being administered. Further still, Borje has not shown that he has an explicit right
to continue holding the Directorship. Further, Borje being considered resigned by reason of his election to
the Sanggunian is not merely grounded on the NEA memorandum. It is also grounded on PD 269 which
provides that elective officials are ineligible to become officers and/or directors of any cooperatives
except if such elective position is no higher than a barangay captain.
There is no merit to Borjes contention that since he was originally qualified he shall be allowed to
continue his unexpired term in MOELC. Eligibility to an office should be construed as of a continuing
nature and must exist at the commencement of the term and during occupancy of the office. Borje
ceased to be qualified and so he must be resigned from MOELC.