44
DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College

DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION. Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College. STANDARDIZATION. STANDARDIZATION. Normalization Transformation of raw data values to different, more meaningful values To map densities instead of “raw” values - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

DATASTANDARDIZATION

and

CLASSIFICATION

Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340)Prof. Hugh HowardAmerican River College

Page 2: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

STANDARDIZATION

Page 3: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

STANDARDIZATION• Normalization• Transformation of raw data values to

different, more meaningful values– To map densities instead of “raw” values

– To map proportions between variables

– To map other relationships between variables

– To map statistical summaries

Page 4: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

MAPPING DENSITY• How much of a particular thing exists

within a given area• Larger enumeration units often have

"more" of a particular thing– Mapping density is not necessary if all

you want to do is show where “more” is– Accounting for the varying sizes of

enumeration units can be more revealing

Page 5: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

MAPPING DENSITY

Population/Area

“persons per square mile”

Page 6: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

MAPPING DENSITY

Bushels/Area

“bushels per acre”

Page 7: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

MAPPING PROPORTIONS• Proportions represent the relationship

of a part to a whole• Several ways to express proportions

– Quotient: 0.0-1.0 – Percentage: 0-100%– Rate: 7 per 1,000

Page 8: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

MAPPING PROPORTIONS

Persons 60 and Over/Total Persons*100

“percentage of seniors”

Persons 60 and Over

Page 9: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

MAPPING PROPORTIONS

Non Grads/Total Population*100

“percentage of non grads”

Page 10: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

MAPPING RELATIONSHIPS• It is often revealing to show how two

variables are related (in a manner that is not strictly proportional)

• Several ways to express relationships– Quotient: 0.0-infinity – Percentage: 0-infinity%– Rate: 1,500 per 100

Page 11: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

MAPPING RELATIONSHIPS

Females/Males

“ratio of females to males”

Page 12: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

MAPPING RELATIONSHIPS• It is often revealing to show how two

variables are related (in a manner that is not strictly proportional)

• Several ways to express relationships– Quotient: 0.0-infinity – Percentage: 0-infinity%– Rate: 1,500 per 100

Page 13: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

MAPPING RELATIONSHIPS

Acres of Cropland/Population

“acres per 1,000 people”

Page 14: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

MAPPING STAT. SUMMARIES• Enumeration units can be represented

according to calculated statistics– Median– Mean (average)– Standard Deviation, etc.

Page 15: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

MAPPING STAT. SUMMARIES

Page 16: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

Animation showing raw and standardized values

(slow version)

Page 17: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

Animation showing raw and standardized values

(fast version)

Page 18: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

STANDARDIZATION• Transformation of raw data values to

different, more meaningful values– Densities, Proportions, Relationships,

and Statistical Summaries

• In conjunction with data classification, normalization allows us to craft our message…

Page 19: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

DATACLASSIFICATION

Page 20: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

DATA CLASSIFICATION• The act of organizing attribute values

into categories, or groups• Can be qualitative or quantitative, and

based on any of the four measurement scales– Nominal– Ordinal – Interval– Ratio

Page 21: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

0 - 500

501 - 1 ,000

1 ,001 - 1,500

RATI O(Popu lat i on )

2 .4 - 4 .7

4.8 - 6.3

6.4 - 8 .6

I NTE RVAL(Qu al i t y of L i fe)

Poor

Fai r

Good

ORD I NAL(Vi si b i l i t y)

Com m er ci al

Residen t i al

In du st r i al

NOM I NAL(Z on i n g)

DATA CLASSIFICATION

Page 22: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

DATA CLASSIFICATION• One of the most interesting aspects of

thematic mapping– One set of attribute values can yield

many different maps, depending on the classification scheme

– The scheme you choose can strongly influence how your map is perceived

Page 23: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

DATA CLASSIFICATION

Page 24: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

DATA CLASSIFICATION• Animation showing population using

equal interval, quantile, and natural breaks classification methods

Page 25: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

DATA CLASSIFICATION

There is no “best” method

Certain methods are not well suited to particular situations

Page 26: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

DATA CLASSIFICATION• How many classes should you use?

– Anywhere from 3 to 7 – 5 is probably optimal– An odd # has a “middle” class

Difficult to differentiate large numbers of tints

Page 27: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

DATA CLASSIFICATION• Animation showing agricultural sales

using 2, 4, and 6 classes

Page 28: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

DATA CLASSIFICATION

Page 29: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

DATA CLASSIFICATION• Equal Interval

– Each class occupies an equal interval along the number line, or histogram

TOWN POPULATION

No gaps between classes

Page 30: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

DATA CLASSIFICATION• Advantages of Equal Interval

– Can be easy to understand and interpret– Good for attributes that are normally

represented using uniform classes: elevation, precipitation, temperature

0 – 2021 – 4041 – 6061 – 8081 – 100

Page 31: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

DATA CLASSIFICATION• Disadvantage of Equal Interval

*

Page 32: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

DATA CLASSIFICATION• *Considers distribution of data along a

number line (poor)– Doesn't work well with skewed

distributions (can result in empty classes)

Page 33: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

DATA CLASSIFICATION• Quantile

– Each class contains the same (or similar) number of attribute values

4 classes: quartiles5 classes: quintiles6 classes: sextilesTOWN

Gaps between classes

POPULATION

Page 34: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

DATA CLASSIFICATION• Advantage of Quantile

– Ensures that a choropleth map will have the same number of darkest polygons as lightest, etc.

≈13 Counties per Class

67 Counties5 Classes

Page 35: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

DATA CLASSIFICATION• Disadvantage of Quantile

*

Page 36: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

DATA CLASSIFICATION• *Considers distribution of data along a

number line (poor)– Doesn’t work well with skewed

distributions (one or two classes can occupy the majority of the range)

Page 37: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

DATA CLASSIFICATION• Natural Breaks

– Each class contains clusters of attribute values, and “natural” breaks between

More subjectiveTOWN

Gaps between classes

POPULATION

Page 38: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

DATA CLASSIFICATION• Advantage of Natural Breaks

*

Page 39: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

DATA CLASSIFICATION• *Considers distribution of data along a

number line (very good)– Considers how the data are distributed

along the number line; each classification is “custom tailored”

– Works well with skewed data distributions

Page 40: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

DATA CLASSIFICATION• Disadvantages of Natural Breaks

– Subjective, and results will differ– More difficult to compare with other maps– One or two classes can end up occupying

the majority of the data's range

Page 41: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

DATA CLASSIFICATION• Classification for map comparison

– Use the same method for all maps (if possible)

– Equal interval with identical break values often works best (shown here)

– Quantile can also work well– By definition, natural breaks will result in

different classifications on different maps, making comparison difficult

Page 42: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION
Page 43: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION
Page 44: DATA STANDARDIZATION and CLASSIFICATION

DATASTANDARDIZATION

and

CLASSIFICATION

Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340)Prof. Hugh HowardAmerican River College