Data for Student Success May, 2010

Ann Arbor, MI“It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data

through professional development and web based dynamic inquiries for school improvement.”

Introduction to the Grant

• Federal Title II Part D of the NCLB Act of 2001 Enhancing Education through Technology Grant awarded through CEPI

OUTCOMES:

1. IDENTIFY IMPORTANT TOPICS RELATED TO MME

2. LEARN MORE ABOUT MME STANDARDS, COMPONENTS, AND ASSESSMENT

DESIGN

3. DEMONSTRATE AND EXPLORE THE NEW MME INQUIRIES

WHAT DO YOU KNOW ABOUT MME?

(SEE HANDOUT)

MME Spring 2009 Assessment Design

(SEE HANDOUT)

Spring 2009 MME Contributing Components

(SEE HANDOUT)

Spring 2009 MME High School Content

Standards by Subject

www.data4ss.org

www.data4ss.org

User name: demo_test1

Password: fall_01

School Year

Reading/ELA

Grade

3 4 5 6 7 8 11

2001-02   38%     31%   42%

2002-03   38%     31%   42%

2003-04   38%     31%   42%

2004-05   48%     43%   52%

2005-06 50% 48% 46% 45% 43% 41% 52%

2006-07 50% 48% 46% 45% 43% 41% 52%

2007-08 60% 59% 57% 56% 54% 53% 61%

2008-09 60% 59% 57% 56% 54% 53% 61%

2009-10 70% 69% 68% 67% 66% 65% 71%

2010-11 78% 77% 76% 75% 74% 73% 79%

2011-12 86% 85% 84% 83% 82% 82% 86%

2012-13 93% 92% 92% 91% 91% 91% 93%

2013-14 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

School Year

Mathematics

Grade

3 4 5 6 7 8 11

2001-02   47%       31% 33%

2002-03   47%       31% 33%

2003-04   47%       31% 33%

2004-05   56%       43% 44%

2005-06 59% 56% 53% 50% 46% 43% 44%

2006-07 59% 56% 53% 50% 46% 43% 44%

2007-08 67% 65% 62% 60% 57% 54% 55%

2008-09 67% 65% 62% 60% 57% 54% 55%

2009-10 67% 65% 62% 60% 57% 54% 55%

2010-11 75% 74% 71% 70% 67% 66% 67%

2011-12 83% 82% 81% 80% 78% 77% 78%

2012-13 91% 91% 90% 90% 89% 89% 89%

2013-14 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Michigan Annual AYP Objectives

School Data Dig

• Access your own school’s data• You may use the templates provided to

record your own MME data for– MME Proficiency 11th grade– MME Proficiency Subgroups

MME Standard Analysis

Accessing Demo Data

• www.data4ss.org• Dynamic Inquiry• Access Dynamic Inquiry Tool• User Name: demo_test1• Password: fall_01• MME • Standard Analysis

27

Navigation Process for Demo Site

• Select Inquiry Settings - tab• Select Demo ISD• Select Disneyland School District• Select Grzebien High School• Select 11th grade• Select Reading• Select 2008-09• View Results

28

MME Standard Analysis

29

MME Blueprint for 2008-2009

30

MME Standard AnalysisMain Graph

• Identifies points possible for each standard within a content area

• Identifies average number of points received by the state and the school in each standard assessed

• Identifies the Blueprint which shows the breakdown of points and percentage by standard for each content area

MME Reading Standard Analysis Spring 2009

32

33

What information does the detail graph provide?

• Identifies the state average number of points on the continuum of points available in the identified standard

• Identifies how our students performed on this standard in comparison to the state average.

34

Student Data

35

What information does the student data provide?

• Identifies the students who scored in the same point range on a particular standard

For each student the following is identified• Scaled score• Proficiency level for content area• Maximum points in the standard • Points scored • Percent Correct

36

Data Narrative Statements…• Are objective statements of FACT about the

school data• Represent student achievement, demographics,

school programs, school processes, and stakeholder perceptions

• Communicate a SINGLE idea• Are clear and concise – written in sentences or

phrases• Describe the data; they do not evaluate the data!• MUST stand alone; they do not require the data

source to accompany them in order to be understandable

38

How might we use the Tabular results to write data narrative

statements about our students?

40

13 students scored

equal to or more than

half the points

possible in this

standard

16 % of our students scored

equal to or more than

half the points

possible in this

standard

70 Students scored

less than half the points

possible in this

standard

84% of our students

scored less than half

the points possible in

this standard

Standard Analysis Tabular Results

School – Data Dig MME Standard Analysis 2008-09

• Complete data dig• Access Data 4SS inquiry tool

• Focus on Reading and Math• Templates

• MME Main Graph• Tabular Results

• Reading Standard Analysis• MME Math Standard Analysis

• Data Narrative Statements42

Navigation Process • Login• Select Inquiries – MME Standard Analysis• Select Inquiry Settings - tab• Select ISD

– Select District – Select School– Select Grade Level– Select Subject– Select School Year(s)

• View Results

43

Where do we go next?

45

13 students scored

equal to or more than

half the points

possible in this

standard

16 % of our students scored

equal to or more than

half the points

possible in this

standard

70 Students scored

less than half the points

possible in this

standard

84% of our students

scored less than half

the points possible in

this standard

Use of High School Content Expectation Document

• Find the Standard indicated on the MME Standard Analysis Blueprint

• Determine the Content Expectations contained within this standard

• Which Content Expectations are identified as Pre-MME?

46

Tabular Results for Standard 2.2

47

48

Expectations identified as Pre-MME by Standard

Now that we have identified the Content Expectations within the

Standard what is our next question?

• What concepts and skills do students need to know and be able to do to be successful on these content expectations?

49

• Where are these Content Expectations taught?– What courses?– What grades?

• How are these Content Expectations taught?– Do we use common instructional practices?– Are our practices effective?

• How are we going to assess these Content Expectations?– Do we use common assessments linked to these

Content Expectations?– Do we analyze and use the results of our common

assessments?

50

• How do we know that students have learned these Content Expectations?

• What evidence will we collect?

• What are we going to do for the students that did not learn?

• What are we going to do for the students who have learned these expectations?

51

“High-quality classroom data clearly reflective of the students’ attainment of the

most critical academic content – and available to educators routinely throughout the quarter/semester/year – are the data teachers need to be able to analyze in

order to determine if students are indeed “hitting the target.”

Common Formative Assessments by Larry Ainsworth and Donald Viegut, 2006

52

What do we know about our High School Students?

• The last state assessment is given in the beginning of the 8th grade year for Math and Reading?

• How do we know what 9th graders know as they come into high school?

• What data are we using to monitor student learning between 8th grade and 11th grade?

53

Assessing your Culture of Quality DataAssessment Inventory

• What does our school have in place?• What data source are they using?• Do they have:

– long-term or summative data?– medium-term or formative/summative data?– short-term or formative data?

• In which content areas?• Who uses all this data?

54

Assessing your Culture of Quality DataAssessment Inventory Activity Objectives

• Designed to inventory the sources of data used by individual schools.

• Enables schools to identify the dates data is collected, its audience, and how it is used.

• Provides schools an overall inventory of the sources of their data in a clear and concise chart.

55

Data Assessment InventoryState Assessment Level

56

Assessment Inventory Local Assessment Level

57

Assessing the Culture of Quality Data

• Using your school– What data do you collect?

• Use template to record what you currently know– What is in place?– Where do we need to go next?

58

QUESTIONS?