Upload
vijina-viswanadh
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction
1/21
4.1 DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
TABLE: 1
1. What’s motives you to o!" mo!e e##i$ie%t&y' ha((i&y)
No. of respondents percentage
Good pay 3 6
Promotion 11 22
Less supervision 34 68
Good working condition 2 4
ota! "# 1##
G o o d
p a y
P r o m
o t i o n
L e s s
s u p
e r v i s i o n
G o
o d w o r k i n
g c o n d i t i o n
01020304050607080
percentage
percentage
$N%&P&%'$(N
)e ta*!e s)ows t)at t)e efficiency and )appiness of an emp!oyee in doing )is work is *ased on !ess
supervision. $t gives more satisfaction to emp!oyees+. ,rom t)e prospective of t)e firm $t is not good+.
TABLE: *
8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction
2/21
Do you #ee& that the sa&a!y +ei%, o##e!e- at %!stone tea estate+ -a!petta is
suffient to !ead satisfied !ife
N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%
ig)!y satisfied 1 2/atisfied 3 6
Neutra! 11 22
0issatisfied 3# 6#
ig)!y dissatisfied " 1#
tota! "# 1##
i g ! " y s a t i s # e d
$ e u t r a "
i g ! " y d i s s a t i s #
e d
010203040506070
PERCENTAGE
P%&'%$()G%
$N%&P&%'$(N
(!e ta*"e and c!art s!own a*ove indicates w!et!er t!e sa"ary *eing o+erd at
%!stone tea estate+ -a!petta is suffient to !ead satisfied !ife , on"y 2- is !ig!"y satis#ed wit!
t!e sa"ary and 6- o. t!em were satis#ed, /aority o. t!e respondents were
dissatis#ed wit! t!e sa"ary wit! t!e statement so .rom t!is we can conc"ude t!at
most o. t!e respondents !ave not satis#ed wit! t!e sa"ary,
TABLE:
're you satisfied wit) t)e emp!oyment condition prevai!ing your organiation
8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction
3/21
N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%
ig)!y satisfied 3 6
/atisfied 18 36
Neutra! 2# 4#
0issatisfied 3 6
ig)!y dissatisfied 6 12
tota! "# 1##
i g ! " y
s a t i s #
e d
$ e t u r a "
i g ! " y
d i s s a t i s #
e d
05
1015202530
354045
PERCENTAGE
P%&'%$()G%
$N%&P&%'$(N
(!e ta*"e and c!art s!own a*ove indicates t!at t!e emp!oyment condition prevai!ing
t)e organiation, rom t!e 50 respondents 40- are neutra" and 36- are satis#ed,
vera"" t!e t!e emp"oyment condition is .air,
TABLE:4
1. 0o you fee! satisfied wit) t)e p)ysica! working conditions
N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%
8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction
4/21
ig)!y satisfied " 1#
/atisfied 13 26
Neutra! 2" "#
0issatisfied " 1#
ig)!y dissatisfied 2 4
tota! "# 1##
i g ! " y
s a t i s # e d
$ e t u r a "
i g ! " y
d i s s a t i s #
e d
010
20
30
40
50
60
PERCENTAGE
P%&'%$()G%
$N%&P&%'$(N
(!e ta*"e and c!art s!own a*ove indicates t!at t!e satis.actory "eve" o. t!e
p)ysica! working conditions of t)e company. "# of t)e respondents were neutra! and 26 of
respondents were satisfied wit) t)e working condition+. )ere are 1# dissatisfied and 4 )ig)!y
dissatisfied persons.
TABLE: /
're you satisfied wit) t)e re!ations)ip e5isting *etween su*ordinates and
superiors
N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%
ig)!y satisfied 33 66
/atisfied 1# 2#
8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction
5/21
Neutra! 4 8
0issatisfied 2 4
ig)!y dissatisfied 1 2
tota! "# 1##
i g ! " y
s a t i s # e d
$ e t u r a "
i g ! " y
d i s s a t i s # e d
010203040506070
PERCENTAGE
P%&'%$()G%
$N%&P&%'$(N
(!e ta*"e and c!art s!own a*ove indicates t!at t!e re!ations)ip e5isting *etween
su*ordinates and superiors are )ig)!y satisfied in 66 of emp!oyees and according!y on!y 2+ 4workers are dissatisfied and )ig)!y dissatisfied 2# are satisfied wit) t)e re!ations)ip and 8 were
neutra!.
TABLE: 0
2. $s your working )ours satisfactory
N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%
ig)!y satisfied 2# 4#
/atisfied 2# 4#
Neutra! 8 16
0issatisfied 2 4
8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction
6/21
ig)!y dissatisfied # #
tota! "# 1##
i g ! " y s
a t i s #
e d
$ e t u r a "
i g ! " y
d i s s
a t i s #
e d
05
1015202530354045
PERCENTAGE
P%&'%$()G%
$N%&P&%'$(N
'*out 4# of t)e respondents said t)at t)e working )ours of t)e company is )ig)!y satisfactory and 4#
of t)e respondents were satisfied wit) t)e working )ours and 16 are neutra! a*out t)e working )oursand t)en t)e rest of t)em are dissatisfied wit) t)e working )ours.
TABLE:
N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%
ig)!y satisfied 11 22
/atisfied 28 "6
Neutra! 6 12
0issatisfied 4 8
ig)!y dissatisfied 1 2
tota! "# 1##
8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction
7/21
3. 're you satisfied wit) t)e way in w)ic) conf!icts are reso!ved in your
company
i g ! " y
s a t i s # e d
$ e t u r a "
i g ! " y
d i s s a t i s #
e d
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
PERCENTAGE
P%&'%$()G%
$N%&P&&%'$(N
)e s)ows w)et)er t)e satisfaction of emp!oyees wit) t)e way in w)ic) conf!icts are reso!ved in t)is
company "6 of t)e emp!oyees are satisfied t)is and 22 are )ig)!y satisfied and rest of t)e 12+
8+2 are neutra!+ dissatisfied+ )ig)!y dissatisfied respective!y.
TABLE: 2
4. ou fee! satisfied wit) t)e canteen faci!ities
N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%
ig)!y satisfied 2 4
/atisfied 7 14
Neutra! 22 44
0issatisfied 13 26
ig)!y dissatisfied 6 12
8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction
8/21
tota! "# 1##
i g ! " y
s a t i s # e d
$ e t u r a "
i g ! " y
d i s s a t i s #
e d
05
101520253035404550
PERCENTAGE
P%&'%$()G%
$N%&P&%'$(N
(!e ta*"e and c!art s!own a*ove indicates w!et!er canteen .aci"ity is
advantage .or t!e workers, 14- o. t!e respondents satis#ed wit! t!e statement
and 4- o. t!em are o. t!em strong"y satis#ed wit! t!e same and 44- !ave
neutra" opinion, 26- o. t!e respondents dissatis#ed and 12- o. t!em strong"ydissatis#ed wit! t!e statement so .rom t!is we can conc"ude t!at most o. t!e
respondents agrees t!at t!e canteen .aci"ity is eit!er advantage not
disadvantage .or t!e workers,
TABLE: 3
/. 're you agreeing t)at t)e work sc)edu!e in your company )e!ps you to improve
your productivity
N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%
ig)!y satisfied # #
/atisfied 6 12
Neutra! 27 "4
8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction
9/21
0issatisfied 16 32
ig)!y dissatisfied 1 2
tota! "# 1##
i g
! " y s a t i s # e d
$ e t u r a "
i g ! "
y d i s s a t i s # e d
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
PERCENTAGE
P%&'%$()G%
$N%&P&%'$(N
(!e ta*"e and c!art s!own a*ove indicates w!et!er t!e work sc)edu!e in your
company )e!ps you to improve your productivity "4 of t)e respondents were neura! a*out t)e
statement and on!y 12 were satisfied wit) t)is. 32 of t)e respondents are dissatisfies and rest of
t)em are )ig)!y dissatisfied.
TABLE: 1
6. 're you )ave t)e )a*it of enoying t)e re creationa! faci!ities t)at is *eing
provided *y t)e company
N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%
ig)!y satisfied 2 4
/atisfied 4 8
Neutra! 2# 4#
0issatisfied 2# 4#
ig)!y dissatisfied 4 8
8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction
10/21
tota! "# 1##
i g ! " y
s a t i s # e d
$ e t u r a "
i g ! " y
d i s s a t i s #
e d
05
1015202530354045
PERCENTAGE
P%&'%$()G%
$N%&P&%'$(N
)e ta*!e and c)art s)ows t)e statement t)at t)e )a*it of enoying t)e re creationa! faci!ities t)at is
*eing provided *y t)e company satisfactory. 4# are neutra! and dissatisfied respective!y.
TABLE: 11
7. 're you agreeing t)at t)e training programs provided *y t)e company )e!ps you
to deve!op your work more
N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%
ig)!y satisfied 1 2
/atisfied 3 6
Neutra! 9 180issatisfied 24 48
ig)!y dissatisfied 13 26
tota! "# 1##
8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction
11/21
i g ! " y
s a t i s # e d
$ e t u r a "
i g ! " y
d i s s a t i s #
e d
0
10
20
3040
50
60
PERCENTAGE
P%&'%$()G%
$N%&P&%'$(N
(!e ta*"e and c!art s!own a*ove indicates t!at training programs provided *y
t!e company, 6- o. t!e respondents satis#ed wit! t!e statement and 2- o.
t!em strong"y satis#ed wit! t!e same and 18- !ave neutra" opinion, 48- o. t!e
respondents dissatis#ed and 26- o. t!em strong"y disagree wit! t!e statement
so .rom t!is we can conc"ude t!at most o. t!e respondents !ave dissatis.action
a*out t!is,
TABLE: 1*
're you satisfied wit) t)e present o*
N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%
ig)!y satisfied 2 4
/atisfied 4 8
Neutra! 18 36
0issatisfied 18 36
ig)!y dissatisfied 8 16
tota! "# 1##
8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction
12/21
i g ! " y
s a t i s # e d
$ e t u r a "
i g ! " y
d i s s a t i s #
e d
05
10152025
303540
PERCENTAGE
P%&'%$()G%
$N%&P&%'$(N
(!e ta*"e and c!art s!own a*ove indicates t!at t!e satis.action wit! t!e present
o*, 8- o. t!e respondents satis#ed wit! t!e statement and 4- o. t!em
strong"y agree wit! t!e same and 36- !ave neutra" opinion, 36- o. t!e
respondents dissatis#ed and 16- o. t!em strong"y disatis#ed wit! t!e
statement so .rom t!is we can conc"ude t!at most o. t!e respondents !ave
neutra" opinion a*out t!is,
Wea!e measu!es
TABLE: 1
8. :edica! faci!ities
N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%ig)!y satisfied 1 2
/atisfied " 1#
Neutra! 2# 4#
0issatisfied 2# 4#
ig)!y dissatisfied 4 8
tota! "# 1##
8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction
13/21
i g ! " y
s a t i s # e d
$ e t u r a "
i g ! " y
d i s s a t i s #
e d
05
1015202530
354045
PERCENTAGE
P%&'%$()G%
$N%&P&%'$(N
(!e ta*"e and c!art s!own a*ove indicates t!at medica" .aci"ities provided *y
t!e company, 10- o. t!e respondents satis#ed wit! t!e statement and 2- o.
t!em strong"y satis#ed wit! t!e same and 40- !ave neutra" opinion, 40- o. t!e
respondents dissatis#ed and 8- o. t!em strong"y disagree wit! t!e statement
so .rom t!is we can conc"ude t!at most o. t!e respondents !ave dissatis.action
a*out t!is,
TABLE: 14
9. ompensation for accidents
N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%
ig)!y satisfied 3 6
/atisfied 11 22
Neutra! 23 46
0issatisfied 6 12
ig)!y dissatisfied 7 14
tota! "# 1##
8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction
14/21
i g ! " y
s a t i s # e d
$ e u t r a "
i g ! " y
d i s s a t i s #
e d
05
101520253035
404550
PERCENTAGE
P%&'%$()G%
$N%&P&%'$(N
(!e ta*"e and c!art s!own a*ove indicates t!at ompensation for accidents provided
*y t!e company, 22- o. t!e respondents satis#ed wit! t!e statement and 6- o.
t!em strong"y satis#ed wit! t!e same and 46- !ave neutra" opinion, 12- o.
t!e respondents dissatis#ed and 14- o. t!em strong"y dissatis#ed wit! t!e
statement so .rom t!is we can conc"ude t!at most o. t!e respondents !ave
satis.action a*out t!is,
TABLE: 1/
1#.ransportation
N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%ig)!y satisfied 2 4
/atisfied 3 6
Neutra! 1# 2#
0issatisfied 26 "2
ig)!y dissatisfied 9 18
tota! "# 1##
8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction
15/21
i g ! " y
s a t i s # e d
$ e u t r a "
i g ! " y
d i s s a t i s #
e d
0
10
20
3040
50
60
PERCENTAGE
P%&'%$()G%
$N%&P&%'$(N
(!e ta*"e and c!art s!own a*ove indicates t!at transportation provided *y t!e
company, 6- o. t!e respondents satis#ed wit! t!e statement and 4- o. t!em
strong"y satis#ed wit! t!e same and 20- !ave neutra" opinion, 52- o. t!e
respondents dissatis#ed and 18- o. t!em strong"y dissatis#ed wit! t!e
statement so .rom t!is we can conc"ude t!at most o. t!e respondents !ave
dissatis.action a*out t!is,
TABLE: 10
11.ousing and accommodation
N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%
ig)!y satisfied 2 4
/atisfied 19 38
Neutra! 19 38
0issatisfied 8 16
ig)!y dissatisfied 2 4
8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction
16/21
tota! "# 1##
i g ! " y
s a t i s # e d
$ e u t r a "
i g ! " y
d i s s a t i s #
e d
05
101520253035
40
PERCENTAGE
P%&'%$()G%
$N%&P&%'$(N
(!e ta*"e and c!art s!own a*ove indicates t!at )ousing and accommodation
provided *y t!e company, 38- o. t!e respondents satis#ed wit! t!e statement
and 4- o. t!em strong"y satis#ed wit! t!e same and 38- !ave neutra" opinion,
16- o. t!e respondents dissatis#ed and 4- o. t!em strong"y dissatis#ed wit!
t!e statement so .rom t!is we can conc"ude t!at most o. t!e respondents !ave
satis.action a*out t!is,
TABLE: 1
12.$s t)e *onus provided *y t)e organiation is ade;uate
N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%
ig)!y satisfied 1" 3#
/atisfied 1" 3#
Neutra! 12 24
0issatisfied 7 14
ig)!y dissatisfied 1 2
tota! "# 1##
8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction
17/21
i g ! " y
s a t i s # e d
$ e u t r a "
i g ! " y
d i s s a t i s #
e d
05
101520253035
PERCENTAGE
P%&'%$()G%
$N%&P&%'$(N
(!e ta*"e and c!art s!own a*ove indicates t!at *onus provided *y t)e organiation,
30- o. t!e respondents satis#ed wit! t!e statement and 30- o. t!em strong"y
satis#ed wit! t!e same and 24- !ave neutra" opinion, 14- o. t!e respondents
dissatis#ed and 2- o. t!em strong"y dissatis#ed wit! t!e statement so .rom
t!is we can conc"ude t!at most o. t!e respondents !ave satis.action a*out t!is
So$ia& se$u!ity measu!es
TABLE: 12
13.$s t)e *onus provided *y t)e organiation is ade;uate
N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%
ig)!y satisfied # #
/atisfied 18 36
Neutra! 2# 4#
0issatisfied 8 16
ig)!y dissatisfied 4 8
tota! "# 1##
8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction
18/21
i g ! " y
s a t i s # e d
$ e u t r a "
i g ! " y
d i s s a t i s #
e d
05
1015202530
354045
PERCENTAGE
P%&'%$()G%
$N%&P&%'$(N
)e ta*!e c)art s)own a*ove indicates t)at
8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction
19/21
i g ! " y
s a t i s # e d
$ e u t r a "
i g ! " y
d i s s a t i s #
e d
05
101520253035
404550
PERCENTAGE
P%&'%$()G%
$N%&P&%'$(N
(!e ta*"e and c!art s!own a*ove indicates t!at provident fund provided *y t)e
organiation, 44- o. t!e respondents satis#ed wit! t!e statement and 4- o.
t!em strong"y satis#ed wit! t!e same and 38- !ave neutra" opinion, 14- o.
t!e respondents are dissatis#ed and no*ody is strong"y dissatis#ed wit! t!e
statement so .rom t!is we can conc"ude t!at most o. t!e respondents !ave
satis.action a*out t!is
TABLE: *
Pension
N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%ig)!y satisfied 2 4
/atisfied 23 46
Neutra! 17 34
0issatisfied 7 14
ig)!y dissatisfied 1 2
tota! "# 1##
8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction
20/21
i g ! " y
s a t i s # e d
$ e u t r a "
i g ! " y
d i s s a t i s #
e d
05
101520253035
404550
PERCENTAGE
P%&'%$()G%
$N%&P&%'$(N
)e a*ove detai!s s)own t)at satisfied of t)e a!! respondent.
8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction
21/21
i g ! " y
s a t i s # e d
$ e u t r a "
i g ! " y
d i s s a t i s #
e d
05
1015202530
354045
PERCENTAGE
P%&'%$()G%
$N%&P&%'$(N
)e socia! security measures taken *y t)e company is good+ *ecause among t)e "# workers 4# workers
are satisfied and t)e 4# workers were neutra! and on!y a few dissatisfied wit) t)is+.