25
Data Abstrac*on Assistant (DAA): A new tool for data abstrac*on during systema*c reviews Ian Saldanha, MBBS, MPH, PhD May 16, 2017 JHU CHSOR Seminar/EPC Journal Club

Data Abstrac*on Assistant (DAA): A new tool for data abstrac*on during systemac reviews · Data Abstrac*on Assistant (DAA): A new tool for data abstrac*on during systemac reviews

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    12

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

DataAbstrac*onAssistant(DAA):Anewtoolfordataabstrac*on

duringsystema*creviews

IanSaldanha,MBBS,MPH,PhDMay16,2017

JHUCHSORSeminar/EPCJournalClub

CollaboratorsDr.TianjingLi(PI,JHU)Dr.ChristopherSchmid(PIofthesubcontracttoBrownU)Dr.IanSaldanha(ProjectDirector,JHU)Mr.BryantSmith(SRDRCoordinator,BrownU)Mr.JensJap(Programmer,BrownU)Mr.JosephCanner(DataManager,JHU)

OtherSteeringCommiPeeMembers

Dr.JesseBerlin(JnJ)Ms.VernalBranchMs.SimonaCarini(UCSF)Dr.WileyChan(KaiserPermanente)Dr.KayDickersin(JHU)

2

Dr.SusanHuVless(JHU)Dr.IdaSim(UCSF)Dr.M.HassanMurad(MayoClinic)Ms.ElizabethWhamondDr.ByronWallace(NortheasternU)

Goalsfortoday

Theproblems

Our(potenYal)fix

Willitwork?

3

Background

•  DataabstracYon–KeysystemaYcreviewstep!

•  Threemainapproaches– SingleabstracYon– SingleabstracYonplusverificaYon– DualindependentabstracYonplusadjudicaYon

4

Problem1-Inaccuracy

5

•  SingleabstracYon~30%errorrate1•  SingleabstracYonplusverificaYon– 20%moreerrorsthanindependentdualabstracYon2

– Errorshighestfornumericalresults3

– Errorshigherforlessexperiencedabstractors3•  ErrorsinpublishedsystemaYcreviews– ≥1errorin37%ofmeta-analyses4

– ≥1errorin48%ofmeta-analyses5

1.  HortonJetal.JClinEpidemiol.20102.  BuscemiNetal.JClinEpidemiol.20063.  GreshamGetal.CochraneColloquium2014.(Abstract)

4. GøtzschePCetal.JAMA20075. JonesAPetal.JClinEpidemiol.2005

Problem2-Inefficiency

6

•  Time– ~50minutesperarYcleperabstractor1

– AddiYonalYmefordataadjudicaYon

•  50%moreYmeforindependentdualabstracYonplusadjudicaYonthansingleabstracYonplusverificaYon2

1.  GreshamGetal.(Abstract)CochraneColloquium20142.  BuscemiNetal.JClinEpidemiol.2006

Problem3-Inconsistentrecommenda*ons

7

“Asaminimum,informa6onthatinvolvessubjec.veinterpreta6onandinforma6onthatiscri.caltotheinterpreta6onofresults(e.g.outcomedata)shouldbeextractedindependentlybyatleasttwopeople.”

“Ideallytworesearchersshouldindependentlyperformthedataextrac6on….Asanacceptedminimum,oneresearchercanextractthedatawithasecondresearcherindependentlycheckingthedata...”

“Ataminimum,usetwoormoreresearchers,workingindependently,toextractquan.ta.veandothercri.caldata….Forothertypesofdata,oneindividualcouldextractthedatawhilethesecondindividualindependentlychecks...”

Our(poten*al)fix

8

•  DataAbstracYonAssistant(DAA)•  Free,opensource,openaccess

HowdoesDAAwork?

9

1.   ViewstudyarYcle(PDFs)sidebysidewithdataabstracYonforms(e.g.,inSystemaYcReviewDataRepository[SRDR]).

2.   Highlight(or“pin”)thelocaYonoftextinthePDF.

3.   CopytextfromthePDFintothedataabstracYonform.

1.Oncedocumentisselected,PDFwillloadonrighthalfofscreeninthisarea

2.DraganddropflagontoPDFtext3.Clickonflagtoviewpinnedloca.ons

4.Clickontexttoautoma.callyselectthePDFandscrolltothemarkedtext.

hPps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dGIL6jltYQ&feature=youtu.be

HowdoesDAAwork?

HowmightDAAhelp?

11

•  Reduceerrors•  Reduce*metakenfordataabstracYon•  FacilitatethetrackingofabstractedinformaYon– HelpwithupdaYngsystemaYcreviews

Willitwork?

12

Willitwork?

13

•  Randomizedcrossovertrial,enYrelyonlineA.  DAA-facilitatedsingleabstracYonplusverificaYonB.  TradiYonalsingledataabstracYonplusverificaYonC.  TradiYonalindependentdualdataabstracYon

•  Outcomes–  AccuracyofabstracYon(i.e.,errorrates)–  EfficiencyofabstracYon(i.e.,Ymetaken)

DAATrial–EligibilityCriteria

14

•  Age≥20years•  Haveabstracteddatafrom≥1arYcleforasystemaYcreviewinanyfield

•  Self-reportedcomfortwithscienYficarYclesinEnglish

DAATrial–SampleSize

15

•  48dataabstractors(24pairs)

LESSexperienced

(Published<3systemaYcreviews)

MOREexperienced

(Published≥3systemaYcreviews)

&

DAATrial–Randomiza*onSchema

16

DAATrial–Dataabstrac*on

17

•  DataabstracYonformsfor48pre-idenYfiedclinicaltrialarYcles

•  AwertraininginSRDRandDAA,eachpairabstractsdatafrom6arYcles,twoundereachapproach(A,B,andC)inarandomlyassignedsequence

DAATrial–Outcome1

18

Errorrates•  AbstracYonbyPIandProjectDirectorwillbethereferencestandard(“answerkey”)

•  Noopen-endedtextquesYonsusedforanalysis•  Foragivendataitem,anydifferencebetweenabstracteddataandanswerkeyisanerror.– Determinedusingacomputerprogram

DAATrial–Outcome2

19

Timetakenfordataabstrac*on•  BothiniYalabstracYonanddataverificaYon/adjudicaYon

•  Measurement– AutomaYcallyrecordedbySRDRYmer– Self-recordedbyabstractors• InSRDR• AQualtricssurvey

DAATrial–Minimizingbias

20

Poten*alsource

Strategy

Sequencegenera6on

Computergeneratedrandomnumbers(1to24)

Alloca6onconcealment

ProjectDirectoremailstheSeniorStaYsYcian

Masking/Blinding

NotfeasibleforabstractorsorProjectDirector.Bothoutcomes(Ymeanderrors)areobjecYve.

Incompleteoutcomedata

AcYvefollowup.TwomethodsformeasuringYme.

Other Washoutnotneeded(noanYcipatedcarryovereffect).Analysisaccountsforsequence.

21

Sta*s*calAnalysisforErrorRates

Ques*ontype(Design/Baseline/Results)

Dataabstrac*onapproach(A/B/C)

Dataabstrac*onsequence1-6

Systema*creview1-4

Abstractorpair1-24

Ar*cle1-48

DAATrial–Wherearewe?

22

•  AlldataabstracYoncompleted

•  Datacleaningisongoing

•  Dataanalysisoverthesummer

•  Resultsexpected–September2017

DAATrial–ExitPollResults

23

•  All52abstractorscompletedtheexitpoll•  83%foundDAAoverall“veryeasy”or“somewhateasy”touse•  74%were“verylikely”orsomewhatlikelytouseDAAinthefuture•  84%were“verylikely”or“somewhatlikely”torecommendthatothersuseDAAinthefuture•  62%namedthe“abilitytoclickonflags”astheirfavoriteDAAfeature

Implica*ons

24

•  Novelsowwaretool– Designedtoworkwithvariousdatasystems– Testedinarigorousrandomizedtrial

•  DAAtrialcould:– InformrecommendaYonsfordataabstracYon– Promotemorerobustevidence-baseddecisions– Saveourenterpriseresources

ThankYou!

Email:[email protected]

TwiTer:@saldanha_ian

25