13
Daniel Rohrlich, Yakov Neiman , , Yonathan Japha, and Ron Folman Yonathan Japha, and Ron Folman Department of Physics and Department of Physics and Ilze Katz Center for Ilze Katz Center for Meso- and Nanoscale Meso- and Nanoscale Science, BGU, Science, BGU, Israel Israel Two-path Interference with a Single Quantum Slit or Mirror BGU

Daniel Rohrlich, Yakov Neiman , Yonathan Japha, and Ron Folman

  • Upload
    tad

  • View
    34

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

BGU. Two-path Interference with a Single Quantum Slit or Mirror. Daniel Rohrlich, Yakov Neiman , Yonathan Japha, and Ron Folman Department of Physics and Ilze Katz Center for Meso- and Nanoscale Science, BGU, Israel. Two path interference. 2. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Daniel Rohrlich, Yakov Neiman , Yonathan Japha, and Ron Folman

Daniel Rohrlich, Yakov Neiman, Yonathan Japha, and , Yonathan Japha, and Ron FolmanRon Folman

Department of Physics and Ilze Katz Center forDepartment of Physics and Ilze Katz Center for Meso- and Nanoscale Science, BGU,Meso- and Nanoscale Science, BGU, Israel Israel

Two-path Interference with a Single Quantum Slit or Mirror

BGU

Page 2: Daniel Rohrlich, Yakov Neiman , Yonathan Japha, and Ron Folman

Two path interferenceTwo path interference

2

Page 3: Daniel Rohrlich, Yakov Neiman , Yonathan Japha, and Ron Folman

3

Single particle superposition

A single particle in a A single particle in a superposition of two superposition of two locations is prepared inlocations is prepared ina double well potentiala double well potentialand then the potentialand then the potentialis turned off.is turned off.

The wavepackets expand The wavepackets expand and overlap after t=and overlap after t=Mdw/h Mdw/h

Initial state of probe+Initial state of probe+Target:Target:

Page 4: Daniel Rohrlich, Yakov Neiman , Yonathan Japha, and Ron Folman

Condition for interference: loss of orthogonality of target states

4

After scattering:After scattering:Final state:Final state:

It final target states (left and right) remain orthogonal then thereIt final target states (left and right) remain orthogonal then thereIs no interference! Is no interference! Final state is an entangled state.Final state is an entangled state.The phase The phase have no effect. have no effect.

Page 5: Daniel Rohrlich, Yakov Neiman , Yonathan Japha, and Ron Folman

1D example: One-mirror Fabry-Perot

5

In the special case M=m: pfin=Pin

Transfer of orthogonality from target to probe

Page 6: Daniel Rohrlich, Yakov Neiman , Yonathan Japha, and Ron Folman

General solution for the 1D problem

6

Page 7: Daniel Rohrlich, Yakov Neiman , Yonathan Japha, and Ron Folman

Suppression of visibility

7

If the initial probe momentum has a spread pin

22

The probe induces an effective coherence length on the The probe induces an effective coherence length on the target. target.

Page 8: Daniel Rohrlich, Yakov Neiman , Yonathan Japha, and Ron Folman

One-slit Young interference

8

Page 9: Daniel Rohrlich, Yakov Neiman , Yonathan Japha, and Ron Folman

Transfer of orthogonality

9

Condition for full interferenceCondition for full interference infin

in

MP

mp sin/

/

Page 10: Daniel Rohrlich, Yakov Neiman , Yonathan Japha, and Ron Folman

Angular spectrum of scattering

10

45

2

1

in

m

M

Page 11: Daniel Rohrlich, Yakov Neiman , Yonathan Japha, and Ron Folman

Visibility as a function of M/m

11

Page 12: Daniel Rohrlich, Yakov Neiman , Yonathan Japha, and Ron Folman

Visibility as a function of pin

12

Page 13: Daniel Rohrlich, Yakov Neiman , Yonathan Japha, and Ron Folman

Summary and conclusions

13

• Two-path interference by scattering off a single free quantum particle in a superposition of two locations is possible.

• Interference is suppressed by initial momentum spread of the probe particle or by measurement precision.

• Double slit interference from a single slit is possible when the mass of the target is comparable to the mass of the probe (or smaller).

• The condition for interference is loss of orthogonality of the target states or equivalently purity of the probe state.