1
Daniel Flynn 1 , Mary Kells 1 , Mary Joyce 1&2 , Catalina Suarez 1&2 1. Health Service Executive 2. National Suicide Research Foundation The National Dialectical Behaviour Therapy Implementation Project Deliberate self-harm has been and continues to be a significant problem amongst Irish men and women. In 2012 alone, 9,483 people were treated for deliberate self-harm episodes, with more than 1 in 5 of these individuals repeatedly self-harming (Griffin et al., 2013). It has been identified that individuals who engage in repetitive self-harm behaviours often present with symptoms associated with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD). BPD is recognised as one of the most distressing disorders for clients and most difficult for clinicians to treat. In terms of treatment, Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT) is an intervention that has a strong evidence base in working with this client population. A number of implementation studies demonstrate its effectiveness in treating BPD and reducing self-harm/suicidal behaviours (e.g. Brassington & Krawitz, 2006). In view of the high incidence of deliberate self-harm repetition across Ireland, the current lack of specialised services available for the treatment of these behaviours, and the results of a recent pilot project undertaken in Cork Mental Health Services (2010), a proposal was put forward to the National Office for Suicide Prevention. This proposal requested funding to establish a National DBT Project which aims to implement DBT at multiple sites across Ireland in a coordinated manner. The primary aim of the National DBT Project is to train 16 teams nationwide over a period of two years (8 teams per year; adult/ adolescent mental health teams), to implement DBT within their services. This initiative will be extensively evaluated over the two year period. The National DBT Project is coordinated by a DBT project team based in Cork Mental Health Services. Engagement In order to generate knowledge and interest about the National DBT Project, Mental Health Service Managers and Executive Clinical Directors across Ireland were contacted by the National DBT Project team. This involved outlining the availability of funding for training in DBT, and providing detailed information about DBT and its requirements. Services and teams who were then interested in training in DBT were required to apply to the National DBT Project office in order to participate in the implementation project. The teams for year one were formally selected by a steering group committee comprising representatives from various professions and backgrounds within mental health. The criteria for the selection of teams were: -Evidence of need (NSRF Registry Data) -Meeting of DBT training requirements -Evidence of team commitment -Evidence of evaluation/ research commitment -Commitment from local management In order to implement DBT in a coordinated manner and evaluate the implementation effectively at each site, the National DBT Project team would liaise regularly with the DBT project champion for each team (team leader), provide support and guidance to the new teams in implementing the programme into their service, and coordinate the evaluation of the implementation at each site. Evaluation In addition to coordinating the training and national implementation of DBT, the National DBT Project team is responsible for comprehensively designing the evaluation of the initiative in line with research best practice. This procedure involved completing a comprehensive literature review, conducting data analyses of the pilot project data, applying for ethical approval from multiple ethics committees, and at a later point, disseminating the findings of the evaluation nationally and internationally. Three strands for the evaluation of the implementation of DBT were thus identified: The evaluation of the effectiveness of DBT The effectiveness of DBT will be evaluated through the collection and analysis of information gathered from a battery of client self-report measures examining change in life- threatening behaviours, skill utilisation, and quality of life. These assessments will be carried out at baseline, midway through the programme (adult sites only), end of programme, and follow-up. The evaluation of the implementation process of DBT The multi-site implementation process will be evaluated by collecting information regarding each sites’ implementation of DBT (DBT implementation logs), coding of DBT session tapes to examine therapists’ adherence to the DBT model, and focus groups/ interviews with DBT therapists and clients. The evaluation of the economic benefit of DBT A comprehensive economic evaluation will be carried out by comparing information collected in the battery of measures and healthcare records of both DBT clients and Treatment-As-Usual clients. Evaluation of DBT Implementation Effectiveness Evaluation Multi-Site Implementation Process Economic Evaluation Conclusion This project will result in the delivery of an evidence- based intervention at a national level for increasingly complex clients presenting with self-harm behaviours. By comprehensively evaluating the implementation of DBT nationally, it is envisioned that this initiative will contribute significantly to the evidence base of DBT. In addition, it is anticipated that the project will continue to grow, ensuring the positive impact of DBT is accessible to more mental health services across Ireland. American Psychiatric Association (2001). Practice guidelines for the treatment of patients with borderline personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 1-52. Brassington, J. & Krawitz, R. (2006). Australasian Dialectical Behavior therapy Pilot Outcome Study: Effectiveness, Utility and feasibility. Australian Psychiatry, 14 (3), 313-319. Department of Health & Children (2006). A Vision for Change: Report of the Expert Group on Mental Health Policy. Dublin: Stationary Office. Flynn, D. & Kells, M. (2013). The Road to Endeavour : Development and evaluation of a programme for those presenting with repeated self-harm and chronic suicidality. Griffin, E., Arensman, E., Wall, A., Corcoran, P. & Perry, I.J. (2013). National Registry of Deliberate Self Harm Annual Report 2012. Cork: National Suicide Research Foundation. National Health and Medical Research Council (2012). Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Borderline Personality Disorder. Australia. National Institute for Health & Clinical Excellence (2009). Borderline Personality Disorder: Treatment and Management. Leicester: BPS National Suicide Research Foundation DBT has been endorsed by the Irish expert group on mental health (Vision for Change, 2006), and has been recommended by the American Psychiatric Association (2001), the NHS National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2009), and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (2012) as being part of any comprehensive treatment programme for persons with Borderline Personality Disorder and co-morbid presentations. HSE’s 4 Administrative Areas & 32 Local Health Offices in Ireland This project is supported by funding from the National Office for Suicide Prevention (NOSP).

Daniel Flynn 1 , Mary Kells 1 , Mary Joyce 1&2 , Catalina Suarez 1&2 1. Health Service Executive

  • Upload
    matsu

  • View
    33

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The National Dialectical Behaviour Therapy Implementation Project. National Suicide Research Foundation. Daniel Flynn 1 , Mary Kells 1 , Mary Joyce 1&2 , Catalina Suarez 1&2 1. Health Service Executive 2. National Suicide Research Foundation. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Daniel Flynn 1 , Mary Kells 1 , Mary Joyce 1&2 , Catalina Suarez 1&2 1. Health Service Executive

Daniel Flynn1, Mary Kells1, Mary Joyce1&2, Catalina Suarez1&2

1. Health Service Executive2. National Suicide Research Foundation

The National Dialectical Behaviour

Therapy Implementation Project

Deliberate self-harm has been and continues to be a significant problem amongst Irish men and women. In 2012 alone, 9,483 people were treated for deliberate self-harm episodes, with more than 1 in 5 of these individuals repeatedly self-harming (Griffin et al., 2013). It has been identified that individuals who engage in repetitive self-harm behaviours often present with symptoms associated with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD). BPD is recognised as one of the most distressing disorders for clients and most difficult for clinicians to treat. In terms of treatment, Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT) is an intervention that has a strong evidence base in working with this client population. A number of implementation studies demonstrate its effectiveness in treating BPD and reducing self-harm/suicidal behaviours (e.g. Brassington & Krawitz, 2006).

In view of the high incidence of deliberate self-harm repetition across Ireland, the current lack of specialised services available for the treatment of these behaviours, and the results of a recent pilot project undertaken in Cork Mental Health Services (2010), a proposal was put forward to the National Office for Suicide Prevention. This proposal requested funding to establish a National DBT Project which aims to implement DBT at multiple sites across Ireland in a coordinated manner.

The primary aim of the National DBT Project is to train 16 teams nationwide over a period of two years (8 teams per year; adult/ adolescent mental health teams), to implement DBT within their services. This initiative will be extensively evaluated over the two year period. The National DBT Project is coordinated by a DBT project team based in Cork Mental Health Services.

Engagement

In order to generate knowledge and interest about the National DBT Project, Mental Health Service Managers and Executive Clinical Directors across Ireland were contacted by the National DBT Project team. This involved outlining the availability of funding for training in DBT, and providing detailed information about DBT and its requirements.

Services and teams who were then interested in training in DBT were required to apply to the National DBT Project office in order to participate in the implementation project.

The teams for year one were formally selected by a steering group committee comprising representatives from various professions and backgrounds within mental health.

The criteria for the selection of teams were:

-Evidence of need (NSRF Registry Data)

-Meeting of DBT training requirements

-Evidence of team commitment

-Evidence of evaluation/ research commitment

-Commitment from local management

In order to implement DBT in a coordinated manner and evaluate the implementation effectively at each site, the National DBT Project team would liaise regularly with the DBT project champion for each team (team leader), provide support and guidance to the new teams in implementing the programme into their service, and coordinate the evaluation of the implementation at each site.

Evaluation

In addition to coordinating the training and national implementation of DBT, the National DBT Project team is responsible for comprehensively designing the evaluation of the initiative in line with research best practice. This procedure involved completing a comprehensive literature review, conducting data analyses of the pilot project data, applying for ethical approval from multiple ethics committees, and at a later point, disseminating the findings of the evaluation nationally and internationally.Three strands for the evaluation of the implementation of DBT were thus identified:

The evaluation of the effectiveness of DBT

The effectiveness of DBT will be evaluated through the collection and analysis of information gathered from a battery of client self-report measures examining change in life-threatening behaviours, skill utilisation, and quality of life. These assessments will be carried out at baseline, midway through the programme (adult sites only), end of programme, and follow-up.

The evaluation of the implementation process of DBT

The multi-site implementation process will be evaluated by collecting information regarding each sites’ implementation of DBT (DBT implementation logs), coding of DBT session tapes to examine therapists’ adherence to the DBT model, and focus groups/ interviews with DBT therapists and clients.

The evaluation of the economic benefit of DBT

A comprehensive economic evaluation will be carried out by comparing information collected in the battery of measures and healthcare records of both DBT clients and Treatment-As-Usual clients.

Evaluation of DBT Implementation

Effectiveness Evaluation

Multi-Site Implementation

Process

EconomicEvaluation

Conclusion

This project will result in the delivery of an evidence-based intervention at a national level for increasingly complex clients presenting with self-harm behaviours. By comprehensively evaluating the implementation of DBT nationally, it is envisioned that this initiative will contribute significantly to the evidence base of DBT. In addition, it is anticipated that the project will continue to grow, ensuring the positive impact of DBT is accessible to more mental health services across Ireland.

American Psychiatric Association (2001). Practice guidelines for the treatment of patients with borderline personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 1-52.

Brassington, J. & Krawitz, R. (2006). Australasian Dialectical Behavior therapy Pilot Outcome Study: Effectiveness, Utility and feasibility. Australian Psychiatry, 14 (3), 313-319.

Department of Health & Children (2006). A Vision for Change: Report of the Expert Group on Mental Health Policy. Dublin: Stationary Office.

Flynn, D. & Kells, M. (2013). The Road to Endeavour : Development and evaluation of a programme for those presenting with repeated self-harm and chronic suicidality.

Griffin, E., Arensman, E., Wall, A., Corcoran, P. & Perry, I.J. (2013). National Registry of Deliberate Self Harm Annual Report 2012. Cork: National Suicide Research Foundation.

National Health and Medical Research Council (2012). Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Borderline Personality Disorder. Australia.

National Institute for Health & Clinical Excellence (2009). Borderline Personality Disorder: Treatment and Management. Leicester: BPS

National Suicide Research Foundation

DBT has been endorsed by the Irish expert group on mental health (Vision for Change, 2006), and has been recommended by the American Psychiatric Association (2001), the NHS National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2009), and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (2012) as being part of any comprehensive treatment programme for persons with Borderline Personality Disorder and co-morbid presentations.

HSE’s 4 Administrative Areas & 32 Local Health Offices in Ireland

This project is supported by funding from the National Office for Suicide Prevention (NOSP).