Damodaran on Dividends.pdf

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    127

    Returning C

    ash to the Ow

    ners:D

    ividend Policy

    Asw

    ath Dam

    odaran

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    128

    First P

    rinciples

    QInvest in projects that yield a return greater than the m

    inimum

    acceptable hurdle rate.

    The hurdle rate should be higher for riskier projects and reflect the

    financing mix used - ow

    ners funds (equity) or borrowed m

    oney (debt)

    R

    eturns on projects should be measured based on cash flow

    s generatedand the tim

    ing of these cash flows; they should also consider both positive

    and negative side effects of these projects.

    QC

    hoose a financing mix that m

    inimizes the hurdle rate and m

    atches theassets being financed.

    QIf there are not enough investm

    ents that earn the hurdle rate,return the cash to stockholders.

    The form

    of returns - dividends and stock buybacks - will depend

    upon the stockholders characteristics.

    Objective: M

    aximize the V

    alue of the Firm

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    129

    Dividends are sticky

    Dividend C

    hanges : 1989-1998

    0.00%

    10.00%

    20.00%

    30.00%

    40.00%

    50.00%

    60.00%

    19891990

    19911992

    19931994

    19951996

    19971998

    Year

    % of all firms

    Increasing dividendsD

    ecreasing dividendsN

    ot changing dividends

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    130

    Dividends tend to follow

    earnings

    Figure 21.5: Dividends and Earnings at US Firms: 1960 - 1998

    0.0

    0

    5.0

    0

    10

    .00

    15

    .00

    20

    .00

    25

    .00

    30

    .00

    35

    .00

    40

    .00

    45

    .00

    1960

    1961

    1962

    1963

    1964

    1965

    1966

    1967

    1968

    1969

    1970

    1971

    1972

    1973

    1974

    1975

    1976

    1977

    1978

    1979

    1980

    1981

    1982

    1983

    1984

    1985

    1986

    1987

    1988

    1989

    1990

    1991

    1992

    1993

    1994

    1995

    1996

    1997

    1998

    Year

    $ Dividends/Earnings

    Earnings

    Dividends

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    131

    More and m

    ore firms are buying back stock,

    rather than pay dividends...

    Fig

    ure

    2

    2.1

    : S

    toc

    k

    Bu

    yb

    ac

    ks

    a

    nd

    D

    ivid

    en

    ds

    : A

    gg

    reg

    ate

    fo

    r U

    S

    Firm

    s

    - 1

    98

    9-9

    8

    $-

    $5

    0,0

    00

    .00

    $1

    00

    ,00

    0.0

    0

    $1

    50

    ,00

    0.0

    0

    $2

    00

    ,00

    0.0

    0

    $2

    50

    ,00

    0.0

    0

    19

    88

    19

    89

    19

    90

    19

    91

    19

    92

    19

    93

    19

    94

    19

    95

    19

    96

    19

    97

    19

    98

    Ye

    ar

    Stock B

    uybacksD

    ivide

    nd

    s

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    132

    Measures of D

    ividend Policy

    QD

    ividend Payout:

    measures the percentage of earnings that the com

    pany pays in dividends

    =

    Dividends / E

    arnings

    QD

    ividend Yield

    :

    measures the return that an investor can m

    ake from dividends alone

    =

    Dividends / Stock Price

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    133

    Dividend P

    ayout Ratios: January 2002

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180

    0-5%

    5-10%

    10-15%

    15-20%

    20-25%

    25-30%

    30-35%

    35-40%

    40-45%

    45-50%

    50-60%

    60-70%

    70-80%

    80-90%

    90-100%

    >100%

    Div

    iden

    d P

    ayo

    ut R

    atio

    s: Jan

    uary

    20

    02

    Firm

    s paying/not paying dividends

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    Pay divid

    ends

    Pay no d

    ividen

    ds

    Number of firms

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    134

    Dividend Y

    ields in the United S

    tates: January2002

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    2500-0.25%

    0.25-0.5%0.5-0.75%

    0.75-%

    1-1.25%

    1-1.5%1.5-1.75%

    1.75-2%

    2-2.5%

    2.5-3%

    3-3.5%

    3.5-4%

    4-5%

    >5%

    Div

    iden

    d Y

    ield

    s: Jan

    uary

    20

    02

    Num

    ber o

    f divid

    end Payin

    g firm

    s = 1

    800

    Num

    ber o

    f non-d

    ividen

    d Payin

    g firm

    s = 3

    971

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    135

    Three S

    chools Of T

    hought On D

    ividends

    Q1. If

    (a) there are no tax disadvantages associated with dividends

    (b) com

    panies can issue stock, at no cost, to raise equity, whenever

    needed

    D

    ividends do not matter, and dividend policy does not affect value.

    Q2. If dividends have a tax disadvantage,

    D

    ividends are bad, and increasing dividends will reduce value

    Q3. If stockholders like dividends, or dividends operate as a signal of future prospects,

    D

    ividends are good, and increasing dividends will increase value

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    136

    The balanced view

    point

    QIf a com

    pany has excess cash, and few good projects (N

    PV>

    0),returning m

    oney to stockholders (dividends or stock repurchases) isG

    OO

    D.

    QIf a com

    pany does not have excess cash, and/or has several goodprojects (N

    PV>

    0), returning money to stockholders (dividends or

    stock repurchases) is BA

    D.

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    137

    Why do firm

    s pay dividends?

    QT

    he Miller-M

    odigliani Hypothesis: D

    ividends do not affect valueQ

    Basis:

    If a firm's investm

    ent policy (and hence cash flows) don't change, the

    value of the firm cannot change w

    ith dividend policy. If we ignore

    personal taxes, investors have to be indifferent to receiving eitherdividends or capital gains.

    QU

    nderlying Assum

    ptions:

    (a) There are no tax differences betw

    een dividends and capital gains.

    (b) If com

    panies pay too much in cash, they can issue new

    stock, with no

    flotation costs or signaling consequences, to replace this cash.

    (c) If com

    panies pay too little in dividends, they do not use the excesscash for bad projects or acquisitions.

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    138

    The T

    ax Response: D

    ividends are taxed more

    than capital gains

    QB

    asis:

    Dividends are taxed m

    ore heavily than capital gains. A stockholder w

    illtherefore prefer to receive capital gains over dividends.

    QE

    vidence:

    Exam

    ining ex-dividend dates should provide us with som

    e evidence onw

    hether dividends are perfect substitutes for capital gains.

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    139

    Price B

    ehavior on Ex-D

    ividend Date

    Let P

    b = Price before the stock goes ex-dividend

    Pa =

    Price after the stock goes ex-dividend D

    = D

    ividends declared on stock to , tcg =

    Taxes paid on ordinary incom

    e and capital gains respectively

    $ Pb$Pa

    ______________|_______ Ex-Dividend Day _______________|

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    140

    Cashflow

    s from S

    elling around Ex-D

    ividendD

    ay

    QT

    he cash flows from

    selling before then are-P

    b - (Pb - P) tcg

    QT

    he cash flows from

    selling after the ex-dividend day are-P

    a - (Pa - P) tcg +

    D(1-to )

    Since the average investor should be indifferent between selling before

    the ex-dividend day and selling after the ex-dividend day -P

    b - (Pb - P) tcg =

    Pa - (P

    a - P) tcg + D

    (1-to )M

    oving the variables around, we arrive at the follow

    ing:

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    141

    Price C

    hange, Dividends and T

    ax Rates

    IfP

    b - Pa =

    Dthen

    to = tcg

    Pb - P

    a < D

    then to >

    tcgP

    b - Pa >

    Dthen

    to < tcg

    Pb

    Pa

    D =

    (1

    -to )

    (1 t

    cg )

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    142

    The E

    vidence on Ex-D

    ividend Day B

    ehavior

    OrdinaryInco

    meCapital

    Gains(

    Pb-

    Pa )/D

    Before1981

    70%

    28%

    0.78(1966-69)

    1981-8550

    %20

    %0.85

    1986-199028

    %28

    %0.90

    1991-199333

    %28

    %0.92

    1994..39.6

    %28

    %0.90

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    143

    Dividend A

    rbitrage

    QA

    ssume that you are a tax exem

    pt investor, and that you know that the

    price drop on the ex-dividend day is only 90% of the dividend. H

    oww

    ould you exploit this differential?

    RInvest in the stock for the long term

    RSell short the day before the ex-dividend day, buy on the ex-dividendday

    RB

    uy just before the ex-dividend day, and sell after.

    R______________________________________________

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    144

    Exam

    ple of dividend capture strategy with tax

    factors

    QX

    YZ

    company is selling for $50 at close of trading M

    ay 3. On M

    ay 4,X

    YZ

    goes ex-dividend; the dividend amount is $1. T

    he price drop(from

    past examination of the data) is only 90%

    of the dividendam

    ount.

    QT

    he transactions needed by a tax-exempt U

    .S. pension fund for thearbitrage are as follow

    s:

    1. Buy 1 m

    illion shares of XY

    Z stock cum

    -dividend at $50/share.

    2. W

    ait till stock goes ex-dividend; Sell stock for $49.10/share (50 - 1*0.90)

    3. C

    ollect dividend on stock.

    QN

    et profit = - 50 m

    illion + 49.10 m

    illion + 1 m

    illion = $0.10 m

    illion

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    145

    The w

    rong reasons for paying dividendsT

    he bird in the hand fallacy

    QA

    rgument: D

    ividends now are m

    ore certain than capital gains later.H

    ence dividends are more valuable than capital gains.

    QC

    ounter: The appropriate com

    parison should be between dividends

    today and price appreciation today. (The stock price drops on the ex-

    dividend day.)

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    146

    The excess cash hypothesis

    QA

    rgument: T

    he firm has excess cash on its hands this year, no

    investment projects this year and w

    ants to give the money back to

    stockholders.

    QC

    ounter: So why not just repurchase stock? If this is a one-tim

    ephenom

    enon, the firm has to consider future financing needs.

    Consider the cost of issuing new

    stock:

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    147

    The C

    ost of Raising F

    unds

    QIssuing new

    equity is much m

    ore expensive than raising new debt for

    companies that are already publicly traded, in term

    s of transactionscosts and investm

    ent banking fees

    QR

    aising small am

    ounts is much m

    ore expensive than raising largeam

    ounts, for both equity and debt. Making a sm

    all equity issue ( say $25-$ 50 m

    illion might be prohibitively expensive)

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    148

    Are firm

    s perverse? Som

    e evidence that theyare not

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    149

    Evidence from

    Canadian F

    irms

    Com

    panyP

    remium

    for Cash dividend over

    Stock Dividend Shares

    Consolidated Bathurst19.30%

    Donfasco13.30%

    Dome Petroleum

    0.30%

    Imperial Oil

    12.10%

    New

    foundland Light & Pow

    er1.80%

    Royal Trustco17.30%

    Stelco2.70%

    TransAlta1.10%

    Average

    7.54%

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    150

    A clientele based explanation

    QB

    asis: Investors may form

    clienteles based upon their tax brackets.Investors in high tax brackets m

    ay invest in stocks which do not pay

    dividends and those in low tax brackets m

    ay invest in dividend payingstocks.

    QE

    vidence: A study of 914 investors' portfolios w

    as carried out to see iftheir portfolio positions w

    ere affected by their tax brackets. The study

    found that

    (a) Older investors w

    ere more likely to hold high dividend stocks and

    (b) Poorer investors tended to hold high dividend stocks

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    151

    Results from

    Regression: C

    lientele Effect

    Dividend Y

    ieldt = a + b t + c Aget + d Incom

    et + e Differential Tax R

    atet + tV

    ariableC

    oefficientIm

    plies

    Constant

    4.22%

    Beta C

    oefficient-2.145

    Higher beta stocks pay low

    er dividends.

    Age/100

    3.131Firm

    s with older investors pay higher

    dividends.

    Income/1000

    -3.726Firm

    s with w

    ealthier investors pay lower

    dividends.

    Differential Tax R

    ate-2.849

    If ordinary income is taxed at a higher rate

    than capital gains, the firm pays less

    dividends.

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    152

    Dividend P

    olicy and Clientele

    QA

    ssume that you run a phone com

    pany, and that you have historicallypaid large dividends. Y

    ou are now planning to enter the

    telecomm

    unications and media m

    arkets. Which of the follow

    ing pathsare you m

    ost likely to follow?

    RC

    ourageously announce to your stockholders that you plan to cutdividends and invest in the new

    markets.

    RC

    ontinue to pay the dividends that you used to, and defer investment

    in the new m

    arkets.

    RC

    ontinue to pay the dividends that you used to, make the investm

    entsin the new

    markets, and issue new

    stock to cover the shortfall

    RO

    ther

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    153

    The S

    ignaling Hypothesis

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    154

    An A

    lternative Story..D

    ividends as Negative

    Signals

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    155

    The W

    ealth Transfer H

    ypothesis

    -2

    -1.5 -1

    -0.5 0

    0.5

    t:-1

    5-1

    2-9

    -6-3

    03

    69

    12

    15

    CA

    R (D

    iv Up)

    CA

    R (D

    iv down)

    EX

    CE

    SS

    RE

    TUR

    NS

    ON

    STR

    AIG

    HT B

    ON

    DS

    AR

    OU

    ND

    DIV

    IDE

    ND

    CH

    AN

    GE

    S

    Day (0: A

    nnouncement date)

    CAR

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    156

    Managem

    ent Beliefs about D

    ividend Policy

    QA

    firms dividend payout ratio affects its stock price.

    QD

    ividend payments operate as a signal to financial m

    arkets

    QD

    ividend announcements provide inform

    ation to financial markets.

    QInvestors think that dividends are safer than retained earnings

    QInvestors are not indifferent betw

    een dividends and price appreciation.

    QStockholders are attracted to firm

    s that have dividend policies that theylike.

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    157

    Determ

    inants of Dividend P

    olicy

    QInvestm

    ent Opportunities: M

    ore investment opportunities - >

    Low

    erD

    ividends

    QStability in earnings: M

    ore stable earnings -> H

    igher Dividends

    QA

    lternative sources of capital: More alternative sources ->

    Higher

    Dividends

    QC

    onstraints: More constraints im

    posed by bondholders and lenders ->L

    ower D

    ividends

    QSignaling Incentives: M

    ore options to supply information to financial

    markets - L

    ower need to pay dividends as signal

    QStockholder characteristics: O

    lder, poorer stockholders -> H

    igherdividends

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    158

    Questions to A

    sk in Dividend P

    olicy Analysis

    QH

    ow m

    uch could the company have paid out during the period under

    question?

    QH

    ow m

    uch did the the company actually pay out during the period in

    question?

    QH

    ow m

    uch do I trust the managem

    ent of this company w

    ith excesscash?

    How

    well did they m

    ake investments during the period in question?

    H

    ow w

    ell has my stock perform

    ed during the period in question?

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    159

    A M

    easure of How

    Much a C

    ompany C

    ouldhave A

    fforded to Pay out: F

    CF

    E

    QT

    he Free Cashflow

    to Equity (FC

    FE) is a m

    easure of how m

    uch cashis left in the business after non-equity claim

    holders (debt and preferredstock) have been paid, and after any reinvestm

    ent needed to sustain thefirm

    s assets and future growth.

    Net Incom

    e

    + D

    epreciation & A

    mortization

    = C

    ash flows from

    Operations to E

    quity Investors

    - Preferred Dividends

    - Capital E

    xpenditures

    - Working C

    apital Needs

    - Principal Repaym

    ents

    + Proceeds from

    New

    Debt Issues

    = Free C

    ash flow to E

    quity

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    160

    Estim

    ating FC

    FE

    when Leverage is S

    table

    Net Incom

    e

    - (1- ) (Capital E

    xpenditures - Depreciation)

    - (1- ) Working C

    apital Needs

    = Free C

    ash flow to E

    quity

    = D

    ebt/Capital R

    atio

    For this firm,

    Proceeds from

    new debt issues =

    Principal Repaym

    ents + (C

    apitalE

    xpenditures - Depreciation +

    Working C

    apital Needs)

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    161

    An E

    xample: F

    CF

    E C

    alculation

    QC

    onsider the following inputs for M

    icrosoft in 1996. In 1996,M

    icrosofts FCFE

    was:

    N

    et Income =

    $2,176 Million

    C

    apital Expenditures =

    $494 Million

    D

    epreciation = $ 480 M

    illion

    C

    hange in Non-C

    ash Working C

    apital = $ 35 M

    illion

    D

    ebt Ratio =

    0%

    QFC

    FE =

    Net Incom

    e - (Cap ex - D

    epr) (1-DR

    ) - Chg W

    C (!-D

    R)

    =$ 2,176

    - (494 - 480) (1-0)- $ 35 (1-0)

    =

    $ 2,127 Million

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    162

    Microsoft: D

    ividends?

    QB

    y this estimation, M

    icrosoft could have paid $ 2,127 Million in

    dividends/stock buybacks in 1996. They paid no dividends and bought

    back no stock. Where w

    ill the $2,127 million show

    up in Microsofts

    balance sheet?

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    163

    Dividends versus F

    CF

    E: U

    .S.

    Fig

    ure

    1

    1.1

    : D

    ivid

    en

    ds

    /FC

    FE

    :

    NY

    SE

    F

    irms

    in

    1

    99

    6

    0

    20

    0

    40

    0

    60

    0

    80

    0

    10

    00

    12

    00

    14

    00

    16

    00

    18

    00

    0 %

    0 -10%

    10 -20%

    20- 30%

    30 - 40%

    4 0 - 5 0 %

    50 - 60%

    60 -70%

    70 - 80%

    80 -90%

    90 - 100%

    > 100%

    Div

    ide

    nd

    s/F

    CF

    E

    Number of Firms

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    164

    The C

    onsequences of Failing to pay F

    CF

    E

    Ch

    rys

    ler: F

    CF

    E, D

    ivid

    en

    ds

    an

    d C

    as

    h B

    ala

    nc

    e

    ($5

    00

    )

    $0

    $5

    00

    $1

    ,00

    0

    $1

    ,50

    0

    $2

    ,00

    0

    $2

    ,50

    0

    $3

    ,00

    0

    19

    85

    19

    86

    19

    87

    19

    88

    19

    89

    19

    90

    19

    91

    19

    92

    19

    93

    19

    94

    Ye

    ar

    Cash Flow

    $0

    $1

    ,00

    0

    $2

    ,00

    0

    $3

    ,00

    0

    $4

    ,00

    0

    $5

    ,00

    0

    $6

    ,00

    0

    $7

    ,00

    0

    $8

    ,00

    0

    $9

    ,00

    0

    Cash Balance

    = F

    ree

    CF

    to E

    qu

    ity =

    Ca

    sh to

    Sto

    ckho

    lde

    rsC

    umulated C

    ash

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    165

    A

    pplication Test: E

    stimating your firm

    sF

    CF

    E

    In General,

    If cash flow statem

    ent usedN

    et Income

    Net Incom

    e+

    Depreciation &

    Am

    ortization+

    Depreciation &

    Am

    ortization- C

    apital Expenditures

    + C

    apital Expenditures

    - Change in N

    on-Cash W

    orking Capital

    + C

    hanges in Non-cash W

    C- Preferred D

    ividend+

    Preferred Dividend

    - Principal Repaid

    + Increase in L

    T B

    orrowing

    + N

    ew D

    ebt Issued+

    Decrease in L

    T B

    orrowing

    + C

    hange in ST B

    orrowing

    = FCFE

    = FCFE

    Com

    pare toD

    ividends (Com

    mon)

    -Com

    mon D

    ividend+

    Stock Buybacks

    - Decrease in

    C

    apital Stock+ Increase in

    Capital Stock

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    166

    A P

    ractical Fram

    ework for A

    nalyzing Dividend

    Policy

    How

    much did the firm

    pay out? How

    much could it have afforded to pay out?

    What it could have paid out

    What it actually paid out

    Net Incom

    eD

    ividends- (C

    ap Ex - D

    eprn) (1-DR

    )+

    Equity R

    epurchase- C

    hg Working C

    apital (1-DR

    )= F

    CF

    E

    Firm

    pays out too littleF

    CF

    E > D

    ividendsF

    irm pays out too m

    uchF

    CF

    E < D

    ividends

    Do you trust managers in the com

    pany withyour cash?Look at past project choice:C

    ompare

    RO

    E to C

    ost of Equity

    RO

    C to W

    AC

    C

    What investm

    ent opportunities does the firm

    have?Look at past project choice:C

    ompare

    RO

    E to C

    ost of Equity

    RO

    C to W

    AC

    C

    Firm

    has history of good project choice and good projects in the future

    Firm

    has historyof poor project choice

    Firm

    has good projects

    Firm

    has poor projects

    Give m

    anagers the flexibility to keep cash and set dividends

    Force m

    anagers to justify holding cash or return cash to stockholders

    Firm

    should cut dividends and reinvest m

    ore

    Firm

    should deal w

    ith its investment

    problem first and

    then cut dividends

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    167

    A D

    ividend Matrix

    FC

    FE

    - Divid

    end

    s

    Good P

    rojectsP

    oor Projects

    Maxim

    umFlexibility in D

    ividend Policy

    Reduce cash

    payout to stockholders

    Significant pressureo

    n m

    an

    agers to pay cash out

    Investment and

    Dividend

    problems; cut

    dividends but also check project choice

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    168

    Disney: A

    n analysis of FC

    FE

    from 1992-1996

    Year

    Net Incom

    e(C

    ap Ex- D

    epr) C

    hg in WC

    FC

    FE

    (1- Debt R

    atio)(1-D

    ebt Ratio)

    1992$817

    $173 ($81)

    $725

    1993$889

    $328 $160

    $402

    1994$1,110

    $469 $498

    $143

    1995$1,380

    $325 $206

    $849

    1996*$1,214

    $466 ($470)

    $1,218

    Avge

    $1,082 $352

    $63$667

    (The num

    bers for 1996 are reported without the C

    apital Cities

    Acquisition)

    The debt ratio used to estim

    ate the free cash flow to equity w

    as estimated

    as follows =

    Net D

    ebt Issues/(Net C

    ap Ex +

    Change in N

    on-cash WC

    )

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    169

    Disneys D

    ividends and Buybacks from

    1992 to1996

    Year

    FCFE

    Dividends +

    Stock Buybacks

    1992$725

    $105

    1993$402

    $160

    1994$143

    $724

    1995$849

    $529

    1996$1,218

    $733

    Average

    $667 $450

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    170

    Disney: D

    ividends versus FC

    FE

    QD

    isney paid out $ 217 million less in dividends (and stock buybacks)

    than it could afford to pay out. How

    much cash do you think D

    isneyaccum

    ulated during the period?

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    171

    Can you trust D

    isneys managem

    ent?

    QD

    uring the period 1992-1996, Disney had

    an average return on equity of 21.07%

    on projects taken

    earned an average return on 21.43%

    for its stockholders

    a cost of equity of 19.09%

    QD

    isney has taken good projects and earned above-market returns for its

    stockholders during the period.

    QIf you w

    ere a Disney stockholder, w

    ould you be comfortable w

    ithD

    isneys dividend policy?

    RY

    es

    RN

    o

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    172

    Disney: R

    eturn Perform

    ance Trends

    Re

    turn

    s o

    n E

    qu

    ity, S

    toc

    k a

    nd

    Re

    qu

    ired

    Re

    turn

    s - D

    isn

    ey

    -10

    .00

    %

    0.0

    0%

    10

    .00

    %

    20

    .00

    %

    30

    .00

    %

    40

    .00

    %

    50

    .00

    %

    60

    .00

    %

    19

    92

    19

    93

    19

    94

    19

    95

    19

    96

    Ye

    ar

    RO

    ER

    etu

    rns o

    n S

    tock

    Re

    qu

    ired

    Re

    turn

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    173

    The B

    ottom Line on D

    isney Dividends

    QD

    isney could have afforded to pay more in dividends during the period

    of the analysis.

    QIt chose not to, and used the cash for the A

    BC

    acquisition.

    QT

    he excess returns that Disney earned on its projects and its stock over

    the period provide it with som

    e dividend flexibility. The trend in these

    returns, however, suggests that this flexibility w

    ill be rapidly depleted.

    QT

    he flexibility will clearly not survive if the A

    BC

    acquisition does notw

    ork out.

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    174

    Aracruz: D

    ividends and FC

    FE

    : 1994-1996

    19941995

    1996N

    et Income

    BR

    248.21 B

    R326.42

    BR

    47.00 - (C

    ap. Exp - D

    epr)*(1-DR

    )B

    R174.76

    BR

    197.20 B

    R14.96

    - Working C

    apital*(1-DR

    )(B

    R47.74)

    BR

    15.67 (B

    R23.80)

    = Free C

    F to Equity

    BR

    121.19 B

    R113.55

    BR

    55.84

    Dividends

    BR

    80.40 B

    R113.00

    BR

    27.00 +

    Equity R

    epurchasesB

    R 0.00

    BR

    0.00B

    R 0.00

    = C

    ash to StockholdersB

    R80.40

    BR

    113.00 B

    R27.00

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    175

    Aracruz: Investm

    ent Record

    19941995

    1996P

    roject Perform

    ance Measures

    RO

    E19.98%

    16.78%2.06%

    Required rate of return

    3.32%28.03%

    17.78% D

    ifference16.66%

    -11.25%-15.72%

    Stock Perform

    ance Measure

    Returns on stock

    50.82%-0.28%

    8.65%R

    equired rate of return3.32%

    28.03%17.78%

    Difference

    47.50%-28.31%

    -9.13%

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    176

    Aracruz: Its your call..

    QA

    ssume that you are a large stockholder in A

    racruz. They have a

    history of paying less in dividends than they have available in FCFE

    and have accumulated a cash balance of roughly 1 billion B

    R (25%

    ofthe value of the firm

    ). Would you trust the m

    anagers at Aracruz w

    ithyour cash?

    RY

    es

    RN

    o

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    177

    Mandated D

    ividend Payouts

    QT

    here are many countries w

    here companies are m

    andated to pay out acertain portion of their earnings as dividends. G

    iven our discussion ofFC

    FE, w

    hat types of companies w

    ill be hurt the most by these law

    s?

    RL

    arge companies m

    aking huge profits

    RSm

    all companies losing m

    oney

    RH

    igh growth com

    panies that are losing money

    RH

    igh growth com

    panies that are making m

    oney

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    178

    BP

    : Dividends- 1983-92

    12

    34

    56

    78

    910

    Net Incom

    e$1,256.00

    $1,626.00$2,309.00

    $1,098.00$2,076.00

    $2,140.00$2,542.00

    $2,946.00$712.00

    $947.00

    - (Cap. E

    xp - Depr)*(1-D

    R)

    $1,499.00$1,281.00

    $1,737.50$1,600.00

    $580.00$1,184.00

    $1,090.50$1,975.50

    $1,545.50$1,100.00

    Working C

    apital*(1-DR

    )$369.50

    ($286.50)$678.50

    $82.00($2,268.00)

    ($984.50)$429.50

    $1,047.50($305.00)

    ($415.00)

    = Free C

    F to Equity

    ($612.50)$631.50

    ($107.00)($584.00)

    $3,764.00$1,940.50

    $1,022.00($77.00)

    ($528.50)$262.00

    Dividends

    $831.00$949.00

    $1,079.00$1,314.00

    $1,391.00$1,961.00

    $1,746.00$1,895.00

    $2,112.00$1,685.00

    + E

    quity Repurchases

    = C

    ash to Stockholders$831.00

    $949.00$1,079.00

    $1,314.00$1,391.00

    $1,961.00$1,746.00

    $1,895.00$2,112.00

    $1,685.00

    Dividend R

    atios

    Payout Ratio

    66.16%58.36%

    46.73%119.67%

    67.00%91.64%

    68.69%64.32%

    296.63%177.93%

    Cash Paid as %

    of FCFE

    -135.67%150.28%

    -1008.41%-225.00%

    36.96%101.06%

    170.84%-2461.04%

    -399.62%643.13%

    Perform

    ance Ratios

    1. Accounting M

    easure

    RO

    E9.58%

    12.14%19.82%

    9.25%12.43%

    15.60%21.47%

    19.93%4.27%

    7.66%

    Required rate of return

    19.77%6.99%

    27.27%16.01%

    5.28%14.72%

    26.87%-0.97%

    25.86%7.12%

    Difference

    -10.18%5.16%

    -7.45%-6.76%

    7.15%0.88%

    -5.39%20.90%

    -21.59%0.54%

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    179

    BP

    : Sum

    mary of D

    ividend Policy

    Summ

    ary of calculations

    Average

    Standard Deviation

    Maxim

    umM

    inimum

    Free C

    F to E

    quity$571.10

    $1,382.29$3,764.00

    ($612.50)

    Dividends

    $1,496.30$448.77

    $2,112.00$831.00

    Dividends+

    Repurchases

    $1,496.30$448.77

    $2,112.00$831.00

    Dividend P

    ayout Ratio

    84.77%

    Cash P

    aid as % of F

    CF

    E262.00%

    RO

    E - R

    equired return-1.67%

    11.49%20.90%

    -21.59%

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    180

    BP

    : Just Desserts!

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    181

    The Lim

    ited: Sum

    mary of D

    ividend Policy:

    1983-1992

    Summ

    ary of calculations

    Average

    Standard Deviation

    Maxim

    umM

    inimum

    Free C

    F to E

    quity($34.20)

    $109.74$96.89

    ($242.17)

    Dividends

    $40.87$32.79

    $101.36$5.97

    Dividends+

    Repurchases

    $40.87$32.79

    $101.36$5.97

    Dividend P

    ayout Ratio

    18.59%

    Cash P

    aid as % of F

    CF

    E-119.52%

    RO

    E - R

    equired return1.69%

    19.07%29.26%

    -19.84%

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    182

    Grow

    th Firm

    s and Dividends

    QH

    igh growth firm

    s are sometim

    es advised to initiate dividends becauseits increases the potential stockholder base for the com

    pany (sincethere are som

    e investors - like pension funds - that cannot buy stocksthat do not pay dividends) and, by extension, the stock price. D

    o youagree w

    ith this argument?

    RY

    es

    RN

    o

    Why?

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    183

    A

    pplication Test: A

    ssessing your firms

    dividend policy

    QC

    ompare your firm

    s dividends to its FCFE

    , looking at the last 5 yearsof inform

    ation.

    QB

    ased upon your earlier analysis of your firms project choices, w

    ouldyou encourage the firm

    to return more cash or less cash to its ow

    ners?

    QIf you w

    ould encourage it to return more cash, w

    hat form should it

    take (dividends versus stock buybacks)?

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    184

    Other A

    ctions that affect Stock P

    rices

    QIn the case of dividends and stock buybacks, firm

    s change the value ofthe assets (by paying out cash) and the num

    ber of shares (in the case ofbuybacks).

    QT

    here are other actions that firms can take to change the value of their

    stockholders equity.

    Divestitures: T

    hey can sell assets to another firm that can utilize them

    more efficiently, and claim

    a portion of the value.

    Spin offs: In a spin off, a division of a firm is m

    ade an independent entity.T

    he parent company has to give up control of the firm

    .

    Equity carve outs: In an E

    CO

    , the division is made a sem

    i-independententity. T

    he parent company retains a controlling interest in the firm

    .

    Tracking Stock: W

    hen tracking stock are issued against a division, theparent com

    pany retains complete control of the division. It does not have

    its own board of directors.

  • Aswath D

    amodaran

    185

    Differences in these actions

    Asset com

    pletelycovenrted into cash

    No cash for

    transaction

    Control fully lost

    Parent com

    panhy preservescontrol

    Taxed on capital gains

    No T

    axes

    Bondholders negatively

    affected

    Bondholders

    unaffected

    Divestitures

    Spin offs

    EC

    OTracking stock

    Divestitures

    Spin offs

    EC

    OTracking stock

    Divestitures

    Spin offs

    Divestitures

    Tracking stock

    EC

    Os

    Trackingstock

    Spin offs

    EC

    O