L3 A W A ITE“’ L C l E\d. L ..r,.,.m

NORTH LANARKSHIRE COUNCIL

To: Education Committee

From: Director of Education

Date: September 1998

REPORT

Subject:

Schools for the Millennium : Review of Primary School Provision

I Ref: MWSAL

Summary

This report is an analysis of primary school provision in the authority. It identifies the extent of surplus capacity and catchment area issues. Finally it recommends four issues for priority attention.

Recommendations

The education committee is recommended

6)

(ii)

(iii)

(i v)

(v)

to note the analysis of current primary school provision and the opportunities which exist for primary school consolidation across the authority.

to approve the review priorities identified in Section 3 of this report.

to request the preparation of consultative documents setting out proposak for these priorities.

to note that an analysis of secondary school provision will be submitted to a hture meeting of the education committee.

to refer h s report to the policy and resources committee.

Members wishng further domation about this paper should contact:

109

Michael O’Neill. Director of Education on 01236 812337 Murdo Maciver. Head of Provtsions/Contracts Services on 0 1236 8 12268 M

I

MM/SAL Sept. 1998

110 NORTH L.-\SARE(SHIRE COUNCIL DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

1

1.1

1.2

1.3

2

2.1

Schools for the Millennium : Review of Primary School Provision

Report bv the Director of Education

BACKGROUND

At its meeting in April 1998 the education committee approved a review of school provision comprising a number of stages. In the first instance the committee agreed that a comprehensive analysis of current provision be undertaken to identifq. issues requiring attention, includmg geographcal areas for possible rationalisation and catchment area arrangements.

The report should also be seen in a wider context. It is part of a strategy to ensure that school provision in North Lanarkshre is fit for the demands'of the millennium, including the hstribution and number of places, buildmg fabric, accommodation and new technology.

Thls paper is an analysis of current priman school provision only. A report on secondan. provision will be submitted to a future meeting.

ISSUES EMERGING FROM T H E REVIEW OF PRIMARY PROVISION

For each school statistical mformation has been collated, as described below and detailed in appendix I .

PuDil roll

Appendix I includes the current roll (1 998) and the roll projected for 2004. No allowance can be made for future placing requests but the 1998 placing request numbers are included for indicative purposes.

I

Design Cauacitv

T h ~ s figure is the maximum number of pupils whch can be accommodated in the buildmg if it is fully occupied by pupils.

Accommodation in school use

In many instances some accommodation w i h the building has been allocated to other uses, for example pre-school classes, and as a result only part is currently available to the priman. school. n7ls part is shown as the total space available and the use the school makes of h s area is shown as a percentage.

Accommodation in other use

Thls is shown as the pupil places allocated to other purposes. The allocation to pre-school classes is shown separately.

Running costs

This is the per pupil cost as used in national statistics. It includes the property costs associated nith the whole building and therefore premises whch are underused b:' the prman. school tend to have hgher per pupil running costs.

(f) Future maintenance costs 111

2.2

2.3

3

These 5 !.ear estimates of major maintenance needs have been provided b!. the department of planning and development to indicate the cost of keeping the building operational. No account is taken of fabric and accommodation upgrading needs.

Each page in the appends lists the denominational and non-denominational schools in each geographcal area. The main issues ivhich have emerged in each area are shoi\n under comments. In the main these relate to

(a) the surplus capacic currentl!’ available.

(b) issues affecting individual schools. for example pressure on accommodation and concerns about the catchment area arrangements.

Appendis 2 summarises selected information for each area and for the authorit!. as a whole.

PRIORITIES FOR FURTHER ACTION

3.1 Over a period it is anticipated that specific proposals affecting each area, for example school replacements. extension, closures and amalgamations, \vi11 be recommended to the education committee.

3.2 h the first instance, hoivever, it is considered that priorit!. should be given to the folloning four issues.

3.3 Priman, Drovision in Cumbernauld I

The current situation is complex. In aggregate there are too man!. priman. school places in Cumbernauld and closures can be justified on value for mone!. grounds. However, there is also a geographical disparit!. between school location and housing developments. The provision of schools north of the A80 is inadequate and pupils are zoned to relatively distant schools on the south side of the tonn. It is recommended that any proposals should be based on the follouing principles.

The provision in the area south of the A80 should be reduced b!. up to 4 schools.

New non-denominational and denominational provision should be provided in the area of current residential developments north of the A80. Currentl:, five sites have been retained in the area for possible educational use. The allocation of.one of these to the new pro13sion is propored.

The school catchment areas across Cumbernauld should be redrann to accommodate the revised distribution of schools. for esample to minimise home-school distances and to maximise safe Ivalking routes.

112

3.4

* - 2 . 3

3.6

(4 The savings generated b!. these proposals. including thc capital receipts from sites and the savings from closures should bc used to enhance the remaining schools. In particular the fabric. accommodation and nen. technolog!. proikion in thc oldcr schools require substantial investment. It is en\.isaged that this \\ . i l l include IT cable nenyorking and the prolision of 3 \\ider rany of ICT equipment. This will ensure that the!. are full!. equipped to meet the demands of the hture curriculum, including the potential of superhigh\va?. developments. As a result children \vi11 develop greater expertise in the use of IT and \vi11 makc gcatcr use of Internet materials in even.da!. learning.

The associated secondan. arrangements for St Alo\.sius PS. Chapcllinll

The current arrangement is that St Alo!.sius PS is associated \\.ith St Patrick's HS. Coatbridge. Although these links ha1.e been \re?. c.ffccti\.c cducntionall\~. there have been repeated calls from a substantial number of parclits for the school to be associated with St Margaret's HS. Airdrie on the grounds that the area is geographicall!., sociall!, and economicall!. morc oriciitxcd to\\.nrds Airdrie.

The future of St Irnatius PS. Wishan.

Currentl!.. this school is maintained on a iveatherti$t basis onl! decision nas inherited from the pre\.ious authorit!, follo\\.ins 2 ciccisioii in

October 1990 not to proceed uith the closure of thc school

This policy

The future of the school now needs to be decided \\.it11 a rcplxc.mcnr. substantial upgrade or closure being the possible options.

!

Zoning issues

In various parts of the authorih. there are relati\,el! niinor school cntchnicnt issues ivhicti require to be esaniined for possible amendmciit E\3111plL.S

include the follo\ving.

areas \vhich are included in the catchment of niorc thnii onc priiiian. school. This arrangement makes it difficult for thc authorit!. t o project pupil rolls and for head teachers to develop links \vir11 pxcnts ucfore school enrolment stage.

catchment boundaries requiring revie\\. because of su bscqucnr housing development. Where developments occur on prei.iousl!. i x a n t land the existing school catchments \vi11 neither take accoiinI of school roll implications or be responsive to road patterns.

North Lanarkshire areas Ivhich are zoned to priman schools i n other authorities.

4 RECOMMENDATIONS

The education committee is recommended

(1) to note the anal!sis of current priman. school provision and the opportunities \\hich exist for prima?. school consolidation across the authorih..

113

(ii) to approi’e the revieiv priorities identified in Section 3 of this report

(iii) to request the preparation of consultative documents setting out proposals for these priorities.

(11.) to note that an analysis of secondan. school provision nil1 be submitted to a future meeting of the education committee.

(v) to refer th ls report to the polic!. and resources committee.

MWSAL Sept 1998

A A

P

Roll (2004) Excluding Design

Future Net Placing Capacity of Placlng Requests the

Requests (1998 Only) Building

Roll (1998) including Placing

Auchinloch P 41

Accommodation In School Use (Pupil Places)

~ccommodation in W ~ e r Use Pupil Places

Malntenance Costs 5 Year Plan

Total Space % Actually Total Runnlng Cost (excluding Available Used Pre- School Others Per School Pupil upgrading)

Chryston P Gartcosh P Glenmanor P Stepps P

TOTAL

Comments

198 81 288 329

937

Review of Chryston ND Primary Schools Appendix 1-1

159 2 297 297 67% 104 4 198 198 41% 273 -2 462 429 67% 33 366 15 363 363 91%

937 23 1452 1419 59% 33

(1) Surplus Design Caoacity :515 places (c.1 school)

(2) Surnlus accommodation Dotenmy available for Drimaw school use - 482 places (c. 1 school)

f 1,885 f 307,407 €237,106 f2,604

f 1,891 f294,255 f322,265 f 1,664

(3) Pupils from proposed development at Stepps (440) cannot all be accommodated at Stepps Primary.

Review of Cumbernauld ND Primary Schools Appendix 1-2

f392.043 Abronhill P 300 216 4 462 462 65% f 1.772 Balrd Mernorlal P

Condorrat P Curnbernauld P Eastfield P Glenhead P Kildrurn P Langlands Melrose P Ravenswood P Westfield P Whitelees P

' Carbrain P 177 294 280 388 399 219 319 185 175 295 202 293

128 260 258 447 328 291 286 317 139 272 292 319

5 -37 13 41 12 -14 5 -16 -2 0 -6 -1

462 462 462 396 528 462 462 462 462 396 462 462

396 462 462 396 528 462 462 429 462 396 396 462

45% 64 % 61 Yo 98% 76% 47% 69% 43% 38% 74% 51% 63%

TOTAL 3526 3553 4 5940 5775 61 %

Comments

(1) Surdus Desion CaDacity : 2414 (c. 5 schools)

(2) arplus accommodation potentiallv available for primary school use - 2249 places (c. 4/55 schools)

33

66

66 f2,002 f 1,824 f 1,597 f 1,531 f 1,534 f 1,964 f 1.734 f2,158 f 2,036 f 1.683 €1,855 f 1,696

f 151,760 f 106,325 f266.459 f279,230 f46,425 f 566,226 f559,225 f567,725 f 299.700 f336,700 f194,352 f 24 7,469

f4.013,639 f 1,799

(3) Zoning of Cumbernauld north areas to schools south of Ihe A80 is unsatisfactory.

Review of Kilsyth ND Primary Schools Appendix 1-3

Roll (2004)

Balmalloch P 294 268 4 Banton P 51 49 4 Chapelgreen P 65 71 0 Kilsyth P 228 297 -5

Design Capaclty 01

the Bulldlng 462 132 132 264

Malntenance Costs

462 64% €1 ,657 f 1 1 3,480 132 39% E3.069 E 184,305 132 4 9% €2,819 €130,250 264 86% El ,862 €31,950

f459,985 Total 638 685 3 990 990 59% f2.352

Comments

(1) SurDlus Desian Cap& : 352 places (c. 1 small school)

(2) SurDlus accommodation potentially available for Drimarv school use - 352 places (c. 1 small school)

Review of Chryston RC Primary Schools Appendix 1-4

Maintenance Costs 5 Year Plan

St Joseph's P St Mlchael's P

TOTAL

213 259 0 23 1 231 92% 288 351 1 462 429 67% 33

663 760 4 924 891 76% 33

Comments

(1) Surplus Desicm CaDacity : 261 places (c. 1 small school)

(2) Surdus accommodation potentiallv available for primarv school use - 228 places@. 1 small school)

(3) Pupils from proposed developments at Slepps (440 houses) cannot all be accommodated at St Joseph's Primary.

0

El ,767 f39,750 f 1,782 f450,472

€1,940 f 1,209,281

(4) An area adjacent to the catchment area of St Barbra's Primary is zoned to a school in East Dunbartonshire.

(5) An area adjacent to the catchment area of St Joseph's Primary is zoned to a school in East Dunbartonshire.

School Sacred Hear1 P

Review of Cumbernauld RC Primary Schools Appendix 1-5

Roll (1998) Including Placlng

Requests 190

Malntenance Costs

E454.09C 198 -2 462 363 52% 99 €2,730 St Francis of Asslsi P 152 132 8 231 231 66% €1,979 El 12,815 SI Helen's P 304 233 2 462 396 77% 66 f 1,707 €192,370 SI Joseph's P 172 173 5 462 396 43% 66 €2,087 €449,525 st Lucy's P 184 190 0 462 363 51 % 99 €3,144 €609,663 SI Mary's P 279 423 7 462 396 70% 33 33 €1,701 f510,550

Total 1281 1349 20 2541 2145 60% 165 231 €2,225 €2,329,013

Comments

(1 ) Surdus Desiqn C a w : 1260 (c. 2/3 schools)

(2) Surplus accommodalion Dotenlially available for orirnarv school use - 864 places (c. 2 schools)

ioly Cross PS St Patrick's PS

Total

Roll (1998) lncludlng Placing

Requests 217

Review of Kilsyth RC Primary Schools

Roll (2004) Excluding

Future Placing

Requests 253 -4 264 264 82% €1,857

339 343 8 792 594 57% 198

556 596 4 1056 858 70% 198

€2,025

€1.941

Appendix 1-6

Maintenance Costs 5 Year Plan (excluding upgrading) I €227,305 €707.630

€934.935

Comments

(1) Surplus Deslan Cap- : 500 places (c. 1 school)

(2) Surplus acco rnrnodalion polenliallv available for Drirnary school use - 302 places (c. 1 small school)

Review of Kilsyth RC Primary Schools Appendix 1-6

Malntenance Cost

Holy Cross PS 217 253 -4 264 264 82% El ,857 f227.305 St Pattick's PS

Total

339 343 8 792 594 57% 198

556 596 4 1056 858 70% 198

f2.025 f707,630

E l ,941 €934,935

Comments

(1) Surdus Deslan Capacity : 500 places (c. 1 school)

(2) Surplus accommodation potentiallv available for primary school use - 302 places (c. 1 small school)

Review of Airdrie ND Primary Schools i

Appendix 1-7

Chapelside P Clarkston P Dunrobin P Golfhill P Petersburn P Rochsolloch P Tollbrae P Victoria P

256 273 373 301 293 357 209 229 138 100 222 203 365 354 21 9 156

5 6 1 -2 -8 9 -4 -7

462 396 462 297 462 363 462 462

462 396 429 297 330 363 462 297

55% 94% 68% 33 70% 4 2 '/a 132 61 'XO 79% 74% 66 99

2185 2101 -1 3663 3267 66% 66 330 TOTAL

/11 Suralus desian caDacity: 1385 places (c. 3/4 schools)

121 Surdus accommodation Dotentiallv available for Drirnarv school use - 989 Dlaceslc. 2/3 schools)

€1 ,898 E 1,564 €1 ,706 El ,911 €2,309 f1,816 E 1,656 f 1,851

f 1.883

€4 74,74 5 €355,945 €371.720 f401.435 f479,030

f452.165 €465.429

~ 3 4 I ,485

€3,626,059

(3) There is accommodation pressure at Clarkston Primary.

Review of Coatbridge ND Primary Schools Appendix 1-8

Total Running Cost Pre- School

Gartsherrie P Greenhill P Kirkshaws P

I id MonLiand t’ Shawhead P Sikeside P Townhead P

, I .

228 156 10 231 231 99% 203 196 0 231 231 88% 199 225 -1 467 396 5 0 % 66

1.18 12/ 1 462 33u 43% 33 144 162 -3 165 165 87% 117 146 -9 231 165 71 % 66 98 104 -1 297 198 49% 66

TOTAL 1544 1586 -1 2673 2310 70% 231

Comments

(1) Surdus Desiqn Caoacity : 1129 places (c. 2/3 schools)

‘(2) Surplus accommodation potentiallv available for primay school use - 766 places (c. 112 schools)

99

33

132

€1 ,625 €69,806 €1 ,721 €319,697 €2 117 r484.1vl

f2.168 f:301,556 €2,196 €1 1,325

f2.619 f254.340 €2,510 €205,208

€2,052 €2,216,106

(3) There is accommodation pressure at Gartsherrie Primary.

Review of Coatbridge ND Primary Schools Appendix 1-8

Gartsherrie P 228 156 10 231 23 1 99% El ,625 €69,806 Greenhill P 203 196 0 231 231 88% €1 ,721 €319.697 Kirkshaws P 199 225 -1 462 396 50% 66 €2,112 €484.450 Langloan P 242 282 3 363 363 67% €1 ,662 €463.399 Old Monkland P 148 127 1 462 330 45% 33 f2.168 f301.556 Shawhead P 144 162 -3 165 165 87% f2,196 €1 1,325 Sikeside P 117 146 -9 231 165 71% 66 f2,510 f205,208 Townhead P 98 104 -1 297 198 49% 66 €2,619 €254,340

TOTAL 1544 1586 -1 2673 2310 70% 231

Comments

(1) Surolus Desian CaDacity : 1129 places (c. 2/3 schools)

(2) SurDlus accommodation Dotentially available for Drimarv school use - 766 places (c. 112 schools)

99

33

132 f2.052 €2,216,106

(3) There is accommodation pressure at Gartsherrie Primary.

Review of Monklands Rural ND Primary Schools Appendix 1-9

Roll (2004) Roll (1998) Excludlng Design Including Future Net Placlng Capacity of Placlng Placing Requests the

Requests Requests (1998 Only) Bulldlng

Accommodation in School Use (Pupil Places)

Accommodation In Other Use Pupil Places

' Maintenance Costs 5 Year Plan

Total Space % Actually Total Runnlng Cost (excluding Available Used Pre- School thers Per School Pupil upgrading)

Calderbank P Chapelhall P Glenbolg P Glengowan P Greengairs P New Monkland P Plains P TOTAL

67 187 66 114 ',11 193 80

938

75 262 60 107 136 191 82

913

Comments

(1) Surdus Desian Camcity : 997places (c. 2 schools)

2 -3 0 0 1 -1 1 0

165 528 132 23 1 231 297 23 1 1815

165 429 132 198 231 297 198 1650

41 % 44% 50% 58%

65% 48%

40% 50%

99

33

132 33 33

f2,667 €2,035 f2.855 f2,246 €2,237 f 1,879 €2,656 f2.343

€1 83.321 f 639,288 f 103,385 f 178,465 €160,516 €457.3 12 €135,362

€1,857,649

(2) m u s accommodation Dolentiallv available for Drirnarv school u s - 832 places (c. 1/2 schools)

Review of Airdrie RC Primary Schools Appendix 1-1 0

St Andrew's P St Dorninic's P St Edward's P St Serfs P

240 216 2 429 363 66% 66 159 21 7 -3 330 264 60% 66 247 261 2 396 363 68% 33 282 298 -24 495 429 66% 66

f 1,934 €472,353 f2,217 €363.230 €1 ,786 €375,320

f248.321 €1,971

TOTAL 1259 1306 -4 1980 1749 72% €1 ,895 €2,118,033

Comments

(1) Surdus Desiqn Cap- : 721 places (c. 2 schools)

(2) Surplus accommodation Dotentiallv available for Rrirnarv school use - 490 places (c 1 school)

(3) As a result of (he high number of placing requests there are concerns about the ability of Alevandra Primary to accommodate all its zoned intake.

Review of Coatbridge RC Primary Schools Appendix 1-1 1

St Augustine's P 452 447 5 462 462 98% €1 ,587 €494.085 St Bartholomew's P St Bernard's P St James' P St Mary's P St Monlca's P St Patrick's P St Stephen's P St Timothy's P

262 187 208 226 349 412 187 232

230 120 147 142 260 380 308 276

-2 4

-1 5 0 14 -12 -19 2

396 264 462 330 528 462 462 462

363 264 429 330 495 429 462 396

72% 71% 48% 60% 71% 96% 40% 59%

TOTAL 2515 2310 -23 3828 3630 69%

Comments

(1) SurDlus Desiqn C a m :I313 places (c. 213 schools)

(2) -Ius accommodation Dotentiallv available for Primarv school use - 1155 places (c. 213 schools)

(3) There is accommodation pressure at St Augustine's Primary.

33

66

99

33 €1 ,938 f 1,949

33 f2,106 f 1,723

33 f1,815 f 1,561 €2,177 f2,149

99 f 1,889

€566,725 €359,654 f437,560 f 133,017 f294,638 f 174,135 €319,911 €433,409

f3.213.142

(4) There is accommodation pressure at St Patrick's Primary

N v1

Review of Monklands Rural RC Primary Schools Appendix 1-1 2

Roll (1998) Including Placing

School Requests Corpus Christi P 93 Our Lady & St Joseph's P 116 St Aloysius' P 257 St David's P 195 St Kevin's P 123 St Mary's P 82

Maintenance Costs 5 Year Plan

90 2 231 165 56% 66 €2,468 f264,353 150 0 396 330 35% 66 f2.414 €246,440 221 0 792 495 52% 297 f1.917 177 -1 396 330 59% 33 33 €2,044 f322,474 90 0 231 23 1 53% €2,234 €220,611 98 -1 23 1 23 1 35% €2,527 f282,914

f 1,094,233

TOTAL 866 826 0 2277 1782 49% 165 330 €2,268 f2.431.025

Comments

(1) SurDlus Desiqn Ca- : 1415places (c. 3/4 schools)

(2) Surplus accommodal~&npotentiallv available for primary school use - 920 places (c. 2 schools)

-

ration .XIS

3elvidere P Lawmuir P Mossend P Noble P

TOTAL

Comments

Roll (1998) lncludlng . Placing Requests

153 449 312 337

1221

-

Review of Bellshill ND Primary Schools Appendix 1-1 3

421 4 462 462 97% 374 16 462 396 79% 66 332 2 462 396 78% 66

1202 13 1683 1485 80% 188

(1) Surdus desian c a m : 462 places (c. 1 school)

12)rplus accommodation Dotentiallv available for primary sch~gl use : 264 Dlaces Ic. 1 small school)

(3) Part of the catchment area of Belvidere PS and Lawmuir PS is shared wilh parents being able to select either option.

-I--- ._

f 1,597 f281,700 €1 ,660 f250,075 €1 ,774 f735.593

€1,615,598 €1.780

(4) There is accommodation pressure at Lawmuir Primary.

Review of HarthiIIIShotts ND Primary Schools Appendix 1-1 4

Accommodation In School Use (Pupil Places)

Total Space % Actually Available Used

I I I I I hxmmmdation in Other Use Pupil Places

Maintenance Costs 5 Year Plan

Total Running Cost (excluding Pre- School Others Per School Pupil upgrading) School

Benhar P Dykehead P Harthill P Kirk 0' Shotts Stane P

Roll (2004) Roll (1998) Excluding Design Including Future Net Placlng Capacity c Placing Placing Requests the

Requests Requests (1998 Only) Building

134 124 -1 231 231 58% 352 333 -1 462 462 76% 156 149 0 297 231 68% 66 80 120 0 198 198 40% 172 182 0 297 297 58%

TOTAL 1016 1018 -1 1716 1650 59%

Comments

(1) surplus Design Capacity : 700 places (c. 1/2 schools)

(2) Surplus accommodation pol~ntiallv available for orimamchool use - 634 places (c. 1/2 schools)

66

f2.177 f1.715 f61,190 f2,064 f2,607 f303.280 f 1,929 f283.915

f2.118 f866.990

(3) Repfacement school for Benhar/Har!hill Primary currently being constructed

L

I Calder School P

Roll (1998) including Placlng

Requests

Glencalrn P Knowetop P Ladywell P Logans P Muirhouse P Muir Street P

Accommodation In School kmmmodat ion in Other Roll (2004) Use (Pupil Places) Use Pupil Places Excluding Design Maintenance Costs

Future Net Placlng Capacity of 5 Year Plan Total Runnlng Cost (excluding Placing Requests the Total Space % Actually

Requests (1998 Only) Building Avallable Used Pre- School Others Per School Pupil upgrading)

f3.407.660 TOTAL 1824 1625 0 2871 2442 71% 99 330 f2,024

Comments

(1) Surplus Desiqn CaDacity : 1047places (c. 2 schools)

(2) arDlus accommodation Dotentiah available for prirnarv school use - 635 places (c. 1 school)

(3) There is severe accommodation pressure at Knowetop Primary because of placing requests.

--

A

N LD

Review of Motherwell Rural ND Primary Schools Appendix 1-1 6

Malntenance Costs

Holytown P 295 216 -18 462 396 74% 66

Newarthill P 162 182 4 231 231 70% Keir Hardie P 192 153 -5 264 264 73%

New Stevenston P 226 222 7 396 297 76% 99

€530,970 €1 ,791 E l ,849 €301,936 €1 ,935 f218,171 €1,819 €399,720

1000 895 -15 1584 1419 70% 165 f1,871 €1,599,257 TOTAL

Comments

(1) Surdus Desicln Capacity : 584 places (c. 1 school)

(2) Surdus accommodation potentially available for DrirnarY school use - 419 places (c. 1 school)

School Ailkenhead P Burnhead P Tannochside P

Roll (2004) Excluding

Future Placlng

Requests

TOTAL

Accommodation In School Use (Pupil Places)

hxmnmodation In Other Use Pupil Places

Design ’ Maintenance Costs Net Placing Capacity of 5 Year Plan

Total Runnlng Cost (excluding (1998 Only) Building Available Used Pre- School Others Per School Pupil upgrading) Requests the Total Space % Actually

Review of UddingstonNiewpark ND Primary Schools

Roll (1998) Including Placing

Requests 21 3

Appendix 1-1 7

.~ 21 8 196 -8 660 363 60% 198 99 €2,221 f485.825 322 296 4 462 396 81 % 66 f 1,664 f686,290

753 694 1 1353 990 78% 264 99 El ,896 f 1 .I 95.425

Comments

(1) SurDlus Design Capacity : 600 places (c. 1 school)

(2) Surplus accommodation potentiallv available for Drimaw school use - 237 places (c. 1 small school)

(3) The catchment area of Tannochside Primary includes an area located in South Lanarkshire.

L

300 121 191 213 100 130 272 189 202 338

Review of Wishaw ND Primary Schools Appendix 1-1 8

Carnbusnethan P Castlehill P Coltness P Larnrnermoor P Morningside P Netherton P Newrnains P Overtown P Thornlie P Wishaw Academy P

349 234 157 276 189 125 336 154 149 343

9 -1 6 2 8 4 9 -3 7 -3 8

363 462 462 462 231 198 429 198 231 396

363 264 396 264 231 198 330 198 23 1 396

83% 46% 48% 81 O h

43% 6 6 '1'0 82% 95% 87% 85%

f 1,567 66 132 f2.968 66 f2.204 33 165 f 1,833

€2,337 f2,008

99 f 1,792 f 1,739 f 1,839 f 1,594

f313.110 f 576.668 f553,930 f524,592 f 327,920 f114.210 €374,022 f 129,735 €336,940 f 31 4,935

TOTAL 2243 2537 9 3894 3234 70% 264

Comments

(1) SurDlus Desicln Ca& : 1651 places (c. 314 schools)

(2) SurDlus accommo.dation Dotentiallv available for Drimarv school use - 991 places (c. 2 schools)

(3) Part of the catchment area of Newrnains PS and Morningside PS is shared with parents being able to select either option.

(4) An area adjacent to the catchment area of Morningside Primary is zoned to a school located in South Lanarkshire

297 f2.035 f3,822.217

(5) There is accommodalion pressure at Overtown Primary.

Holy Family P Sacred Heart P St Gerard's P

Review of Bellshill RC Primary Schools Appendix 1-19

otal Running Cost

356 331 -8 462 429 83% 33 f 1,776 197 163 0 462 297 66% 66 99 f 1,934

Maintenance Costs S Year Plan (excluding

E34 1,614 f 349.855

TOTAL 82 1 749 4 1320 1122 72% 66 132 f 1.787 f1,032.169

Comments

(1) SurDlus desictn canaci!y : 499 places (c. 1 school)

(2) Surplus accommodation ootentiallv available for Drimaw school use : 301 olacesIc. 1 small school)

2

W P

Review of HarthiII/Shotts RC Primary Schools Appendix 1-20

Rofl(l998) Including Placlng I School St Palrick's P

Requests 297

Roll (2004) Excluding

Future Placing

Requests 176 -1 429 429 69% E l ,760

TOTAL 297 176 -1 429 429 69%

Mahtenance Costs 5 Year Plan (excluding upgrading) f225.525

fl,760 f225.525

Comments

(1) Surdus Desian CaDacify : 132 places

(2) SurDlus accommodation ootentiallv available for Drimary school use - 132 places

Review of Motherwell RC Primary Schools Appendix 1-21

Cathedral P St Bernadette's P St Brendan's P

Roll (20041

434 421 206 185 184 220

Design Net Placing Capacity 01 Requests I the

(1998 Only) , Building 4 495 -4 462 -2 462

Accommodation In School Use (Pupil Places)

Accommodation In Other Use Pupil Places ' .

495 f 1.572 330 62% 297 62%

132 €2,037 165 €2,052

Maintenance Costs 5 Year Plan (excluding upgrading)

€289,212 f 401,150 €831,730

TOTAL 824 826 -2 1419 1122 71% 297 f i ,887 f 1,522,092

Comments

(1) SurDlus Desian C a m : 595 places (c. 1 school)

(2) Surplus accommodation Dotentiallv available for Drirnaw school use - 298 places (c. 1 smali school)

_-

A

W VI

I Christ School the King P

Our Lady's & SI Francis P St Mary's P St Patrick's P St Teresa's P

TOTAL

Appendix 1-22 Review of Motherwell Rural RC Primary Schools

Roll (1998) Including Placing

Requests 214 158 168 169 313

1022

Maintenance Costs

Total Running Cost

150 11 264 198 80% 66 131 -1 297 231 73% 66 223 0 231 198 85% 33 358 -8 429 429 73%

1031 -14 1617 1452 73% 165

Comments

(1) Sur~lus Desian CaDacity : 507 places (c. 1 school)

(2) Surdus accommodation Dotentiallv available for Drimarv school use - 430 places (c. 1 small school)

f333,464 El,895 f329,952 f2,022 f504,260 E l ,937

f1,711 f415,686

f1.815,657 f 1.884

(3) The catchment area of Tannochside Primary includes an area located in South Lanarkshire.

L

Review of UddingstonNiewpark RC Primary Schools Appendix 1-23

Maintenance Costs

St Gabrlel's P

TOTAL

135 120 1 23 1 231 58%

446 430 2 627 561 76% 66

Comments

(1) Surdus Desian Capacity : 181 places

(2) Sumlus accommodation Dotenlially available for PrimarV school use - 11 5 places

(3) An area adjacent to the catchment area of St Colurnba's Primary is zoned to a school located in South Lanarkshire.

€2,282 €291,865

€2,053 €816,430

Review of Wishaw RC Primary Schools Appendix 1-24

St Brlgld's P 220 255 3 330 330 67% St Ignalius' P 172 222 -2 231 231 74% St Matthew's P 204 177 1 462 429 48% SI Thomas' P 259 294 -2 462 462 56%

f 1,930 f299,341 E l ,908 f 386.226

33 f2,066 f522,OOO f 1,852 f500,525

TOTAL 1207 1260 2 1947 1914 64 % 33 f i ,a74 f2,057,577

Somments

(1) Surdus Desicln CaDacity : 740 places (c. 1/2 schools)

(2) Sur~lus acmm modation Dotentiallv available for Drimarv school use - 707 places (c. 1/2 schools)

(3) SI lgnatius PS is maintained on a wind and watertight basis only. A final decision on the future of the school is required.

(4) An area adjacent to the catchment area of St Brigid's Primary Is zoned to a school located in South Lanarkshire.

(5) The catchment area of St Brigid's Primary includes an area located in South Lanarkshire.

RI Q

n

E 0 iK L L

.. 2 CO in cn r(

I i- 0 0

I CO El

APPENDIX 2 AREA ANALYSIS OF PRIMARY SCHOOL PROVISION

CUMBERNAISLD RC Airdrie M) Cmtbridge ND Mor~klands Rural ND MONKLANDS ND Airdrie RC Coatbridge RC Monklands Rum1 RC MONKLANDS RC Bellshill ND EIarthilYShotts ND Mod~emzll NI> Motherwell Ilrunl ND ViewpkRJddingston NI) Widmw ND MOTHERWELL NL) Bellsliill RC rrd i i imot t s RC Motlicnvell RC Mothenvell Rural. RC Vie~~prk/Uddinpstan RC Wislinw 1tC MOTHERWELL RC

-

Nu7 TOTAL - (ND) N W TOTAL - {RC) TOTAL OV3RALL

i Design

Pupil Roll Capcity (1998) (pupil

1,207 1 1,947

~~

Accomodotio~ in School use

Planning capacity % Plenning (pupil places) capacity in use

GI%

60% 76%

2,145 1 60% R W 711% ..-..

3,894 67%

3 71n 7W? 3,267 MY0

. ... -,- . - 1,650 5Wh 7*227 62 ?4

~

1749 I 72% ~. . . .,. . _ 3,630 GY! 1,786 18%

~

7,161 I 63% 1,485 80% 1.650 59% 2,459 71% 1,419 70°%

99I1 78% 3,234 70%

1,122 72% 429 69%

1,122 71% 1,452 73%

11,220 7 1 %

56 1 76% 1,914 &%

26,631 64 V O

4600 71%

17,655 1 47% 64,286 6 6 '/o

Running 5 year costs Mointeoncc

0 1 (z1

a J

t- 0 E

a