DIGHEM SURVEY

OF

ST. ANTHONY LAKE AREA

SKEAD TOWNSHIP, ONTARIO

FOR

SUPERIOR NORTHWEST INC.

BY

DIGHEM LIMITED

HEARST

RECEIVED

JUN301976

PROJECTS UNIT

010

Toronto, Ontario May 18, 1976

D. C. Fraser President

LOCATION MAP

79 0 45*

79 e45'

Scole 1:250,000

FIGURE 1. The survey area.

INTRODUCTION

A DIGHEM survey of 318 line-miles was flown with

a 1/8th mile line-spacing for Superior Northwest Inc. in the

interval from April 14th to 20th, 1976, in the St. Anthony

Lake area of Skead Township, Ontario (Figure 1). This

includes 18 line-miles of flight-line extensions which were

flown at no charge'. The Gazelle jet helicopter C-FGCE flew

with an average airspeed of 60 mph and EM bird height of

110 feet. Ancillary equipment consisted of a Barringer. s-'

Research AM-104 magnetometer with its bird at an average

height of 160 feet, a Bonzer radaraltimeter, Geocam sequence

camera, sferics monitor, 60 hz monitor, MFE 8-channel hot

pen analog recorder, and a Geometrics G-704 digital data

acquisition system with a Facit 4070 punch paper tape recorder.

The analog equipment recorded five channels of EM data at

918 hz, and one of sferics, magnetics and radaraltitude.

The digital equipment recorded the magnetic field to an

accuracy of one gamma.

The Appendix provides details on the analog data

channels, their respective noise levels, and the data reduction

procedure. The quoted noise levels are generally valid for

wind speeds up to 20 mph. Higher winds may cause the system

to be grounded because excessive bird swinging produces

control difficulties in piloting the helicopter. The swinging

results from the 50 square feet of area which is presented by

the bird to broadside gusts. The DIGHEM system nevertheless

can be flown under wind conditions that seriously degrade

other AEM systems.

if

- 8 -

Magnetics

The existence of a magnetic correlation with an

EM anomaly is indicated directly on the EM photomosaic. An

EM anomaly with magnetic correlation has a greater likelihood

of being produced by sulfides than one that is non-magnetic.

However, sulfide ore bodies may be non-magnetic (e.g./ Kidd

Creek near Timmins, Ontario) as well as magnetic (e.g., Mattabi)

The magnetometer data are digitally recorded in the

aircraft to an accuracy of one gamma. The digital tape

is processed by computer to yield a standard total field

magnetic map contoured at 25 gamma intervals. The magnetic

data also are treated mathematically to enhance the magnetic

response of the near-surface geology, and an enhanced

magnetic map is produced with a 100 gamma contour interval.

The response of the enhancement operator in the frequency

domain is shown in Figure 2.

AM

PLIT

UD

E

o -

o -c

o

r

m -n

O o

- 9 -

The enhanced magnetic map bears a resemblance to

a ground magnetic map. It therefore simplifies the recognition

of trends in the rock strata and the interpretation of

geological structure. The contour interval of 100 gammas is

suitable for defining the near-surface local geology while

de-emphasizing deep-seated regional features.

Apart from the difference in the contour interval,

the enhanced magnetic map and the standard magnetic map are

identical when magnetic basement rocks underlie several

thousand feet of non-magnetic cover. The difference between

the two maps increases with the amount of magnetization of

the near-surface geology.

The presence of a magnetic coincidence with an EM

anomaly can result because the conductor is magnetic or

because a magnetic body occurs in juxtaposition with the

conductor. The majority of magnetic conductors represent

sulfides containing pyrrhotite or magnetite. However,

graphite and magnetite in close association can provide

coinciding EM-magnetic anomalies. The truly magnetic

conductors tend to follow closely the contoured magnetic

highs. Such coincidence may be more evident on the enhanced

magnetic map than on the standard magnetic map because of

less disturbance from regional magnetic features. The

enhancement, therefore, provides data maps which contribute

to the evaluation of EM anomalies.

- 13 -

Respectfully submitted,

Toronto, Ontario May 18, 1976 /ap

D. C. Fraser President

Four maps accompany this report.

Electromagnetics Magnetics Enhanced magnetics Reference for report

l map sheetl map sheetl map sheetl map sheet

APPENDIX

THE FLIGHT RECORD AND PATH RECOVERY

The flight record is a roll of chart paper which

moves through the recorder console at a speed of 1.5 mm/sec.

This provides a ground scale on the flight record in

feet/mm which is approximately equal to the helicopter

flight speed in mph. Thus, for example, the ground scale

of the flight record is approximately 70 feet/mm when the

helicopter flies at 70 mph. -

The flight record consists of eight channels of

information, where the label on the record illustrates

which of the following ten selections were recorded:

Time Scale Channel Constant units/mm Noise

Standard whaletail quadrature 4 sec 2 ppm 2 ppmStandard fishtail quadrature 4 sec 2 ppm 2 ppmStandard coil-pair (Max) inphase l sec 5 ppm 5 ppmStandard coil-pair (Max) inphase 4 sec 2 ppm 2 ppmStandard coil-pair (Max) quadrature l sec 5 ppm 5 ppmStandard coil-pair (Max) quadrature 4 sec 2 ppm 2 ppmSferic monitor l sec 5 ppmRadaraltitude l sec 10 feetMagnetometer: l gamma/step ' l sec 2.5 gammasMagnetometer: 10 gamma/step l sec 25 gammas

The sferic monitor responds to electromagnetic signals

having a frequency close to the transmitted frequency. Its

purpose is to identify anomalies which are caused by environmental

EM noise, e.g., distant lightning discharges and power line

harmonics.

Several fiducial markers are used between the

channels, as follows:

Fiducial Occurrence

60-hz fiducials occur only over power lines

camera fiducials occur regularly at 3 mmintervals on every line

navigator fiducials occur discontinuously onevery line.

The 60-hz fiducials identify anomalies generated

by power lines, allowing them to be either flagged on, or

deleted from, the EM map.

The navigator fiducial marks represent points on

the ground which were recognized by the aircraft navigator.

These are the initial base points for flight path recovery.

The flight line begins with an encircled navigator fiducial

mark. This is followed by a series of unevenly-spaced

fiducial marks moving right-wards along the record, which

is in the direction of flight. The end of the line is

flagged by a second encircled .navigator fiducial mark.

The camera fiducial marks indicate each point where

a photograph was taken. These photographs are used to

provide accurate photo-path recovery locations for the

navigator fiducials, which are then plotted on the

geophysical maps to provide the track of the aircraft.

- iii -

The navigator fiducial locations on both the

flight records and flight path maps are examined by a

computer for unusual helicopter speed changes. Such

changes often denote an error in flight path recovery.

The resulting flight path locations therefore reflect

a more stringent checking than is provided by standard

flight path recovery techniques.

/ap (

, P.ENG.

3208488*848 2.2141 HEARST OSO

of Lot 6, Concession 6, Skead Township, m , 0 n wo_______Ontario_____________ JUL * 9 1976

Introduction PROJECTS UNIT

Soil sampling was carried out on previouslycut lines on four claims in the south half of Lot 6, Concession 6, Skead Township, during May of 1976*

Location, Access and Ownership

The property is located in the south half oflot 6 Concession 6 of Skead Township, Larder Lake Mining Division, District of Temiskaming, Ontario* It comprises four claims numbered L341838-341840 inclusive and L342531. The claims are recorded in the name of R. A. MaoOregor, 134 Palace Drive, Sault Ste* Marie, Ontario. Highway 624 passes through the west part rf the claims about 8 miles south of Larder Lake, Ontario*

Previous Exploration

Gold was discovered in the 1920's and a shaft started. This was continued in the 1930's to a total depth of 500 feet with lateral work on the 215 and 475 foot levels. Many old surface pits and trenches can also be seen on the property* Ho records could be located on this work.

Geology

The property is underlain by felsic and maficvolcanics with a small area of sediments in the south-east corner* Two bands of high magnetic readings in the centre of claim L341839 and the north west corner of L341838 are probably serpentinimd peridotite assooiated with the larger sill located a few thoussd feet south. Both the Linooln-ftipissing shear sone and the Manor fault cross the property.

Survey Procedure

Samples were taken from the 'B' soil noris* at 100 foot intervals along lines cut at a spacing of 400 feet* The samples were obtained by an auger at a depth of 12"-18*. The samples were then dried and screened to -80 mesh, deoompomd by hot aqua regia and analysed for copper by Atomic Adsorption*

Results and Conclusions.

A number of samples are considered to beweakly anomalous* As a standard the work by the Ministry of Natural Resources in Halliday and Midlothian Townships is used as a guide. This survey suggests that samples over 25 p.p.m. copper are considered anomalous. Ho anomalous pattern is evidentf the anomalous samples probably represent transported glacial material.

jf Q ffi*.'

Ontario

Ministry of Nature

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGIC, TECHNICAL DATA

aaowsEwne 2.2141 HEARST 900 j

Type of Survey(s' Township or Area Claim Holder (s)

Survey Company Author of Report Address of Autho Covering Dates of

Total Miles of Lin

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORT FACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION. CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Airborne Magnetometer 'sSkead, Hearst, CatherineR. A. MacGregorL. LacasseDie/hem LimitedD. C. Frazer

r

Survey Apri

e Ciir

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

1 14- Mayl8 P 1976(linecutting to office)

s .

DAYS~, i-i perdaim Geophysical— El'"rtrr'magr""tir—Magnptnrr)Pfr ,,,

—Radiometric, .-Othpr

Hpnlogiral ————

Geochemical...-———.-..

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provuion credits do not apply to airborne lurveyi)

Magnetometer ..2.0 F.Wtrnmaornetir Rariinmptrir

DATE;

LRes. Genl.

Previous Surveys

(enter dayc per claim)

Sir.NATTTRF..Author of Report or Agent

• D-Qualifications ^ ^ ' " 2/0 {/(rf. f

File No. Type Date Claim Holder ,

W ' \Xl^ \W^^ctA rt/i ^W." WLvAT W^V^^' F

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED- ; , ' :,; List numerically ,. ., ,1

(prefix)'V- s . ,

(number)

i: . '.' - ' '•'••'" ' '" : '- " " J '

. '. '. " - '' •-' n^:,,".:'.""",'' ;. '- ;

~ , - : .: ' -' "h. i,,' T -

, . r .' " ...i-j. . : . ' s '

i ' . ~ ' . .' \. :. \ ''Y - " - " . .i 1 :

1 r "' ' ' 'jii 1 "

^^)cap :H* .--i Jl Q ft s ^i ' - f Xir^ ' ^^ ' ^Ai'^^^XjjW""^

:, f "• i .'. " - -, .' ,- '; ' . i . . , , . - :t. ., ; , f . ...i- ^ '-

- '.'.•. ' ' :

: , .'^•..' " ; l;4j;'l;

TOTAL ctAl^i

'-"* ..-. V-. -.

V ' . . " ; : ' J--.-.

r . ,i,; ..•.j.-i'L ^if. ..if. v r....

\, ' . , n".' . .' J -

- ' ! ! ,?' ' - " ! ' -* '

- i,;*'*? '-.'/^y'jv:

J ' - ; "1 LVL f' ̂ ' -i u ' -- - -

1

iKa

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of surveyi

Number of Stations. Station interval —— Profile scale ____

.Number of Readings -Line spacing ' '

Contour interval.

Instrument.

Accuracy — Scale constant. Diurnal correction method.Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value ___

I

•S•esw

InstrumentCoil configuration Coil separation —— Accuracy ————— Method: Frequency————

Parameters measured.

CH Fixed transmitter D Shoot back Q In line D Parallel line

(specify V.L.F. station)

O

Instrument.Scale constant

Corrections made.

Base station value and location .

Elevation accuracy.

'85

l

Via

InstrumentMethod [~1 Time Domain

Parameters — On time ___ - Off time ___— Delay time ———

— Integration time.

Power.Electrode array— Electrode spacing . Type of electrode

D Frequency Domain _ Frequency ._ Range . .——-w-

SELF POTENTIAL

Instrument——————————————————————————————————————— Range.Survey Method ————————————————————————————————————,———;—

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRIC

Instrument.Values measured.Energy windows (levels) ———-—^-^---————————-—^—-————.—.^-—.-.^—-——Height of instrument^———^——.^————-—^—r——^———-—.Background Count. Size of detector________________________' ___________;'

Overburden —-^———^—————^^—.—^——--——-—-———^-——^—.——.——-(type, depth - include outcrop map)

OTHERS {SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.)

Type of survey_________________.——————————————— Instrument ——————————————————————————————————— Accuracy——————————————————————————————————————-Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS

Type of survey(s)___Magnetometerinstrument(s) ____Barringer AM-104

(specify for each type of survey)Accuracy^—-——-——-l gamma

(specify for each type of turvey)Aircraft used______Gazelle jet helicopter C-FGCESensor altitude^————160 feetNavigation and flight path recovery method.

see appendix to reportAircraft altitude_____200 feet———————————,.^Line Spring 1/8 tnilnMiles flown over total area____2iS_________________Over claims only 62 milep

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)Average Sample Weight——————— Method of Collection——————

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth———— Terrain————————

Drainage Development———————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODS

Values expressed in: per centp. p. m. p. p. b.

D D D

Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)

Others __________________'4-——-—Field Analysis (.

Extraction Method. Analytical Method™ Reagents Used——

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. ——-——^———

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis ———~.

Extraction Method. Analytical Method - Reagents Used——

Commercial Laboratory (. Name of Laboratory^ Extraction Method—^ Analytical Method—— Reagents Used___—

.tests)

.tests)

-tests)

General. General.

CLAIM BIST

L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L

341838341839341840342531374771374772374773374774374775374777374778374779396263396264396274396275396276396277396278396279396280396281396282396283396284396285396286396287400700400701400702400703400704400705400706400707400708400709400710400711400712400713400714400715400716400717400718400719400720400721400722400723400724400725400726400727

L 400728 L 400729 L 401394 L 401395 L 401396 L 401397 L 401398 L 415023 L 415024 L 415025 L 415026 L 415027 L 415028 L 442035 L 442036 L 442037 L 442038 L 442039 L 442040 L 442041 L 442042 L 442043 L 442044 L 442045 L 442046 L 442047 L 442048 L 442049 L 442050 L 442051 L 442052 L 442053 L 442054 L 442055 L 442056 L 442057 L 442058 L 442059 L 442060 L 442061 L 442062 L 442063 EXXXXBKXX EXXX2BKSX L 442070 L 442071 L 442072 L 442073 L 442074

L 447535 L 447536 L 447537 L 447538 L 447539 L 447540 L 447541 L 447542 L 447543 L 447544 L 447545 L 447546 L 447547 L 447548 L 447549 L 447550

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

File. a w/-x

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION. CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Suryey(s) ^ Township or Area Claim Holder(s)

Ca

tt*

Survey Company ———————- Author of Report ** M t 4 Address of Author —^——.^^-—— Covering Dates of Survey Mc\y

Total Miles of Line Cut______

J*;

(linecutung to office)

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical—Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer——Radiometric———Other^—————

DAYS per claim

Geological___ nT^Geochemical.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne lurveyi)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric

DATE:, , 71 "7

(enter days per claim)

STHNATITRT?.-Author of Report o^Agent

. j/OS

Res. Geol.. .Qualifications.Previous Surveys

File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

A2+J.SJLL" ' '(prefix)

Ll.tM.lt...(number)

TOTAL CLAIMS.

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations.

Station interval —— Profile scale ____

.Number of Readings

.Line spacing ————

Contour interval.

U

iInstrument.Accuracy — Scale constant. Diurnal correction method.Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value ___

ELECTROMAGNETIC

Instrument

fYijl rnnfignratinn

Oiil separation

Arrurary

Method: CD Fixed transmitter D Shoot back Q In lineFrpqiipnry

(specify V.L.F. station)

Parameters measured

. CD Parallel line

O

Instrument.Scale constant.Corrections made.

Base station value and location .

Elevation accuracy.

Instrument _________ Method l l Time DomainParameters — On time -——,

- Off time

D Frequency Domain _ Frequency ______ Range ————.^—

— Delay time ——.— Integration time.

Power.Electrode array — Electrode spacing . Type of electrode .

SELF POTENTIAL

Instrument,.—.^^——————^^^^^^^-.^-——^^———————^—^—— Range.i

Survey Method ——————————————————————————————————————————.

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRIC

Instrument ———Values measured.

Energy windows (levels) ̂ ———————.^^^^——-————-————-^^—————-.——

Height of instrument___________________________Background Count.

Size of detector——^^^^——————-———---^-—^^-^-™.—--—^...-—.—.—-.Overburden .—-———.^^—-————..-—.^^———-———.—-——.—.—^^——..———————

(type, depth — include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.)

Type of survey——————————————————.———————————————Instrument —^—————^——-—————^—^^———————^————- Accuracy———————————————————————————————————Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS

Type of survey(s)____ Instrument(s) ——————

(specify for each type of survey)

Accuracy^-^————.———^^--——.(specify for each type of survey)

Aircraft used.^^————-——^^^^——.———————-—^—.—.—-—

Sensor altitude.Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude______________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area________________________Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of SamplesType of Sample_______S* i l

JL4' V 1

(Nature of Material) Average Sample Weight————2—f A

of Collection-Aba f f

Soil Horizon Sampled.' a ' *" '* /o

Sample Depth. Terrain————

12* ~

Drainage Development———C&. Estimated Range of Overburden

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis ———-90

ANALYTICAL METHODS

Values expressed in: per cent CDp. p. m. [S3p.p. b. CD

'Cu) Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)

Others .—--——.-.-—.—-^-.—.-^.——-—^Field Analysis (.

ExtrarHnn MpfhnH

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. (______'.Extraction Method. Analytical Method.

Used-.—

Laboratory ( : of Laboratory^/3jLL

Extraction MethodjafiJ—^ Analytical Method—/v V Reagents Used ______-.

.tests)

.tests)

L Td .

Oeneral General.

PATENTED LANDCROWN LAND SALELEASESLOCATED LANDLICENSE OF OCCUPATIONMINING RIGHTS ONLYSURFACE RIGHTS ONLYROADSIMPROVED ROADSKING'S HIGHWAYSRAILWAYSPOWER LINESMARSH OR MUSKEGMINESCANCELLED PATENTED S.R.O.

MCVITTIE TWP M-3?o

447157,447158 I447IS9

L \ * Y3&JE * v ̂ -*iv*wvs i OIVcU' j '

r^L~~T L" l L ] L. , L,4420*8J44Z066 j 446670 /446677,1 44668 l ^46685

446671 .446678 |44668? 1446*86

447102 1447103 l44TloU 447IOS (44666B '446673 1446680 4466H4 1447156---J l J 1 l 't i t- i-t-lr c-i—L -1—L—TT--447098 1447099 447IOOl447IOI '

(446669 l 446674 l}96?03

447092 l 447093 1447094 l, 8917* 891' , 3I94B3 ' — J l ..-.i — — ~~ \r, - - , L L

l ••""-*.xrf-r -l ^ TJ f\J f

i— - — - -r- —u 407*76 L\44I4*I \ \44I852

l 4470/87'447088 l 447089 l 447090\ T l l ,

447082 447K}Sy 447084 |44708B | 447O88 t--

447079 447080 ! 447081

407277 l 407273 ' 4072*9447072 '.4A707 J , 447074 l 4470 f S l 44 f 07 6^~\ ~ ~ ~\

' ' - - -(L4806I

T\VP \ rHp7. ^\/ L ; L \^-

|44lt*I 44ltCOI 441*57—"-"'4419*4 1441981 i 44I9S6

————.———— l———————l

4419*9 1441962 l 441*6*..., ' .L ——J- ———

i L i L ;L

420717 i 446660 l 44*408 j 441402

L i L ! L -L

__L.ni.__i_^L W l L

4420TI l 442072 i 449073

PLAN NO

SKEAD TWR M-387

380*406*84* 2.8141 WAR8T

THE TOWNSHIP OF

HEARSTDISTRICT OF

TIMISKAMING

LARDER LAKEMINING DIVISION

SCALE: MNCH 40 CHAINS

LEGENDor

NOTES400' Surface Rights reservation along the shores of all lakes and rivers

Townthip of H*or*t h** entirely within the CORPORATION of the TOWNSHIP of LARDER LAKE File: 129282.

Staking of mirung claims within ths Town of Larder Lake shown thus -———^il~; subject to Sec 37 t b) of the Mining Act (RSO 1970)

DATE OF ISSUE

JUL-21976

SURVEYS AND MAPPING

M-354ONTARIO

MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCESSURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH

NOTES

TP. M.354HEARST400' surface rights reservation along the shores of all lakes and rivers.

All unpotented mining cloimt accepted subject to survey, Section 118 of the Mining Act (R S.O. 1970)

SAND and GRAVELMTC PIT No 1230

447538 j ,0 l ^If"-44266311 i

4007IS J4007I6J |4O07l7 ,4007I8

^...F/"',

Montagu9DATE OF ISSUB

JUL-21976

SURVEYS AND MAPPING

BAYLY TP.380M8EM4* 8.8141 HiARST

LEGEND

HIGHWAY AND ROUTE NoOTHER ROADSTRAILSSURVEYED LINES.

TOWNSHIPS. BASE LINES. ETC LOTS, MINING CLAIMS. PARCELS, ETC

UNSURVEYED LINESLOT LINESPARCEL BOUNDARYMINING CLAIMS ETC.

RAILWAY AND RIGHT OF WAY UTILITY LINES NON-PERENNIAL STREAM FLOODING OR FLOODING RIGHTS SUBDIVISION ORIGINAL SHORELINE MARSH OR MUSKEG MINES

DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS

TYPE OF DOCUMENT

PATENT. SURFACE A MINING RIGHTS

SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY MINING RIGHTS ONLY

LEASE, SURFACE A MINING RIGHTS SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY

MINING RIGHTS ONLYLICENCE OF OCCUPATION

CROWN LAND SALE

ORDER-IN-COUNCIL

RESERVATIONCANCELLEDSAND A OftAVEL

SYMBOL

t

a

BaT cs ocO ® 0

SCALE : 1 INCH 40 CHAINS9 BOO 1000 tOOO_________4000_________•OOP

O 100 *OO tOO MO l KM IKM

ACRES HECTARES

TOWNSHIP

SKEADDISTRICT

TIMISKAMINGMINING DIVISION

LARDER LAKE

Ministry of Natural ResourcesSurveys and Mapping Branch

10/4/74Whitney BlocK

Queen's Park, Toronto

Plan No.

M. 387

NOTES

400' surface rights reservation along the shores of all lakes and rivers.

All unpotsntsd mining claims occsptsd subisot to survey, Ssotlon 118 of ths Mining Act (R.S.0. 1970).

SAND and GRAVELMTC PIT No 1230

DATE OF ISSUE

JUL301976

SURVEYS AND MAPPING L pRA^nn ,J

to ro

o:H

UJZZ

HEARST TP. M.354

VI

V

IV

7)43 660•i * li

L II "

- /Maytau

: L L[442060/ j

CDro

a:

cc

BAYLY TP. M.323

LEGEND

HIGHWAY AND ROUTE No.

OTHER ROADSTRAILSSURVEYED LINES:

TOWNSHIPS. BASE LINES, ETC LOTS. MINING CLAIMS. PARCELS, ETC

UNSURVEYED LINESLOT LINESPARCEL BOUNDARYMINING CLAIMS ETC.

RAILWAY AND RIGHT OF WAY UTILITY LINES

NON-PERENNIAL STREAM FLOODING OR FLOODING RIGHTS

SUBDIVISION

ORIGINAL SHORELINE MARSH OR MUSKEG MINES

DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS

TYPf OF DOCUMENT

PATENT. SURFACE A MINING RIGHTS

SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY MINING RIGHTS ONLY

LEASE, SURFACE 4 MINING RIGHTS SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY

MINING RIGHTS ONLY

LICENCE OF OCCUPATION

CROWN LAND SALE

ORDER-IN-COUNCIL

RESERVATION

CANCELLEDSAND A GRAVEL

SYMBOL

9.e9B BaT cs ocO

SCALE : 1 INCH 40 CHAINS9 800 1090 1000________4000________tOOO

nn

O tOO 4OO MO lOO l KM

ACRES HECTARES

TOWNSHIP

SKEADDISTRICT

TIMISKAMINGMINING DIVISION

LARDER LAKE

Ontario

Ministry of Natural ResourcesSurveys and Mapping Branch

Date 10/4/74Whitney Block

Queen's Park, Toronto

Plan No.

M. 387

MCELROY TP M. see

VI447S48 44 7.545

47663 l 4768S

j

373440 l 37343*

e'sIS947 18661

i\ 441197 441190

IB856 l l IS883T ^

ft T'r®18554 l /I8646

T

- V- —— -

MARTER TP M. 543

NOTES

400' surface rights reservation along the shores of all lakes and rivers.

Areat withdrawn from staking under Section 45 of the Mining Act ^s ',.,

••' " File Date Disposition(is) W 64/74 26940 10/10/74 SRO

\SSUEjUL- 21976

SURVEYS AND MJWNG1

f-'

LEGEND

PATENTED LAND

PATENTED FOJ SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY

LIA8ELICENSE OF OCCUPATIONCROWN LAND SALESLOCATED LANDCANCELLEDMINING RIGHTS ONLYSURFACE RIGHTS ONLYHIGHWAY l ROUTE NO.ROADSTRAILSRAILWAYSPOWER LINESMARSH OR MUSKEGMINES

w ^

'used only with summer resort locations or when space Is limited

TOWNSHIP OF

CATHARINEDISTRICT OF

TIMISKAMING

LARDER LAKEMINING DIVISION

SCALE : 1 INCH - 40 CHAINS (1/2 MILE)DR. X f l

DATE JUHt -ri PLAN NO. M,0\ l \K!0

MINISTRY Or NATURAL RFSOURCES•HJRVFY* AM^ ,.,AP'' 'i, BPANfH

- "VaSM

f i1 ' '

'/' " ' V'/ . rf f '7

r

LOC AT l ON MAP

t. 61 hi

Seal*

DIGHEM SURVEYMAGNETICS

FOR

SUPERIOR NORTHWEST INC.

SKEAD TWP , ONTARIO

MIL FS

' due iolf

200

ISOMAGNETIC LINES

(total field)

^*'^ 1000 gammas

^ . ZOO gammos

50 gammas

25 gommas

magnetic depression

32D04SEB8ia 2.2141 HEARST 240

,J*r

l' ' ' 1 ' f \ i T* 'N' . .. -v, v, 1 w; ifcw '.. - 'i|f Ai 1* ( * A 4V4 ' f J^^^^^^j^^^^^^aaa^^MKPi^^^^*s-.: ' - fe|*— ' — T,;V'-, ' -ri* ' 1 i;i - .i /-;

' v , U "' "* ' '

r U ' " ;:1-4* ; r-'r U ^ "f/ l

T 3 f ^ 'P :;' ^-,r -T f' t -'"tT "' T, .14" v" *-,L V r'-.

l*k/4* i 'E'v/n __ j* tr-

(T)-i-- — 'i-5

r - T' *' l \

T: rU y t' .1 ^- i l! At. ; T \"

•:\.-,;,::A'3y-W:'f 'fi- " -V-" . ''. --'. T' ' ; T

• i "V -' "' V'*-' \ '*' \ •' '' ' ...'' ' T\" M" '••'i- : . . . \ : l^•::--::. ••.-.-.•v- 't T i^•.- i' t - T :

i'-' V T : - Tr;-: ^.;...l:. .*U .,. "*-i - i l ., !- rV", -" ; . ' '•••.•••-.i.. - --.T A' ' ' - l

•. ,, :"- t ,\' ": ,^ f '. .-.An ^ ': f \*

i A/ * ^ li ,* 2 . * ___ ̂ y — . —— tir — i \" T-: "lr "\r , r TT\ T t4 ' -ir-'.-- -"y 4-,

i.ft \f f \c l J \ 4" Tr r* s ^14 \4 1

" 4'J, ,U ___ —4^ — - — *\ ———"*i~ \~\ t ^ rT. A-"" - T "" T

rr -T >T ! T

'-; ^A, A* - -' "^ ' 1, A" - '"f' /i ? ^ oli - Y\ } T-- 1

A, At4" T

V T :T•A-

;.\- t'-. . . - *\^ : J .^ rVi rV*i

N

* ,LOT^

:- v

LIN*

f,y GEOCHEMICAL 6URVEYSKEAD TOWNSHIP

SCALE l"*200'

COPPER IN P.P.M. T-TILL p-PEAT

CO/V.5

tl.

i. JiA^.4' a .iL*.