Upload
kevin-bondelli
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/15/2019 Curtailing the Increasing Costs of Higher Education in Arizona by Kevin Bondelli
1/7
8/15/2019 Curtailing the Increasing Costs of Higher Education in Arizona by Kevin Bondelli
2/7
One of the greatest challenges for American families today is the rising cost of
higher education. Year after year both resident and out-of-state tuition rates are increased.
This is combined with a decrease in the amount of financial aid available for students.
Prohibitive costs act as a deterrent for many students to gain a college education. Tuition
rates at public universities increase because of a lack of funding by their state
legislatures. State legislatures under-fund higher education because students traditionally
are not high-efficacy voters and there is no political ramification against them. In order to
ensure proper funding and in turn prevent drastic tuition increases, an effective
organization must be created to organize students as an efficient voting and lobbying
entity.
Tuition rates have increased dramatically over the past few years. According to
the Christian Science Monitor, since 1993-94, the new report points out, average tuition
and fees have risen 47% ($1,506) at four-year public colleges (MoneyCentral.com). The
article also explains that a key reason for the tuition tsunami: Cash-strapped states are
cutting budgets. Their 1990s largess toward public higher education has already slowed,
and for the fiscal year 2003-04 their support for universities is poised to fall by 2% to
3% (MoneyCentral.com). Chart 1 indicates this trend. It shows a decrease in state
appropriation for Arizona State University and an increase in tuition in order to balance
the difference.
8/15/2019 Curtailing the Increasing Costs of Higher Education in Arizona by Kevin Bondelli
3/7
Chart 1
http://www.auditorgen.state.az.us/Reports/Universities/Arizona%20State%20University/Financial_Audits/Financial_Audit_June_30_2004/Arizona_State_University_June_30_2004_Report_Highlights_Financial_
Audit.pdf
In order to prevent the current trend from becoming more drastic, an organization must
be created in order to increase the likelihood of greater funding to the universities.
The organizations primary responsibility will be lead students to register to vote
in the universitys legislative district and to aid students in voting. Initially, the
organization will work to place an early polling place on Arizona State Universitys
campus. Such a polling place already exists at the University of Arizona. An early polling
place would dramatically increase the number of students that would be able and willing
to vote. An early polling place is open for thirty days up until the day of the election. This
allows students with busy schedules to vote at any time during that month and prevents
them from having to wait in long lines on Election Day. The organization will also
8/15/2019 Curtailing the Increasing Costs of Higher Education in Arizona by Kevin Bondelli
4/7
register student voters by working with residence halls, student organizations, and
political parties. The importance of this is to make students a more efficient voting bloc.
State legislators are constantly decreasing the amount of funding for public
universities because they know there will be little or no political repercussion for it. Chart
2 shows that only 32.4% of the 18-24 bracket voted in the 1996 Presidential Election, and
that the number of voters in that group has decreased since 18-20 year olds were given
the right to vote.
Chart 2
http://www.fairvote.org/turnout/youth_voters.htm
Legislators tend to respond to requests from organizations that have the ability to affect
their election. A politicians primary concern is for them to remain a politician, and if the
organization is able to represent enough registered voters to affect their election, the
legislators will be much more likely to increase university funding. Chart 3 shows that
8/15/2019 Curtailing the Increasing Costs of Higher Education in Arizona by Kevin Bondelli
5/7
the 18-24 voting block has not been voting nearly as much as other age groups. With
students voting at the same rate as the other blocks, student concerns would be much
more likely to be addressed.
Chart 3
http://www.fairvote.org/turnout/youth_voters.htm
The costs for the creation and operation of this organization in Arizona will come
by replacing the Arizona Students Association. All students at Arizona public universities
pay $1 per semester to ASA. This creates a large budget that would enable the
organization to function. This is possible because the primary role of the Arizona
Students Association is to lobby for student issues, however its current structure prevents
it from being effective.
8/15/2019 Curtailing the Increasing Costs of Higher Education in Arizona by Kevin Bondelli
6/7
Critics will argue that it is near impossible to mobilize voters in college.
However, this is not the case. In the past 18-24 voters were disengaged because they felt
distanced from the issues that were being discussed. Nothing really seemed to apply to
them. The issue of university funding is directly affecting these students, many of whom
must go deep into debt or drop out of college because of the cost. With an organizing
force, these students would be much more likely to vote than in the past, especially if the
organization takes the measures that increase voter turnout such as gaining an early
polling place and making available mail-in ballots. The organization would also educate
students about the reasons for the tuition increases. Many students believe that it is
because of the university presidents or the Board of Regents. If more students were made
aware of the fact that they have electoral control of those people that are causing their
tuition to increase, voter turnout would be much higher.
Another challenge to the proposal is that even is the students were to be organized
and become efficient voters, it still would not change the way legislators vote on the
issue. Electoral consequences would make legislators more likely to increase the amount
of money appropriated to the universities. Legislators would be more willing to move
money from less important projects to higher education because of this. No matter what
the lobbying group is, a significant block of voters will be able to affect legislative
decisions, regardless of age or status.
An organization that is effective in educating, registering, and encouraging voting
of university students would be able to increase the amount of money appropriated by the
state legislature and therefore would decrease the need to raise tuition dramatically. The
funding and infrastructure for the organization already exist and it would be invaluable in
8/15/2019 Curtailing the Increasing Costs of Higher Education in Arizona by Kevin Bondelli
7/7
obtaining early polling places and other aids to voting efficiency. The concept is similar
to any union, a number of people working together to ensure that their interests are not
ignored.