Upload
alexia-johnson
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Current structure of review of Human Research Protocols
that involve ionizing radiation
Chaitanya Divgi, [email protected]
Protocol utilizing ionizing radiation in human subjects
Standard of care – NO JRSC review
No increase in amount of Ionizing radiation – EXPEDITED JRSC review
ALL other – JRSC review
Points to considerDoes the protocol include the use of
ionizing radiation?Would the subject have received
ionizing radiation if not for the protocol?Would the subject have received less
ionizing radiation if not for the protocol?◦ If yes, why does the subject need to receive
the additional ionizing radiation?If there are experimental devices/drugs
that include ionizing radiation, are there appropriate IND/IDE approvals/exemptions in place?
Review algorithmIonizi
ng radiation Y/N
• Protocol sent to IRB• Protocol sent to JRSC
Primary reviewer identified
• Dosimetry review• Initial review by JRSC Chair• Primary reviewer assigned by JRSC Chair
• Reviewer within HUS (MD)• Ad hoc review by additional JRSC members• Ad hoc Presentation by PI/RI
Back to
IRB
• Formal critique presented at HUS• Approve/Pending/Returned/Disapprove
Back to PIBack to IRB
Back to PI
Back to PI
To IRB
Dosimetry Review of Human Research Protocols
Thomas L Morgan, Ph.D., CHPExecutive Director, Radiation SafetyChief Radiation Safety Officer
Principles of Radiation Protection of Human Subjects
Justification: expected benefits to society exceed the overall societal cost
ALARA: total societal detriment from such justifiable activities is ALARA, economic and social factors being taken in to account
Limitation: apply individual dose limits to ensure that individuals or groups of individuals do not exceed levels of acceptable risk
Scientific ReviewWhy is radiation necessary?
◦“We hypothesize that drug XYZ will accelerate fracture healing. Radiographs will be necessary to assess healing at various time points”
How will it be used?◦“14 lateral and 14 AP radiographs of the wrist will be taken over 52 weeks”
Dosimetry ReviewAppropriate studies are being
performed (Justification)Radiation dose is the minimum
necessary to collect and analyze required data (ALARA & Limitation)
Minimum number of subjects are enrolled consistent with the objectives of the study (Limitation)◦No “fishing” expeditions
Dosimetry ReviewReview data dose data
presented and check cited references
Suggest corrections as necessary
Review risk language on Informed Consent Form
Comments returned to P.I. P.I. makes changes and
returns for final dosimetry review