Upload
lisa-palmer
View
213
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CURRENCY AND STATE POWERCURRENCY AND STATE POWER
Benjamin J. CohenUniversity of California, Santa Barbara
SUMMARYSUMMARY Question: What is the effect of an int’l
currency (IC) on state power? Analytical strategy: Disaggregate the roles
of an IC –> 3 questions: What is the effect of each role alone? Are there interdependencies among roles? What are their relative or cumulative impacts?
Conclusion: Three roles are paramount – in financial markets, trade, and central-bank reserves
CONTEXTCONTEXT
Conventional wisdom: an IC increases state power.
But what are the specific causal pathways? To answer, we must understand – Meaning(s) of state power Implications of separate roles
STATE POWERSTATE POWER Monetary power: a complex phenomenon. Two issues
Autonomy vs. influence Autonomy = capacity to delay or deflect costs
of balance-of-payments adjustment Influence derives from autonomy Influence may be passive or active
Relations as a source of power Relevance of asymmetries, dependencies Influence as a function of centrality of position
THE AGENDATHE AGENDA
What is the effect of an IC on an issuing state’s network position?
What is the effect on the state’s monetary autonomy?
What is the effect on the state’s capacity for influence?
What is the likelihood that influence will be actualized?
MONEY AND POWERMONEY AND POWER Conventional wisdom: an IC yields benefits
to the issuing country Seigniorage Macroeconomic flexibility Reputation Leverage
Problem: What are the specific causal pathways?
Answer: need to disaggregate the separate roles of an IC
ROLES OF AN INT’L CURRENCYROLES OF AN INT’L CURRENCY
Private level (markets) Forex trading (medium of exchange) Trade invoicing (m/e, unit of account) Investment (store of value)
Official level (policy) Intervention currency (m/e) Exchange-rate anchor (u/a) Reserve currency (s/v)
THE CURRENCY PYRAMIDTHE CURRENCY PYRAMID “Top” currency (US dollar)
Universal in scope (all six roles) Universal in domain (the globe)
“Patrician” currencies (euro, yen) Limited number of roles Mostly regional
“Elite” currencies (sterling, Swiss franc, Canadian dollar, etc.) Limited scope and domain
PRIVATE LEVELPRIVATE LEVEL Foreign-exchange trading
Centrality yields economic benefits but no political gain – autonomy unaffected
Trade invoicing and settlement Similar: economic benefits but autonomy
unaffected Financial markets (investment role)
Autonomy is enhanced (greater macroeconomic flexibility)
But difficult to translate directly into influence
OFFICIAL LEVELOFFICIAL LEVEL Intervention currency
Centrality yields economic benefits but no political gain – autonomy unaffected
Exchange-rate anchor Similar: economic benefits but autonomy
unaffected Reserve currency (reserve role)
Autonomy is enhanced (greater macroeconomic flexibility)
May be possible to translate directly into influence
INFERENCES All six roles generate economic
benefits Political benefits derive only from the
store-of-value roles (investment, reserve)
But this does not mean that only the s/v roles matter. Why? Because of interdependencies among roles
INTERDEPENDENCIESINTERDEPENDENCIES Is either s/v role (investment, reserve)
dependent on any of the m/e or u/a roles? Private level: No
Appeal as s/v depends on financial markets, not use for forex trading or trade invoicing
Official level: Yes Politics apart, choice of reserve currency tends
to reflect patterns of currency choice in trade relationships
Inference: Three roles matter critically – trade, financial, and reserve
RELATIVE, CUMULATIVE IMPACTSRELATIVE, CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
Of the three (trade, financial, reserve), the investment role (alone) contributes least to state power
But the investment role is critical in paving the way for a reserve role
The link between the two? The trade role
CONCLUSIONSCONCLUSIONS Three roles are critical: trade, investment, and reserve roles
The two s/v roles enhance autonomy, creating a capacity for influence
Alone, the investment role has little impact But a reserve role is unlikely without, first, an investment role The link between the two is the trade role
Practical lesson: For a government that wants to enhance its monetary power (autonomy, influence), there are two critical imperatives: Commitment to broad financial-market development Commitment to wider use of the national currency in trade
invoicing and settlement