13
7/24/16 www.caleblack.com 1 What is Cri9cal Thinking? Chapter 4 What is a Skep9c? A scien9fic skep9c is led by evidence, not personal beliefs Tries to overcome biases and mispercep9ons and are willing to be wrong Is willing to say “I don’t know” rather than profess a non-jus9fied belief

CTSP 04 - Caleb Lackcaleblack.com/psy1133_files/CTSP04.pdf · 7/24/16 3 Types of Skepcism Scien&fic skep&cism – are open to new ideas, are willing to change if presented with evidence;

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

7/24/16

www.caleblack.com 1

WhatisCri9calThinking?Chapter4

WhatisaSkep9c?

•  Ascien9ficskep9cisledbyevidence,notpersonalbeliefs

•  Triestoovercomebiasesandmispercep9onsandarewillingtobewrong

•  Iswillingtosay“Idon’tknow”ratherthanprofessanon-jus9fiedbelief

7/24/16

www.caleblack.com 2

WhatisaSkep9c?

•  Allbeliefsshouldbecon9ngentontheinforma9onwehaveaccessto

•  Skep9csfightfornuanceinbeliefbynotfeigningconvic9onwhenitisinappropriate

•  Skep9csarewillingtoembraceuncertainty,andassertwhenaconclusionisstronglyjus9fied

NotActualSkep9cs

•  Peoplesome9mesuse“skep9c”whentheyshouldusetheterms“cynic”or“denier”

•  Bothreferto“hyperskep9cs”whodoubtordenythescien9ficconsensusandengageinpseudoscien9ficthinking

DenialismExamples

•  HIVdoesn’tcauseAIDS

•  Globalwarmingisahoax

•  TheHolocaustwasn’treal

7/24/16

www.caleblack.com 3

TypesofSkep9cism

Scien&ficskep&cism–areopentonewideas,arewillingtochangeifpresentedwithevidence;donotacceptthewordofauthorityfiguresasevidence

TypesofSkep9cism

Pathologicalskep&cism–markedbyclosed-mindednessandcynicism;guiltyofthedisconfirma9onbias

MethodsMa[erMost

•  Scien9ficskep9csvaluehowwereachconclusionsoverwhattheconclusionis

•  Beingright(ifweare)istheendresultofaprocessofcri9calthinking

•  Focusingonconclusionsratherthanmethodscanresultindogma9smanddenial

7/24/16

www.caleblack.com 4

Op9malDecisions

•  Foranyonedecision,wecanbeoverwhelmediftryingtofactorinallpoten9alpiecesofinforma9ontomakethe“perfect”choice

•  Instead,wehavetounderstandthatweworkwithinboundedra.onality

BoundedRa9onality

•  Allourdecisionsareconstrainedbynumerousfactors– Timeavailabletothinkaboutaproblem–  Informa9onwehaveaccessto– Resourceshortages(moneyor9meforresearch)

•  Weneedtosa.sfice,ormakethebestdecisionwecanwithinourlimits

GotProblems?NeedResearch!

•  Anyproblemthatyouaretryingtosolveorques9onyouaretryingtoanswercanbearesearchac9vity

•  Researchinvolves– Gatheringinforma9on– Arrangingthatinforma9onintoausefulpackage– Usingthatinforma9ontoguideac9ons

7/24/16

www.caleblack.com 5

Cri9calThinking

•  Understandingthatweoeenmakeerrorsorshowbiaseswhenevalua9nginforma9on

AND

•  Developingandimplemen9ngbestprac9cesforgatheringandusinginforma9ontomakedecisionsaboutbeliefs

TheSpaceofReasons

•  Ifaseriousissueisatstake,youshouldbeabletogivereasonswhyyoubelieveonethingratherthansomethingelse

•  Conversely,youshouldbeenabledtoaskotherpeopleforthesame

•  Cri9calthinkingenablessoundreasons

TheSpaceofReasons

•  Ifanac9onordecisiontakenbysomeoneelseislikelytoaffectyou,itisreasonableto– Requireevidencethatthedecisionorac9onhasbeenthoughtthrough

– Foryoutobereassuredthatthedecisionwas•  Takencarefully•  Notmadeasaconsequenceofsomebiasorprejudice

7/24/16

www.caleblack.com 6

TheSpaceofReasons

•  Conversa9onisaseriesofongoingdebatesandresearch

•  Eachsidepresentstheirevidenceandreasoningforwhytheirbeliefisjus.fied

ArgumentandArgumenta9on

•  “Argument”doesn’thavemeananaggressiveoremo9onalba[le

•  Itcanbeapar9cularmethodologythatprovidesuswiththebestpossiblechanceofarrivingataconclusionthat– Bestfitstheevidence– Hasthemostadvantageousconsequences

ArgumentandArgumenta9on

•  Weoeendon’tevenrealizewhenwe’vemadeadecisionusingargumenta9on

•  What’sfordinner?

7/24/16

www.caleblack.com 7

Non-Arguments

•  Notallcommunica9onisargument– Expressingfeelings– Askingques9ons– Describingevents– Explana9ons

•  But,weneedargumentsassoonasapointofview,decisionorac9onneedstobejus.fied

GlobalDebates

•  Itisalmostcertainthatyouwillinteractwiththosewhohavedifferentbeliefs

•  Weneedresourcestodeterminewhatisworthbelievingwithoutthesafetynetofourpreconceivedhabits

GlobalDebates

•  Everyonehasapar9cularculturalbackground,whichcomeswithit’sownsetofblinders

•  So,youneedtoconsiderwhyyoumightbewrong,inordertofeeljus9fiedthatyouareactuallyright

•  Cri9calthinkingprovidesamethodforarrivingatworthwhilebeliefs

7/24/16

www.caleblack.com 8

Cri9calThinking

•  Rulesofthumbthatletusbecomeconsistentlybe[eratreachinggoodconclusions– Extraordinaryclaims– Falsifiability– Occam’srazororparsimony– Rulingoutrivalhypotheses– Recognizingfallacies– Separa9nginduc9onfromdeduc9on

ExtraordinaryClaims

•  “Awiseman...propor9onshisbelieftotheevidence.“

•  "Notes9monyissufficienttoestablishamiracle,unlessthetes9monybeofsuchakind,thatitsfalsehoodwouldbemoremiraculousthanthefactwhichitendeavorstoestablish.”

DavidHume,18thcenturyScokshphilosopher

ExtraordinaryClaims

•  Hume’swordsinspiredCarlSagantosay…

“Extraordinaryclaimsrequireextraordinaryevidence.”

7/24/16

www.caleblack.com 9

ExtraordinaryClaims

•  Agoodskep9cbelievessomethingonlytothedegreethatitissupportedbyevidence

•  Themorespectacularaclaimis,themoresolidtheevidenceforsuchaclaimmustbeinordertotakeitseriously

Falsifiability

•  Determiningtruthviatryingtoproveourbeliefsisinherentlyflawed

Falsifiability

•  Instead,weneedtodeterminetruthviates9ngsomethingtoseeifitisfalse

•  Ifaclaimisfalsifiableandsurvivesoura[emptstofalsifyit,wecanconsideritstrong

•  So,takeawaythes9cksfromthemaninTimesSquaresandseeiftheelephantsshowup

7/24/16

www.caleblack.com 10

Falsifica9on

•  Ifthereisnopossibilityofsomethingbefalsified,thenthereisnora.onalreasontobelieveit

•  Ifcanbebelievedforotherreasons(emo9onal,spiritual)butnotra9onalones

Occam’sRazor

•  Whenconsideringvariousexplana9onsforanyphenomena,selecttheonewiththefewestnumberofaddi9onalassump9onsorcomplica9ons

•  Principleofparsimony WilliamofOckham,14thcenturyEnglishfriar

RulingOutRivalHypotheses

•  Parsimonydoesnotguaranteeyouhaveselectedthecorrecthypothesis

•  But,yourunalowerriskoferrorifyourelyonassump9onsthatarenotthemselvesindoubtorunprovable

7/24/16

www.caleblack.com 11

Fallacies

•  Broadtermforaspecifictypeoferrorormistakeinreasoning

•  Conclusionsthatsomehasmadefallaciouslyaren’talwayswrong,buttheydon’thaveajus.fiedreasonforsomeonetobelievethem

SpecificFallacies

•  Almosttoonumeroustomen9on!– ThouShaltNotCommitLogicalFallacies

EngagingwithFallacies

•  Althoughentertaining,justpoin9ngoutwhatkindoffallacysomeoneismakingdoesli[letospreadcri9calthinking

•  Instead,beingabletodemonstratewhyaperson’s(oryourown!)reasoningisflawedisthekey– Thefallacyfallacy

7/24/16

www.caleblack.com 12

Induc9onvs

Inferenceaboutaruleorpa[ernbyreferencetospecificobserva9ons

Oeenbroadinscope

Predic9veabilitydependsonnumberandqualityofone’sobserva9ons

Deduc9on

Movesfromgeneralrulestospecificclaims

Modestinscope,withconclusionsgenerallynarrowerthanpremises

Conclusionsareoeenquitereliable

Logic&TruthPreserva9on

•  Trueevidenceresultsintrueconclusions,butonlyifyourreasoningiserror-free

•  Logicalone,though,doesnotguaranteetruth

•  Forexample…

1.   Grassisred.2.   Allredthingsarepoisonous.3.   Therefore,grassispoisonous.

7/24/16

www.caleblack.com 13

Logic&TruthPreserva9on

•  Logiccanbevalid,andyets9llremovedfromreality

•  Certainty(viathestructureofanargument)isdifferentfromconfidence(viatheevidenceforanargument)

Conclusions

•  Beingagoodcri9calthinkerishardwork

•  Weshouldfocusonwhetherornotabeliefisjus.fied,ratherthanbeingcertainitistrue

•  Doestheavailableevidence,whenevaluatedfairly,makeacertainbeliefmorelikelytobetruethananycompe9ngbeliefs?