117
1 CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

  • Upload
    umeko

  • View
    19

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability. Mathematical Preliminaries and Background Sets Relations Functions Logic Graphs Trees Proof Techniques Languages and Strings Automaton. Sets. SETS. A set is a collection of elements, having a property that - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

1

CSSE 350Automata, Formal Languages, and

Computability

Page 2: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

2

Mathematical Preliminaries and Background

• Sets

• Relations

• Functions

• Logic

• Graphs

• Trees

• Proof Techniques

• Languages and Strings

• Automaton

Page 3: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

3

Sets

Page 4: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

4

}3,2,1{A

A set is a collection of elements, having a property that

characterizes those elements.

SETS

},,,{ airplanebicyclebustrainB

We write Belongs To and Does not Belong To as:

A1

Bship

Page 5: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

5

Set Representations• One way is to enumerate the elements completely.

All the elements belonging to the set are explicitly given. – For example, A = {1,2,3,4,5}

• Alternate way is to give the properties that characterize the elements of the set. – For example, B = {x | x is a positive integer less than

or equal to 5} – Or B = {x : x is a positive integer less than or equal to 5}

• Ellipses may be used in the set specification if the meaning is clear. For example, C = { a, b, …, z}, which stands for all the lower-case letters of the English alphabet

Page 6: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

6

Set Representations

C = { a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k }

C = { a, b, …, k }

S = { 2, 4, 6, … }

S = { j : j > 0, and j = 2k for some k>0 }

S = { j : j is nonnegative and even }

finite set

infinite set

Page 7: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

7

A = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }

Universal Set: all possible elements U = { 1 , … , 10 }

1 2 3

4 5

A

U

6

7

8

910

Page 8: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

8

Set Operations

A = { 1, 2, 3 } B = { 2, 3, 4, 5}

• Union

A U B = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }

• Intersection

A B = { 2, 3 }

• Difference

A - B = { 1 }

B - A = { 4, 5 }

U

A B2

31

4

5

2

3

1

Venn diagrams

Page 9: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

9

A

• Complement

Universal set = {1, …, 7}

A = { 1, 2, 3 } A = { 4, 5, 6, 7}

12

3

4

5

6

7

A

A = A

Page 10: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

10

02

4

6

1

3

5

7

even

{ even integers } = { odd integers }

odd

Integers

Page 11: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

11

DeMorgan’s Laws

A U B = A B

U

A B = A U BU

Page 12: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

12

Empty, Null Set:= { }

S U = S

S =

S - = S

- S =

U= Universal Set

Page 13: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

13

Subset

A = { 1, 2, 3} B = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }

A B

U

Proper Subset: A B

UA

B

Page 14: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

14

Disjoint Sets

A = { 1, 2, 3 } B = { 5, 6}

A B =

UA B

Page 15: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

15

Set Cardinality

• For finite sets

A = { 2, 5, 7 }

|A| = 3

(set size)

Page 16: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

16

Powersets

A powerset is a set of sets

Powerset of S = the set of all the subsets of S

S = { a, b, c }

2S = { , {a}, {b}, {c}, {a, b}, {a, c}, {b, c}, {a, b, c} }

Observation: | 2S | = 2|S| ( 8 = 23 )

Page 17: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

17

Cartesian ProductA = { 2, 4 } B = { 2, 3, 5 }

A X B = { (2, 2), (2, 3), (2, 5), ( 4, 2), (4, 3), (4, 5) }

|A X B| = |A| |B|

Generalizes to more than two sets

A X B X … X Z

Page 18: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

18

Set Identities A, B, C represent arbitrary sets and ø is the empty set

and U is the Universal Set.

The Commutative laws:              A  B = B  A

             A  B = B  A The Associative laws:

             A  (B C) = (A B) C              A  (B C) = (A B) C

The Distributive laws:              A  (B C) = (A B) (A C)

             A  (B C) = (A B) (A C)

Page 19: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

19

The Idempotent laws:              A  A = A              A A = A

The Absorptive laws:              A  (A B) = A              A  (A B) = A

The De Morgan laws:              (A  B)' = A' B'              (A  B)' = A' B'

Other laws involving Complements:              ( A' )' = A              A A' = ø              A  A' = U

Page 20: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

20

Other laws involving the empty set              A  ø = A              A  ø = ø

Other laws involving the Universal Set:              A  U = U              A  U = A    

Page 21: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

21

RELATIONS

Page 22: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

22

Relations

Let A and B be sets. A binary relation from A into B is any subset of the Cartesian product A B.

For example: let A = {2, 3, 5, 6}, and B = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15}, and a relation R from A into B by (a, b)  R if and only if 2a = b

So, R = {(2, 4), (3, 6), (5, 10), (6, 12)}.

Page 23: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

23

A typical element in R is an ordered pair (x, y). In some cases R can be described by actually listing the pairs which are in R, as in the previous example. This may not be convenient if R is relatively large.

Other notations are used depending on the past practice. Consider the following relation on real numbers. R = {(x, y) | y is the square of x} and S = {(x, y) | x <= y}.

R could be more naturally expressed as R(x) = x2 or R(x) =y where y = x2.

Page 24: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

24

RELATIONS R = {(x1, y1), (x2, y2), (x3, y3), …}

xi R yi

e. g. if R = ‘>’: 2 > 1, 3 > 2, 3 > 1

Page 25: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

25

Relation on a Set

A relation from a set A into itself is called a relation on A.

For example, let A = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, and a relation R from A to A itself by (a, b)  R if and only if a is a divisor of b

So, R = {(1, 1), (1, 2), (1, 3), (1, 4), (1, 5), (1, 6), (2, 2), (2, 4), (2, 6), (3, 3), (3, 6), (4, 4), (5, 5), (6, 6)}.

Let A be a set of people and let P = {(a, b) | a  A b  A a is a child of b}. Then P is a relation on A which we might call a parent-child relation.

Page 26: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

26

Composition

Let R be a relation from a set A into set B, and S be a relation from set B into set C. The composition of R and S, written as RS, is the set of pairs of the form (a, c)  A C, where (a, c)  RS if and only if there exists b  B such that (a, b)  R and (b, c)  S.

For example PP, where P is the parent-child relation given, is the composition of P with itself and it is a relation which we know as grandparent-grandchild relation.

Page 27: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

27

Properties of Relations Assume R is a relation on set A; in other words, R  A

A. Let us write a R b to denote (a, b)  R. 1. Reflexive: R is reflexive if for every a  A, a R a.2. Symmetric: R is symmetric if for every a and b in A, if aRb, then bRa. 3. Transitive: R is transitive if for every a, b and c in A, if aRb and bRc, then aRc. 4. Equivalence: R is an equivalence relation on A if R is reflexive, symmetric and transitive.

For example, the equality relation (=) on a set of numbers such as {1, 2, 3} is an equivalence relation.

Page 28: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

28

Equivalence Relations

• Reflexive: x R x

• Symmetric: x R y y R x

• Transitive: x R y and y R z x R z

Example: R = ‘=‘

• x = x

• x = y y = x

• x = y and y = z x = z

Page 29: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

29

FUNCTIONS

Page 30: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

30

FunctionsA function is something that associates each element of

a set with an element of another set (which may or may not be the same as the first set).

Or a function is a rule that assigns to elements of one set a unique element of another set.

For example, a social security number uniquely identifies a person, in this case, to each member of the set of social security number, some member of the set of person is assigned.

Page 31: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

31

FUNCTIONSdomain

12

3

a

bc

range

f : A -> B

A B

If A = domain

then f is a total function

otherwise f is a partial function

f(1) = a4

5

Page 32: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

32

Growth Rates of FunctionsLet f(n) and g(n) to be two functions whose domain is a

subset of the positive integersIf there exists a positive constant c such that for all

sufficiently large nf(n) ≤ cg(n)

f has the order at most gf(n) = O(g(n))

cg(n)

f(n)

Page 33: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

33

If there exists a positive constant c such that for all sufficiently large n

f(n) cg(n)f has the order at least g

f(n) = (g(n))

cg(n)

f(n)

Page 34: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

34

If there exist positive constant c1 and c2, such that for all sufficiently large n

c1g(n) ≤ f(n) ≤ c2g(n)

f and g have the same order of magnitudef(n) = (g(n))

c1g(n)

f(n)

c2g(n)

Page 35: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

35

ExamplesExample 1: 2n is Θ(n)

f(n) = 2n, g(n) = n For all integers n ≥ 0, 2n ≤ 2n, which is f(n) ≤ 2g(n);

so constant c ≥ 2 suffices for the definition of O.For all integers n ≥ 0, 2n ≥ n, which is f(n) ≥ 1g(n); so any 0 < c ≤ 2 suffices for the definition of Ω.Since 2n is both O(n) and Ω(n), it is Θ(n).

Page 36: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

36

Example 2: n is O(n2) but not Ω(n2)f(n) = n, g(n) = n2

For all integers n ≥ 0, n ≤ n2; which is f(n) ≤ 1g(n); so constant c ≥ 1 suffices for the definition of O.However, n cannot be Ω(n2) since no matter how small c>0 is chosen, for all n > 1/c, n = c(1/c)n < cnn = cn2.

Page 37: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

37

Logic

Propositional Logic & Predicate Logic

Page 38: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

38

Propositional Logic

Proposition: a declarative statement having a specific truth-value, true or false. For example:8 is an even number. True4 is a negative number. False

Page 39: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

39

Two or more propositions can be combined together to make compound propositions with the help of logical connectives. For example: above two propositions can be used to make a compound proposition using any of the logical connectives. 8 is an even number  AND  4 is a negative number.

False8 is an even number  OR 4 is a negative number.

True

For the first compound proposition to be true both the propositions have to be true as the connective is AND. As OR is the connective for the second one, if either of the propositions is true, the truth value of the compound proposition is true.

Page 40: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

40

logical Connectives Conjunction: The compound proposition truth-value is

true if and only if all the constituent propositions hold true. It is represented as " ^ ". Truth table for two individual propositions p and q with conjunction is given below.

p q p q

T T T

T F F

F T F

F F F

Page 41: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

41

Disjunction: This is logical "or" read as either true value of the individual propositions. Truth table is given below.

p q p V q

T T T

T F T

F T T

F F F

Page 42: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

42

Negation: This is the logical "negation" and it is expressed by as  ¬p for "not p". Truth table is given below.

p ¬ pT F

F T

Page 43: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

43

Conditional: This is used to define as "a proposition holds true if another proposition is true" i.e. p q is read as "if p, then q". Truth table is given below.

p q p q

T T T

T F F

F T T

F F T

Page 44: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

44

Biconditional: A proposition (p  q) ^ (q  p) can be abbreviated using  biconditional conjunction as p  q and is read as "if p then q, and if q then p".

Tautology: A compound proposition, which is true in every case. E.g., p V ¬ p

Contradiction: This is the opposite of tautology, which is false in every case. E.g., p ¬ p

Page 45: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

45

Identities ¬ (P Q) (¬ P ¬Q) ----- DeMorgan's Law ¬ (P Q) (¬ P ¬ Q) ----- DeMorgan's Law (P Q) (¬ P Q) ----- implication [(P Q) R] [P (Q R)] ----- exportation (P Q) (¬ Q ¬P) ----- contrapositive

Page 46: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

46

Implications

[(P Q) ¬Q] P ----- modus tollens [(P Q) (R S)] [(P R) (Q S)] [(P Q) (Q R)] (P R)

Page 47: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

47

Predicate LogicThe propositional logic is not powerful enough to represent all

types of assertions. For example, the statement: x is a non-zero integer, where x is a variable, is not a proposition because you can not tell whether it is true or false unless you know the value of x. Thus the propositional logic can not deal with such sentences.

The predicate logic is one of the extensions of propositional logic and it is fundamental to most other types of logic. Central to the predicate logic are the concepts of predicate and quantifier.

A predicate is a feature of language which you can use to make a statement about something, e.g. to attribute a property to that thing. If you say "Peter is tall", then you have applied to Peter the predicate "is tall". We also might say that you have predicated tallness of Peter or attributed tallness to Peter.

Page 48: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

48

A predicate is a template involving a verb that describes a property of objects, or a relationship among objects represented by the variables. For example, the sentences:The flower is red.The sweater is red. The frame is red.

All these sentences come from the template "is red" by placing an appropriate noun/noun phrase in front of it. The phrase "is red" is a predicate and it describes the property of being red. Predicates are often given a name.

For example any of "is_red", "Red" or "R" can be used to represent the predicate "is red" among others. We can adopt Red as the name for the predicate “is_red". Sentences that assert an object is red can be represented as "Red(x)", where x represents an arbitrary object. Red(x) reads as "x is red".

Page 49: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

49

A predicate with variables, called atomic formula, can be made a proposition by applying one of the following two operations to each of its variables: assign a value to the variable quantify the variable using a quantifier

For example, x > 1 becomes 3 > 1 if 3 is assigned to x, and it becomes a true statement, and it becomes a proposition.

In general, a quantification is performed on formulas of predicate logic (called wff), such as x > 1 or P(x), by using quantifiers on variables.

Page 50: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

50

There are two types of quantifiers:universal quantifierexistential quantifier

The universal quantifier turns, for example, the statement x > 1 to "for every object x in the universe, x > 1", which is expressed as " x x > 1". This new statement is true or false in the universe of discourse. Hence it is a proposition once the universe is specified.

Similarly the existential quantifier turns, for example, the statement x > 1 to "for some object x in the universe, x > 1", which is expressed as " x x > 1." Again, it is true or false in the universe of discourse, and hence it is a proposition once the universe is specified.

Page 51: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

51

The universe of discourse, also called universe, is the set of objects of interest. The propositions in the predicate logic are statements on objects of a universe.

The universe is thus the domain of the (individual) variables. It can be:the set of real numbersthe set of integersthe set of all cars on a parking lotthe set of all students in a classroom etc.

The universe is often left implicit in practice. But it should be obvious from the context

Page 52: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

52

Predicate logic is more powerful than propositional logic. It allows one to reason about properties and relationships of individual objects. In predicate logic, one can use some additional inference rules, as well as those for propositional logic such as the equivalences, implications and inference rules.

Predicate logic permits reasoning about the propositional connectives and also about quantification ("all" or "some"). A classic, if elementary, example of what can be done with the predicate logic is the inference from the premises: All men are mortal.Socrates is a man.

to the conclusion Socrates is mortal

Page 53: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

53

Important Inference Rules of Predicate Logic

First there is the following rule concerning the negation of quantified statement which is very useful:

¬x P(x) x ¬P(x)

Next there is the following set of rules on quantifiers

and connectives: x [P(x) Q(x)] [x P(x) x Q(x)] [x P(x) x Q(x)] x [P(x) Q(x)]

x [P(x) Q(x)] [x P(x) x Q(x)]

x [P(x) Q(x)] [x P(x) x Q(x)]

Page 54: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

54

GRAPHS

Page 55: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

55

GRAPHSA directed graph

• Nodes (Vertices)

V = { a, b, c, d, e }

• Edges

E = { (a,b), (b,c), (b,e),(c,a), (c,e), (d,c), (e,b), (e,d) }

node

edge

a

b

c

d

e

Page 56: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

56

Labeled Graph

a

b

c

d

e

1 3

56

26

2

Page 57: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

57

Walk

a

b

c

d

e

Walk is a sequence of adjacent edges

(e, d), (d, c), (c, a)

Page 58: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

58

Path

a

b

c

d

e

Path is a walk where no edge is repeated

Simple path: no node is repeated

Page 59: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

59

Cycle

a

b

c

d

e

12

3

Cycle: a walk from a node (base) to itself

Simple cycle: only the base node is repeated

base

Page 60: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

60

Euler Tour

a

b

c

d

e1

23

45

6

7

8 base

A cycle that contains each edge once

Page 61: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

61

Hamiltonian Cycle

a

b

c

d

e1

23

4

5 base

A simple cycle that contains all nodes

Page 62: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

62

Finding All Simple Paths

a

b

c

d

e

origin

Page 63: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

63

(c, a)

(c, e)

Step 1

a

b

c

d

e

origin

Page 64: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

64

(c, a)

(c, a), (a, b)

(c, e)

(c, e), (e, b)

(c, e), (e, d)

Step 2

a

b

c

d

e

origin

Page 65: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

65

Step 3

a

b

c

d

e

origin(c, a)

(c, a), (a, b)

(c, a), (a, b), (b, e)

(c, e)

(c, e), (e, b)

(c, e), (e, d)

Page 66: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

66

Step 4

a

b

c

d

e

origin

(c, a)

(c, a), (a, b)

(c, a), (a, b), (b, e)

(c, a), (a, b), (b, e), (e,d)

(c, e)

(c, e), (e, b)

(c, e), (e, d)

Page 67: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

67

Trees

Page 68: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

68

Treesroot

leaf

parent

child

Trees have no cycles

Page 69: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

69

root

leaf

Level 0

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Height 3

Page 70: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

70

Binary Trees

Page 71: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

71

PROOF TECHNIQUES

Page 72: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

72

PROOF TECHNIQUES

• Proof by induction

• Proof by contradiction

Page 73: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

73

Induction

We have statements P1, P2, P3, …

If we know

• for some b that P1, P2, …, Pb are true

• for any k >= b that

P1, P2, …, Pk imply Pk+1

Then

Every Pi is true

Page 74: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

74

Proof by Induction• Inductive basis

Find P1, P2, …, Pb which are true

• Inductive hypothesis

Let’s assume P1, P2, …, Pk are true,

for any k >= b

• Inductive step

Show that Pk+1 is true

Page 75: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

75

Example

Theorem: A binary tree of height n

has at most 2n leaves.

Proof by induction:

let L(i) be the maximum number of

leaves of any subtree at height i

Page 76: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

76

We want to show: L(i) <= 2i

• Inductive basis

L(0) = 1 (the root node)

• Inductive hypothesis

Let’s assume L(i) <= 2i for all i = 0, 1, …, k

• Induction step

we need to show that L(k + 1) <= 2k+1

Page 77: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

77

Induction Step

From Inductive hypothesis: L(k) <= 2k

height

k

k+1

Page 78: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

78

L(k) <= 2k

L(k+1) <= 2 * L(k) <= 2 * 2k = 2k+1

Induction Step

height

k

k+1

(we add at most two nodes for every leaf of level k)

Page 79: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

79

Remark

Recursion is another thing

Example of recursive function:

f(n) = f(n-1) + f(n-2)

f(0) = 1, f(1) = 1

Page 80: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

80

Proof by Contradiction

We want to prove that a statement P is true

• we assume that P is false

• then we arrive at an incorrect conclusion

• therefore, statement P must be true

Page 81: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

81

Example

Theorem: is not rational

Proof:

Assume by contradiction that it is rational

= n/m

n and m have no common factors

We will show that this is impossible

2

2

Page 82: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

82

= n/m 2 m2 = n2

Therefore, n2 is evenn is even

n = 2 k

2 m2 = 4k2 m2 = 2k2m is even

m = 2 p

Thus, m and n have common factor 2

Contradiction!

2

Page 83: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

83

Languages and Strings

Page 84: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

84

A language is a set of strings

String: A sequence of letters

Examples: “cat”, “dog”, “house”, …

Defined over an alphabet: zcba ,,,,

Page 85: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

85

Alphabets and StringsWe will use small alphabets:

Strings

abbaw

bbbaaav

abu

ba,

baaabbbaaba

baba

abba

ab

a

Page 86: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

86

String Operations

m

n

bbbv

aaaw

21

21

bbbaaa

abba

mn bbbaaawv 2121

Concatenation

abbabbbaaa

Page 87: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

87

12aaaw nR

naaaw 21 ababaaabbb

Reverse

bbbaaababa

Page 88: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

88

Concatenation and Reverse of Strings

Theorem: If w and x are strings, then (w x)R = xR wR.

Example:

(nametag)R = (tag)R (name)R = gateman

Page 89: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

89

Concatenation and Reverse of Strings Proof: By induction on |x|:

|x| = 0: Then x = , and (wx)R = (w )R = (w)R = wR = R wR = xR wR.

n 0 (((|x| = n) ((w x)R = xR wR)) ((|x| = n + 1) ((w x)R = xR wR))):

Consider any string x, where |x| = n + 1. Then x = u a for some character a and |u| = n. So:

(w x)R = (w (u a))R rewrite x as ua= ((w u) a)R associativity of concatenation= a (w u)R definition of reversal= a (uR wR) induction hypothesis= (a uR) wR associativity of concatenation= (ua)R wR definition of reversal= xR wR rewrite ua as x

Page 90: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

90

String Length

Length:

Examples:

naaaw 21

nw

1

2

4

a

aa

abba

Page 91: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

91

Length of Concatenation

Example:

vuuv

853

8

5,

3,

vuuv

aababaabuv

vabaabv

uaabu

Page 92: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

92

Empty StringA string with no letters:

Observations:

abbaabbaabba

www

0

Page 93: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

93

SubstringSubstring of string:

a subsequence of consecutive characters

String Substring

bbab

b

abba

ab

abbab

abbab

abbab

abbab

Page 94: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

94

Prefix and Suffix

Prefixes Suffixesabbab

abbab

abba

abb

ab

a

b

ab

bab

bbab

abbab uvw

prefix

suffix

Page 95: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

95

Another Operation (Replication)

Example:

Definition:

n

n wwww

abbaabbaabba 2

0w

0abba

Page 96: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

96

The * Operation : the set of all possible strings from alphabet

*

,,,,,,,,,*

,

aabaaabbbaabaaba

ba

Page 97: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

97

The + Operation : the set of all possible strings from alphabet except

,,,,,,,,,*

,

aabaaabbbaabaaba

ba

*

,,,,,,,, aabaaabbbaabaaba

Page 98: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

98

LanguagesA language is any subset of

Example:

Languages:

*

,,,,,,,,*

,

aaabbbaabaaba

ba

},,,,,{

,,

aaaaaaabaababaabba

aabaaa

Page 99: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

99

Note that:

}{}{

0}{

1}{

0

Sets

Set size

Set size

String length

Page 100: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

100

Another Example

An infinite language }0:{ nbaL nn

aaaaabbbbb

aabb

ab

L Labb

Page 101: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

101

Operations on LanguagesThe usual set operations

Complement:

aaaaaabbbaaaaaba

ababbbaaaaaba

aaaabbabaabbbaaaaaba

,,,,

}{,,,

},,,{,,,

LL *

,,,,,,, aaabbabaabbaa

Page 102: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

102

Reverse

Definition:

Examples:

}:{ LwwL RR

ababbaabababaaabab R ,,,,

}0:{

}0:{

nabL

nbaL

nnR

nn

Page 103: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

103

Concatenation

Definition:

Example:

2121 ,: LyLxxyLL

baaabababaaabbaaaab

aabbaaba

,,,,,

,,,

Page 104: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

104

Another OperationDefinition:

Special case:

n

n LLLL

bbbbbababbaaabbabaaabaaa

babababa

,,,,,,,

,,,, 3

0

0

,, aaabbaa

L

Page 105: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

105

More Examples

}0:{ nbaL nn

}0,:{2 mnbabaL mmnn

2Laabbaaabbb

Page 106: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

106

Star-Closure (Kleene *)

Definition:

Example:

210* LLLL

,,,,

,,,,

,,

,

*,

abbbbabbaaabbaaa

bbbbbbaabbaa

bbabba

Page 107: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

107

Positive Closure

Definition:

*

21

L

LLL

,,,,

,,,,

,,

,

abbbbabbaaabbaaa

bbbbbbaabbaa

bba

bba

Page 108: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

108

Grammar

Page 109: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

109

GrammarMathematically describe language

English: informal, inadequateSet notations: limited

GrammarEnglish grammar describes whether a sentence is well-formed

or not<sentence> <noun_phrase><predicate>

Then, what is noun_phrase, what is predicate?<noun_phrase> <article><noun><predicate> <verb>

Basic idea of formal grammars: Start from the top level conceptReduce it to the irreducible building blocks

Page 110: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

110

Grammar DefinitionA grammar G is defined as a quadruple

G = (V, T, S, P)V is a finite set of objects called variablesT is a finite set of objects called terminal

symbolsS V is a special symbol called the start

variableP is a finite set of productionsv and T are non-empty and disjoint

Page 111: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

111

Production RulesHeart of a grammarDescribe how the grammar transforms one string into anotherDefine a language associated with grammarProduction rules are of the form

x y, where x (V T)+, y (V T)* For example, given w = uxv, x y,

then z = uyv, z is a new stringwritten as: w z, means that w derives z or

z is derived from w w1 w2 … wn is the same as w1 wn *

Page 112: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

112

DefinitionLet G = (V, T, S, P) be a grammar. Then the set

L(G) = { w T* : S w}is the language generated by G.

If w L(G),

S w1 w2 … wn w

is a derivation of the sentence w.

Strings S, w1, w2, …, wn are called sentential forms of the derivation. All these strings may contain variables and terminals.

*

Page 113: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

113

Automaton

Page 114: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

114

Automaton

Input

“Accept” or“Reject”

OutputS1 S2 S3

S4 S5

Storage

ControlUnit

Page 115: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

115

AutomataAn abstract model of a digital computer• Input mechanism

– Can read but not change an input file • Input file

– Contains a string over a given alphabet– Divided into cells, each cell holds one symbol

– The reading is from left to right, one symbol at a time– Can sense the end of the input string

• Storage device– Consist of an unlimited number of cells– Each cell holds a symbol– Can be read and changed

• Control unit– Internal states– Transition function (or next-state): gives the next state of the control

unit • Current state• Current input symbol• Current information in the temporary storage

Page 116: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

116

To Illustrate “State”

State: status, A state stores information about the past, i.e. it reflects the input changes from the system start to

the present moment Example: a robot

Page 117: CSSE 350 Automata, Formal Languages, and Computability

117

• Configuration– A particular state of the control unit, input file, and temporary

storage• Move

– The transition of the automaton from one configuration to the next

• Deterministic automata– Each move is uniquely determined by the current

configuration– If the internal state, the input, and the contents of the

temporary storage are known, the future behavior of the automata can be predicted

• Nondeterministic automata– At some point, the automata may have several moves– A set of possible actions can be predicted

• Accepter– An automata whose output response is either “yes” or “no”