Upload
lonan-carroll
View
24
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
S
ShareholdersBy: Marina Manzoni ,Erika Christy, Belen Sanchez, Lonan Carroll, &
Marina Konopelko
Shareholders & CorporateGovernance
Changes on modern capitalism
Shareholders X Managers
Definition of Corporate Governance:
“Corporate governance describes the process by which shareholders seek to ensure that ‘their’ corporation is run according to their intentions. It includes processes of goal definition, supervision, control, and sanctioning… It includes all actors who contribute to the achievement of stakeholder goals, inside and outside the corporation.” (Parkinson 1993: 157)
Corporate Governance Cont.
Agency Relation Definition: Shareholders as the principal who contracts management
as an agent to act in their interest within the boundary of the firm. Conflict of interests between shareholders and managers. Information Asymetry
Different Frameworks of Corporate Governance Globally
Ethical Dilemmas:
Executive remuneration- High executive pay on the base of market rates
Problems directly occurring from this: Appropriate performance-related pay can not be delegated due to
the excessive salary levels This remuneration has influenced executive pay globally; there is
a global market for executive talent, so the standards of the highest level of pay seem to be implied internationally, although performance-related pay is already in place in regions such as Europe. This ultimately skyrockets pay levels across the board
The influence of the board is limited and often does not accurately reflect the shareholder’s interests
Dilemmas Cont.
Hostile takeovers- When an investor intends to purchase a majority stake in a corporation against the wishes of its board.
Two options for dealing with the takeover: The company can be seduced by the takeover, by being offered a large sum
of money or a, ‘golden parachute’. Managers can secretly send ‘greenmail’ (as opposed to blackmail) to the
potential hostile party and offer to buy back the shares for the company at a higher price than the present market price in order to prevent themselves from losing their jobs
Faith stocks- Blind faith in the stock market ex: of this is the real estate market in the early 2000’s, in which people blindly put their faith into, in hopes that it would continue to rise. The market was much too complex for anyone to understand and the amount of uncertainty that lay within was almost criminal to put trust in.
Dilemmas Cont.
Insider trading- When certain investors have superior knowledge of the market before any other potential traders are aware.
Ethical arguments against insider trading: Fairness- One party has an unfair advantage over the other when
they receive predictive information that the other is not able to receive
Misappropriation of property- The information that is used is essentially the property of the firm involved, to which they have no rights to
Harm to investors and the market- The traders may benefit to the cost of ‘ordinary’ traders, making the market riskier
Undermining of fiduciary relationship- Since the insider trading is driven by self-interest, not the interest of the shareholders, trust is ultimately lost between the managers and the shareholders
Alternative models of ownership
Ex.
Shareholders as citizens of the corporation
Governance and
control
National security and
protectionism
International
speculation
Unfear competitio
n
Space for illegal
transactionsEthical issues
Reforming corporate governance
Definition and implementation of new corporate governance codes
by
Legal basis and
power vary
Role somewh
at ambivale
nt
Shareholder democracy
A shareholder has a say in corporate decisions
Force for wider social accountability and performance
Scope of activities
Mechanism for change
Adequate information
Shareholder Activism
Main objective:
Have a voice at AGMs
Create real change at management level
Highlight unethical practises in the media
Disadvantages:
Loss of integrity
High financial cost
Socially Responsible Investing (SRI)
Profit driven investment
Companies must comply with ethical, social and environmental criteria
Two main types;
- Market Led Funds
- Deliberative Funds
Criticisms: Quality of information, dubious criteria, too inclusive, emphasize returns
Shareholding for sustainability
Indexes rating corporations according to their performance towards the broader goal of sustainability:
1. DJSI
2. FTSE4Good
3. Cleantech Indexes
“A step in linking investors’ interests in financial performance with the sustainability”
Shareholders and Globalization
Has exacerbated transparency and shareholder control.
Financial crisis of 2000s
The ethics of private equity and edge funds
turned shareholders into actors in national capital markets.
involved shareholders in global financial markets.
Globalization has
Private equity (PE) firmsHedge funds (EF)
Bibliogrpahy