13
C.S.I. Lexington and Concord Mr. Giesler Social

C.S.I. Lexington and Concord

  • Upload
    violet

  • View
    51

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

C.S.I. Lexington and Concord. Mr. Giesler Social Studies. CASE FILE. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: C.S.I. Lexington and Concord

C.S.I.Lexington and

Concord

Mr. Giesler

Social Studies

Page 2: C.S.I. Lexington and Concord

CLASSIF IED

C A S E F I L E

Lexington and Concord

On April 19, 1775 ten years of political protest escalated as British soldiers clashed with “minute men” at Lexington and Concord. The events that occurred profoundly impacted the people of Massachusetts and soon grew into an American war for independence and self-government.

Page 3: C.S.I. Lexington and Concord

Activity Directions Work Cooperatively

Read each document thoroughly

Use your Think Marks

Complete handout - “Detective Log”

Complete handout - “Questions to Consider”

Individually, complete a one-page summary

Have Fun!!!

Page 4: C.S.I. Lexington and Concord

Who authored

the document?

When was the

document authored?

What type of

document?

Who was the audience for

the document? Why was it created?

Who was the aggressor in the

incident according to the document?

Document A

Document B

See Handout

Detective Log

Page 5: C.S.I. Lexington and Concord

Document A

Vocabulary

Intelligence: information about an opponent’s plans

Provision: food and other necessary supplies

Artillery: cannons and similar large weapons

Small arms: hand-held weapons, often handguns, swords, or knives

Avowed: specific or stated

Grenadier: a type of soldier in the British army

Plunder: take personal goods by force from people who have been conquered

Draught: a map

Trunion: a part of a cannon that helps the barrel be aimed to the correct elevation

Chaises: two-wheeled carriages

Order Given to Lt. Colonel Francis Smith from Thomas Gage Primary Source Lieut. Colonel Smith, 10th Regiment Foot

Page 6: C.S.I. Lexington and Concord

Document B

First-Hand Accounts of the Battle Lt. John Barker, British Soldier, 4th Regiment Diary Account on the beginning of the march to Lexington

Page 7: C.S.I. Lexington and Concord

Document C

Official Statement of John Robbins, Lexington Militia, April 24, 1775, on Lexington Green

Vocabulary Instant: a particular point in time, in this case on the nineteenth of April, 1775. Front rank: front row Huzzaing: cheering and yelling loudly Volley: one round of firing

Page 8: C.S.I. Lexington and Concord

Document D

Narrative of Ensign Jeremy Lister of His Majesty’s 10th Regiment of Foot, on the Fighting in Lexington

VocabularyFlank: fleshy section between the last rib and hip Salute: firing of guns

Page 9: C.S.I. Lexington and Concord

Document E

Statement of James Barrett, Colonel of Concord Militia, on the Battle at North Bridge

Page 10: C.S.I. Lexington and Concord

Document F

Alice Stearns Abbott, Citizen of Bedford, Massachusetts, on the Beginning of Fighting

Page 11: C.S.I. Lexington and Concord

Document G

Page 12: C.S.I. Lexington and Concord

Questions to Consider

What questions did you ask while evaluating these sources?

On what points do the accounts agree?

On what points do the accounts differ?

Which of these sources aligns most closely with what you already knew about the Battle of Lexington and Concord? How so?

Which of these sources is most reliable in determining what actually happened at the Lexington and Concord? Why do you think so?

Describe the difficulties in developing an accurate account of historical events like the Battle of Lexington and Concord?

If you were asked to write your own historical account of the events that occurred during the Battle of Lexington and Concord, how would you go about doing so?

Page 13: C.S.I. Lexington and Concord

Cracking the Case

Based on your analysis of the documents and citing

evidence to support your answer, please write a one-page

summary, which answers the following questions: how

did the Battle of Lexington and Concord unfold, what was

the response from the colonists to British aggression,

what was the response from the British? Did the British

seem surprised?