25
CSA Corporate Governance Forum SANDRA BIGGS, STATE MANAGER - SA COMPUTERSHARE INVESTOR SERVICES

CSA Corporate Governance Forum

  • Upload
    evonne

  • View
    41

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

CSA Corporate Governance Forum. SANDRA BIGGS, STATE MANAGER - SA COMPUTERSHARE INVESTOR SERVICES. Shareholders still prefer to make contact via web channels. Almost one quarter of shareholders receive their investor communications electronically. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: CSA Corporate Governance Forum

CSA Corporate Governance Forum

SANDRA BIGGS, STATE MANAGER - SACOMPUTERSHARE INVESTOR SERVICES

Page 2: CSA Corporate Governance Forum

Shareholders still prefer to make contact via web channels

Page 3: CSA Corporate Governance Forum

Almost one quarter of shareholders receive their investor communications electronically

Page 4: CSA Corporate Governance Forum

The percentage of self-service transactions has increased in 2013, after plateauing since 2010

Page 5: CSA Corporate Governance Forum

Most shareholders do not receive an Annual Report

Page 6: CSA Corporate Governance Forum

Almost one quarter of shareholders participate in a Dividend Reinvestment Plan

Page 7: CSA Corporate Governance Forum

Volume of off-market transfers has continued to decline since charging was introduced in 2011

Page 8: CSA Corporate Governance Forum

Very small numbers are turning up to meetings and attendance is dropping by around 10% pa

8

Page 9: CSA Corporate Governance Forum

Voting participation continues to increase for the larger companies but continues to trend down generally

9

Page 10: CSA Corporate Governance Forum

Voting participation tends to be marginally higher for companies who use a direct voting model

10

Page 11: CSA Corporate Governance Forum

Most votes are submitted in the last few days before proxy close, but voting reminders prove useful

11

Page 12: CSA Corporate Governance Forum

Over-voting continues to cause headaches for issuers

› 187 cases of over-voting in 2012, impacting 117 issuers

› Over-voting represented more than 20% of the issued capital voted for 4 companies.

› One issuer saw over-voting make up 56.8% of its issued capital voted or 31.7% of its total issued capital.

› 98.9% of over-vote cases were lodged via paper proxy forms

› Chasing over-votes is time consuming and time critical

› Issue is being made worse through the pooling of investors into one account on the register

12

Page 13: CSA Corporate Governance Forum

More securityholders are swapping paper for convenience

13

Proportion of voting securityholders who voted online

Page 14: CSA Corporate Governance Forum

Mobile device voting proves to be popular and effective

14

Proportion of voting holders who used the mobile device module of InvestorVote vs. the desktop version of this web service (2012 pilot group companies)

Page 15: CSA Corporate Governance Forum

Institutional investors show strong support for Intermediary Online – their dedicated web service

15

Page 16: CSA Corporate Governance Forum

Using voting handsets at meetings maximises attendee experience

“We’ve now used the handset voting system at the ANZ AGM since 2006. It’s easy for the shareholder, and enables the votes cast electronically at the meeting to be tallied and displayed instantly at the meeting – this is a significant improvement compared with using voting cards and has most certainly enhanced the AGM ‘experience’ for those in attendance.”

JOHN PRIESTLEY – ANZ COMPANY SECRETARY

16

Page 17: CSA Corporate Governance Forum

Fewer companies received a first strike in 2012 than in the previous year

17

Data source: 2012 AGM results (all companies), Financial Review Business Intelligence, January 2013

Page 18: CSA Corporate Governance Forum

25 companies received a second strike in 2012

18

Page 19: CSA Corporate Governance Forum

The practical application of the two strikes legislation puzzles many

19

Page 20: CSA Corporate Governance Forum

Four key recommendations to CAMAC from Computershare’s submission

› To support market transparency, institutions and nominees should be encouraged to use designated accounts rather than pooled accounts.

› Regulatory change that allows companies to require securityholders to opt in to receive physical proxy material and Notices of Meeting.

› We do not recommend moving the record date as it will introduce concerns about people voting who are no longer securityholders by the time the meeting takes place.

› Allow ‘hybrid’ meetings – a combination of the physical and online AGM. But it should be the company’s choice.

Page 21: CSA Corporate Governance Forum
Page 22: CSA Corporate Governance Forum

When they are offered in other regions, virtual meetings prove to be increasingly popular

Page 23: CSA Corporate Governance Forum

What is happening around the globe

Canada • TSX - Stricter voting on election of directors to improve corporate

governance principals, all directors elected annually• Notice and Access

India• Legislation only now just allows despatch AGM docs by email• Compulsory for top 500 listed companies to record an email

address, where provided, for the distribution of electronic AGM docs

China & Hong Kong• An increase of more than 44% in shareholder attendance from

20011 attributed to renewed interest by investors• Number of shares voted has declined over the same period

Page 24: CSA Corporate Governance Forum

What is happening around the globe

United Kingdom • Issued capital voted has risen by 2.6% since 2010 in FTSE 350• 5% increase in FTSE100 companies experiencing a high degree of

opposition to remuneration resolutions• UK is considering additional legislation in the future to give

shareholders more say over remuneration policies

Ireland• Increased participation in meetings during 2012, voting in greater

numbers and noticeably more verbally challenging of Boards at AGMs.

• Increase in the use of proxy solicitation services

Page 25: CSA Corporate Governance Forum

The growing influence of social media is driving global compliance changes

United States• SEC has recently ruled to allow companies to use social media to

make IR announcements as long as people are aware the company will use those platforms

• Closely on the heels of Netflix CEO who faced possible SEC action after disclosing monthly view figures via his personal Facebook account without the company making a public announcement

South Africa• Recently ruled that legal papers can be served by Facebook