Click here to load reader
Upload
aidian-peterson
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/13/2019 Cry Freedom Review
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cry-freedom-review 1/2
8/13/2019 Cry Freedom Review
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cry-freedom-review 2/2
I also think that the film is balanced to the extent that both views for the whites and blacks against
apartheid were shown; this is so because blacks were not the only people who suffered from apartheid.
This can be shown through strong relationship Biko and Woods shared, also when Woods threatened to
shoot the officer if touch his servant Evalina who was black, also the attendance of a few white people at
Bikos funeral.
As reported by The New York Times “Stephen Biko was a less flamboyant kind of hero, more thededicated political theorist and less the colorful eccentric. Much less is known about him.
And tragically, his story was a great deal shorter.” I disagree with this statement because to
me Biko was a well known man, known throughout most of South Africa, Biko was also very
flamboyant in a sense that he did not try to make any race superior but equal. This shows that
Biko was open to all views coming from a white man and a black man. The New York Times
review also states that “ Yet ''Cry Freedom'' makes relatively little of this, and in fact
makes relatively little of Steve Biko himself, allowing him to disappear before the
film is even half over. The rest of the time, it chooses to concentrate on Donald
Woods, the newspaper editor who was Biko's close friend and bravely defied South
African authorities on Biko's behalf.” I agree with the statement because I thought that Biko
shouldn’t have died so early on in to the movie. I think that they should have shown more of the
struggle that Biko had to face before his death; I also agree that movie was concentrated on
Donald Woods more than it was on Biko.