12
Cross border cooperation under the Phare and Tacis Programmes Nick Maddock, UNDP BRC Objectives Similar to INTERREG, but embraces CBC involving non- Member States

Cross border cooperation under the Phare and Tacis Programmes Nick Maddock, UNDP BRC

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Cross border cooperation under the Phare and Tacis Programmes Nick Maddock, UNDP BRC. Objectives Similar to INTERREG, but embraces CBC involving non-Member States. Types of intervention. Stress on heavy infrastructure (60% of expenditure), especially roads, rail and waste-water treatment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Cross border cooperation under the Phare and Tacis Programmes Nick Maddock, UNDP BRC

Cross border cooperation under the Phare and Tacis Programmes

Nick Maddock, UNDP BRC

Objectives

Similar to INTERREG, but embraces CBC involving non-Member States

Page 2: Cross border cooperation under the Phare and Tacis Programmes Nick Maddock, UNDP BRC

Types of intervention

Stress on heavy infrastructure (60% of expenditure), especially roads, rail and waste-water treatment

Smaller interventions through Small Projects Funds & Joint Small Projects Funds

Page 3: Cross border cooperation under the Phare and Tacis Programmes Nick Maddock, UNDP BRC

Implementation arrangements

Extensive use of Euroregions in programming and implementation

…but with substantial oversight and control by the European Commission

Page 4: Cross border cooperation under the Phare and Tacis Programmes Nick Maddock, UNDP BRC

Lessons of experience

• Heavy demand for SPF & JSPF

• Trends away from infrastructure (especially given provision under ISPA)

• Economic interventions and soft actions

• Cross-border partnerships for SPF/JSPF take time to build

Page 5: Cross border cooperation under the Phare and Tacis Programmes Nick Maddock, UNDP BRC

New Neighbourhood Programme Background and objectives

• new instrument: builds on INTERREG, & Phare and Tacis Cross-border programmes

• similar objectives: economic & social development, border management, ‘common concerns’

• will include Western Balkans, even though not covered by ‘Wider Europe’ initiative

Page 6: Cross border cooperation under the Phare and Tacis Programmes Nick Maddock, UNDP BRC

Eligibility

Must involve a Member State

(cannot only include CBC between non-Member States)

Page 7: Cross border cooperation under the Phare and Tacis Programmes Nick Maddock, UNDP BRC

Process

• resolution, and ensuring compatibility, of the different instruments and preparing for new financial instrument after 2006

• allow for single projects operating on both sides of a border (single application process)

• funding of the MS component from Structural Funds

Page 8: Cross border cooperation under the Phare and Tacis Programmes Nick Maddock, UNDP BRC

Cross border cooperation across the internal borders of former Yugoslavia

the role of UNDP in cross-border cooperation

Page 9: Cross border cooperation under the Phare and Tacis Programmes Nick Maddock, UNDP BRC

Context

New international borders where there was previously free movement of people, goods, services and capital

New international borders have resulted in marginal border areas

Efficacy of support enhanced by establishing cross-border partnerships early

Page 10: Cross border cooperation under the Phare and Tacis Programmes Nick Maddock, UNDP BRC

Objectives of UNDP support

Building cross-border partnerships in advance of EU assistance

Add value to the work of LEDAs and local and regional development programmes

Page 11: Cross border cooperation under the Phare and Tacis Programmes Nick Maddock, UNDP BRC

What can donor-funded support to cross-border

cooperation do?

….which (working) free trade agreements and WTO membership cannot

Page 12: Cross border cooperation under the Phare and Tacis Programmes Nick Maddock, UNDP BRC

Donor-funded support to economic cross-border cooperation is appropriate when….

market response is:

• unlikely in the foreseeable future

• likely to be unduly delayed relative to accompanying market-based actions

• prevented or heavily constrained by structural and other factors