32
220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment- Critique a research article.pdf by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige Submission date: 14-May-2018 03:11PM (UTC+1000) Submission ID: 963397198 File name: 140127_Tharindu_Dushyantha_Dewalegama_Gamacharige_220179206_D_G_Tharindu__HLTH_520__Writte.pdf Word count: 3869 Character count: 22390

Critique a research article.pdf 520) Written Assignment ...220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdf by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Critique a research article.pdf 520) Written Assignment ...220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdf by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige

220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH520) Written Assignment-

Critique a research article.pdfby Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige

Submission date: 14-May-2018 03:11PM (UTC+1000)Submission ID: 963397198File name:140127_Tharindu_Dushyantha_Dewalegama_Gamacharige_220179206_D_G_Tharindu__HLTH_520__Writte.pdfWord count: 3869Character count: 22390

Page 2: Critique a research article.pdf 520) Written Assignment ...220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdf by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige
Page 3: Critique a research article.pdf 520) Written Assignment ...220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdf by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige

this is a good introduction

research def int ion

EBP

Page 4: Critique a research article.pdf 520) Written Assignment ...220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdf by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige

very good

Page 5: Critique a research article.pdf 520) Written Assignment ...220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdf by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige

good

very good

Page 6: Critique a research article.pdf 520) Written Assignment ...220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdf by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige

very good

Page 7: Critique a research article.pdf 520) Written Assignment ...220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdf by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige

very good

very good

Page 8: Critique a research article.pdf 520) Written Assignment ...220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdf by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige

good

good discussion of the topic of COPD

Page 9: Critique a research article.pdf 520) Written Assignment ...220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdf by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige

you needed to include a reference tothe article here

Page 10: Critique a research article.pdf 520) Written Assignment ...220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdf by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige

good

you have undertaken some good analysis here

Page 11: Critique a research article.pdf 520) Written Assignment ...220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdf by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige

good

Page 12: Critique a research article.pdf 520) Written Assignment ...220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdf by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige

good

you need to include a reference to the article here

support ing reference

Page 13: Critique a research article.pdf 520) Written Assignment ...220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdf by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige

art icle

support ing reference

Page 14: Critique a research article.pdf 520) Written Assignment ...220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdf by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige

support ing reference

art icle

Page 15: Critique a research article.pdf 520) Written Assignment ...220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdf by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige

art icle

art icle

Page 16: Critique a research article.pdf 520) Written Assignment ...220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdf by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige

art icle

Conclusion

Page 17: Critique a research article.pdf 520) Written Assignment ...220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdf by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige

1

Page 18: Critique a research article.pdf 520) Written Assignment ...220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdf by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige
Page 19: Critique a research article.pdf 520) Written Assignment ...220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdf by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige
Page 20: Critique a research article.pdf 520) Written Assignment ...220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdf by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige

24%SIMILARITY INDEX

14%INTERNET SOURCES

5%PUBLICATIONS

21%STUDENT PAPERS

1 6%

2 2%

3 1%

4 1%

5 1%

6 1%

7 1%

8 1%

9 1%

220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdfORIGINALITY REPORT

PRIMARY SOURCES

Submitted to University of New EnglandStudent Paper

Submitted to TAFE Queensland BrisbaneStudent Paper

Submitted to Waikato Institute of TechnologyStudent Paper

eprints.uwe.ac.ukInternet Source

Submitted to Napier UniversityStudent Paper

scholarworks.alaska.eduInternet Source

Submitted to EDMCStudent Paper

Submitted to Sheffield Hallam UniversityStudent Paper

Submitted to University of QueenslandStudent Paper

Page 21: Critique a research article.pdf 520) Written Assignment ...220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdf by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige

10 1%

11 1%

12 1%

13 1%

14 1%

15 1%

16 1%

17 <1%

18 <1%

19 <1%

20 <1%

21

lra.le.ac.ukInternet Source

Submitted to Southern Cross UniversityStudent Paper

Submitted to Bolton Institute of HigherEducationStudent Paper

www.research.manchester.ac.ukInternet Source

Submitted to University of Central LancashireStudent Paper

Submitted to Chamberlain College of NursingStudent Paper

Submitted to University of SouthamptonStudent Paper

courseprofile.secure.griff ith.edu.auInternet Source

media.elsevierhealth.com.auInternet Source

Submitted to Monash UniversityStudent Paper

Submitted to The Robert Gordon UniversityStudent Paper

Submitted to University Of TasmaniaStudent Paper

Page 22: Critique a research article.pdf 520) Written Assignment ...220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdf by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige

<1%

22 <1%

23 <1%

24 <1%

25 <1%

26 <1%

27 <1%

28 <1%

29 <1%

30 <1%

31 <1%

32 <1%

Submitted to Bournemouth UniversityStudent Paper

Submitted to Kingston UniversityStudent Paper

eprints.uthm.edu.myInternet Source

Submitted to Edith Cowan UniversityStudent Paper

Submitted to University of NewcastleStudent Paper

Submitted to American IntercontinentalUniversity OnlineStudent Paper

Submitted to Oxford Brookes UniversityStudent Paper

canberra.libguides.comInternet Source

espace.curtin.edu.auInternet Source

centaur.reading.ac.ukInternet Source

usir.salford.ac.ukInternet Source

Page 23: Critique a research article.pdf 520) Written Assignment ...220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdf by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige

33 <1%

34 <1%

35 <1%

Exclude quotes Of f

Exclude bibliography Of f

Exclude matches Of f

health.gov.auInternet Source

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.govInternet Source

eprints.qut.edu.auInternet Source

Page 24: Critique a research article.pdf 520) Written Assignment ...220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdf by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige

QM

QM

FINAL GRADE

40/50

220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdfGRADEMARK REPORT

GENERAL COMMENTS

InstructorHi Tharindu,

You have met the requirements f or this assignment.

You started with a clear introduction of what youplanned to do within the essay.

You provided def init ions and descriptions ofresearch and EBP and discussed the dif f erences.

You provided a good overview and detail about thearticle you were going to crit ique. You includedadditional literature that you compared it to.However, you have not once ref erenced the articleyou are crit iquing within your essay only the tit le, andit is not in your ref erence list?

Good application of the checklist although you couldhave supported some of the discussion andanalysis with the literature.

Overall good work. Please see comments within your essay. Best wishes, Karen

PAGE 1

PAGE 2

Text Comment. this is a good introduction

research def intiongood def init ion and description of research

EBPGood def init ion and description of EBP

PAGE 3

Page 25: Critique a research article.pdf 520) Written Assignment ...220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdf by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige

Text Comment. very good

PAGE 4

Text Comment. good

Text Comment. very good

PAGE 5

Text Comment. very good

PAGE 6

Text Comment. very good

Text Comment. very good

PAGE 7

Text Comment. good

Text Comment. good discussion of the topic of COPD

PAGE 8

Text Comment. you needed to include a ref erence to the article here

PAGE 9

Text Comment. good

Text Comment. you have undertaken some good analysis here

PAGE 10

Text Comment. good

PAGE 11

Text Comment. good

Text Comment. you need to include a ref erence to the article here

Page 26: Critique a research article.pdf 520) Written Assignment ...220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdf by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige

QM

QM

QM

QM

QM

QM

QM

QM

QM

supporting referencerequires a ref erence to support this paragraph

PAGE 12

articleyou need to ref erence the article you are ref erring to here

supporting referencerequires a ref erence to support this paragraph

PAGE 13

supporting referencerequires a ref erence to support this paragraph

articleyou need to ref erence the article you are ref erring to here

PAGE 14

articleyou need to ref erence the article you are ref erring to here

articleyou need to ref erence the article you are ref erring to here

PAGE 15

articleyou need to ref erence the article you are ref erring to here

Conclusiongood but you need to summarise what you have discussed within your essay

PAGE 16

Comment 1you have not included the article that you have crit iqued in your ref erence list

PAGE 17

PAGE 18

Page 27: Critique a research article.pdf 520) Written Assignment ...220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdf by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige

RUBRIC: HLTH520 ASSESSMENT 50%

CRITERION 1 (20%)

HD(100)

HD(95)

HD(85)

D(80)

D(75)

C(70)

C(65)

P(60)

P(55)

P(50)

N(45)

N(35)

CRITERION 2 (20%)

HD(100)

HD(95)

79 / 100

85 / 100

Demonstrates mastery of the underlying principles of the dif f erences between research and evidencebased practice and the implications f or health and social care

Comprehensively def ines and describes the dif f erences between research andevidence based practice and the implications f or health and social care

Comprehensively def ines and describes the dif f erences between research andevidence based practice and the implications f or health and social care

Comprehensively def ines and describes the dif f erences between research andevidence based practice and the implications f or health and social care

There is evidence of detailed def init ions and descriptions between research andevidence based practice and the implications f or health and social care

There is evidence of detailed def init ions and descriptions between research andevidence based practice and the implications f or health and social care

There are adequate def init ions and descriptions between research and evidencebased practice and the implications f or health and social care

There are adequate def init ions and descriptions between research and evidencebased practice and the implications f or health and social care

There is minimal inf ormation about the dif f erences between research and evidencebased practice and the implications f or health and social care

There is minimal inf ormation about the dif f erences between research and evidencebased practice and the implications f or health and social care

There is minimal inf ormation about the dif f erences between research and evidencebased practice and the implications f or health and social care

There are no def init ions or descriptions of research and evidence based practice andthe implications f or health and social care

There are no def init ions or descriptions of research and evidence based practice andthe implications f or health and social care

80 / 100

Investigate and analyse an appropriate research article that is related to an area of practice. Discuss why itis important and what impact it would have in practice

Provides a comprehensive rationale f or the choice of the article to be investigatedand analysed and relates this to their area of practice. Discusses the importance ofthe research and how it would impact in practice

Provides a comprehensive rationale f or the choice of the article to be investigatedand analysed and relates this to their area of practice. Discusses the importance ofthe research and how it would impact in practice

Page 28: Critique a research article.pdf 520) Written Assignment ...220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdf by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige

HD(85)

D(80)

D(75)

C(70)

C(65)

P(60)

P(55)

P(50)

N(45)

N(35)

CRITERION 3 (20%)

HD(100)

HD(95)

HD(85)

Provides a comprehensive rationale f or the choice of the article to be investigatedand analysed and relates this to their area of practice. Discusses the importance ofthe research and how it would impact in practice

Provides a detailed rationale f or the choice of the article to be investigated andanalysed and relates this to their area of practice. Discusses the importance of theresearch and how it would impact in practice

Provides a detailed rationale f or the choice of the article to be investigated andanalysed and relates this to their area of practice. Discusses the importance of theresearch and how it would impact in practice

An adequate rationale has been discussed f or the choice of the article to beinvestigated and analysed, and is related to an area of practice. Discusses theimportance of the research and how it would impact in practice

An adequate rationale has been discussed f or the choice of the article to beinvestigated and analysed, and is related to an area of practice. Discusses theimportance of the research and how it would impact in practice

The rationale is minimal in relation to the choice of article to be crit iqued. There isvery litt le discussion of which area of practice it would be suitable f or. Minimaldiscussion on the importance of the research and how it would impact in practice

The rationale is minimal in relation to the choice of article to be crit iqued. There isvery litt le discussion of which area of practice it would be suitable f or. Minimaldiscussion on the importance of the research and how it would impact in practice

The rationale is minimal in relation to the choice of article to be crit iqued. There isvery litt le discussion of which area of practice it would be suitable f or. Minimaldiscussion on the importance of the research and how it would impact in practice

There is no rationale f or the choice of article and no discussion about the area ofpractice. No discussion on the importance of the research and how it would impact inpractice

There is no rationale f or the choice of article and no discussion about the area ofpractice. No discussion on the importance of the research and how it would impact inpractice

80 / 100

Identif ies the study design and justif ies the appropriateness of the design to the study

There is evidence of a comprehensive discussion in relation to the study designwhich is correctly identif ied as qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods or systematicreview

There is evidence of a comprehensive discussion in relation to the study designwhich is correctly identif ied as qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods or systematicreview

There is evidence of a comprehensive discussion in relation to the study designwhich is correctly identif ied as qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods or systematic

Page 29: Critique a research article.pdf 520) Written Assignment ...220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdf by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige

D(80)

D(75)

C(70)

C(65)

P(60)

P(55)

P(50)

N(45)

N(35)

CRITERION 4 (20%)

HD(100)

HD(95)

HD(85)

D(80)

D(75)

C(70)

C(65)

review

There is a detailed discussion in relation to the study design which is correctlyidentif ied as qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods or systematic review

There is a detailed discussion in relation to the study design which is correctlyidentif ied as qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods or systematic review

There is an adequate discussion in relation to the study design which is correctlyidentif ied as qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods or systematic review

There is an adequate discussion in relation to the study design which is correctlyidentif ied as qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods or systematic review

There is minimal discussion in relation to the study design which is correctly identif iedas qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods or systematic review

There is minimal discussion in relation to the study design which is correctly identif iedas qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods or systematic review

There is minimal discussion in relation to the study design which is correctly identif iedas qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods or systematic review

There is no discussion in relation to the study design which has not been correctlyidentif ied

There is no discussion in relation to the study design which has not been correctlyidentif ied

70 / 100

Apply methods (tools) to appraise and evaluate methodologies and methods used within a research articleto ensure the validity and trustworthiness of the research

There is evidence of a comprehensive crit ical appraisal and evaluation of theresearch article using an appropriate tool such as CASP

There is evidence of a comprehensive crit ical appraisal and evaluation of theresearch article using an appropriate tool such as CASP

There is evidence of a comprehensive crit ical appraisal and evaluation of theresearch article using an appropriate tool such as CASP

A detailed crit ical appraisal and evaluation has been undertaken of a research articleusing an appropriate tool such as CASP

A detailed crit ical appraisal and evaluation has been undertaken of a research articleusing an appropriate tool such as CASP

An adequate appraisal and evaluation has been undertaken of a research articleusing an appropriate tool such as CASP

An adequate appraisal and evaluation has been undertaken of a research articleusing an appropriate tool such as CASP

Page 30: Critique a research article.pdf 520) Written Assignment ...220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdf by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige

P(60)

P(55)

P(50)

N(45)

N(35)

CRITERION 5 (10%)

HD(100)

HD(95)

HD(85)

D(80)

D(75)

C(70)

C(65)

P(60)

P(55)

There is a minimal appraisal and evaluation that has been undertaken of a researcharticle using an appropriate tool such as CASP

There is a minimal appraisal and evaluation that has been undertaken of a researcharticle using an appropriate tool such as CASP

There is a minimal appraisal and evaluation that has been undertaken of a researcharticle using an appropriate tool such as CASP

There is no appraisal or evaluation of the research article or no CASP tool or othershave been applied

There is no appraisal or evaluation of the research article or no CASP tool or othershave been applied

80 / 100

Follows requirements f or structure, presentation grammar and spelling.

Accurately and consistently adheres to essay f ormat writ ing conventions,grammatical conventions with no errors and is a logical / well and succinctly structuredassignment

Accurately and consistently adheres to essay f ormat writ ing conventions,grammatical conventions with no errors and is a logical / well and succinctly structuredassignment

Accurately and consistently adheres to essay f ormat writ ing conventions,grammatical conventions with no errors and is a logical / well and succinctly structuredassignment

Mostly accurate and consistent adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions,adheres to grammatical conventions with f ew errors and is a logical and well-structured assignment

Mostly accurate and consistent adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions,adheres to grammatical conventions with f ew errors and is a logical and well-structured assignment

Partial but close adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, adheres togrammatical conventions, but with f requent errors, mainly a well- structuredassignment, lacking cohesion in places

Partial but close adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, adheres togrammatical conventions, but with f requent errors, mainly a well- structuredassignment, lacking cohesion in places

Minimal adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, minimal adherence togrammatical conventions with multiple errors, a weakly structured assignment,f requently lacking cohesion

Minimal adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, minimal adherence togrammatical conventions with multiple errors, a weakly structured assignment,f requently lacking cohesion

Page 31: Critique a research article.pdf 520) Written Assignment ...220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdf by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige

P(50)

N(45)

N(35)

CRITERION 6 (10%)

HD(100)

HD(95)

HD(85)

D(80)

D(75)

C(70)

C(65)

P(60)

P(55)

P(50)

N(45)

N

Minimal adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, minimal adherence togrammatical conventions with multiple errors, a weakly structured assignment,f requently lacking cohesion

Litt le attempt to adhere to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, multiple grammaticalerrors with minimal attention to writ ing / spelling conventions that signif icantly distractthe reader f rom the content. A poorly structured assignment, lacking cohesion

Litt le attempt to adhere to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, multiple grammaticalerrors with minimal attention to writ ing / spelling conventions that signif icantly distractthe reader f rom the content. A poorly structured assignment, lacking cohesion

80 / 100

Follows requirements f or ref erencing (APA 6th Edition) and the application of evidence

Accurately and consistently adheres to APA ref erencing conventions f or the in- textand ref erence list Explicit ly acknowledges all sources used throughout theassignment

Accurately and consistently adheres to APA ref erencing conventions f or the in- textand ref erence list Explicit ly acknowledges all sources used throughout theassignment

Accurately and consistently adheres to APA ref erencing conventions f or the in- textand ref erence list Explicit ly acknowledges all sources used throughout theassignment

Mostly of f ers accurate and consistent APA ref erencing conventions f or the in- textand ref erence list Principally acknowledges sources used throughout the assignment

Mostly of f ers accurate and consistent APA ref erencing conventions f or the in- textand ref erence list Principally acknowledges sources used throughout the assignment

A number of inaccurate and inconsistent APA ref erences in the in- text and ref erencelist Mostly acknowledges sources used throughout the assignment

A number of inaccurate and inconsistent APA ref erences in the in- text and ref erencelist Mostly acknowledges sources used throughout the assignment

Multiple inaccurate and inconsistent APA ref erences in the in- text and ref erence listMinimal acknowledgment of sources used throughout the assignment

Multiple inaccurate and inconsistent APA ref erences in the in- text and ref erence listMinimal acknowledgment of sources used throughout the assignment

Multiple inaccurate and inconsistent APA ref erences in the in- text and ref erence listMinimal acknowledgment of sources used throughout the assignment

Did not adhere to the APA ref erencing conventions and/or made catastrophic,multiple and consistent APA errors throughout Litt le or no acknowledgment ofsources used throughout the assignment

Did not adhere to the APA ref erencing conventions and/or made catastrophic,

Page 32: Critique a research article.pdf 520) Written Assignment ...220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdf by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige

(35) multiple and consistent APA errors throughout Litt le or no acknowledgment ofsources used throughout the assignment