Critical Tax Issues

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 Critical Tax Issues

    1/23

    T & D CONCLAVE

    CRITICAL TAX ISSUES

  • 8/3/2019 Critical Tax Issues

    2/23

    Level Playing field for domestic manufacturersThe cost disadvantage 14%

    Sales tax/ VAT, Entry tax/ Octroi, Higher financing cost; Low customs duty NIL (for Mega Projects) and 5% for (Project

    Import)

    lack of quality infrastructure

    dependence on foreign sources for critical raw material and

    components.

    (CoS) in July 2010 suggested similar duty structure as applicable for non-

    mega projects be made applicable to Mega/Ultra Mega Power projects.

    Arun Maira Committee recommended 10% BCD, 4% SAD

    Suggestion:Customs Duty @ 10%, CVD @ NIL SAD @ 4%

    Simultaneously Excise exemption Suitable measures like price preference to domestic manufacturers under the

    Mega Power Policy, for cost-plus as well as tariff based power projects.

  • 8/3/2019 Critical Tax Issues

    3/23

    Interest on differential Excise Duty - Supplementary Invoices

    Delay due to delay in publishing applicable indices

    In some cases, even prices published by foreign agencies

    like LME

    Certain Customers insists on prior approval of PV factors

    before raising invoices

    SC Judgment in SKF case

    Suggestion:

    Rule 7(4) may be amended to read as THE MONTH IN WHICH

    Duty is determined instead ofTHE MONTH FOR WHICH

  • 8/3/2019 Critical Tax Issues

    4/23

    Exemption to steel & cement used in Mega/Ultra MegaPower Projects

    Exemption to goods falling under CHAPTER 98.01

    (S. No 400 of Customs Notification No 21/2002)

    Hence no exemption to steel and cement.

    Suggestion:

    Should be amended to read as goods falling under

    any chapter. (The language used in notification 06/2006

    CE at S.No 91 is any chapter)

  • 8/3/2019 Critical Tax Issues

    5/23

    Supply to Solar Power Projects

    The manufacturer of such goods to furnish an undertaking to Excise

    authorities that (Notification 15/2010-CE dated 27.02.2010 -

    (a) The said goods shall be used only in the said project or facility and not

    for any other use; and

    (b) In the event of failure to observe conditions above, the manufacturer

    shall pay the duty

    no direct control of the manufacturer in execution of projects & uses ofmaterial.

    Further, in case of any failure in fulfillment of the above conditions,

    supplier liable for penalties.

    Manufacturer to pay 5% towards Input credit availed.

    Suggestion: Purchaser being the beneficiary of duty exemption, the liability should be on

    him to use it in as per the requirement of the statutory condition.

    The rule (6) of Cenvat credit rules 2004 should be amended suitably so that no

    Cenvat reversal is required for these projects

  • 8/3/2019 Critical Tax Issues

    6/23

    Inverted Duty Structure on Insulators

    Basic duty on all Insulators (chapter 8546 and 8547)is 7.5%

    Major imported components like metal parts,

    hardwares etc. attract 10% basic duty

    The metal parts consist of MCI / SGI casting

    component (chapter 7325)

    Suggestion:

    Customs Duty on inputs under Chapter 7325 used formanufacture of Insulators be reduced to 5%

  • 8/3/2019 Critical Tax Issues

    7/23

    Service Tax on Power Projects

    Infrastructure projects like roads, airports, railways,transport terminals, bridges, tunnels and dams are

    exempt from levy of service tax

    Suggestion:

    Similar exemption be granted to service provided for

    construction of power projects

  • 8/3/2019 Critical Tax Issues

    8/23

    CST/VAT exemption to Mega POWER PROJECTS Imports exempt from CST/VAT

    Domestic supplies attract CST @ 2% and VAT from 5% to 14.5%.State Governments advised to exempt supplies to Mega Power Plants from Sales Tax

    and other local levies.( OM issued by the MoP - F. No. A-108/98-IPC-I dated

    31.05.1999-Clause 2),

    Accordingly, the Sales Tax, Local Levies and Octroi on domestically manufactured

    capital goods, not to be considered for evaluation of bids, irrespective of the fact

    whether the State Governments provide exemptions or not.

    However, many customers not accepting this de-loading principle (regarding Sales

    Tax, Local Levies & Octroi) and evaluate bids taking these levies, including CST, into

    account.

    Suggestion:Mega /Ultra Mega Power Projects should be mandatorily exempted from CST/ VAT.

    CST exemption should be provided in the CST Act itself.Alternately, CST/VAT component, should be excluded for the purpose of bid

    evaluation.

  • 8/3/2019 Critical Tax Issues

    9/23

    EXEMPTION FROM C FORMS

    Previously States had powers to exempt specified sales/class ofsales/class of dealers from submitting C Form before amendment

    to CST Act in May 2002.

    States using these powers exempted certain class of dealers from

    specified sales from C forms submission

    Suggestion:

    The facility of exempting submission of C forms may be restored

    back to the respective state governments as before amendment in

    2002

  • 8/3/2019 Critical Tax Issues

    10/23

    Supply of goods to SEZs - BOIs

    As per existing provisions:Exemption for SEZs from CST for manufactured goods

    against Form I

    However no provision, not even machinery provision,

    for exemption from CST for supplies effected fromvendors directly to SEZs.

    However exemption provision exist for vendor supplies

    against physical exports

    Customers insisting on modalities not prescribed under

    CST Law.

    CST Act needs amendment

  • 8/3/2019 Critical Tax Issues

    11/23

    Provisions of CST ActSection 8. Rates of tax on sales in the course of inter-State trade

    or commerce.

    (6) Notwithstanding anything contained in this section, no tax

    under this Act shall be payable by any dealer in respect of sale of

    any goods made by such dealer, in the course of inter-State trade

    or commerce, to a registered dealer for the purpose of

    manufacture, production, processing, assembling, repairing,

    reconditioning, reengineering, packaging or for use as trading or

    packing material or packing accessories in an unit located in any

    special economic zone, if such registered dealer has beenauthorized to establish such unit by the authority specified by the

    Central Government in this behalf.

  • 8/3/2019 Critical Tax Issues

    12/23

    Provision of CST Act

    Section 8.

    (8) The provisions of sub-section (6) and (7) shall not apply to any

    sale of goods made in the course of inter-State trade or commerce

    unless the dealer selling such goods furnishes to the authority

    referred to in sub-section (6) a declaration in the prescribed manner

    on the prescribed form obtained from the authority referred to in sub-

    section (5), duly filled in and signed by the registered dealer to

    whom such goods are sold.

  • 8/3/2019 Critical Tax Issues

    13/23

    Summary of main/Charging section

    What is exempt under sub-section (6) is the sale by a dealer

    to a registered dealer for setting up a unit located in any

    Special Economic Zone or for development, operation and

    maintenance of Special Economic Zone by the developer of

    Special Economic Zone.

  • 8/3/2019 Critical Tax Issues

    14/23

    Requirements to avail exemption under CST Act

    Exemption can be claimed only by the dealer selling the goods whohas to furnish to his tax authority Form-I obtained from the

    specified authority which should be duly filled in and signed by

    the registered dealer (SEZ unit) to whom such goods are sold.

    In those cases where there are two sales, as in the case of vendor

    supplies, it cannot be said that the vendors of bought out items

    had sold the goods to a registered dealer in the Special Economic

    Zone.

  • 8/3/2019 Critical Tax Issues

    15/23

    SEZ provisions

    Section 26 (1). Exemptions, drawbacks and concessions toevery Developer and entrepreneur.

    (g) exemption from the levy of taxes on the sale or purchase

    of goods other than newspapers under the Central Sales TaxAct, 1956 if such goods are meant to carry on the authorised

    operations by the Developer or entrepreneur.

  • 8/3/2019 Critical Tax Issues

    16/23

    SEZ provisions

    Rule 10. Permission for procurement of items.

    Provided further that exemptions, drawbacks and

    concessions on the goods and services allowed to a Developer or

    Co-developer, as the case may be, shall also be available to thecontractors including sub-contractors appointed by such

    Developer or Co-developer, and all the documents in such cases

    shall bear the name of the Developer or Co-developer along with the

    contractor or sub-contractor and these shall be filed jointly in the

    name of the Developer or Co-developer and the contractor or sub-contractor, as the case may be.

  • 8/3/2019 Critical Tax Issues

    17/23

    Can Rules override the provisions of Act?

    Settled position of law is that a rule cannot override the substantive

    provisions of an enactment.

    Since, SEZ Act does not provide for exemption to sub-

    contractor, can Rules expand the scope of exemption?

    The CST Act dealing with inter-State sales, does not provide forsuch exemption for supplies made by the sub-contractors/sub vendors

    similar to physical imports [Sec 5(3)].

    The authorities administering the CST Act would be bound by

    the provisions of the CST Act and would not go beyond what is

    provided in the said Act to grant exemption to sub-contractors.

  • 8/3/2019 Critical Tax Issues

    18/23

    Can Rules override the provisions of Act? Some of the judgments

    The basis of the statutory power conferred by the Statute cannot be

    transgressed by the rule making authority. The rule making authority has noplenary power. It has to act within the limits of the power granted to it

    (Bimal Chandra Banerjee v. State of Madhya Pradesh AIR 1971 SC 517)

    The Rules, therefore, cannot be so framed which do not carry out the purpose

    of the chapter and cannot be in conflict with the same (Laghu Udyog Bharti v.

    UOI 2006 (2) STR 276 SC)

    Delegated legislation must be read in the context of the primary/legislative

    Act and not the vice-versa - In case of a conflict between a substantive

    provision of an Act and delegated legislation, the former shall prevail

    ( ITW Signode India Ltd. v. Collector of central excise 2003 (158) E.L.T. 403

    (S.C.)

    Other similar judgments: Chief Commissioner v. Kishan Goyal (1982) 50 STC 1 (Del) (F.B.);State of Tamil Nadu v. E.I.D. Parry (India) (1998) 109 STC 146 at 165 (Mad.); Rallis India Ltd. v.

    State of A.P. (1980) 45 STC 456 (S.C.); The S.T.O. v. H. Farid Ahmed & Sons (1975) 36 STC 567

    (S.C.); Sales Tax Officer v. Abraham (1967) 20 STC 367 (S.C.)

  • 8/3/2019 Critical Tax Issues

    19/23

    SEZ provisions

    Section 51. Act to have overriding effect.

    The provisions of this Act shall have effect

    notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith

    contained in any other law for the time being in forceor in any instrument having effect by virtue of any law

    other than this Act.

  • 8/3/2019 Critical Tax Issues

    20/23

    Can exemption be assumed under CST Act?

    When a language is plain and unambiguous and admits of only onemeaning no question of construction of a statute arises, for the Act

    speaks for itself. When the words of a statute are clear, plain or

    unambiguous, i.e., they are reasonably susceptible to only one

    meaning, courts are bound to give effect to that meaning irrespective

    of consequences. If the words used are capable of more than one

    construction, only then it would be open to the courts to adopt any other

    hypothetical construction on the ground that such construction is more

    consistent with the alleged object and policy of the Act. The spirit of the

    law may well be an elusive and unsafe guide and the supposed spirit

    can certainly be not given effect to in opposition to the plain language

    of the sections of the Act- Orient Paper & Industries Ltd. Vs. State of

    M.P. and others (and a transfer petition) [2006] 148 STC 0649

    [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA]

  • 8/3/2019 Critical Tax Issues

    21/23

    Can exemption be assumed under CST Act?

    "The Act in question is a taxing statute and, therefore, must beinterpreted as it reads, with no additions and no subtractions, on the

    ground of legislative intendmentor otherwise." -Vikrant Tyres Ltd. Vs.

    First Income-tax Officer, Mysore [2002] 127 STC 0005 [SUPREME

    COURT]

    "In interpreting a taxing statute, equitable considerations are entirely

    out of place. Nor can taxing statutes be interpreted on any

    presumptions or assumptions. The Court must look squarely at the

    words of the statute and interpret them. It must interpret a taxing

    statute in the light of what is clearly expressed: it cannot imply

    anything which is not expressed; it cannot import provisions in the

    statutes so as to supply any assumed deficiency" - Commissioner of

    Sales Tax, U.P. Vs Modi Sugar Mills Ltd.[1961] 012 STC 0182

    [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA]

  • 8/3/2019 Critical Tax Issues

    22/23

    What about Transit Sale ?

    Section 6 (2)- No such subsequent sale exempt unless selling

    dealer furnishes to his tax authorities

    - Certificate in E1/EII [Rule 12 (4)]

    - Declaration in Form C [Rule 12 (1)]

    Can SEZ unit issue Form C Yes as per Clarification by Maharashtra commissioner to L&T

    dated 9th June 2008.

    - Further such SEZ is registered under CST/VAT Acts of

    respective States

  • 8/3/2019 Critical Tax Issues

    23/23

    THANK YOU

    Suraj Prakash AGM (Fin Ind. Taxation)BHEL, New DelhiMember IEEMA Economic & Taxation Committee