Upload
matthew-griffin
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Critical Infrastructure Protection and Higher Education:
University of California Hazard Vulnerability Assessment
Kristine HafnerUniversity of California Office of the
President
Safety, Security and Anti-Terrorism (SSAT) Task Force
Created in response to September 11 University-wide committee co-chaired by
VC Research and AVP IT Focus:
Vulnerability / Risk assessment Mitigation plans Policy development Campus-wide dialogue University-wide collaboration
Phase 1: Hazard Vulnerability Assessment Process
One day assessment process at all 10 campuses facilitated by UC Office of President team
Broad campus participation , e.g. Administrative VC, Vice Provosts Research,
Instruction Controller, Risk Manager, Police Chief, Fire
Marshall, Emergency Manager EH&S, Facilities / Physical Plant, Human Resources Housing & Dining Services, Student Affairs,
Student Health Services
Hazard Vulnerability Assessment : Objectives
Relative risk ranking for each campus
Prioritized mitigation plans UC opportunities to share best
practices University-wide strategies to address
common vulnerabilities
Hazard Vulnerability Assessment Tool
Assessment includes 24 threats/hazards
7 questions asked about each threat (PC-based voting tool) Probability of occurrence (1 question) Severity of impact:
Human (2 questions) Facilities (2 questions) Institutional (2 questions)
Hazard Vulnerability Assessment Threat/Event Categories
Natural hazards / events: Flood Landslide / mudslide High winds Wildfire Catastropic earthquake Tsunami
Hazard Vulnerability Assessment Threat/Event Categories
Technological hazards: Power failure Water supply disruption Telecommunications system failure Information Technology infrastructure
disruption Residential building fire Central administration or laboratory fire Accidental hazardous materials release
Hazard Vulnerability Assessment Threat/Event Categories
Human-related events: Public health emergency Sports / public event disruption Workplace violence Civil disturbance
Hazard Vulnerability Assessment Threat/Event Categories
Terrorism events: Truck bomb Mail / package bomb Active shooter Intentional biological agent release Intentional radiological material release Theft of select agents Animal / Crop Vandalism
Hazard Vulnerability Assessment: Outcome
Overall score for each event : Probability Severity of impact
Relative risk score for each threat Relative risk ranking for each
campus Campus mitigation strategies
Hazard Vulnerability Assessment: Campus actions
Identify vulnerable campus locations and critical assets
Develop interim and long-term mitigation measures
Prioritize mitigation actions in light of institutional priorities and cost/benefit analysis
Develop implementation strategies
Next Steps
Collecting campus mitigation plans Summary report to President by
June Overview of findings Opportunities for collaboration Investment priorities