Upload
talon-carpenter
View
40
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Criteria for successful policy integration. Oliver Lah 11-12/09/2014. Criteria topics. The policy’s alignment with broader priorities Supportive environment at the local level Striking a policy balance Facilitation of integration through cooperation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Criteria for successful policy integration
Oliver Lah11-12/09/2014
SHAPE-IT final conference presentation Slide 2
Criteria topics
• The policy’s alignment with broader priorities• Supportive environment at the local level• Striking a policy balance• Facilitation of integration through cooperation• Ensuring accountability during implementation
and afterwards
SHAPE-IT final conference presentation Slide 3
Policy alignment
The policy’s alignment with broader priorities• Alignment of the local policy with regional, national
and EU-level frameworks and goals• Integration of the policy into a broader local-level planFor example: Munich’s TDP embedded in the broader plan,
Perspektive München The Netherlands’ national LEV policies synergies
with EU laws
SHAPE-IT final conference presentation Slide 4
Local support
Supportive environment at the local level• Openness to the take-up of solutions that originate
from departments not directly involved with transportFor example: Lund’s and Munich’s inter-departmental
consultation processes
SHAPE-IT final conference presentation Slide 5
Policy balance
Striking a balance in the policy measure(s)• Policies that encourage complementary transport
modes• Creating complementary push and pull measuresFor example: TDP’s aim of a modal shift toward cycling The Netherlands’ Motor vehicle Tax and subsidies
on LEVs
SHAPE-IT final conference presentation Slide 6
Cooperation
Facilitating integration through cooperation• Clearly defined roles for inter-departmental
cooperation and for interaction at various government levels
• Capacity-building for collaborative policy development• Thinking, planning and acting as a wider urban areaFor example: Lund’s and Munich’s cooperative processes Krakow’s TeleBus, connecting outer areas
SHAPE-IT final conference presentation Slide 7
Responsibility
Ensuring accountability during implementation and follow-through:• Policy implementation plan which ensures continued
accountability across departments • Re-evaluation of the policy at regular intervalsFor example: Munich’s Planning Department is responsible for
the TDP; other departments must consult them regarding transport-related projects
Lund’s update of LundaMaTs with a widened vision