CRIME text.docx

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 CRIME text.docx

    1/3

    CRIME

    Pre-reading questions

    1. Name three ways by which the police can find a criminal.

    2. Do you think computers have helped in the process of detecting criminals? How / Why not?

    ADVANCES IN INVESTIGATION AND DETECTION

    A man received a life sentence for murder in London last month. What is unusual about this is that the murder took

    place 29 years ago. At the time the murder was committed, the man, Anthony Richardson, was questioned by the

    police, but their investigations did not reveal enough evidence for them to charge him. He claimed to have an alibi

    for the time of the crime.

    Richardson clearly thought he had got away with the murder. The victim, who was strangled, had been his girlfriend

    at one time and he continued to be friendly with her family after her death. In all these years he has shown no signs

    of any guilt on his conscience.

    His conviction was partly due to modern advances in crime detection and partly to chance. Genetic fingerprinting,

    based on DNA patterns, is now an important part of forensic science, but it was not developed in the UK until after

    the murder. The process depends on obtaining a sample of the suspects blood, saliva, skin, or other material that

    contains body cells, and therefore DNA. It has been discovered that the number and pattern of certain repeated

    sequences in human DNA appear to be unique to each individual, making it a valuable and accurate means of

    identification.

    Computers also played a part in Richardsons eventual conviction. When he was convicted of a minor theft last year,

    details of his DNA were automatically included on a police database. At the time the police were already re-investigating the 1983 murder, and Richardsons possible part in it, following a telephone tip-off from a member of

    the public.

    A forensic sample taken from the murder scene was analysed, using DNA profiling, and the analysis revealed that

    the DNA matched Richardsons. He had left some body samples at the scene of the crime and this is what led to his

    conviction so many year later.

    This has been a great victory for modern forensic techniques. It was the murderers own body that proved him

    guilty.

  • 8/12/2019 CRIME text.docx

    2/3

    VocabularyTry to complete the table without looking at the text:

    1. ____________________ The process of analysing DNA patterns, which are unique to individuals, using bodytissues, such as blood and saliva, in order to find out someones identity, used

    particularly to find out if someone has committed a crime.

    2. ____________________ To carry out a careful enquiry or examination into the facts of a situation, event, etc.to try and find out the truth.

    3. ____________________ To be identical to, or extremely similar to, something.

    4. ____________________ To believe that someone may have committed a crime or done something wrong,without having proof of this.

    5. ____________________ To do something wrong and not be punished for doing so.

    6. ____________________ To do something that is considered wrong, often something that is illegal.

    7. ____________________ To kill someone by squeezing their throat so that they cannot breathe.

    8. ____________________ The process of investigating crime or wrongdoing, collecting evidence and finding thecriminals.

    9. ____________________ Connected with the application of scientific tests to the investigation of a crime.

    10. ____________________ Proof that someone accused of a crime could not have done it because they were

    elsewhere at the time of the crime.

    11. ____________________ The chemical at the centre of the cells of living things which carries geneticinformation (deoxyribonucleic acid).

    12. ____________________ To state officially, as in a court of law, that someone is guilty of a certain crime.

    13. ____________________ To examine something in detail, especially by separating it into its parts, in order todiscover more about it.

    14. ____________________ When the police accuse someone formally of having committed a crime.

    15. ____________________ Secret information given to someone in order to help them, especially informationgiven to the police about a crime that has happened or that is being planned.

    16. ____________________ A punishment for a serious crime given by a court of law, by which a person spends

    the rest of their life in prison.

    17. ____________________ A small amount of a substance, etc. which can be used as an example to find outinformation about the substance, etc. as a whole.

    18. ____________________ The clear liquid that is produced in your mouth.

    B) Match the words in Column A with their meaning in Column B.

    Column A Column B

    1. committed A. luck

    2. investigations B. proof

    3. evidence C. guilty verdict

    4. charge D. investigated

    5. conviction E. carried out

    6. chance F. enquiries

    7. sample G. accuse

    8. analysed H. specimen

  • 8/12/2019 CRIME text.docx

    3/3

    C) Match the words in Column A with their opposite meaning in Column B.

    Column A Column B

    1. continued A. fully

    2. partly B. stopped

    3. unique C. innocent

    4. individual D. common

    5. accurate E. earlier

    6. included F. group

    7. later G. excluded

    8. guilty H. false

    Reading Comprehension

    In pairs, discuss the following questions, considering the text:

    1. what made the author say that Richardson did not show any signs of guilt?

    2. Name some of the samples used for genetic fingerprinting.

    3. Why did the police re-open the murder case?