Upload
fadzlli-amin
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/13/2019 Credibility Review of the Malaysian States E-government Websites
1/5
OCTOBER2006-M
ARCH
2007VOL.1
NO.1
4 1
ABSTRACT
The migra tion from paper-based services to electronic vers ion has deve lope d the potent ia l of e-gov ernment
applications enormously. However, designing a credible government web site is not a simple task. This paper
discusses the importance of credibility for the Malaysian states government web sites. Top web credibility factors
are listed. Reviews on five state government websites are also presented. Assessment of the credibility issues were
done on five state government sites, which are Sarawak, Selangor, Johor, Melaka and Kedah Government web site.
We found that there are still room for improvement for the sites in terms of credibility and site appearance.
Keywords: WebsiteCredibility, Usability, E-government, portals.
Tab le 1 : State Governments Website Address
N o. State government Site Address
1 Sarawak www.sarawak.gov.my
2 Selangor www.selangor.gov.my
3 Johor www.johorDT.gov.my
4 Melaka www.melaka.gov.my
5 Kedah www.kedah.gov.my
6 Perlis www.perlis.gov.my
7 Pulau Pinang www.penang.gov.my
8 Perak www.perak.gov.my
9 Negeri Sembilan www.sukns.gov.my
10 Pahang www.pahang.gov.my
11 Terengganu www.terengganu.gov.my
12 Kelantan www.kelantan.gov.my
13 Sabah www.sabah.gov.my
1. INTRODUCTION
The migration from paper-based services to electronic
version has opened wide the potential of e-government
application [5]. Hence, several state governments in
Malaysia have started to have their online presence.
However, designing a credible government website is a
fairly complicated matter, let alone the measurement
of its impact to the citizens. Credibility is emerging as a
key element of success in the on-line environment,
especially for a site involved with the government.
In this paper, the assessment of the credibility issue
was done on five pre-selected state government sites.The sites involved are Sarawak, Selangor, Johor, Melaka,
and Kedah Government web sites. For ease of discussion,
only the homepages were accessed and reviewed. We
would like to highlight that all the states used the state
name as the Uniform Resources Locator (URL) address,
except for Johor (JohorDT.gov.my) and Negeri Sembilan
(SUKNS.gov.my). The practice of using state name as the
domain name is good for the user to easily remember the
site address hence, improving site credibility.
However, for reference, the list of all 13 state government
sites in Malaysia along with the site address is shown
in Table 1 below.
CREDIBILITY REVIEW OF THE MALAYSIAN STATES
E-GOVERNMENT WEB SITES
Jonathan Sidi and Syahrul Nizam Junaini
Faculty of Computer Science and Information
Technol ogy
Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS)
94300 Kota Samarahan, Sarawak
Tel: 082 583641, Fax: 082 583764
E-mail: [email protected],syahru ln@fi t.unim as.my
8/13/2019 Credibility Review of the Malaysian States E-government Websites
2/5
PUBLIC
SECTOR
ICTM
ANAGEMENT
REVIEW
4 2
Tabl e 2 : List of Credibil ity Factors [4]
Topic of Cr edibil ity Inc idence
Design Look 46.1%
Information Design/Structure 28.5%
Information Focus 25.1%
Company Motive 15.5%
Usefulness of Information 14.8%
Accuracy of Information 14.3%
Name Recognition & Reputation 14.1%
Advertising 13.8%
Bias of Information 11.6%
Tone of the Writ ing 9%
Identity of Site Sponsor 8.8%
Functionality of Site 8.6%
Customer Service 6.4%
Past Experience with Site 4.6%
Information Clarity 3.7%
Performance on a Test 3.6%
Readability 3.6%
Affiliations 3.4%
This paper is presented as follows: In Section 2, a brief
explanation about web credibility is given. We discussseveral top credibility factors that can be deployed to
improve the e-government web sites. Section 3 reviews
the five home pages as mentioned above. Finally, in
Section 4, we conclude with several suggestions on
how all states government in Malaysia could improve
their web site credibility and charisma.
2. WHY WEB CREDIBILI TY?
Prompted by demands for a more credible e-government
site, players involved in setting up the government
websites have been struggling with how to come upwith a highly credible site. For example, the visitor who
browses an e-government site can easily access the
credibility of the information presented through text
writing style and its relevancy. Sometimes, in certain
cases, the sites that are controlled by the government
may contain inaccurate and misleading information.
For this reason, the web designers faced increasing
demands to boost the credibility of the sites [3].
Other web credibility decisive factors are navigation,
content, reliability and technicality [6]. These factors,
even though seems general, may affect the credibility
of the site. A survey done by Stanford Persuasive TechnologyLab [7] shows that a clear answer to questions
submitted by users makes websites more credible. The
survey involved 1,481 users in Finland and the United
States. Other significant factors were the links precision
and absence of typographical errors.
One main related study on e-government website
usability was done by Tolbert and Mossberger [8].
Th ey tr y to un de rs ta nd ho w in di vi du als ev al ua te
e-government content and credibility. It is important
to assess and evaluate the factors related with
e-government website. This is to ensure that the
information and materials presented on the site satisfy
citizens needs. Moreover, the user has the desire to
know the source of information found in a web page.
It is good for e-government website to provides users
with such information that are crucial.
Other than that, there are several other issues that
influence how information on the web can be used
effectively. The information provider especially the
webmaster for e-government website must be careful,
since the user can differentiate the material that is
credible from that which is not. Generally, the user feels
that a web site loses credibility when it has errors and
technical problems. Distracting advertisements and
banners also decreases its credibility. This paper
addresses the web credibility issue for improving the
way government disseminates their information online.
2.1 WEB CREDIBILITY FACTORS
Fogg et al. [2] proposed five areas that affect the
credibility of a Web site. The factors are as follows:
Real-world Pres ence. Designers can enhance the
credibility of a Web site by conveying an organizations
real world presence such as the physical address and
phone number to users.
Small Errors. An organization must take care to
eliminate even small errors to ensure credibility of their
web site.
U se r Navig a t ion. U sabi l ity of s ite in te r ms of
navigation can enhance the sites perceived credibility. Advertisement. Only place advertisement on web
pages in ways that it does not distract readers.
Technical Proble ms. The site must perform as users
expect. Slow download time for instance affects site
credibility.
In another study Fogg et al. [4] mentioned that while
evaluating the credibility of a web site, participants
commented on the design look of the site most
frequently compared to another factors. Complete list
of the factors that they claimed affects site credibility
is presented in Table 2 below.
8/13/2019 Credibility Review of the Malaysian States E-government Websites
3/5
OCTOBER2006-M
ARCH
2007VOL.1
NO.1
4 3
The percentage shows the inc idence of the factors as
reported by 2,684 respondents. Meanwhile, anothercredibility cue may include real-world feel [1]. It refers
to indication of the government physical location i.e.
the office building and how they can be contacted. The
citizen need to know real people behind the website to
be contacted should they have any questions.
3. STATE GOVERNMENTS HOMEPAGE
CREDIBILITY
3.1 SARAWAK.GOV.MY
Overall, in terms of design and appearance, the site looks
simple and fairly straightforward. The state government
crest is suitably located on the top-left portion of the
page. Small top banner image of Kuching City on the
right of the banner adds the credibility to the site. It
helps the visitor to recognize Sarawak hence, improving
site reputation. We suggest that better photographs of
beautiful Sarawak panorama be placed on the
homepage. It will be able to promote Sarawak, which is
well known to have numerous tourist attractions.
However, the site information structure is a little bit tooconventional. Massive number of menu items makes
the page looks less credible. There are too many menu
items listed in the main menu. The best number of item
should be around 7 2 (i.e. five or nine). This site has 12
menu items. Generally, the key to information design is
a balance between breadth and depth of the site. The
site should present only what is truly necessary for
primary display on the homepage. The slightly less
important information could be placed on the second-
level page and not on the first page.
The information clar ity is fair ly good. Perfect choice of
fonts typeface and colour makes the site easy to read.For example, size of the font used for the highlight of
events columns is highly readable and clear. Nevertheless,
long text in the middle columns could reduce site
credibility. Normally, the user is more attracted withnon-textual element on the site. We recommend that
bulky paragraphs should be rectified into several
smaller paragraphs.
Th e in fo rm at io n ab ou t la te st up da te ha s no t be en
included on the homepage. A credible site should be
updated frequently. We propose that to improve site
credibility, the latest details about information update
be included somewhere at the bottom corner of the
page. However, if the information has not been updated
currently, the visitor could easily know that perhaps
the site manager does really bother to update the site.
The site only has three links in smal l banner format atthe right portion of the page. However, the usage of
animated banner is slightly less credible. We recommend
that it is better to use static banner.
3.2 SELANGOR.GOV.MY
Images of people are widely used in advertising and
branding. It acts as a means of creating positive
attitudes towards the products and credibility in brands.On this site, the usage of a real photos of the Chief
Minister is a good way to improve site credibility. The
practice of using real photos from the real event is
better than using the portrait of the Chief Minister. In
addition, the blur image of Kota Darul Ehsan arch on
the top of the site perhaps would be better if it was in
full-colour version. It will look more real compared to
the one being used now.
The source of inf orma tion is an important cri ter ia for
evaluating site credibility. For the announcement
column, for every announcement, it is better for the person
who posts the announcement to use his/her positionin the department rather than mentioning his/her name.
Use submitted by rather than submitted
8/13/2019 Credibility Review of the Malaysian States E-government Websites
4/5
PUBLIC
SECTOR
ICTM
ANAGEMENT
REVIEW
4 4
by . Credibility of the position or affiliation is
better compared to personal name that may be anonymous.
3.3 JOHOR.GOV.MY
The Chief Ministers Diary column is a credible way to
represent Johor Governments initiative to announce
their state leaders activity. Its also could improve citizen
trust about the information provided. The disclaimer
statement provided is also significant for the content
provider. For the visitor, they can think that the site
provider is really serious about their business. Other
than that, the State Governments Administrative Building
photograph used as the top image banner is a good
way to improve site credibility. Light blue colour theme
contributes power appearance to the site.
3.4 MELAKA.GOV.MY
the image or tourist attraction content using appropriate
web scripting technology. In this way, the site wouldbecome more dynamic in nature.
3.5 KEDAH.GOV.MY
Th e we lc om e me ss ag e fr om th e Ch ief Mi ni st er in
multimedia format (video) shows the Melaka Governments
initiative to improve its site quality and credibility. The
site displays historic cultural heritage site on thehomepage. We recommend that to improve this
functional ity, the site should be able to randomly change
Among all the five websites above, the Kedah homepage
is the most impressive in terms of credibility. The site is
also comprehensive and presentable. All the icons
together with the menu have been carefully designed.
Thi s fa ct or is vit al to wa rd s si te cr ed ib il it y. Th e
professional look and sleek design of the site element
such as button and images is another contributor
towards site credibility. However, in the hyperlinks
section, too many links were listed, making the list look
too cluttered.
4. CONCLUSION
We have presented a review on five e-government
homepages in Malaysia. We also have included some
comments with regards to sites credibility. It is crucial
for the webmasters to improve their sites to ensure
that their sites appearance have strong credibility. In
the near future, analysis of differences in web credibility
perceptions by gender, age, income, experience level,
and nationality can be done.
In conclusion, the state governments should exploit
this opportunity to improve their site credibility. A
highly credible site could attract worldwide audience.
It could lead to inward investment for their state. To do
so, the information on the site has to portray state
achievements and promote any related developments.
8/13/2019 Credibility Review of the Malaysian States E-government Websites
5/5
OCTOBER2006-M
ARCH
2007VOL.1
NO.1
4 5
REFERENCES
[1] Collins, J. (2006) An investigation of web-page
credibility, Journal of Computing Sciences in
Colleges archive, Volume 21, Issue 4, April 2006,
Consortium for Computing Sciences in Colleges,
pp. 16 21.
[2] Fogg, B.J., Swani, P., Treinen, M., Marshall, J., Osipovich,
A., Varma, C., Laraki, O., Fang, N., Paul, J., Rangnekar,
A., and Shon, J. (2000). Elements that affect Web
credibility: Early results from a self-report study.
Proceedings of CHI00, Extended Abstracts on
Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press,
New York, pp. 287-288.
[3] Fogg, B.J. and Tseng, H. (2003). The Elements of
Computer Credibility. Proceedings of the CHI
Conference on Human Factors and Computing
Systems, 1999, ACM Press, New York, pp. 80-87.
[4] Fogg, B.J., Soohoo, C., Danielson, D.R., Marable, L.,
Stanford, J. & Tauber, E.R. (2003). How do users
evaluate the credibility of Web sites? A study with
over 2,500 participants. Proceedings of Designing
for User Experiences Conference, DUX2003,
ACM Press, New York, pp. 1-15.
[5] Ke , We i l ing and We i , K.K . ( 2004). Succe ssful
e-government in Singapore, Communications ofthe ACM, June 2004, Vol. 47, No. 6, ACM Press,
New York. pp. 95-99.
[6] Merwe, R van der and Bekker, J. (2003). A framework
and methodology for evaluating e-commerce web
sites. In tern et Res earch: electronic Networking
Applica tions and Policy. Vol. 13, No.5, pp. 330-341.
[7] Stanford Web Cr edibil i ty Re se arch,
http://credibility.stanford.edu
[8] Tolbert, C. and Mossberger, K. (2003). The Effects of
E-Government on Trust and Confidence in
Government. Proceedings of the 2003 annual
national conference on Digital government research,
Digital Government Research Center, pp. 1-7.