Upload
joshua-moran
View
216
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
c r e a t i v e n d u s t r i e si
creativeindustries.qut.com
‘Anyone Can Edit’:Understanding the Produser
Dr Axel Bruns(Visiting Scholar, Institute of Communications Studies, University of Leeds)Creative Industries Faculty / Institute for Creative Industries and Innovation
Queensland University of [email protected] – http://snurb.info/
c r e a t i v e n d u s t r i e si
creativeindustries.qut.com
The Produser
‒ No, it’s not a typo…
‒ Produsers are involved in:• user-led content production –
produsage
‒ In a variety of environments
(Image: http://flickr.com/photos/stabilo-boss/93136022/)
c r e a t i v e n d u s t r i e si
creativeindustries.qut.com
Produsing the News?
‒ Traditional news process:
(from Bruns, Gatewatching: Collaborative Online News Production, 2005)
c r e a t i v e n d u s t r i e si
creativeindustries.qut.com
Against Gatekeeping
‒Gatekeeping is outdated:• media scarcity no longer exists• too many gates to keep• journalists’ judgment can fail• ‘all the news that’s fit to print’ is patronising• Fordist production model• citizens want to be active and involved
c r e a t i v e n d u s t r i e si
creativeindustries.qut.com
Towards Gatewatching
‒ New form of collaborative news produsage:• observing what news passes through the gates of
news and other organisations• highlighting those news items which are of relevance
to the community• publicising rather than publishing the news• adding commentary, analysis, and discussion to the
news• post-Fordist production model, involving users as
produsers
c r e a t i v e n d u s t r i e si
creativeindustries.qut.com
Produsing the News
‒Gatewatcher news process:
(adapted from Bruns, Gatewatching: Collaborative Online News Production, 2005)
‒ Variations on the process are possible
c r e a t i v e n d u s t r i e si
creativeindustries.qut.com
Gatewatching and the News
‒Rise of alternative online news:• in news-related blogs and collaborative online
news sites• e.g. Indymedia, Slashdot, Kuro5hin, Plastic,
OhmyNews• often in response to perceived shortcomings
in the mainstream news media• creating a kind of open news• but not replacing the mainstream news media
c r e a t i v e n d u s t r i e si
creativeindustries.qut.com
Gatewatching Effects
‒ Suggestion of a new role for open news:• bottom-up rather than top-down news coverage• multiperspectival news coverage (Herbert Gans)• democratic, dialogic, deliberative journalism
(Dan Gillmor: move from lecture to conversation)
‒ Effects on mainstream journalism:• bypassing journalists and editors• offering corrective to, watchdog for mainstream news
(Herbert Gans: a second tier of news organisations)• breaking down producer/consumer dichotomies
c r e a t i v e n d u s t r i e si
creativeindustries.qut.com
Open News and Open Source‒ Open source approach to news:
The basic idea behind open source is very simple: When programmers can read, redistribute, and modify the source code for a piece of software, the Software evolves. People improve it, people adapt it, people fix bugs. And this can happen at a speed that, if one is used to the slow pace of conventional software development, seems astonishing.
We in the open source community have learned that this rapid evolutionary process produces better software than the traditional closed model, in which only a very few programmers can see the source and everybody else must blindly use an opaque block of bits.
(Opensource.org)
c r e a t i v e n d u s t r i e si
creativeindustries.qut.com
Produsage
‒ emerging in various domains:• open source software
development• online publishing
∘ blogs∘ open news – e.g. Slashdot,
Indymedia, OhmyNews
• knowledge management∘ wikis – e.g. Wikipedia∘ social bookmarking – e.g.
del.icio.us, digg∘ geotagging – e.g.
Google Earth, Frappr
• multi-user gaming∘ e.g. The Sims, Everquest,
Second Life, Spore
• media sharing and creative practice∘ e.g. Flickr, ccMixter, YouTube
, Jumpcut, Current.tv
• reviews and viral marketing∘ e.g. Epinions, IgoUgo
• automatic aggregation∘ Google, Amazon, Technorati
c r e a t i v e n d u s t r i e si
creativeindustries.qut.com
‒ decline of the traditional value chain:
producer distributor consumer
(producer advised by consumer distributor consumer)
(customer-made ideas producer distributor consumer)
Beyond Production
c r e a t i v e n d u s t r i e si
creativeindustries.qut.com
Beyond Products
‒ traditional value chains rely on key assumptions:
• products exist in discrete versions, and producers decide when these are to be released
• the distribution of products is controlled (and controllable) by producers and distributors, not by consumers
• consumers are relatively isolated – only producers have access to the whole community
• the core business lies in the sale of copyrighted products
‒ but in a user-led, digital environment, this is no longer true:
• the latest update is always immediately available – e.g. open source, Wikipedia
• content is available for direct access online – users become producers, and the Net replaces the distributor
• consumers join together in enthusiast groups, interest groups, developer groups
• the core business lies in providing value-added services around freely available content
c r e a t i v e n d u s t r i e si
creativeindustries.qut.com
A New Value Chain?
(as producer)
produser
(as consumer)
content content
c r e a t i v e n d u s t r i e si
creativeindustries.qut.com
Common Characteristics
‒ shared across these environments:• Community-Based – the community as a whole, if sufficiently large and
varied, can contribute more than a closed team of producers, however qualified
• Fluid Roles – produsers participate as is appropriate to their personal skills, interests, and knowledges; this changes as the produsage project proceeds
• Unfinished Artefacts – content artefacts in produsage projects are continually under development, and therefore always unfinished; their development follows evolutionary, iterative, palimpsestic paths
• Common Property, Individual Merit - contributors permit (non-commercial) community use of their intellectual property, and are rewarded by the status capital
c r e a t i v e n d u s t r i e si
creativeindustries.qut.com
content development space
set up by community or company to
harbour produsage
(e.g. Wikimedia Foundation; Google;
SourceForge)
commercial / non-profit harvesting of user-generated content
(e.g. The Sims, Wikipedia on CD-ROM)
commercial / non-profit services to support produsage
(e.g. Red Hat, SourceForge)
commercial activities by users themselves, harnessing the hive
(e.g. support services, consultancies, content sales)
initial IP contributions from
individuals, the public domain, or
commercial sources
collaborative, iterative, evolutionary, palimpsestic user-led content development
valuable, often commercial-grade content is created
Produsage Environment(populated by produsers)
Breaking the Chains
c r e a t i v e n d u s t r i e si
creativeindustries.qut.com
Produsage
‒ beyond production:• ‘anyone can edit’ – users become producers of
content• usage and production are increasingly, inextricably
intertwined• strict distinctions between producers, distributors, and
consumers no longer apply• a new “Generation C” of content produsers?
this is produsage
c r e a t i v e n d u s t r i e si
creativeindustries.qut.com
Harnessing the Hive
‒ Implications of produsage:• emergent community structures?• creative potential – grassroots, vernacular creativity?• (e-)democratic potential?• sustainability of voluntary labour?• commercial approaches (JC Herz: ‘harnessing the
hive’) and exploitation (i.e. hijacking the hive)?• intellectual property issues?• trust, authority, responsibility, liability?
c r e a t i v e n d u s t r i e si
creativeindustries.qut.com
Produser Economics
‒ Economic potential:• cheap workforce for commercial producers• but also post-Fordist production/produsage models• possible opposition to traditional business, and
opportunity for new businesses• increasing focus on creativity and innovation in
international business development – e.g. move from ‘made in China’ to ‘created in China’
c r e a t i v e n d u s t r i e si
creativeindustries.qut.com
Intellectual Property
‒ Ambiguous relation of produsage to IP:• innovative use of new IP licences (e.g.
Creative Commons)• complex IP relationships in massively multi-produser
environments (e.g. Wikipedia)• conflicted response from established industries
(“Rip. Mix. Burn.” vs. p2p persecution)• potential stifling of produser innovation by heavy-
handed IP legislation, with potential economic impact – China’s growth helped by lax IP enforcement
c r e a t i v e n d u s t r i e si
creativeindustries.qut.com
Political Implications‒ Towards post-Fordist politics?
• growing effect of produser news on political process ∘ towards more dialogue and deliberation,∘ or more argument and conflict?
• rear-guard battles by governments and news organisations against citizen journalists – but not only in authoritarian regimes
• conflict between alternative and mainstream media coverage (e.g. Howard Dean campaign)
• digital divide opening between traditional audiences and new produser-citizens?
Is it possible to harness produsage to support a move of citizens from being a passive audience for to being active produsers of democracy?