Upload
brit
View
95
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Creating the Master Academic Plan. Academic Affairs Council Members Bemidji State University MnSCU CAO/CSAO Retreat Fall 2013. Pre-Plan: Draft the Process. Organize team to develop a 3 year MAP in 6 months Team retreats - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
A member of the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system, Bemidji State University is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer and educator.
A member of the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system, Bemidji State University is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer and educator.
Creating the Master Academic Plan
Academic Affairs Council Members
Bemidji State University
MnSCU CAO/CSAO Retreat
Fall 2013
Pre-Plan: Draft the Process Organize team to develop a 3 year MAP in 6 months Team retreats
• Create need, purpose, ‘given’ goals/open goal areas, and frameworko Need: Avoid recalibrationo Purpose: Put academics/students at the center of all
university planningo Given goal #1: Financial sustainability o Given goal #2: International competitiveness o Open goal areas
Planning process link:
http://www.bemidjistate.edu/academics/affairs/strategic_planning/
Pre-Plan: Draft the Framework Beliefs
Vision
Mission
Values
Priority areas
Goal areas (=<5) and actions
Program classification categories: grow, sustain, revise/create
Resources for implementation
Appendices
http://www.bemidjistate.edu/academics/affairs/strategic_planning/
Pre-Plan: Draft the Program Indicators Select program indicators for departments to use in reviewing
their programs as they dialogue, categorize programs, and plan
• Worked closely with IR office to develop quantitative and qualitative indicators
• Point system created for each indicator
• Categories created for program recommendations
o Growo Sustaino Create/Revise
Program indicators link: http://www.bemidjistate.edu/academics/affairs/strategic_planning/
Phase I: Introduce the MAP and Process Introduction of MAP and process
• Campus event to present need, purpose and processoNeed: Avoid recalibrationoPurpose: Put academics/students at the center of all
university planningoProcess:
Deans facilitate program reviews and categorization process with chairs/departments
Faculty engage at departmental/college level and at all campus times set aside for planning
All information open and posted on web University open forums scheduled Meetings by college scheduled Bargaining units informed
Phase II: Department Dialogue
Indicators and SWOT• Program rankings from program indicators are shared with all
departments
• All departments participate in a SWOT-Wish conversation and generate a summary
• Departments dialogue, consolidate comments and respond to indicators
• Dean is involved with departments as part of the conversation
Program indicators:
http://www.bemidjistate.edu/academics/affairs/strategic_planning/
Phase III: Department Decision Making
Program Categorization• Department faculty engage in using all data and dialogue summaries
to categorize programs, with justification, as a program to:
o Growo Sustaino Create/Revise
• As a general guide, if a program is below the mid-point on the majority of indicators, the program should be considered for revision with a goal to achieve at least the mid-point on the majority of the indicators. However, there are factors the indicators do not address that may affect the decision to categorize a program, so do not hold hard and fast to where a program is ranked by the ten indicators. Factors not defined by the indicators should be considered at this point in the planning process.
Phase IV: Drafting the MAPDraft the MAP
• Planning group holds a retreat to review all information and to begin drafting master academic plan
• Draft work plan
Critical Plan Elements Throughout Process
• Consensus sought during entire planning process
• All information posted and shared
• Constancy of purpose and feedback
• Draft build upon all feedback/information from meetings/forums/planning sessions and from open call for comment
ResultsLink to plan:
http://www.bemidjistate.edu/academics/affairs/MAP%20Final%20version(1).pdf
Beliefs
Academic BeliefsWe believe that Bemidji State University is
‣ A living/learning environment where student learning is at the heart of everything we say and everything we do.
‣ An institution where learning best occurs when students engage their ‘mind, heart, and hands’ in addressing personal and social concerns relevant to them.
‣ A university where students, staff, faculty and administrators are teachers and everyone is a learner.
‣ An environment where creative and critical thinkers engage in service to advance the ‘common good’.
Therefore, we believe that learning and the needs of students are considered first in all university planning, in all assessment and evaluation activities (including the evaluation of students, faculty, staff, and administration), and in all decisions regarding resource allocation.
Mission Statement
Bemidji State University is an undergraduate institution with specialized and distinct graduate programs where content and delivery is grounded in the principles of social justice and democracy.
Academic Mission
Core Values
• Creative and critical thinking.
• Living democratic principles.
• A collaborative culture that includes all students, staff, faculty and administrators in all aspects of university life.
• Highly interactive, relevant and engaging learning environments.
Academic Core Values
Academic Programming Priorities
• Health and human capacity.
• Personal and social responsibility.
• Learning, knowing, and understanding the role of business related activities.
• Writing/reading/speaking/listening across the university.
• Curricular integration, particularly in liberal education and teacher education.
Academic Programming Priorities
Goal Areas
• Financial sustainability
• Distinctiveness
• Internationally competitive
• Organizational
Goal Areas
Key Definitions
• Common good
• Critical and creative thinking
• Curriculum integration
• Democracy
• Human capacity development
• Social justice
• Responsibility centered budgeting
Definitions
Overall Process
• Comment period by February 1o Bargaining units
o Individual deans’ council members; verbal or email
o Provost blog comments
o Campus forums
o Direct to deans or provost
• Revisions by deans’ council
• Timeline created by deans’ council
• Work plan with assignments created by deans’ council
• Hard copy distribution last February
Phase V: Moving to Final Version
Thank you!
• Enjoy the coming winter in balmy Minnesota