Upload
dakota
View
30
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up. Clay Adams Assistant Dean for New Student Programs Duke University [email protected] Katie Granholm Assistant Director of Orientation and the Transfer Experience University of Minnesota, Twin Cities [email protected] - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
Clay Adams Assistant Dean for New Student ProgramsDuke University [email protected]
Katie Granholm Assistant Director of Orientation and the Transfer ExperienceUniversity of Minnesota, Twin Cities [email protected]
Jessica Hale, Ed.DProfessional Services FacultyWashtenaw Community College [email protected]
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
Mission: The mission of the National Orientation Directors Association is to provide education, leadership and professional development in the fields of college student orientation, transition and retention
Core Values: Community, Diversity, Integrity, Learning, Scholarship, Service.
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
NODA Home OfficeUniversity of Minnesota
1313 Fifth Street SESuite 323A
Minneapolis, MN 55414Toll free: 866-521-NODA or 612-627-0150
612-627-0153 (fax)[email protected]
www.nodaweb.org
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
Learning Outcomes Engage in discussion of the key components of online orientation creation. Interact with orientation professionals who have experience with successful online orientation programs. Create a plan for implementing your own online orientation.
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
Introduction and BackgroundThe goal of orientation is to help students integrate
socially and academically into college environment (Tinto, 1975)
Over the last few decades orientation programs have experienced rapid growth and evolved to meet the changing needs of students (Strumpf, Sharer, & Wawrzynski, 2003)
Online education is growing at a rate that far outpaces face-to-face higher education (Allen & Seaman, 2009)
Online orientations are emerging as an acceptable means to facilitate the transition process
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
Online Orientation : A web-based orientation program that
occurs synchronously or asynchronously
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
Current Online Orientation Practices Online Orientation programs are utilized at all types of
institutions Used for many different student populationsUtilize various platforms
Synchronous Asynchronous
Three Primary Types of Online Orientation Programs (Page, 2009) Pre-Orientation Replacement Hybrid
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
Relevant theories:• Participatory Learning (Shirky, 2008)
• Active Learning (Astin, 1999)
• Web 2.0 (Yuen, 2010)
• Concept of Cognitive Surplus (Shirky, 2010)
Take Home Point:• Learning is an interactive and participatory
process facilitated by media
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
Overview of the Planning Process 1.Set Goals 2.Identify Key Players and Collaborators 3.Evaluate Resources4.Explore the Technology 5.Develop a Process and Timeline 6.Create an Assessment Plan 7.Maintain and Revise
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
Set Goals What is the purpose of your online orientation? What population(s) will the online orientation serve? How will the online orientation relate to existing programs? How will you make your online orientation participatory and interactive? What are your learning outcomes?
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
Goal Setting at Duke Action Item Response
What is the purpose of your online orientation?
• Assist in the overall transition of our students through added, intentionally designed, touch points
What population(s) will the online orientation serve?
• Primary – Undergraduate, traditional, first-year students
• Secondary - International students (undergraduate, graduate and professional)
• Tertiary – Parents, guardians, family members
How will the online orientation relate to existing programs?
• Amplify or enhance the messages currently being shared
• Supplemental
How will you make your online orientation participatory and interactive?
• Q/A• Polls• Documents sharing
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
Set Goals: Learning OutcomesDuke UMN-TC
Overarching Learning Outcomes (Synchronous programs)
Overarching Learning Outcomes (Asynchronous Program)
• Students will learn to proactively participate in their education process (through collaboration with university officials and peers)
•Understand the academic and community expectations of a University of Minnesota student.
Nine Modules – Separate Learning Outcomes for each session
•Become acquainted with the resources available to University of Minnesota students.
Example – Academic Advising Module
•Have a better understanding of the University of Minnesota student experience.
• Understand the First Year academic requirements
•Be prepared to take responsibility while enrolled at the University of Minnesota.
• Develop an overall working knowledge of our online scheduling system
•Feel more prepared to transition into the University.
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
What are your desired learning outcomes?
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
Identify Key Players and CollaborationsWho needs to involved to make an effective online
orientation a reality? Internal
Your office College constituents Departmental partners Web Services/Information Technology
External New students Parents and supporters Sponsors
Other
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
Internal Key Players and Collaborators
Your office • New Student Orientation
College constituents • President• Dean of Support Services and Student
Advocacy• Counselors/Advisors• Students
Departmental partners • Admissions• Enrollment Services• Public Relations and Marketing
Web Services/Information Technology
• Director• Wed Designers• Programmers• Videographers
Key Players and Collaborations at WCC
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
Who might fall into the “other” group of key collaborators?
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
Evaluate ResourcesWhat resources are available?
Immediate vs. long-term Internal vs. external
What is your budget? Start-up costs Maintenance costs
What human resources are needed? Editing, graphic design, web design, programmer, etc.
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
Resources at UMN-TCAction Item Response
What resources are available?
• Transfer student confirmation fee: $80 • No additional funding; Need to work within
existing budget for initial start-up • Long-term: Account for needs in each 3-
year budget cycle • External funding: Instructional Technology
Grant of $10,000
What is your budget? • No additional financial resources • Utilize existing staffing and technology
resources
What human resources are needed?
• Internal: graphic design (limited), orientation professional for content development and editing
• External: WebCT/WebVista central support/troubleshooting, Instructional Technology support, content experts
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
What is your budget for online orientation?
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
Explore the Technology What capabilities do you require based on your
goals? Customization Participation tracking Interactive components like videos, quizzes, etc.
What type of platform will you use? Synchronous vs. Asynchronous
What products/tech support is available through your institution? In-house vs. third party vendor
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
Technology Exploration at WCCAction Item Response
What capabilities do you require based on your goals?
• Customization with Banner• Tracking of participation • Interactive components like videos,
quizzes, etc.
What type of platform will you use?
• Asynchronous
What products/tech support is available through your institution?
• In-house design• In-house server• Web Services/Information Services
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
What type of platform would you like to use?
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
Develop a Process and Timeline How will content be developed and edited?
Content driven by your learning outcomes Individual vs. collective process
Is special expertise needed? Graphic design, web design, database building If so, what does this timeline look like?
When will online orientation be available? Allow time for usability testing, editing, demonstration, etc.
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
Process and Timeline at Duke Action Item Response
How will content be developed and edited?
Content is a shared responsibility in our platform as it combines both the university “expert” and the student participants
Is special expertise needed? Technology – no!Content – yes, and this is why….
When will online orientation be available?
May-August to coincide with action-item due dates
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
Sample TimelineAction Item Timeline
Outline current challenges/opportunities in current work
Working knowledge – tangibly defined in November/December
Define goals and constraints See above
Approach key players Mid-December, February, April & May
Explore technologies Mid-December – Late January (asked for 6 weeks) – followed up in 2
Content development March & April
Training & Pilot May & June
Evaluate & revise July & September
Implement Following summer
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
What is your timeframe from conception to implementation?
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
Create an Assessment PlanWhat determines success?
Accomplishment of learning outcomes, participation rate, etc.
How will success be measured? When will success be measured? What do you need to know?
May be driven by stakeholders/campus constituencies
What methods of evaluation will you use? Online questionnaire, paper form, follow-up survey, focus groups,
usability testing, etc. Does the evaluation method align with desired outcomes?
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
Assessment Plan at WCCAction Item Response
What determines success? • 100% mastery of quizzes• 95% completion rate
How will success be measured?
• Statistics from the online orientation• Clicker results from in-person orientation• Focus groups• Qualitative feedback provided in in-person
orientation
When will success be measured?
• Immediate feedback for each student• Beginning of each in-person orientation• Annual review and update process
What do you need to know? • Success rate• Completion rate• Attempts per question• Percentage correct at beginning of in-person
orientation
What methods of evaluation will you use?
• Multiple choice• True/False• Sequencing• Likert scale • Open-ended evaluation
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
How will you define success?
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
Maintain and Revise• How will content be maintained? o What is involved in this process? o What is the timeline? o Who is responsible?
• How will technology be maintained? o What is the process? o What is the timeline? o Who is responsible?
• How often will major revisions take place?
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
Maintenance and Revision at UMN-TC
Action Item Response
Who will maintain the content? • Each department asked to review content each orientation cycle. Orientation staff member provides guidance, edits and compiles the content.
• Content updates/revisions obtained 3-4 weeks prior to launch
Who will maintain the technology?
• Course management system maintained by Office of Information Technology
• Online orientation course maintained by in-house technology specialist
How often will major revisions take place?
• Plan for major changes and revisions every 2 years
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
What challenges do you foresee in maintaining your online orientation?
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
Tips for SuccessSet clear goalsIdentify key players and collaborators earlyEvaluate resources Explore technological optionsCreate an assessment plan during product
developmentPlan a staged implementationBuild an exaggerated timeline
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
Learning Outcomes RevisitedEngaged in discussion of the key components of online orientation creation. Interacted with orientation professionals who have experience with successful online orientation programs. Created a plan for implementing your own online orientation.
Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up– December 10, 2010
References Allen, I.E., & Seaman, J. (2009). Learning on demand: Online education in the United States, 2009. Needham, MA: Sloan-C. Retrieved from http://www.sloan-c.org/resources/survey04a.asp
Astin, A. W. (1999). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40(5), 518-529.
Page, D. (2009). Online orientation program research summary. Minneapolis, MN: National Orientation Directors Association.
Shirky, C. (2008) . Here comes everybody: The power of organisation without organisations . London: Allen Lane.
Shirky, C. (2010). In Tantor Media. (Ed.), Cognitive surplus [sound recording]. Old Saybrook, Conn. : Tantor Media.
Strumpf, G., Wawrzynski, M., & Sharer, G. (2003). 20 years of trends and issues in orientation programs. In (Eds). Designing successful transitions: A guide for orienting students to college. The Freshman Year Experience Monograph Series. South Carolina University, Columbia. National Resource Center for the Freshman Year Experience. National Orientation Directors Association.
Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125.
Yuen, S.C. (2010). Collective intelligence and e-learning 2.0 : Implications of web-based communities and networking . In Yuen S. C. (Ed.), Hershey, PA : Information Science Reference.