7/28/2019 Create a Country Grading Rubric
1/1
Create a Country Grading RubricStudent Name:
_______________________________________ Points= ___________ / 24
Project Grade: _______%
CATEGORY 4 3 2 1
RequiredElements
Student included more
information/elements than was
required.
Student included all information that
was required.
Student included some information that
was required.
Student did not include a satisfactory
amount of required information.
Role Point-of-view, arguments, andsolutions proposed were
always
consistently in character with the
selected political structure and physical
characteristics of the country. This
student played their part brilliantly!
Point-of-view, arguments, and solutions
proposed were often in character with
the selected political structure and
physical characteristics of the country.
This student played their part
satisfactorily.
Point-of-view, arguments, and solutions
proposed were sometimes in character
with the selected political structure and
physical characteristics of the country.
This student needed to spend a lot more
time developing their character.
Point-of-view, arguments, and solutions
proposed were rarely in character with
the selected political structure physical
characteristics of the country. This
student didnt develop their character to
any believable extent.
Knowledge
Gained
Can insightfully explain all ways in
which their character "saw" things
differently than other characters and
can clearly explain why. Their insight
gained could lead to a future in global
politics!
Can clearly explain several ways in
which their character "saw" things
differently than other characters with a
satisfactory understanding of why. They
gained an appropriate understanding of
global politics.
Can explain minimal ways in which their
character "saw" things differently than
other characters, with a reduced
understandingof why. They have a
minimal grasp of the political objectives
of the assignment.
Cannot explain any way in which their
character "saw" things differently than
other characters and has no conception
of why they should or should not have
different views. The student didnt gain
any new understanding of global politics.
Creativity Clearly exhibited creativity in allaspects of the
assignment, which
highlighted indisputable evidence of a
superior level of engagement in the
task.
Clearly exhibited creativity in some
aspects of the assignment, which
highlighted evidence of a satisfactory
level of engagement in the task.
Exhibited flashes of creativity in a few
aspects of the assignment, which
highlighted evidence of a marginal level
of engagement in the task.
Exhibited little, if any, creativity in any
aspect of the assignment, which indicated
an extremely low level of engagement in
the task.
Student
Responses &
Conclusions
Responses and conclusions were
always superior and reflected unique,
insightful understanding of the project
as a whole.
Responses and conclusions were
satisfactory and reflected adequate and
occasionally indicated an overall
understanding of the project as a whole.
Responses and conclusions were
occasionally satisfactory and left
questions about the level of the
student\'s understanding of the project
as a whole.
Responses and conclusions were
unsatisfactory and reflected no
understanding of the project as a whole.
Discretionary
Points
Classroom Behavior= Outstanding
Assignments= Always on time
Respect for Peers/Teacher= Always
Responsibility= Superior
Participation= Constant / Appropriate
Classroom Behavior= Satisfactory
Assignments= Mostly on time
Respect for Peers/Teacher= Acceptable
Responsibility= Satisfactory
Participation= When Requested
Classroom Behavior= Needs work
Assignments= Rarely on time
Respect for Peers/Teacher= Occasionally
Responsibility= Sporadic
Participation= Hardly Ever
Classroom Behavior= Unsatisfactory
Assignments= Never on time
Respect for Peers/Teacher= Disrespectful
Responsibility= Irresponsible
Participation= Never / Inappropriate
Notes:
