Cranfield Report a.S.a.E. No 2-1971

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/11/2019 Cranfield Report a.S.a.E. No 2-1971

    1/30

    C R A NF IE LD R E P O R T A . S . A . E . N O . 2

    C R A N F I E L D

    I N S T I T U T E O F T E C H N O L O G Y

    P I L O T E X P E R I M E N T A L S T U D Y O F T H E V I B R A T I O N

    C H A R A C T E R I S T I C S O F

    A M A C P H E R S O N S T R U T W H E E L S U S P E N S I O N

    by

    R. M. STAYNER

  • 8/11/2019 Cranfield Report a.S.a.E. No 2-1971

    2/30

    Cranfield Report ASAE No. 2

    April.1971

    CRANFIELD INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

    PILOT EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE VIBRATION

    CHARACTERISTICS OF

    A MACPHERSON STRUT WHEEL SUSPENSION

    - by -

    R.M. Stayner

    S U M M A R Y

    The vibratory force transmissibility of a strut type wheel suspension has

    been investigated in the laboratory. Measurements were made using an electro

    hydraulic vibrator and both swept frequency sinusoidal and broad band random

    excitation. The development of the test rig and the analysis equipment are

    described briefly. The results indicate the importance of non-linearity in

    the response of the suspension system and the need for a more satisfactory

    theoretical analysis.

  • 8/11/2019 Cranfield Report a.S.a.E. No 2-1971

    3/30

    CONTENTS

    INTRODUCTION

    EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS

    Page No.

    1

    1

    General design of the rig

    Modifications

    Sinusoidal analysis equipment

    Swept sinusoidal vibration tests

    Constant frequency test

    Random vibration tests

    1

    1

    2

    2

    3

    3

    CALCULATION OF TRANSMISSIBILITY FUNCTIONS

    Swept sine forcing

    Random forcing

    DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

    Raw data

    Reduced data

    Sing le f requency t e s t

    Relevance of theoretical analysis

    SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE WORK

    General investigation of suspension systems

    Extensions to theory

    Verification of experimental method

    Extensions to experiment

    Equipment improvements

    CONCLUSIONS

    5

    6

    6

    6

    7

    7

    7

    7

    8

    TABLES

    1.

    2.

    3.

    Force transmissibility from swept sine analysis

    Force transmissibility from random analysis

    Resonant frequencies: experimental observations

    compared with theoretical values

    9

    10

    11

    FIGURES

    1.

    2.

    3.

    4.

    5.

    6.

    7.

    8.

    9.

    10.

    Block diagram:swept,sinusoidal vibration.

    Block diagram: random vibration.

    Swept sine vibration response: vector locus

    Swept sine amplitude response.

    Typical repeatability of consecutive sweeps.

    Distortion effects.

    Force in strut, 15-200 Hz., 60 lb. input force,

    Force in tie-rod, lower link, 15-200 Hz., 60 lb. input force.

    Force in strut, 15-200 Hz., 30 lb. input force.

    Force in tie-rod, lower link, 15-200 Hz., 30 lb. input force,

    Force in strut, tie-rod, 2-50 Hz., small displacement.

  • 8/11/2019 Cranfield Report a.S.a.E. No 2-1971

    4/30

    Forceinstrut, tie-rod,4-50Hz ., larger displacement.

    Constant frequency responsetovariationsinforcing amplitude.

    Strut force, displacement.

    Tie-rod force, lower link force.

    Responsetorandom forcing,

    Displacement p.s.d.,0-25Hz ., larger displacement.

    Strut force, input force,0-25H z. , larger displacement.

    Tie-rod force, lower link force,

    0-25

    Hz. , larger displacement.

    All forcesanddisplacement p.s.d.0-25Hz, , smaller displacement,

    Tie-rod force, input force p,s.d.,0-200 Hz,

    Strut force p.s.d.,0-200 Hz.

    Force transmissibility functions.

    Sinusoidal forcing, 15-200 Hz.,60 lb.input force.

    Sinusoidal forcing, 15-200 Hz.,

    30 lb.

    input force.

    Sinusoidal forcing,

    2-50

    Hz., small displacement.

    Sinusoidal forcing,4-50Hz ., large displacement,

    Random forcing0-25Hz., (large displacement).

    Random forcing0-25Hz ., (small displacement)

    Random forcing0-200Hz ., strutand tie rodforce only.

    Strut forcefor alltypesofinput.

    Tierodforcefor alltypesofinput.

    Lower link forcefor alltypesofinput.

    Force transducer calibrations.

  • 8/11/2019 Cranfield Report a.S.a.E. No 2-1971

    5/30

    - 1 -

    The vibratory forces transmitted through an automobile suspension system

    may be studied in the laboratory and related to theoretical analysis of the

    system. The work reported here concerns the development of experimental

    techniques useful in such a laboratory study.

    Measurements were made on a test rig in which an electro-hydraulic

    vibrator was used to excite a single suspension system in isolation. This rig

    was built to validate the theoretical analysis of a student thesis project,

    but has not yet been operated successfully. A brief series of experiments

    was carried out in which forces transmitted through the suspension system were

    analysed, by several techniques, at frequencies in the range 0-200HZ. Two

    types of excitation were used; swept sinusoidal and broad band random. For

    the former, equipment was available to plot the complete vector locus of the

    relationship between two variables, or to track and plot the fundamental

    amplitude of a distorted signal. For the randomly excited vibrations, analysis

    was restricted to power spectral density functions of single variables.

    The details of the experimental techniques, discussed in the next section,

    are included as an aid to future, more complete studies using the same or

    similar equipment. This leads to the procedures for obtaining transmissibility

    functions from the raw data, as required for evaluation of both the suspension

    system and the experimental methods. The results are then discussed with

    reference to the existing theoretical analysis of the suspension system, and

    finally some suggestions are made concerning possible continuation of

    experimental and analytical work on this topic. Continuation of such work is

    encouraged by indications of variation in the system characteristics observed

    during this preliminary investigation. Further experiment is also required

    to resolve a certain lack of correlation between results of random and swept

    sinusoidal vibration tests.

    EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS

    General Design of the Rig.

    The general design of the rig is fully described in the relevant A.S.A.E.

    thesis.*

    A stiff frame supports the suspension unit, as on the car, by the top

    of the MacPherson strut, the inner pivot of the transverse lower link and the

    stabilizer bar. Also attached to the frame and connected to the wheel spindle

    is the ram of the electro-hydraulic vibrator. Force transducers are inter

    posed between the hydraulic ram and the wheel spindle and between the frame

    and suspension system at each attachment point. A displacement transducer

    is fitted between the frame and the wheel spindle.

    Provision is made for forcing the wheel spindle in each of three directions,

    effectively vertically, longitudinally, and laterally, relative to the orient

    ation of the suspension as part of the car. Only the first position was used

    for the tests described.

    Modifications

    Modifications made since the rig was originally completed concern the

    control and measurement functions. A two channel carrier-amplifier system

    was constructed for the input force transducer and for the displacement trans

    ducer.

    The latter had been replaced by one of the inductive type as the

    W.J. Foulkes

    (1966).

  • 8/11/2019 Cranfield Report a.S.a.E. No 2-1971

    6/30

  • 8/11/2019 Cranfield Report a.S.a.E. No 2-1971

    7/30

    - 3 -

    However a source of error was introduced in that the amplitude response of the

    tracking filter varies with frequency. This did not affect the vector plotting

    function as the output was used to provide phase information only, but for

    tracking filter operation it presents a considerable limitation.

    Repeatability of measured frequency functions was better for pairs of runs

    with the same direction of frequency sweep (fig. 4) than for pairs of runs with

    opposite directions of frequency sweep. This suggested a system response for

    decreasing frequency sweeps which differs from that for increasing frequency

    sweeps. To avoid investigation of this phenomenon at this stage, tests were

    restricted to increasing frequency only. The output of each force transducer,

    total and fundamental component, was plotted for each of two input force levels,

    nominally 60 lb. r.m.s. and 30 lb, r.m.s. (figs. 6 - 9 ) .

    To extend the frequency range below 15 HZ , distortion information was

    neglected and only total r.m.s. outputs of the transducers were recorded. This

    allowed frequencies as low as 2 HZ to be investigated, and the input force level

    to be plotted concurrently with each output using the second pen of the X-Y

    plotter. The lower level of input force, 30 lb. r.m.s. was used, but only two

    of the outputs were obtained, since the system response changed radically during

    this series ofruns. The change, which occurred suddenly, is attributed to a

    reduction of coulomb friction with increase of working temperature, since

    displacement amplitude increased markedly. Fig. 10 shows the responses at the

    start of the test, while fig. 11 shows the later responses.

    Constant Frequency Test

    A constant frequency test was therefore carried out to investigate the effect

    of varying the amplitude of the input force. A frequency of 6.5 HZ was chosen

    as at this frequency considerable force change had been observed (fig. 12 and

    fig.

    13). The displacement demand signal was gradually increased from zero, with

    the force feedback amplitude control removed. It is to be noted that the chosen

    force level for the previous tests, viz. 30 lb., was the maximum for system

    operation under friction lock conditions at this frequency.

    Random Vibration Tests

    Random vibration tests were carried out with demanded displacements of band-

    limited white noise. Two ranges were chosen to suit the analysis equipment.

    viz.0 - 25 HZ and 0 - 200 HZ. The input frequency content was controlled by

    properties of the vibrator/suspension system and no attempt was made to obtain

    white noise characteristics for either the input force or the displacement

    (fig. 2) . An extended series of tests was not planned and so the most readily

    obtainable random excitation was used. All transducer outputs were recorded for

    The tracking filter is made up of a set of modular equipment. The performance

    was reported to the manufacturer who conducted supervised tests of each component

    module. These were all within the quoted specifications. Similar checks were

    observed on other modules which, when combined in the tracking filter configuration

    had a far better frequency response. No cause could be found for the poor

    performance of the A.S.A.E. system, but it is suggested that it be returned to the

    manufacturer for a more extended test so that it can be brought up to specification.

  • 8/11/2019 Cranfield Report a.S.a.E. No 2-1971

    8/30

    -

    4 -

    power spectral analysis,andtheir r.m.s, levels for allfrequencies above

    2

    HZ)

    measured with

    a

    valve voltmeter.

    For

    the

    lower frequency analysis,

    0 - 25 HZ

    (Figs. 14-17) displacement

    and

    all

    four force signals were recorded

    at

    each

    of two

    levels

    of thedis

    placement signal. These were obtained

    for the

    same r.m.s. input force

    by

    approaching this force from firstahigherandthenalower value. Inthisway

    it

    was

    hoped that

    the

    results could

    be

    related

    to

    those obtained with sinusoidal

    excitation when

    two

    types

    of

    response were observed

    for the

    same input.

    The broader band analysiswas retrictedtoinputand twooutput forces

    (figs.18 and 19)

    only,

    by a

    shortage

    of

    analyser tape loops

    and

    experimental

    time.

    CALCULATION

    OF

    TRANSMISSIBILITY FUNCTIONS

    The transmissibility functions were calculated

    for

    each type

    of

    excitation

    so that

    the

    random

    and

    swept sine vibration results could

    be

    compared.

    Comparison

    of the

    system response

    to

    different levels

    of the

    same type

    of

    forcing

    is also simplified.

    Swept sine forcing

    Fortheresultsof thesinusoidal forcing tests,thetransmissibility ratios

    of each output force

    to the

    input force,

    as

    functions

    of

    frequency, (figs.

    20 - 23)

    were obtained

    as

    follows:

    At each frequencytheamplitudes were read fromtheplotted results. Using

    calibrations

    of the

    transducers,

    e.g. in

    Ibf./volt

    fig. 30, and of the

    analyser

    plotted output,

    in

    volts/cm.,

    the

    measured amplitudes were converted

    to Ibf.

    Ratios

    of two

    force levels thus obtained could

    be

    plotted directly

    as

    trans

    missibility functions. Where suitable, frequency intervals were restricted

    to

    those marked duringtheexperiment,but forrapidly changing functionsit wasoften

    necessary

    to

    interpolate frequency values, with some lack

    of

    accuracy.

    All values were measured from total signal level curves, corrected where

    distortion

    was

    observed.

    A

    linear amplitude response

    was

    assumed

    for the

    analyser,for thecalculations,but infacttheresponseof thesystemwassome

    what non-linear

    and

    results

    for

    values outside

    the

    range

    0.025 - 0.075

    volts

    are

    not accurate. Table

    1

    shows

    a

    specimen calculation

    for

    sinusoidally obtained

    transmissibility functions.

    Random Forcing

    Calculation

    of

    transmissibility functions from

    the

    results

    of the

    random

    forcing tests

    are

    complicated

    by the

    presentation

    of the

    results

    as

    power spectral

    density functions,

    i.e., as

    plots

    of

    mean squared amplitude density.

    In

    addition

    the variance inherent

    in the

    results must

    not be

    confused with minor system

    resonance effects. Procedure

    was as

    follows:

    The area under each p.s.d. curve

    was

    measured,

    and

    that amount

    for the

    area

    above

    2 HZ was

    used

    to

    calibrate

    the

    power density scale.

    The

    area represents

    the mean square signal level,

    and the

    root mean square level

    was

    known from

    the

    voltmeter reading taken during

    the

    test.

    The

    resulting values

    of for

    example

    lb2/HZ/cm. were notedforeach variable. Amplitude values were measured from

    the p.s.d. curves

    as cm. and

    ratios calculated

    for

    each frequency

    and

    pair

    of

    curves

    in

    these units. Square roots then taken yielded transmissibility functions

  • 8/11/2019 Cranfield Report a.S.a.E. No 2-1971

    9/30

  • 8/11/2019 Cranfield Report a.S.a.E. No 2-1971

    10/30

    - 6 -

    vibrator/suspension system to a demanded white noise displacement control.

    The actual displacement cannot be maintained at frequencies above a few HZ ,

    while the input force at low frequencies is very low if large displacements are

    not allowed. Tie rod and lower link forces are maintained even at low

    frequencies and vary little in frequency content with amplitude of forcing.

    Strut force increases at low frequencies as displacement level is increased, but

    not at frequencies above 10 HZ, although displacement frequency spectra have

    similar forms for the two cases.

    Reduced Data

    The reduction of the raw data to obtain transmissibility functions introduced

    little change in the interpretation of the results of the swept sine tests.

    Agreement between transmissibility function amplitudes from both sets of results

    was good for the tie rod force, but only fair for the low frequency test and so

    no comparison can be made. It may be worth noting that the tie rod force

    appeared least effected by amplitude variation in all the available raw data.

    Reduction of the results of the random vibration tests yielded transmiss

    ibility functions which, except for the tie rod, differed considerably from those

    obtained in sinusoidal vibration (figs. 27 to

    29).

    Where comparisons are

    available, the form of the transmissibility functions is similar, with main

    resonances apparent from the strut force at 20 HZ, and from the tie rod at 25 and

    60 HZ, but the vibrator/system response was limited to frequencies below 130 HZ.

    The lower frequency random test was less informative. Differences in the forces

    appear related to differences in the displacement transfer function, but not to

    the results of the sinusoidal tests.

    Single Frequency Test.

    The results of the test carried out at a single frequency with gradually

    increasing amplitude (figs. 12 and 13) bear out the previous observation that two

    types of response are possible for one amplitude of input force. In this case

    the low frequency swept sine test had been carried out with the input controlled

    to be 30 Ibf., which value corresponds to the limit of one type of motion at 6.5

    HZ. The sudden increase in displacement amplitude was accompanied by a decrease

    in all the force amplitudes, but it is to be noted that the force transmissibility

    ratios did not all decrease. The force transmitted through the tie rod increased

    considerably.

    Relevance of Theoretical Analysis

    The relevance of the earlier theoretical analysis of the suspension system

    must be questioned in the light of the comparison afforded by table 3, In this

    table the predicted resonant frequencies for a simplified model of the suspension

    system may be compared with maxima of the force transmissibility functions.

    Particularly notable is the lack of predicted resonant conditions between 90 and

    200 HZ, when in fact, in addition to those resonances shown, there were several

    which did not result in high force transmissibilities but were observed to produce

    considerable displacements. The primary standing wave frequency in the main spring

    was observed at the calculated frequency, but produced increased force transmiss

    ibilities only through the lower link and through the strut in the high friction

    state.

  • 8/11/2019 Cranfield Report a.S.a.E. No 2-1971

    11/30

    - 7 -

    SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE WORK

    General Investigation of Suspension Systems

    The investigation of suspension systems as vibration isolators should be a

    feasible experimental task. It should serve as an aid in verifying or modifying

    analytical models for an integrated vehicle analysis, and also as a design tool

    for the study of components and of temperature and ageing effects. Information

    could also be provided of dynamic loading applied to the vehicle structure, i.e.

    verification of force analysis procedures. The methods are available for such

    work, but further development is still required, as indicated in the following

    paragraphs.

    Extensions to Theory

    The theoretical analysis for the particular suspension used requires

    considerable extension to be of any practical value, A more complete model is

    required for prediction of many of the frequency effects observed. It should

    at least be three dimensional. Further degrees of freedom could be included after

    experimental study of individual resonances. Such a study requires the theory

    to yield modes of vibration for each resonance, and measurements to be made of

    displacements or accelerations of several co-ordinates. To be relevant to the

    measurements made and the results sought, the model equations of motion should be

    solved for transfer functions or frequency response functions relating forces at

    fixtures to force input to the hub. This force input to the hub, which should be

    a random function in order to produce realistic operating conditions, must be

    related to observed suspension inputs which may be available only in the form of

    displacement or acceleration values.

    Verification of Experimental Method

    Further verification of the experimental method is required before any

    weight can be given to the disparity between certain swept sine and random

    vibration results. These preliminary tests must be repeated, with a careful

    check on transducer calibrations and amplifier settings. What little insight

    that has been gained into the response of the system should be used to ensure

    that results are obtained from all transducers for each type of forcing. It

    would be particularly valuable to include the displacement in the swept sine

    test as a record of the system operating conditions. Random analysis should

    be carried out with longer sample recordings.

    Extensions to the Experiment

    Extensions to the experiment can be suggested in many

    ways.

    Forcing has

    so far been limited to one axis only, but the rig was designed for forces to be

    applied to the wheel spindle from any of three mutually perpendicular directions.

    In the first instance, each axis of forcing could be used, with a range of

    pre

    loads on the main suspension spring. It would also be possible to force the

    system on two axes simultaneously to study the effect of coulomb friction in

    the strut on transmission of horizontal forces. Random forcing with amplitude

    and frequency parameters similar to road conditions may be obtained using the

    equaliser filter set for low frequency shaping. Effect of statistical parameters

    of the forcing on system response could be studied and related to swept sinusoidal

    responses.

    There is much basic information which could be gained from a series

    of constant frequency tests, in each of which the variation of system response

    with amplitude may be measured.

  • 8/11/2019 Cranfield Report a.S.a.E. No 2-1971

    12/30

    - 8 -

    Equipment Improvements

    Improvements can be made in the laboratory equipment to reduce approximations

    involved in some of the measurements and to reduce the labour of data reduction.

    The swept sine tests would benefit from incorporation of a dependable

    frequency discriminator. A suitable module is available to fit into the

    frequency response analyser. The analyser would be far more valuable if the

    complete tracking filter arrangement could be brought up to the maker s claimed

    performance. This is quite feasible for the frequency response, and surely the

    non-linearity of the output amplitude response could be reduced. Random testing

    would be facilitated if equalisation filters covering the range 25 - 200 HZ were

    added.

    Data reduction should be carried out on the digital computer. For swept

    sine tests the higih speed data logger could be used to digitise the frequency

    response curves instead of recording them on the X-Y plotter. A high speed

    analogue-to-digital converter is available which was bought with random signal

    analysis in mind. This could be used, either on-line or from magetic tape

    recordings of the experiments, to enable the digital computer to be used for cross-

    spectral analysis, a function which the existing analogue equipment cannot perform.

    A suitable programme ought to be available for such analysis in the computer

    library of programmes.

    CONCLUSIONS

    In conclusion, it is not claimed that the experimental results presented

    here are themselves reliable descriptions of the performance of the MacPherson

    strut suspension system. Rather it is hoped that as the results of only four

    days laboratory measurements they are indicative of the state of development

    of the equipment and experimental techniques. Variations were observed in the

    response of the suspension system. Since these were such as the equipment was

    intended to measure, it is suggested that the work could be continued to some

    purpose,

  • 8/11/2019 Cranfield Report a.S.a.E. No 2-1971

    13/30

    - 9 -

    TABLE 1

    Force Transmissibility from Swept Sine Analysis

    Assumed sensitivity of analyser graphical output: 1 cm.reps.0.005volts

    Transducer calibrations: Input force, f, 1250 Ibf./volt.

    Strut force, s, 1545 Ibf./volt

    Results, 4 - 5 0 HZ , large displacement amplitude:

    Frequency

    HZ

    4

    6

    7

    10

    14

    17

    20

    25

    30

    40

    47

    50

    Input

    cm.

    6.1

    5.8

    4.2

    4.3

    4.5

    4.4

    4.5

    5.1

    4.8

    4.5

    4.6

    4.5

    force,

    f

    Ibf.

    38.1

    36.2

    26.3

    26.9

    28.1

    27.5

    28,1

    31.9

    30.0

    28.1

    28.75

    28.1

    Strut force, s

    cm. Ibf.

    11.4

    6.4

    3.5

    3.0

    3.0

    4.5

    11.2

    13.2

    11.1

    6.1

    2.5

    3.4

    88.0

    49.5

    27.0

    23.2

    23.2

    34.8

    86.5

    102.0

    85.8

    47.1

    19.3

    26.3

    Transmissibility

    Ratio s/f

    2.31

    1,37

    1.03

    0.86

    0.83

    1.26

    3,08

    3.20

    2.86

    1.68

    0.67

    0.94

  • 8/11/2019 Cranfield Report a.S.a.E. No 2-1971

    14/30

    - 10 -

    TABLE 2

    Force Transmissibility from Random Analysis

    Specimen calculation: Strut force, 0-25 HZ, small displacement case.

    Spectral density calibrations:

    Input force, F, measured0.030volts r.m.s., calibration

    1250 Ibf/volt, thus 37.5 Ibf. r.m.s.

    2

    Area under p.s.d. curve, 5.6 cm

    2 2 2

    so 1 cm equivalent to (37.5) /5.6 mean squared Ibf.(lb )

    Frequencyaxis:1 cm, represents 2,5 HZ,

    (37 5i 2

    therefore, on power density

    axis,

    1 cm. represents ^ /- c lb /HZ

    * * ^

    6xz.

    whence the factor F 100 lb.

    /WLlcm.

    and F - 10 r.m.s.lb./HZ/cm.

    S i m i l a r l y f o r t h e s t r u t f o r c e

    e} = 0.666 Ib^/HZ/cm.

    and s = 0 .8 1 6 Ib ./HZ/cm.

    For calculat

    Frequency

    HZ

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    18

    20

    22

    ion in the table,

    Power Densities

    Input

    force

    0.22

    0.22

    0.30

    0.31

    0.35

    0.42

    0.52

    0.45

    1.15

    1.20

    1.61

    the factor -

    0.0816

    r

    (cm.)

    Strut

    force

    2.5

    2.9

    3.75

    3.75

    5.2

    4.3

    5.0

    3.0

    6.3

    6.2

    6.2

    Ratio

    H2

    11.4

    13.2

    12.5

    12.1

    14.9

    10.2

    9.6

    6.67

    5.5

    5.2

    3.85

    H

    3.38

    3.63

    3.54

    3.48

    3.86

    3.19

    3.10

    2.58

    2.34

    2.28

    1.96

    Transmissibility

    0.28

    0.30

    0.29

    0.28

    0.32

    0.26

    0.25

    0.21

    0.19

    0.19

    0.16

  • 8/11/2019 Cranfield Report a.S.a.E. No 2-1971

    15/30

    - 11 -

    TABLE 3

    Resonant Frequencies; experimental observations compared with theoretical values

    Experimental Observations

    Frequency,

    HZ

    5

    15-30

    20-25

    25

    30-35

    45

    45

    80-120

    120

    180

    Transducer

    Strut

    Strut

    Transverse

    Link

    Tie rod

    Strut

    Transverse

    Link

    Tie Rod

    Various

    Tie rod

    All

    Conditions

    Sweep Range

    HZ

    0-25

    15-200

    15-200

    0-25,

    15-200

    15-200

    15-200

    0-25,

    15-200

    15-200

    15-200

    15-200

    Displacement

    large

    small

    small

    any

    large

    large

    any

    various

    any

    any

    Predicted

    Frequency

    HZ

    3 - 4

    21.5

    34-83

    46.5

    49

    316

    Frequencies

    Conditions

    no friction

    friction

    locked

    damper unlocked,

    varies with

    damping.

    spring surge

    any condition

    any condition

  • 8/11/2019 Cranfield Report a.S.a.E. No 2-1971

    16/30

    ^''( l/'.'

    DISPLACEMENT

    TRANSDUCER

    //yy//

    VOLTAGE

    PROP.

    FREQUENCY

    nn

    X - Y

    PLOTTER

    TRACKING

    FILTER

    n

    COMPONENT

    RESOLVER

    JUNCTION

    BLOCK

    2-BEAM

    C.R.O.

    - I

    CARRIER

    AMPLIFIERS

    m

    VALVE

    XTMETER

    RG. I . BLOCK D IAGRAM: APPARATUS FOR SWEPT SINUSOIDAL VIBRATION.

    RANDOM

    SIGNAL

    GENERATOR

    // /^ ^ / y ^j y /

    LOAD

    CELL

    2

    CHANNEL

    CARRIER

    SYSTEM

    - ^

    //??/

    DISPLACEMENT

    TRANSDUCER

    UlU

    JUNCTION

    BLOCK

    CARRIER

    AMPLIFIERS

    X - Y

    PLOTTER

    NO RATOM ISAC

    STATISTICAL ANALYSER

    B

    VALVE

    VOLTMETER

    FIG.2. BLOCK DIAGRAM ; APPARATUS FOR RANDOM VIBRATION.

  • 8/11/2019 Cranfield Report a.S.a.E. No 2-1971

    17/30

    O O I

    FIG.

    3. VECTOR LOCUS PLOT STRUT FORCE I5 -200 Hz

    RELATIVE TO CONSTANT INPUT FORCE.

    20

    so K30 20 0

    FREQUENCY

    Hj

    FIG.4.

    REPEATABILITY OF AMPLITUDE RESPONSE TO SWEPT SINE FORCING

    15-200H2. ( S T R U T FORCE)

  • 8/11/2019 Cranfield Report a.S.a.E. No 2-1971

    18/30

    - 0 7 $

    TOTAL SIGNAL

    FUNDAMENTAL COMPONENT

    I

    .-

    ao o Hz

    F1G.S. DISTORTION : FUNDAMENTAL AND TOTAL COMPONENTS OF TRANSDUCER

    OUTPUT

    ( I N P U T F O R C E ) ( N O T E - F R E Q U E N C Y

    RESPONSE OF TRACKING FILTER)

    ' 0 2 5

    INPUT FOBCE N OMINAL 60 LB R.M.S.

    STRUT FORCE

    FIG.

    FREQUENCY H j

    6. FREQUENCY RESPONSE^ SWEPT SINE FORCING, I5- 200 Hj . 60LB R.M.S. INPUT

  • 8/11/2019 Cranfield Report a.S.a.E. No 2-1971

    19/30

    ^

    0 7 5

    i/i -OS

    2

    TTt ROD FORCE

    UOWER LINK FORCE

    SO

    FREQUENCY Hj

    FIG.7. FREQUENCY RESPONSE, SWEPT SINE INPUT F0 RC E7 60L B R.M.S. I S - 2 0 0 H j

    075 ..

    ui 'OS

    2

    of

    J

    r^x

    INPUT FREQUENCY

    ( N O M .

    3 0 L B

    R.MtS)

    STRUT FORCE

    ^ \

    > I ^ -

    5 0

    FREQUENCY Hj

    FIG.

    8. FREQUENCY RESPONSE. SWEPT SINE INPUT FORCE 3 0 LB RM.S. I 5 - 2 0 0 H ^.

  • 8/11/2019 Cranfield Report a.S.a.E. No 2-1971

    20/30

  • 8/11/2019 Cranfield Report a.S.a.E. No 2-1971

    21/30

    VOLTS R.M.S.

    O

    s i

    >

    3)

    O

    m

    &

    -

    ^

    *

    7 - - -

    ^ i ^ ^

    / r

    i

    s

    \

    /-' s,

    s

    .^

    (

    . ^ ^

    i