18
Cranberry Station Phosphorus in Cranberry Nutrient Management Carolyn DeMoranville UMass Cranberry Station

Cranberry Station Phosphorus in Cranberry Nutrient Management Carolyn DeMoranville UMass Cranberry Station

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Cranberry Station

Phosphorus in Cranberry Nutrient Management

Carolyn DeMoranvilleUMass Cranberry Station

2Cranberry Station

Why is this important?

3Cranberry Station

What have we done?

• Plot scale work to define P requirement– >0 but <22 kg

• Field-scale: Enlist growers to reduce well below 22 kg/ha (‘not to exceed’ level)

• Collect data from their farms – Crop yield– Tissue P– Water quality

• Use these data to make the case for others to adopt reduced P

4Cranberry Station

Results of surveys conducted in January 2008 (2007 season); January 2009 (2008 season); March 2010 (2009 season).

seasonManagement choice 2007 2008 2009

N:P P>N 36% 15%

N:P P no more than N 34% 61%

Plan to reduce P use next season 36%

Reduced P use 51% 65%

5Cranberry Station

Grower P reduction sites study

P rate in kg/ha

Site #P applied

2008P applied

2009P applied

2010P applied

2011 P applied

2012

1 6.6 8.4 10.0 12.3 10.9

2 8.5 9.9 8.2 11.2 8.2

3 8.2 0.7 0.9 0.8 7.5

4 8.7 4.1 10.2 4.9 6.8

5 -- 8.6 5.6 8.3 16.0

6 14.1 8.5 8.4

6Cranberry Station

Through 2012 season

7Cranberry Station

Data from 2005-2011

8Cranberry Station

Standard range = 0.1 – 0.2%

  

  Tissue P % dry weight  

SiteAvg.

kg/ha P 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

1 8.3 0.13   0.12 0.13 0.10

2 8.8 0.16   0.09 0.16 0.13

3 2.7 0.13 0.15 0.11 0.15 0.11

4 7.0 0.15 0.16 0.13 0.16 0.12

5 7.5   0.14 0.11 0.12 0.13

6 10.3   0.14   0.12  

9Cranberry Station

Comparison of TP in floodreleases

Years of P reductionSite 2009 2010 2011

1 7 8 92 5 6 73 2 3 44 2 3 45 1 2 36 3 4 5

10Cranberry Station

Harvest flood P concentrations

11Cranberry Station

Winter flood P concentrations

Note: scale is 10x less than for harvest flood

12Cranberry Station

Harvest flood

1 acre-foot = 1233 m31 lb = 0.45 kg

13Cranberry Station

Change (kg/ha released)

Harvest Winter

Year 1 2.92 1.77

Year 7 0.48 ---

Year 8 0.68 0.20

Year 9 0.51 0.19

Applied P

Pre-2003 = 22 kg/ha

Avg. starting 2003 = 11 kg/ha

Site 1

14Cranberry Station

Potential impact

Site 1 Bog is ~25 ha In 2003, the 2 floods (winter/harvest) contained

117 kg P 8 years later, the floods contained 17 kg P 85% reduction

15Cranberry Station

Next steps

Continue and expand monitoring study, recruit growers to use 5 kg/ha P

Large grant to begin to install and evaluate methods to remove or minimize P from discharge water – filters, other BMPs

16Cranberry Station

Questions?

Cranberry Bog Total Phosphorus

CES/SMASTField Expt.

TP Fertilization

(kg/ha/yr)

TPincoming (kg/ha/yr)

TP leaving (kg/ha/yr)

TP export

(net)(kg/ha/yr)

Bog ID Mean 2003-04

EH 11.2 0.3 4.5 4.2

PV 22.2 1.8 8.5 6.8

BEN 18.8 1.2 3.9 2.7

WS 19.6 0.2 5.5 5.3

M-K 23.1 2.0 3.2 1.2

ASH 39.3 1.8 3.4 1.7

Mean 22.4 1.22 4.83 3.65

A Flow-through Bog was found to have a higher A Flow-through Bog was found to have a higher annual TP loss of 9.9 kg/ha/yr (Howes & Teal annual TP loss of 9.9 kg/ha/yr (Howes & Teal 1995)1995)

18Cranberry Station

Yield (Mg/ha) comparison of 4 or 6 years prior to that in 2008-2011

SiteP 2008-2011

(kg/ha/yr)4 years prior

yield6 years

prior yield2008-2011

average

1 8.3* 17.1 23.9

2 8.8* 17.4 25.8

3 2.7 12.9 14.4

4 7.0 19.9 23.4

6 7.5** ? 22.3**

7 10.3* 17.4 18.0*

**2009-2011*2008-2010