18
Humanitarian System 1

Cracks in the machine: is the humanitarian system fit for purpose? (Peter Walker, Tufts)

  • Upload
    alnap

  • View
    243

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Cracks in the machine: is the humanitarian system fit for purpose? (Peter Walker, Tufts)

1

Humanitarian System

Page 2: Cracks in the machine: is the humanitarian system fit for purpose? (Peter Walker, Tufts)

2

Six deadly glitches in the system

1. Starting models2. Does evidence matter3. Compliance4. State avoiding5. Emergency6. Market seduction

Page 3: Cracks in the machine: is the humanitarian system fit for purpose? (Peter Walker, Tufts)

3

1: Poor starting models

Darfur is Islamic Arab raiders V Non Islamic Settled villagersAfghanistan is post Taliban non-conflict

Page 4: Cracks in the machine: is the humanitarian system fit for purpose? (Peter Walker, Tufts)

4

2: Does evidence matter?

Data

Analysis

Response

Impartiality

“Without data and analysis there is no impartiality”

Page 5: Cracks in the machine: is the humanitarian system fit for purpose? (Peter Walker, Tufts)

Evidence

Evidence Driven

Proven model

Fit to Context

FeedbackMonitoring

Page 6: Cracks in the machine: is the humanitarian system fit for purpose? (Peter Walker, Tufts)

6

Sex and Age1. Collecting & using data is good! But ….2. Virtually no collection in Phase I & II 3. Education & Shelter do better4. When collected , little used5. Where used, demonstrable difference

Page 7: Cracks in the machine: is the humanitarian system fit for purpose? (Peter Walker, Tufts)

7

Why?

• Evidence doesn’t matter• Donors and cluster

leaders not interested• Don’t believe it is

possible • Collecting evidence

makes us accountable

Page 8: Cracks in the machine: is the humanitarian system fit for purpose? (Peter Walker, Tufts)

8

Does Needs Assessment matter?

Disaster Programming

Needs Assessment

Political calculus

Cash flow needs

We have always done it this way

Page 9: Cracks in the machine: is the humanitarian system fit for purpose? (Peter Walker, Tufts)

9

What you Measure is What you Get

Input

Process

Output

Outcom

e

Impact

Page 10: Cracks in the machine: is the humanitarian system fit for purpose? (Peter Walker, Tufts)

10

Why don’t you collect?

• “We report against deliverables. Our HQ and donors only want to hear success.”

• “Donors and cluster leaders are not interested”

• “Collecting evidence makes us accountable and open to risk.”

Page 11: Cracks in the machine: is the humanitarian system fit for purpose? (Peter Walker, Tufts)

3: Quality & Compliance

• Standards & Systems • Flexibility, Context

Page 12: Cracks in the machine: is the humanitarian system fit for purpose? (Peter Walker, Tufts)

12

Counter-Bureaucracy

Risk & Quality

Compliance

“The demands of [compliance] are now so intrusive that they have distorted, misdirected, and disfigured USAID‘s development practice to such a degree that it is compromising U.S. national security objectives and challenging established principles of good development practice.”

Page 13: Cracks in the machine: is the humanitarian system fit for purpose? (Peter Walker, Tufts)

13

ReliefDev’

4:Not all states are bad

Host State Avoiding

Host State Enhancing

Page 14: Cracks in the machine: is the humanitarian system fit for purpose? (Peter Walker, Tufts)

14

Managing risk and response is normal

• National Disaster Response Law

• New partnerships• Citizen expectations• Quality assurance

expectations

Page 15: Cracks in the machine: is the humanitarian system fit for purpose? (Peter Walker, Tufts)

15

5: Emergency?

70%

20%

10%

Column1

>8 years4-8 years<4 years

Source: Development Initiatives 2011

Page 16: Cracks in the machine: is the humanitarian system fit for purpose? (Peter Walker, Tufts)

16

Chronic crisis 1990, 2010

Sudan Ethiopia Somalia Angola Mozambique

Page 17: Cracks in the machine: is the humanitarian system fit for purpose? (Peter Walker, Tufts)

17

6 Show me the money

• Gov Pakistan. 1.5 million people via Visa

• Horn of Africa 600,000 via cash through Hawala

Page 18: Cracks in the machine: is the humanitarian system fit for purpose? (Peter Walker, Tufts)

Interventionist

Anecdote

18

Abnormal

Risk transfer

Evidence

Normal

PowerfulAgile