32
Carolina Rossini Director for International Intellectual Property [email protected] AN INTEROPERABILITY PRINCIPLE FOR KNOWLEDGE CREATION AND GOVERNANCE: THE ROLE OF EMERGING INSTITUTIONS

Cr knol gov4gc

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Cr knol gov4gc

Carolina Rossini

Director for International Intellectual Property

[email protected]

AN INTEROPERABILITY PRINCIPLE FOR KNOWLEDGE CREATION AND GOVERNANCE: THE ROLE OF

EMERGING INSTITUTIONS

Page 2: Cr knol gov4gc
Page 3: Cr knol gov4gc

• “‘Knowledge Governance’ brings together fresh theoretical insights and new empirical evidence on an important challenge: how to design public policies and institutions to promote knowledge creation and diffusion to promote economic development. This collection of essays will be an important source of ideas for researchers and policymakers alike.” —Bhaven N. Sampat, Columbia University

Page 4: Cr knol gov4gc

Chapter 8 of “Knowledge Governance: Reasserting the Public Interest

By Wilbanks and Rossini

•This study examines the relationships among funders, research institutions, and the “units” of knowledge creation and local knowledge governance, which are hosted inside research institutions. Our goal is to uncover the knowledge spaces where commons- based approaches, peer production and modes of network-mediated innovation have – and have not – emerged and to examine the conditions under which these approaches either flourish or are discouraged. Our rationale is that the emergence of novel, democratized and distributed knowledge governance represent a meaningful complement to more traditional systems, with the potential to create new public knowledge goods accessible to a global civil society and spur innovation in previously unforeseen ways.

“Knowledge Governance: Reasserting the Public Interest,” edited by Leonardo Burlamaqui, Ana Celia Castro and Rainer Kattel. London: Anthem Press, 2012. ISBN: 9780857285355.

Page 5: Cr knol gov4gc

knowledge and the network...

Page 6: Cr knol gov4gc

knowledge in

“permanent beta”

Page 7: Cr knol gov4gc

knowledge units:

“text”“data”“tools”

Page 8: Cr knol gov4gc

text knowledge governance:

registration

certification

dissemination

preservation

Page 9: Cr knol gov4gc

data knowledge governance

Page 10: Cr knol gov4gc

tool knowledge governance

Page 11: Cr knol gov4gc

new rules...

Page 12: Cr knol gov4gc

“distributed”innovation

1. shared standards2. shared infrastructure3. democratized access

4. rights to the user

Page 13: Cr knol gov4gc

not taking root in institutions

Page 14: Cr knol gov4gc

not taking root in institutions

Page 15: Cr knol gov4gc

old institutions, new roles:

university as public spaces

Page 16: Cr knol gov4gc

interoperability as essential condition

for new institutions

Page 17: Cr knol gov4gc

The idea of interoperability as something that scales from technology to knowledge

itself has emerged alongside the rise of the digital commons in culture and software. In this view, it is not only computer networks

that must interoperate, but intellectual property rights and semantic understanding,

so that distributed peer production of knowledge can make the leap from an

encyclopedia into the sciences and other research disciplines.

Page 18: Cr knol gov4gc

“separate concerns” in the early design of the Internet itself enabled

the emergence of distributed innovation and knowledge

construction

Page 19: Cr knol gov4gc

•it promises to transform the role of the individual inside academia by allowing more and greater access to knowledge, faster publishing and correction, more democratic peer review, at the same time that it may also allow less traditional actors to enter the knowledge governance systems, as editors, readers, critics and, hopefully at least occasionally, new partners.

Page 20: Cr knol gov4gc

University

Industry

Government

Actors in Traditional Knowledge Governance

Page 21: Cr knol gov4gc

University

Industry

Government

connect these three together into network for e-R&D

Page 22: Cr knol gov4gc

Role of Universitysufficiently complex internal policy of intellectual property to allow the open innovation and user-

driven innovation models, that asks for A2K strategies and governance

cyberinfrastructure

Page 23: Cr knol gov4gc

University

Page 24: Cr knol gov4gc

University

Industry

Government

Page 25: Cr knol gov4gc
Page 26: Cr knol gov4gc
Page 27: Cr knol gov4gc
Page 28: Cr knol gov4gc

interoperability as first principle

Page 29: Cr knol gov4gc

judge decisions by their “environmental

impact” factor.

Page 30: Cr knol gov4gc

if you care about the emergence of knowledge

federation systems that allow broader access to knowledge) you may have to have some kind of intervention…and not wait for organic emergence.

Page 31: Cr knol gov4gc
Page 32: Cr knol gov4gc

Additional material•“Knowledge Governance: Reasserting the

Public Interest,” edited by Leonardo Burlamaqui, Ana Celia Castro and Rainer Kattel. London: Anthem Press, 2012. ISBN: 9780857285355.

•http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/interactive/events/luncheon/2010/06/rossini

•http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/commonsbasedresearch/Industrial_Cooperation_Project