Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
COVID-19 TRACKER
ECONOMIC IMPACT
CRE FUNDAMENTALS
CAPITAL MARKETS
THINGS TO THINK ABOUT
CORONAVIRUSIMPACT ON THE PROPERTY MARKETSFOCUS: U.S. & CANADA
APRIL 2020
COVID-19 TRACKERThe path of the virus - its spread, its duration, its severity - are all central to our ability to model the impact on property.
Key Observations:
• The number of new cases has stabilized and appears to have peaked over the last two weeks.
• However, although trending better globally, the virus is spreading at different rates across different communities.
• Countries are unlikely to loosen lockdowns and restrictions until they are confident that the number of active cases has fallen to a low level and the daily growth in newly confirmed cases is low (~1%).
• Discussion of next steps has moved from lockdown to reopening the economy in many countries and in states across the U.S. We aren’t there yet, but we are moving in the right direction.
PROGRESS IS BEING MADEDaily Growth in Global Confirmed Cases
Source: John’s Hopkins University, Cushman & Wakefield Research
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
03/15
/20
03/19
/20
03/23
/20
03/27
/20
03/31
/20
04/04
/20
04/08
/20
04/12
/20
One Day Change Seven Day Average
BUT AT DIFFERENT STAGES: DAILY CASES
Source: Johns Hopkins University & Medicine Coronavirus Research Center
Updated 4-14-2020
0
10
20
30
40
3/14 3/20 3/26 4/1 4/7 4/13
Thou
sand
s
United States
Daily Cases 7-day trailing average
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
3/14 3/20 3/26 4/1 4/7 4/13
Thou
sand
s
Italy
Daily Cases 7-day trailing average
0
2
4
6
8
3/14 3/20 3/26 4/1 4/7 4/13
Thou
sand
s
Germany
Daily Cases 7-day trailing average
0
1
1
2
2
3
3
3/14 3/20 3/26 4/1 4/7 4/13
Thou
sand
s
Canada
Daily Cases 7-day trailing average
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
3/14 3/20 3/26 4/1 4/7 4/13
Hun
dred
s
Philippines
Daily Cases 7-day trailing average
0
2
4
6
8
10
3/14 3/20 3/26 4/1 4/7 4/13
Thou
sand
s
United Kingdom
Daily Cases 7-day trailing average
0
1
1
2
2
3
3
3/14 3/20 3/26 4/1 4/7 4/13
Thou
sand
s
Russia
Daily Cases 7-day trailing average
0
2
4
6
8
10
3/14 3/20 3/26 4/1 4/7 4/13
Hun
dred
s
Japan
Daily Cases 7-day trailing average
Stabilizing/Trending Better
Unclear/Trending Worse
Key Observations:
• China & South Korea are often cited as countries that have a better handle on combating the virus.
• Using Mainland China as a roadmap, the lockdown period for most of the country lasted 75 days before they partially reopened the economy.
• South Korea is combating the virus without completely closing its economy, but activity and confidence remain very weak.
GETTING A BETTER SENSE OF TIMING
Source: Johns Hopkins University, Various media outlets
Updated 4-17-2020
1/1 1/8 1/15 1/22 1/29 2/5 2/12 2/19 2/26 3/4 3/11 3/18 3/25 4/1 4/8 4/15
Lockdown1/23-24
New cases peak2/13 Partial
reopening of economy
3/28
SOUTH KOREA
Reopen economy
4/8
1/1 1/8 1/15 1/22 1/29 2/5 2/12 2/19 2/26 3/4 3/11 3/18 3/25 4/1 4/8 4/15
MAINLAND CHINA
Initial case decline
3/11
Case decline begins
2/22
First case1/20
New cases peak2/29
Case declinebegins 3/22
Rebound from nursing home outbreak 3/19
Confidence remains
weak
Key Observations:• There is risk that this is
seasonal, meaning it goes away and comes back, or that we keep re-infecting each other.
• We are observing a resurgence in Singapore where the second wave of infections is larger than the first, leading to a return of lockdowns. A resurgence is also occurring in Hong Kong & Taiwan.
• We continue to watch these daily trends very carefully to inform our analysis.
COVID-19 RESURGENCE TRACKERDaily Growth in Confirmed Cases
Source: Johns Hopkins University
Updated 4-14-2020
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
3/15/2
020
3/18/2
020
3/21/2
020
3/24/2
020
3/27/2
020
3/30/2
020
4/2/20
20
4/5/20
20
4/8/20
20
4/11/2
020
4/14/2
020
China S Korea Singapore
3
5
9
12
20
45
47
86
227
0 50 100 150 200 250
Devices
RNA-based
Cell-based Therapies
Scanning Compounds to Repurpose
Anti-virals
Antibodies
Others
Vaccine
Total
Key Observations:
• The international science community is all over this.
• There are 86 coronavirus vaccines are already in development globally, and 3 already being tested in human trial.
• Other experimental drugs and therapies are showing promise.
• Studies indicating some portion of the world’s population have already been infected and have built up immunity. Others show that the transmission rate is likely to drop substantially as the warmer summer months approach.
REASONS FOR OPTIMISMTreatment/Vaccine Tracker
Source: Milken Institute Covid-19 Tracker, Cushman & Wakefield
Updated 4-16-2020
ECONOMIC IMPACTA painful – but possibly short-lived recession – and then the rebuild begins.
GLOBAL RECESSION IN 2020World GDP, %
Source: IMF, Cushman & Wakefield Research
Updated 4-16-2020
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
Early 80’s recession: High inflation/energy
crisis
0.6%
Great Financial Crisis
-0.1%
Great Lockdown Recession
-3.0%
Perhaps a great rebound?
Key Observations:
• COVID-19 and government-imposed “lockdowns” are shrinking global growth dramatically.
• The global economy is projected to contract sharply, by -3% in 2020, much worse than during the GFC.
• The majority of advanced and emerging economies are assumed to be in recession in 2020H1.
• Assuming the pandemic fades in the second half of 2020, the economy is expected to rebound sharply and grow by 5.8% in 2021.
BRUTAL Q2Real GDP, Second Quarter of 2020, Annualized %
Source: Oxford Economics, Cushman & Wakefield Research
Americas Europe Asia Pacific
-32
-38
-18
-30 -30 -29 -29
-23 -22
-34-30
-1
-17
-34
-19
-33
-10
-45
-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
Uni
ted
Sta
tes
Can
ada
Mex
ico
Euro
zone
Fran
ce
Ger
man
y
Italy
Net
herla
nds
Pola
nd
Spai
n
Uni
ted
Kin
gdom
Chi
na
Hon
g K
ong
Indi
a
Japa
n
Sing
apor
e
Sout
h K
orea
Key Observations:
• Initial claims filed over thelast four weeks are alreadymore than double the joblosses registered during theGreat Recession.
• The initial claims dataimplies the unemploymentrate could have gone from~3.5% to around 16% in amatter of weeks.
• Importantly, however, manyof these job losses mayprove to be temporary asthe economy is widelyexpected to enter recoveryin 2020H2.
JOB LOSSES MOUNTINGUnited States
Source: BLS, ETA, CNBC Graphic
Updated 4-16-2020
Jobs created since Great Recession trough
(2/1/2010 – 2/1/2020)
Initial jobless claims since 3/21
Great Recession total job losses (peak to
trough)
Initial jobless claims filed during Great Recession
(12/1/2007 – 6/30/2009)
8.7M
3.3M(3/21)
24.8M
39.5M
6.6M(4/4)
5.2M(4/11)
6.9M(3/28) 22.0M
U.S. SCENARIOS
Source: Moody’s Analytics & Oxford Economics Scenario descriptions adjusted By Cushman & Wakefield Research
Updated 4-19-2020
SCENARIO 1 (V-SHAPE) SCENARIO 2 (U-SHAPE) SCENARIO 3 (SWOOSH)
Epid
emio
logi
cal
Ass
umpt
ions
Econ
omic
St
atis
tics
• Coronavirus resolves much sooner thanexpected
• New cases fall rapidly starting in May
• Partial reopening of the economy in May
• Full reopening in June/July
• Assumes quicker medical breakthrough orvirus burns out
• Coronavirus slower to resolve
• New cases trend lower but still up anddown, consumer remains highly cautious
• Partial reopening in May
• Economy does not become fully engageduntil proven vaccine or therapeutics
• Assumes slower medical breakthrough
• Coronavirus lingers for much longer
• New cases trend lower, but multiple waves
• Partial reopening in May
• Economy does not become fully engageduntil proven vaccine or therapeutics
• Assumes slower medical breakthrough oreventual herd immunity
• Milder recession in Q1,sharp in Q2
• Unemployment peaks in Q2 and fallsprecipitously as people go back to work
• Strong snapback in H2
• Momentum into 2021
• Return to full employment by 2022
• Harsh recession in H1
• Unemployment peaks in Q2 but remainselevated and is slower to come down
• Mathematical bounce in Q3, but growthremains sluggish until medical breakthrough
• Slower climb into 2021
• Return to full employment by 2023
• Deeper recession
• Unemployment peaks in Q2, but elevatedfor years
• Bounce in Q3, then back in recession asvirus flares up again in the fall
• Recovery start date pushed into 2021H2
• Return to full employment by 2025
15,000
16,000
17,000
18,000
19,000
20,000
21,000
22,00020
19Q
4
2020
Q1
2020
Q2
2020
Q3
2020
Q4
2021
Q1
2021
Q2
2021
Q3
2021
Q4
2022
Q1
2022
Q2
2022
Q3
2022
Q4
2023
Q1
2023
Q2
2023
Q3
2023
Q4
2024
Q1
2024
Q2
2024
Q3
2024
Q4
Billi
ons
of U
SD
V-Shape Short U-Shape Swoosh Key Observations:
• The sharp decline will be painful, as painful as it gets, but relatively short-lived. One horrible quarter, which we are already in.
• After that, there is growth. Whether that’s fast or slow depends on a lot of factors, but in the two most probable scenarios*, demand starts rising in Q3.
THE ROAD BACK TO 2019U.S. Real GDP
Source: V-shape = Oxford Economics Baseline (April 14); U-Shape = Moody’s Analytics Baseline, Swoosh = Moody’s Analytics S3 scenario (April 10)
*Swoosh is a low probability tail risk
Short-U: return to 2019 GDP by 2022Q2
Swoosh: return to 2019 GDP by
2023Q1V-shape: return to 2019 GDP by 2021Q1
STOCK MARKET LOOKING MORE OPTIMISTICWilshire 5000, $tril.
Source: Yahoo! Finance, Cushman & Wakefield Research
Updated 4-15-2020
22,000
24,000
26,000
28,000
30,000
32,000
34,000
1/6/20
20
1/15/2
020
1/24/2
020
2/2/20
20
2/11/2
020
2/20/2
020
2/29/2
020
3/9/20
20
3/18/2
020
3/27/2
020
4/5/20
20
4/14/2
020
$5 trillion of stockholder wealth
regained in 4 weeks
Key Observations:
• Equity markets still swinging wildly but have generally been rallying for the last few weeks.
• The rebound is likely due to the speed and size of the unprecedented fiscal and monetary response.
• This implies that investors have removed the darkest tail risk scenario (i.e. coronavirus forever, not enough stimulus).
• As real estate investor’s confidence returns, perhaps this is an early indication of the potential rebound to occur in investment sales.
$1.5 $2.4
$12.3
$9.7
10%11%
85%
45%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
$14
2008-10 Congress March 2020 Congress 2008-10 (including Fed &Regulators)
March 2020 (including Fed)
Dollars in trillions (lhs) Percent of GDP* (rhs)
POLICY RESPONSE BIG & FAST (PLUS, MORE TO COME)Comparing Stimulus Programs: GFC vs. Covid-19 Crisis
Source: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Oxford Economics/Moody’s Analytics, Cushman & Wakefield Research. 2007 nominal GDP used for GFC, 2019 nominal GDP used for present.
https://www.cbpp.org/research/economy/the-financial-crisis-lessons-for-the-next-one
AND IT’S GLOBAL...
Source: Various Central Banks
CENTRAL BANK POLICY RATE – MAR 2020
POLICY RATE
– MAR 2019
DATE OF LATEST RATE
CHANGE
DIRECTION OF LATEST RATE
CHANGEEASING/
TIGHTENING OTHER MEASURES
Federal Reserve 0.00% to 0.25%
1.00 to 1.25% Mar 2020 Down Easing
• Over the coming months will increase holdings of Treasury securities by at least $500B and agency MBS by at least $200B.
• Announced special credit facility to purchase corporate debt that could total $1T funded by Treasury Exchange Stabilization Fund. Will extend liquidity of up to $5T.
Bank of Canada 0.75% 1.75% Mar 2020 Down Easing
• Establishing a Business Credit Availability Program which will further support financing in the private sector, adding $10B to support businesses.
• Also lowering Domestic Stability Buffer requirement for systemically important banks by 1.25%.
Bank of England 0.25% 0.75% Mar 2020 Down Easing• Term Funding Scheme introduced with additional incentives for
small and medium-sized enterprises.• Maintain stock of UK government bond purchases financed by
issuance of GBP 435B of central bank reserves.
European Central Bank 0.00% 0.00% Mar 2016 Down Easing
• Additional longer-term refinancing operations.• Additional €120B Euro net asset purchases will be added until the
end of the year. • Interest rates remain unchanged. Reinvestments of principal
payments from maturing securities to continue.
Bank of Japan -0.10% -0.10% Feb 2016 Down Easing • Holding rates steady buy will double purchases of ETFs (risky assets) to about ¥12T to help companies get loans.
People’s Bank of China 4.05% 4.35% Feb 2020 Down Easing• Not issuing any “short-term stimulus” measures. Has focused on
measures to relieve financial stresses on companies and their creditors.
Reserve Bank of Australia 0.50% 1.5% Mar 2020 Down Easing • $90B in funding to SMEs.• Emergency rate cut and QE.
Reserve Bank of India 5.15% 6.25% Oct 2019 Down Easing • $2B US dollar sell/buy swap & LT Repo Operation of up to 1T Rs.
CRE FUNDAMENTALSGenerally solid coming into the crisis, but now feeling the COVID-19 impact.
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
Office Industrial Retail Multifamily
2019 Q4 Historical Average Key Observations:
• Regional variations aside, commercial real estate (CRE) entered this crisis with generally solid fundamentals.
• U.S. vacancy rates are well below historical averages. Commercial property types are 165-225 bps below their respective 10-year averages.
• The supply pipeline is also more disciplined than at the end of previous expansionary periods.
CRE ENTERS THE CRISIS ON SOLID FOOTINGOverall U.S. Vacancy Rates Below Historical Averages*
Source: Cushman & Wakefield Research; CoStar Group, Reis
*Historical average = annual average 1999-2019
OFFICESECTOR
U.S. OFFICE LEASING: PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONSMarket Moving Slowly, Marked by Delays and Uncertainty
Source: Cushman & Wakefield Research
Updated 4-17-2020
• Many occupiers and landlords are in “wait-and-see” mode. Companies are distracted by the impact to current operations; focused on figuring out how to deal with remote workers, closed locations and disrupted supply chains.
• Broadly speaking, tenants and office landlords are having positive conversations about how to manage the current situation. Cash flow is an issue for occupiers, but the vast majority of April rent was paid. There is now more space for further discussions / negotiations.
• COVID-19 is causing disruptions to construction projects. Builders are having a difficult time getting raw materials due to supply chain disruptions and getting the labor, permits, and inspections needed to build due to social distancing and construction moratoriums.
• There are a few examples where landlords will not sign previously agreed upon contracts because they have lost faith that they can deliver the space needed for the tenant due to COVID-19 uncertainty.
• There is a clear slow down in activity. Leasing activity in Q1 2020 was at its lowest point since 2015. A third of office markets experienced declines in asking rents quarter-over-quarter.
• Some occupiers are considering shorter-term leases during a period of increased uncertainty, and are requesting to investigate blend and extend or are asking to renegotiate terms.
• In-person space tours are difficult or impossible in some locales based upon recommendations and directives to limit interaction and group meetings. The process backlog may push back timelines on leases that previously would have been scheduled to be signed in Q2 or early Q3. Look for technology (e.g., drone tours) to be leaned on to assist during social distancing periods.
2019Q1 2020Q1 DIRECTION
United States 5,839,968 4,135,561
Atlanta -1,938,166 1,029,365
Austin 858,058 157,052
Boston 851,738 -623,114
Chicago 633,679 270,078
Dallas 925,436 92,306
Denver 756,860 423,835
Los Angeles -173,003 1,227,324
Manhattan -3,656,576 -692,522
SF Bay Area* 696,617 -1,608,802
Greater Seattle** 743,366 366,397
Silicon Valley 130,030 385,680
Washington, DC 514,267 -200,427
2019Q1 2020Q1 DIRECTION
United States 12.9 13.2
Atlanta 19.6 18.3
Austin 9.6 10.0
Boston 9.9 9.2
Chicago 17.2 17.9
Dallas 18.2 18.6
Denver 15.0 14.0
Los Angeles 14.6 14.4
Manhattan 10.7 11.3
SF Bay Area* 8.6 9.5
Greater Seattle** 7.1 7.4
Silicon Valley 9.8 9.9
Washington, DC 13.3 15.8
HOT OFF THE PRESSU.S. Office Market Snapshot – Q1 2020 (Select Markets)
Source: Cushman & Wakefield Research
* Includes San Francisco and East Bay/Oakland Markets Only; ** Includes Seattle and Puget Sound Eastside
DEMAND (NET ABSORPTION) SUPPLY (VACANCY)
2019Q1 2020Q1 DIRECTION
Canada 1,246,850 203,282
Calgary -2,739 -713,491
Edmonton 25,574 -227,285
Montreal 795,650 233,152
Ottawa 16,826 -198,577
Toronto -369,804 333,841
Vancouver 398,453 142,354
2019Q1 2020Q1 DIRECTION
Canada 9.9 9.3
Calgary 20.8 21.6
Edmonton 14.5 15.7
Montreal 10.9 8.9
Ottawa 7.6 7.7
Toronto 6.0 5.2
Vancouver 3.8 3.4
HOT OFF THE PRESSCanada Office Market Snapshot – Q1 2020 (Select Markets)
Source: Cushman & Wakefield Research
DEMAND (NET ABSORPTION) SUPPLY (VACANCY)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
9020
16 Q
1
2017
Q1
2018
Q1
2019
Q1
2020
Q1
MSF
Key Observations:
• Q1 2020 leasing (61 msf) is down 25% year-over-year (YOY).
• Leasing in the first half of the quarter was strong, but slowed down dramatically as the virus’ spread impacted the U.S. directly.
• Expect low activity in Q2 as most occupiers are waiting to see how “re-entry” plays out.
LEASING ACTIVITY DOWN SHARPLY National (U.S.) Leasing Activity by Quarter
Source: Cushman & Wakefield Research
Updated 4-17-2020
Key Observations:
• New deliveries over the past three years have been considerably lower than the three years leading into the previous two recessions:
• 1999-2001: 341 msf• 2007-2009: 203 msf• 2017-2019: 159 msf
• However, there are some markets scheduled to add significant square footage by the end of 2021, which will increase vacancy and impact rents.
TOP 30 OFFICE CONSTRUCTION MARKETSUnited States: Estimated New Completions, 2019-2021
Source: Cushman & Wakefield Research
Updated 4-17-2020
Rank City Completions % of Inv.
16 New York - Brooklyn 4,657,244 15.3%17 Houston 3,664,284 1.9%18 Northern VA 3,502,608 2.6%19 Minneapolis/St. Paul 3,283,019 4.3%20 Salt Lake City 3,210,221 8.3%21 San Diego 3,170,692 3.9%22 Denver 2,805,415 2.4%23 Sacramento 2,732,416 3.0%24 Suburban MD 2,701,787 4.5%25 St. Louis 2,457,032 4.9%26 Oakland/East Bay 2,201,156 2.0%27 Pittsburgh 2,180,927 2.4%28 San Francisco 2,174,034 2.6%29 Omaha 2,023,204 10.6%30 Miami 1,790,808 3.9%
Rank City Completions % of Inv.
1 San Jose 10,889,277 5.0%2 New York - Midtown 8,943,234 3.6%3 Atlanta 8,113,871 5.5%4 Dallas 8,074,330 3.7%5 Austin 7,792,385 14.2%6 Chicago 7,534,131 3.2%7 San Mateo County 7,314,922 12.4%8 New York - Midtown South 7,124,310 10.4%9 Charlotte 7,008,870 13.3%10 Seattle 6,277,543 9.7%11 Boston 5,355,146 3.1%12 Phoenix 5,200,406 4.9%13 Washington 4958631 4.4%14 Los Angeles Non-CBD 4,870,553 2.8%15 Nashville 4,776,020 11.3%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Q1
MS
F
Non-CBDCBD
Key Observations:
• Availability of sublease space is a sign of softness in the market as occupiers look to cut costs and offload excessive space. This is where vacancy will show up first.
• Total sublease space increased 7.2% quarter-over-quarter in Q1 2020 to 67.3 msf, but remains well-below the 2009 peak (88.1 msf).
WATCH FOR RISING SUBLEASE ACTIVITYAvailability of Sublease Space
Source: Cushman & Wakefield Research
Updated 4-17-2020
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0
TucsonJacksonville
NashvilleOrange County
PhoenixMinneapolis
Salt Lake CityAustin
San FranciscoAtlanta
NJ - NorthernNY - Midtown So.
NJ - CentralHouston
Silicon ValleyNY - Midtown
MSF
Q4 2019 Q1 2020 Change
AVAILABLE SUBLEASE SPACE MARKETS WITH LARGEST Q1 2020 INCREASE IN SUBLEASE SPACE
Key Observations:
• Office vacancy & unemployment generally trend together.
• However, the brief surge in remote working should not, on its own, cause office vacancy rates to rise significantly right away (91% of all office leases are two years in length or longer).
• The unemployment rate will be a key metric to watch going forward, not just the immediate spike, which is now expected, but also the trajectory of the improvement during the recovery.
AS UNEMPLOYMENT GOES, SO GOES VACANCYUnited States
Source: Cushman & Wakefield, Moody’s Analytics Baseline Unemployment Forecast Made updated 4-17-2020
*C&W Research is updating its models and will be released updated forecasts in the coming weeks.
0%
3%
6%
9%
12%
15%
18%
21%
2007
Q1
2007
Q4
2008
Q3
2009
Q2
2010
Q1
2010
Q4
2011
Q3
2012
Q2
2013
Q1
2013
Q4
2014
Q3
2015
Q2
2016
Q1
2016
Q4
2017
Q3
2018
Q2
2019
Q1
2019
Q4
2020
Q3
2021
Q2
2022
Q1
2022
Q4
Office Vacancy Unemployment
*Vacancy forecasts are a rough estimate based on U-shape scenario
26,000
28,000
30,000
32,000
34,000
36,000
$24
$26
$28
$30
$32
$34
2007
Q1
2008
Q1
2009
Q1
2010
Q1
2011
Q1
2012
Q1
2013
Q1
2014
Q1
2015
Q1
2016
Q1
2017
Q1
2018
Q1
2019
Q1
2020
Q1
2021
Q1
2022
Q1
Asking Rents (left scale) Office-using employment (ths., right scale)
Key Observations:
• Demand is expected to slow and turn negative, and sublease space is expected to come back as layoffs free up space creating more leverage.
• Under the U-shape scenario, we expect rents to fall by ~10% in the U.S. from peak to trough.
RENTS STICKIER, BUT CORRECTION IS COMINGUnited States
Source: BLS, Moody’s Analytics, Cushman & Wakefield Research
*C&W Research is updating its models and will be released updated forecasts in the coming weeks.
*Rent forecasts are a rough estimate based on U-shape scenario
INDUSTRIALSECTOR
U.S. INDUSTRIAL LEASING: PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS
• Demand heading into the current slowdown was much stronger than in prior periods with the recent rolling 3-quarter average of net absorption running 15.0% stronger than pre-Financial Crisis, and 17.0% stronger than before the dot-com bubble burst.
• Early observations on leasing are consistent with prior Q1 leasing during the expansion – it is too soon to say what effects COVID-19 has had on the U.S. industrial market. Rent relief requests from certain tenants are not uncommon.
• Longer-term, COVID-19 is accelerating the shift to eCommerce out of necessity. That may induce some longer-lasting behaviors in consumers.
• We expect the industrial-logistics sector to come out of this crisis stronger than ever.
Not All Good News, but Trajectory Remains Robust
• It is a mistake to think that COVID-19 is having no negative impact on the U.S. industrial sector. A large amount of industrial space is occupied by retailer/wholesalers, many of which are struggling. The possibility that some of these companies file for chapter-11 is high.
• Industrial markets, especially those along the coastsand dependent on global trade, are being negatively impacted. As West coast ports take a hit from trade with China, and the East coast from Europe – port proximate markets will likely see a slow down in leasing volume with less goods to house.
• Many industrial development projects have been put on hold as developers and investors take a “wait-and-see” approach to the market and economy.
• However, the industrial sector entered the crisis with extremely robust fundamentals and is positioned to weather the crisis better than most other product types.
Source: Cushman & Wakefield Research
Updated 4-17-2020
2019Q1 2020Q1 DIRECTION
United States 4.9 4.9
Atlanta 8.7 7.1
Chicago 5.5 5.1
Dallas / Ft. Worth 7.0 5.9
Houston 7.3 10.2
Indianapolis 4.6 4.4
Inland Empire 4.0 3.9
Kansas City 6.6 5.8
Los Angeles 1.6 2.1
NJ – Central 3.1 2.1
NJ – Northern 4.0 4.0
PA I-81/I-78 Corridor 7.6 7.9
Phoenix 7.0 7.1
2019Q1 2020Q1 DIRECTION
United States 45,404,355 42,319,885
Atlanta 1,660,023 5,287,692
Chicago 3,287,279 3,863,518
Dallas / Ft. Worth 6,434,728 9,732,116
Houston 1,188,278 -730,500
Indianapolis 1,316,724 673,531
Inland Empire 2,072,417 2,262,511
Kansas City 1,193,262 628,997
Los Angeles -410,643 -945,830
NJ – Central 526,457 -21,680
NJ – Northern 1,977,680 456,299
PA I-81/I-78 Corridor 1,387,427 3,410,018
Phoenix 1,992,072 2,016,514
HOT OFF THE PRESSU.S. Industrial Market Snapshot – Q1 2020 (Select Markets)
Source: Cushman & Wakefield Research
DEMAND (NET ABSORPTION) SUPPLY (VACANCY)
2019Q1 2020Q1 DIRECTION
Canada 3,849,593 1,133,310
Calgary 1,649,586 41,600
Edmonton 117,558 -126,995
Montreal 286,675 873,440
Ottawa -182,657 -106,176
Toronto 590,771 -727,010
Vancouver 868,150 1,109,846
2019Q1 2020Q1 DIRECTION
Canada 3.1 2.8
Calgary 7.6 7.8
Edmonton 5.9 6.1
Montreal 4.3 3.3
Ottawa 4.8 4.4
Toronto 1.5 1.5
Vancouver 1.9 1.3
HOT OFF THE PRESSCanada Industrial Market Snapshot – Q1 2020 (Select Markets)
Source: Cushman & Wakefield Research
DEMAND (NET ABSORPTION) SUPPLY (VACANCY)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
16020
08 Q
1
2009
Q1
2010
Q1
2011
Q1
2012
Q1
2013
Q1
2014
Q1
2015
Q1
2016
Q1
2017
Q1
2018
Q1
2019
Q1
2020
Q1
MSF
Key Observations:
• Q1 2020 leasing (134 msf) is down 6.5% YOY. However, activity remains healthy.
• Going into this crisis, the U.S. industrial vacancy rate remained at a record low of 4.8% as of 2019 Q4.
• Vacancy is likely to increase, but remain extremely tight relative to historical precedents.
LEASING ACTIVITY STILL HEALTHY BUT SLOWERNational (U.S.) Leasing Activity by Quarter
Source: Cushman & Wakefield Research
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
19-Ja
n
19-Feb
19-M
ar
19-A
pr
19-M
ay
19-Ju
n19
-Jul
19-A
ug
19-S
ep
19-O
ct
19-N
ov
19-D
ec
20-Ja
n
20-Feb
Mar-20
*
Key Observations:• Disruptions in supply chains in
Asia Pacific led to a drop of 5% in retail imports during the first two months of the year compared with January-February 2019.
• March is expected to come in at 1.3 million TEUs, which would be 21% below the previous year.
• Forecasts indicate retail imports will be below 2019 levels by approximately 20% for the next four months (through July).
• We expect the disruption in global trade to negatively impact industrial demand, particularly along the coasts.
CONTAINER VOLUMES DOWN SHARPLYMonthly Imports, Millions of Twenty-Foot Equivalent Units (TEUs)
Source: Cushman & Wakefield Research, NRF
* Forecast as of April 7, 2020.
5% 6% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10% 11%12%
13%15%
17%
19%
31%
24%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%20
07
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
(F)
2021
(F)$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
eCommerce Sales ($bil, left scale)
eCommerce % of Total Retail Sales (right scale)
Key Observations:
• The necessity of shelter-in-place is accelerating the long-term shift to eCommerce. The current pandemic is likely to induce some longer-lasting behaviors in consumers.
• For every $1 billion of online sales, 1.2 msf in warehouse space is needed to fulfill those orders.
• Near-term stress combined with long-term strength is a potent formula for investment opportunity.
INDUSTRIAL COMES OUT STRONGER THAN EVEReCommerce Sales Trends
Source: Cushman & Wakefield Research; Digital Commerce 360 forecast for eCommerce sales in 2020 and 2021
RETAILSECTOR
U.S. RETAIL LEASING: PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONSEconomic Impact of COVID-19 Will Accelerate Key Trends Already in Play
• eCommerce will surge. It is currently the only channel connecting with consumers for many categories of retail. While consumers will eventually return to brick-and-mortar stores, there is likely a permanent shift in behavior for many consumers.
• Emerging trend of buy-online, pickup-in-store (BOPIS)is already vastly accelerating, with many chains rushing to provide these capabilities.
• Economic downturn will favor value: dollar stores, discounters, warehouse club and lower price superstores.
• Necessity retail (i.e., grocery, convenience and drug stores) will be a bright spot; such sales have surged recently. The near-term economic impact of the crisis means that consumers will be focused on value and essentials both in-store and online.
• Social distancing will temporarily halt some of the hottest trends in physical retail: experiential concepts, entertainment, food and beverage, food halls, fitness clubs, upstart independent brands, digital native retailers and pop-up stores.
• Retail is moving from being a standalone shopping destination to becoming the ultimate amenity in live/work/play communities. The crisis will accelerate the ongoing trend of malls and shopping centers adding mixed-use elements.
• Many retailers already struggling with high debt loads will not survive the crisis.
• The crisis is also accelerating the ongoing demise of the weakest Class C shopping centers and malls.
Source: Cushman & Wakefield Research
Updated 4-17-2020
2019Q1 2020Q1 DIRECTION
United States 2,326,982 -4,631,249
Atlanta 354,816 33,498
Austin -102,009 197,828
Boston 117,613 -181,506
Chicago 415,115 -106,271
Dallas -371,755 -592,880
Denver -350,381 60,964
Los Angeles -239,834 112,300
New York* 290,052 -315,293
SF Bay Area** -154,004 -17,821
Greater Seattle*** -97,575 31,157
Silicon Valley -65,929 -35,434
DC Metro**** -145,975 -90,557
2019Q1 2020Q1 DIRECTION
United States 6.4 6.6
Atlanta 6.7 6.7
Austin 5.3 5.3
Boston 3.5 4.0
Chicago 9.4 9.2
Dallas 7.2 7.7
Denver 6.2 6.4
Los Angeles 5.4 5.9
New York* 6.0 6.7
SF Bay Area** 5.0 5.1
Greater Seattle*** 5.2 4.4
Silicon Valley 4.7 4.7
DC Metro**** 4.8 5.0
HOT OFF THE PRESSU.S. Outdoor Shopping Center Market Snapshot – Q1 2020 (Select Markets)
Source: Cushman & Wakefield Research
* Includes New York MSA, ** San Francisco, North Bay and San Mateo County, *** Includes Seattle and Puget Sound Eastside, ****Northern VA, Suburban MD and Washington, DC
DEMAND (NET ABSORPTION) SUPPLY (VACANCY)
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
2008
Q1
2009
Q1
2010
Q1
2011
Q1
2012
Q1
2013
Q1
2014
Q1
2015
Q1
2016
Q1
2017
Q1
2018
Q1
2019
Q1
2020
Q1
MSF
Key Observations:
• Retail demand peaked in Q4 2014 at 15.8 msf. It has generally been on a downward trend since that time.
• Q1 2020 net absorption of -4.6 msf reflects the sharpest drop the market had seen since Q1 2009 (-8.1 msf).
• While the crisis began to impact demand levels and deal flow in March, it is critical to note that its full impact is not yet in the data.
RETAIL DEMAND NEGATIVE IN Q1 2020National (U.S.) Net Absorption by Quarter
Source: Cushman & Wakefield Research, Costar
13.0%
29.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Class A Class B & C
Key Observations:
• Enclosed malls are being hit much harder by the crisis than outdoor centers, many of which have been able to remain open due to concentration of “essential” retailers.
• Brick-and-mortar retail accounted for 85% of all sales before the crisis. Even if eCommerce market share were to double, physical retail will remain the dominant way people shop.
• The retail sector is the most adaptive and innovative sector in CRE. It must be in order to react to quickly changing consumer preferences.
CERTAIN ASPECTS OF RETAIL TO THRIVE AGAINMALL “All-in” Vacancy Rate: Class A vs. The Rest
Source: Costar, Cushman & Wakefield: Vacancy rate includes all retail properties
MULTIFAMILY SECTOR
MULTIFAMILY: PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONSTrue Test Still Coming…
• Operators have been agile, adjusting to the current situation. Collections have outperformed expectationsin March and April. Operators are working with tenants on payment plans, waiving late fees, accepting credit card payments and security deposit conversions. The number one priority for operators—after resident and employee safety and well-being—is retaining tenants and preserving cashflow.
• The proliferation of PropTech—virtual leasing, marketing, and e-payments—gained steam in recent years. The operators who implemented these early have reaped the benefits of more easily retaining tenants and enabling a certain level of new tenant traffic to occur. While traffic levels are down, new lease conversion rates are up.
• The expansion of federal unemployment benefits, with an additional $600 per week through the end of July, has helped buoy rent collections.
• The multifamily transaction market paused as of mid-March. The exceptions are deals that were already in progress pre-COVID and time-sensitive deals such as 1031 exchanges, although new guidance has been released by the government for the latter.
• CMBS and debt funds have been sidelined. Unlike other CRE sectors, there is available debt for multifamily assets through agency and LifeCo options. However, the rates have been fluctuating and there is general bias for stronger assets, sponsors and MSA’s less affected by COVID-19 conditions.
• Pre-COVID-19 projections showed an increase in deliveries in 2020. However, construction projects have been delayed. In a recent NMHC survey, roughly half of the respondents indicated construction project delays.
Source: Cushman & Wakefield Research
Updated 4-17-2020
2019Q1 2020Q1 DIRECTION
United States 6.3 6.6
Atlanta 8.8 9.0
Austin 7.6 8.4
Baltimore 6.6 7.0
Boston 4.9 6.2
Chicago 6.6 6.6
Dallas/Ft. Worth 8.5 8.7
Denver 7.5 8.0
Detroit 5.8 6.7
Houston 9.6 10.2
Kansas City 7.5 7.4
Las Vegas 6.5 7.1
Los Angeles 4.4 4.6
2019Q1 2020Q1 DIRECTION
Miami 5.8 6.2
Minneapolis 4.1 5.1
New York 2.3 2.4
Orlando 6.8 8.0
Philadelphia 5.7 6.0
Phoenix 6.0 6.6
Portland 5.9 6.7
San Diego 4.8 4.9
San Francisco 4.2 5.0
Silicon Valley 5.1 5.7
Seattle 6.1 5.6
Tampa 7.3 6.7
Washington, DC 6.1 6.3
HOT OFF THE PRESSU.S. Multifamily Market Snapshot – Q1 2020 (Select Markets)
Source: CoStar Group, Cushman & Wakefield Research
Note: Trends include all multifamily asset subtypes and properties in lease-up.
SUPPLY (VACANCY)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
40020
10 Q
1
2011
Q1
2012
Q1
2013
Q1
2014
Q1
2015
Q1
2016
Q1
2017
Q1
2018
Q1
2019
Q1
2020
Q1
Thou
sand
s
Key Observations:
• Apartment absorption in Q1 2020 was just shy of 65,000 units, which is 18.5% off the 5-year average for the first quarter of the year.
• Federal support is helping buoy rent payments and occupancy, but a drop off could occur when those programs roll off.
ABSORPTION STILL STRONG, BUT SLOWERUnited States: Net Absorption (4-Quarter Trailing)
Source: CoStar Group, Cushman & Wakefield Research
ALTERNATIVES
ALTERNATIVES: PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONSSince the Coronavirus Outbreak…
• Medical Office: The COVID-19 crisis has made telemedicine more mainstream, with a new high in the volume of calls. Going forward doctors’ offices and group practices will all need to have a telemedicine hub as part of their operations. The need for rapid shifting of space from one form of treatment to another (operating room to ICU) points to the need for flexibility in design. However, this flexibility can be costly. The financial stress being felt by some hospitals and healthcare systems may lead to a push toward monetization of assets if it is feasible.
• Life Science: The life science sector has been resilient in the last two recessions, with employment growing through the downturn while other sectors lost jobs. Vacancy is lower and rents are generally higher for lab space than for office space in the major life science markets. Social distancing has disrupted clinical trials in the sector which can lead to delays in the pharmaceutical process, however, the industry is at the forefront of resolving COVID-19 with testing and vaccine development.
• Self-storage: Demand for self storage has counter-cyclical properties – it often comes from positive and negative life events such as moving, birth, death, marriage, or divorce. Self storage REITs have recently been outperforming all other asset types except for data centers and cell towers due to the stability of the asset class.
• Data Centers: These have risen to the forefront as large corporations learn to modify their IT infrastructure on the fly as employees work from home. Data center REITs have performed well during the crisis, with the expectation of far greater investment across the industry as circumstances move toward normalcy.
• Senior Housing: Factoring in the vulnerability of its tenant population and the headline risk, senior housing has fared better than expected early on in this crisis. According to NIC’s most recent senior housing survey (April 1-12), 60% to 62% of independent living and memory care operators reported no change or an increase in occupancy compared to the prior month. Long term, independent living may have risk depending upon tenants’ preferences for remaining in the home and hiring in-home care.
• Student Housing: Rent payment delinquency has remained relatively low through the first weeks in April. However, the full impact will not be seen until the start of the next school year, as spring is prime leasing season. Coming out of this crisis, Tier 1 student housing properties in major markets are projected to fare better as this population is anticipated to have a higher propensity to return back to student housing quickly.
CAPITAL MARKETSMost investors remain in a “wait and see” posture.
INVESTMENT SALES SLOWING QUICKLYExpect Similar Sudden Stop in Transaction Activity in EMEA, Americas
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 1 3 5 7 9 11 13
Americas Weekly EMEA Weekly AsiaPac Weekly2020 Weekly 2017 2018 2019 2020
Key Observations:
• Sales data still being compiled for Q1, but expect sharp drops in activity to be reported across all global regions.
• Early readings out of Asia Pacific – the first to feel the full brunt of COVID19 – show sales down ~57% compared to a year ago.
• The pace of recovery should be faster than in the GFC because of abundant capital, though fundraising could still be adversely effected by portfolio balance effects from the equity market sell-off.
Source: RCA, Cushman & Wakefield Research
Global Year-to-Date Transaction ActivityDollars in billions
-2% YoY
-21% YoY
-57% YoY
5.0%
5.5%
6.0%
6.5%
7.0%
7.5%
8.0%
8.5%
9.0%
9.5%
Mar
-02
Mar
-03
Mar
-04
Mar
-05
Mar
-06
Mar
-07
Mar
-08
Mar
-09
Mar
-10
Mar
-11
Mar
-12
Mar
-13
Mar
-14
Mar
-15
Mar
-16
Mar
-17
Mar
-18
Mar
-19
Mar
-20
Office Industrial Apartment Retail
Key Observations:
• As of now, there are no clear signs of panic-selling.
• It is difficult, if not impossible to price risk right now, so investors are still very much in “wait and see mode.”
• REIT implied cap rates have expanded modestly YTD: office +40 bps YTD, industrial -10 bps, retail +110 bps YTD, apartment +40 bps YTD.
PRICING WILL BE STICKIER – BUT TOO EARLY TO TELLU.S. Cap Rates
Source: RCA, Cushman & Wakefield Research
REITS INDICATE A PRICE CORRECTION IS COMINGYear-to-Date Total Return Performance: U.S. REITs (%)
Source: NAREIT, Cushman & Wakefield Research
Updated 4/16/20
15.9
-4.4
-11.1
-18.8
-19.8
-24.9
-50.6
-53.7
-60 -40 -20 0 20
S&P
500
(-12.
8)
Hotel Sector: Occupancy has fallen by 70% globally, Revpar down ~60%.
Har
dest
Hit
Leas
t im
pact
ed
Retail: Social distancing – massive disruption. Strength in spots (e.g. grocery & pharma).
Office: Any sector that supports human interaction is exposed.
Housing: Uncertainty putting big pause on home sales.
Multifamily: More resilient, not immune. Enters crisis overbuilt if demand falls off.
Industrial: More resilient. Supply chain disruptions but even stronger shift to eCommerce.
Storage: More resilient, but not immune.
Data Centers: Stay at home economy, more data. Somewhat GDP agnostic.
INVESTMENT SALES TYPICALLY TRACK WITH STOCK MARKET
Source: DJIA, Cushman & Wakefield Research
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
$0
$40
$80
$120
$160
$200
02Q
1
04Q
1
06Q
1
08Q
1
10Q
1
12Q
1
14Q
1
16Q
1
18Q
1
20Q
1
U.S. Investment Sales ($bil, left scale)DJIA (right scale)
DOW VS. INVESTMENT SALES REITS VS. INVESTMENT SALES
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
$0.0
$40.0
$80.0
$120.0
$160.0
$200.0
02Q
1
04Q
1
06Q
1
08Q
1
10Q
1
12Q
1
14Q
1
16Q
1
18Q
1
20Q
1
U.S. Investment Sales ($bil, left scale)REITs Composite Index (right scale)
Key Observations:
• The equity markets and REITs are reasonably correlated with investment sales.
• Both the equity and investment sales markets were humming along until late February, leaving only a month of disruption for the sales market.
• By the end of March ~80% of deals had been placed on hold. Should this continue, then transaction activity will be down dramatically in Q2.
• On the other hand, if the equity rally is sustained and the CRE debt markets re-open, then transaction activity may resume albeit at a lower level.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
April
-20
North America Europe Asia Rest of World
Key Observations:
• Dry powder is at record levels; in other words, there is tons of cash on the sidelines.
• Value-add, opportunistic and debt funds have particularly large war chests.
• Following the GFC, LPs sought to discourage their private asset managers from calling capital. This is happening now to a much lesser extent amid the rebound in equities.
• Our sense of the market is that there is considerable latent risk appetite and the capital to act on it once liquidity returns to the market.
WHEN THIS TURNS, LOOK OUTDry Powder at Closed End Real Estate Funds
Source: Preqin, Cushman & Wakefield Research
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Apr-0
3
Apr-0
4
Apr-0
5
Apr-0
6
Apr-0
7
Apr-0
8
Apr-0
9
Apr-1
0
Apr-1
1
Apr-1
2
Apr-1
3
Apr-1
4
Apr-1
5
Apr-1
6
Apr-1
7
Apr-1
8
Apr-1
9
Apr-2
0
Key Observations:
• At the peak of QE, the Fed bought $120bn of Treasuries per month. Today they are buying $70bn each day!
• The Fed has already added $1.1 trillion of treasuries securities to its balance sheet in less than 1 month.
• The rounds of QE during the Great Recession had a positive impact on CRE values, this is QE on steroids.
• On top of buying up Treasuries, the Fed has become a buyer –indeed, buyer/lender of last resort – in a growing number of markets: MBS, CMBS, ABS, CP, Investment grade bonds, and more.
FED IS CRANKINGChange in Level of Treasury Securities Held Outright, $bil
Source: Federal Reserve, Cushman & Wakefield Research
QE – we thought this was big at the time
SPREADS AT 20 YEAR HIGH
Source: Real Capital Analytics, Cushman & Wakefield Research
0
2
4
6
8
10
2002
Q1
2004
Q1
2006
Q1
2008
Q1
2010
Q1
2012
Q1
2014
Q1
2016
Q1
2018
Q1
2020
Q1
10-Yr Treasury Yield U.S. Office Cap Rate
Current: 590 bps
Historical Average: 410 bps
Historical Avg. *Current
Office 410 590
Industrial 427 565
Multifamily 322 482
Retail 400 600
OFFICE CAP RATES VS. 10-YR TREASURY YIELD
CAP RATE SPREADS OVER 10-YR (BPS)
*As of 4/20/2020
ATTRACTIVE GLOBALLYPrime Office Cap Rates Spread to 10-Year Gov’t Bond (bps)
Source: Real Capital Analytics, Altus Insite Investment Trends Survey, Cushman & WakefieldNote: U.S. cities based on top quartile rolling 12-month figures.
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Amsterda
m
Frank
furt
Lond
on (W
E)
Paris (
CBD)
Stockh
olmBeij
ing
Hong K
ong
Shang
hai
Singap
ore
Sydne
yTo
kyo
Boston
Chicag
o
Los A
ngele
s
Montre
al
New York
San Fr
ancis
co
Toron
to
Vanco
uver
Washin
gton,
DC
Max* Min* 19Q4 (current) 18Q4
APAC/CHINA AMERICASEUROPE
(*max/min refer to 2007-2019Q4)
THINGS TO THINK ABOUT
WHAT COULD BE LONG LASTINGThings to Think About…
• A different perspective on the workplace:• Policies: More attention paid to when illness leads
to remote work or taking sick time.• Layouts: Incorporation of six foot spacing into
workspaces.• Cleaning: Heightened attention on cleaning levels
and wording in lease documents.
• Use of technology to make life more touchless. For example, smart phones providing access through security and informing elevator which floor to utilize.
• Acceleration of wellness tracking:• Measuring air quality and increasing filtration to
minimize spread of airborne viruses or bacteria.• Utilizing facial recognition technology to measure
employee, customer and visitor temperatures.• Tracking employee vitals (but still much to work
through regarding privacy concerns).
• Changed perception of work-from-home. In many cases, organizations that have never had any (or any significant portion of) employees work remotely have been doing so due to shelter-in-place orders. However, it is likely that most workers will continue to access office space on a regular basis, even if they increase the frequency of remote work.
• A different perspective on CRE portfolios:• Fortune 500 companies identifying ways to reduce
their global footprint.• Exploration of workplace ecosystem, including
primary office space, co-locations, flex, and work-from-home.
• Greater comfort with virtual experiences, but still great value placed on the benefits of face-to-face interactions. The amenities and services provided in the workplace become even more important to drive employee experience.
KEY CONTACTS:
Garrick BrownVP, Americas Retail Services [email protected]
Jason TolliverAmericas Head of Industrial & Logistics [email protected]
David BitnerAmericas Head of Capital Markets [email protected]
Kristina Garcia Director, U.S. Multifamily [email protected]
Kevin ThorpeChief Economist, Global Head of [email protected]
Rebecca Rockey Economist, Global Head of [email protected]
David C. SmithAmericas Head of Occupier [email protected]
Carolyn SalzerDirector, Americas Head of Logistics & Industrial [email protected]
Ken McCarthyAmericas Head of Applied [email protected]
CORONAVIRUSIMPACT ON THE PROPERTY MARKETSFOCUS: U.S. & CANADA
APRIL 2020
About Cushman & WakefieldCushman & Wakefield (NYSE: CWK) is a leading global real estate services firm that delivers exceptional value for real estate occupiers and owners. Cushman & Wakefield is among the largest real estate services firms with approximately 53,000 employees in 400 offices and 60 countries. In 2019, the firm had revenue of $8.8 billion across core services of property, facilities and project management, leasing, capital markets, valuation and other services. To learn more, visit www.cushmanwakefield.com or follow @CushWake on Twitter.
DISCLAIMER: Cushman & Wakefield and our staff are not authorized or qualified to guide or influence you in the preparation of your own business continuity or preparations plans from a health and public policy perspective. While we are making efforts to ensure we are providing an up-to-date list of publicly available resources, all details on COVID-19, as well as health, economic and public policy implications, should be addressed with the advice of an independent specialist.
Copyright © 2020 Cushman & Wakefield. All rights reserved.