Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
COVID-19 Dashboardof Economic Indicators
27 January 2021
2
COVID-19 in België
Evolutie van het aantal opnames in het ziekenhuis
629
879
89266
5759
7487
1958
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
90015
/03/
2020
22/0
3/20
2029
/03/
2020
05/0
4/20
2012
/04/
2020
19/0
4/20
2026
/04/
2020
03/0
5/20
2010
/05/
2020
17/0
5/20
2024
/05/
2020
31/0
5/20
2007
/06/
2020
14/0
6/20
2021
/06/
2020
28/0
6/20
2005
/07/
2020
12/0
7/20
2019
/07/
2020
26/0
7/20
2002
/08/
2020
09/0
8/20
2016
/08/
2020
23/0
8/20
2030
/08/
2020
06/0
9/20
2013
/09/
2020
20/0
9/20
2027
/09/
2020
04/1
0/20
2011
/10/
2020
18/1
0/20
2025
/10/
2020
01/1
1/20
2008
/11/
2020
15/1
1/20
2022
/11/
2020
29/1
1/20
2006
/12/
2020
13/1
2/20
2020
/12/
2020
27/1
2/20
2003
/01/
2021
10/0
1/20
2117
/01/
2021
24/0
1/20
21
Aantal nieuwe opnames (linkeras) Totaal aantal patiënten in het ziekenhuis (rechteras)
3Bron: Sciensano, Belgisch Instituut voor de Volksgezondheid: 26 januari 2021.https://epidemio.wiv-isp.be/ID/Documents/Covid19/Meest recente update.pdf
1. COVID-19 in België: aantal gehospitaliseerde patiënten daalttraag en bevindt zich nog steeds op een veel te hoog niveau
https://epidemio.wiv-isp.be/ID/Documents/Covid19/Meest%20recente%20update.pdf
4
GDP and confidence indicatorsfor Belgium
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
December 2020 projections p.m. June 2020 projections p.m. Scenario without COVID-19
5
The Belgian economy is expected to return to its pre-crisis level at theend of 2022, but it will remain below the scenario without COVID-19
Real GDP in Belgium(quarterly data, index 2019Q4=100, annual growth rates in the top boxes)
1,7 % -6,7 % 3,5 % 3,1 % 2,3 %
P R O J E C T I O N S
Sources: National Accounts Institute (NAI), National Bank of Belgium (NBB).
6
Het ondernemersvertrouwen stijgt lichtjes verder en benadert zijnlangetermijngemiddelde
-32
-11 (maart)
-36 (april)-34 (mei)
-8 (januari 2021)
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Brutoreeks Langetermijngemiddelde sinds 1985 Afgevlakte reeks
Algemene synthetische curve
Bron: Nationale Bank van België (NBB), laatst beschikbare gegevens: 25 januari 2020, perscommuniqué maandelijkse conjunctuurenquête bij de bedrijven.
https://www.nbb.be/doc/dq/n/dq3/histo/pnc2101.pdf
Baromètre de conjoncture – Belgique : Branches d’activité – janvier 2021
La conjoncture s’est renforcée en janvier dans la construction et dansles services
7Moyenne de long terme (depuis 1980)Série dessaisonalisée et lissée Série dessaisonalisée
-70-60-50-40-30-20-10
01020
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Industrie manufacturière
CommerceConstruction
Services aux entreprises
-70-60-50-40-30-20-10
01020
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-70-60-50-40-30-20-10
01020
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-70-60-50-40-30-20-10
01020
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Source: Banque nationale de Belgique (BNB), dernières données disponibles: janvier 2021.
8
Het consumentenvertrouwen gaat er wat op achteruit, na deforse verbetering vorige maand
-9 (mrt)
-26
-10 (jan)
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Consumentenvertrouwen Langetermijngemiddelde sinds 1985
Historisch minimum
Bron: NBB, laatst beschikbare gegevens: 21 januari 2021, perscommuniqué maandelijkse consumentenenquête.
https://www.nbb.be/doc/dq/n/dq3/histo/pne2101.pdf
12 14 13 9 11 12 1720 17 13 15 19
17 16 15 15 16 1423 24 21
21 2518
20 17 17 18 15 16
30 20 22 25 2128
51 52 55 59 59 58
30 36 39 41 39 35
0
20
40
60
80
100
Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan
Total Households with losses > 10%²Less than 1 month 1 - 3 months4 - 6 months More than 6 months
9Source: NBB, replies to January 2021 consumer survey (additional COVID-19 questions).1 Households with losses >10% (16 %) and less than three months savings (37 %) = 6 % of the total of households.2 16 % of total respondents.
How long can you cover your expensesthrough a savings buffer?(in % of the 1 850 respondents, unless otherwise stated)
Is your household sufferinga loss of income?(in % of 1 850 respondents)
Around 16 % of households suffer an income loss of more than 10 %and 37 % of them have a savings buffer of less than 3 months1
Yes:More than >10 %:
16 %
70 71 72 71 74 77
9 9 8 8 97
13 12 12 13 10 95 4 5 5 4 53 4
2 4 3 3
0
20
40
60
80
100
Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan
No losses < 10% 10-30%
30-50% >50%
No losses: 77 %A large majority ofBelgian householdshas been unaffected
(so far)
0
20
40
60
80
100O
ct
Nov De
c
Jan
Oct
Nov De
c
Jan
Oct
Nov De
c
Jan
Oct
Nov De
c
Jan
Belgium (1850respondents)
Flanders (750respondents)
Wallonie (750respondents)
Brussels (350respondents)
No losses < 10% 10 - 30 % 30 - 50% > 50%
10
Savings buffer remains higher in Flanders(in % of respondents with loss of income)
In January, the proportion of households sufferingno loss of income increases in all regions(in % of respondents)
Flemish households still hold the less defavourable position(especially regarding savings buffer)
25252224
16 12 13 16 9 9 1217 19 15 11 14
2611 17
19
2119 23 18 20 15
19 1524
21 24 2116
22
29 19
2124 19 24
15 1616 16
2628
22 2928
28
2127
42 45 45 4156 59 54 52
31 3543 36
3139 33 34
0
20
40
60
80
100
Oct
Nov De
c
Jan
Oct
Nov De
c
Jan
Oct
Nov De
c
Jan
Oct
Nov De
c
Jan
Belgium Flanders Wallonie Brussels
Less than 1 month 1 - 3 months4 - 6 months More than 6 months
Source: NBB, replies to January 2021 consumer survey (additional COVID-19 questions).
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
11Source: Algaba, A., Borms, S., Boudt, K. & Van Pelt, J. (2020). The Economic Policy Uncertainty index for Flanders, Wallonia and Belgium. Research note. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3580000.The index reflects normalized frequency counts of news articles related to economic policy uncertainty, latest available data: December 2020.
Economic Policy Uncertainty index for Belgium(monthly indicator)
Economic policy uncertainty has eased recently, but remains elevated
Belgian governmentformation
April 2020: COVID-19
Belgian government fallsover UN Migration Pact
European debt crisis
Global financial crisis
12
Labour market
13Source: Institut des Comptes Nationaux (ICN), dernières données disponibles: troisième trimestre 2020.
L’emploi salarié plus durement impacté que l’emploi indépendant(emploi en personnes - variation trimestrielle en %)
0,50,4 0,4 0,4
-0,2
-0,8
0,2
-1,2
-1,0
-0,8
-0,6
-0,4
-0,2
0,0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
2019-T1 2019-T2 2019-T3 2019-T4 2020-T1 2020-T2 2020-T3
Indépendants Salariés Emploi total
0,11
-0,46
0,05
-0,05
0,42
-0,70
0,94
0,08
0,15
-0,13
0,15
0,18
-0,38
-0,09
-1,67
-0,36
-0,480,05
-1,76
0,18
-0,56
-0,77
-2,0 -1,5 -1,0 -0,5 0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5
Agriculture
Industry
Construction
Trade, hotels and restaurants, transport
Information and communication
Financial activities
Property business
Business services
Administration and education
Health and social services
Other services
Total employment
2020 Q2 2020 Q3Source: NAI, latest available data: third quarter 2020.
14
Impact on employment stronger for some branches of activity(QoQ variation in %)
pm thousandsof people
4 880
213
654
855
975
30
113
129
1 000
291
560
60
15Source: Federgon, dernières données disponibles: novembre 2020.
Chute brutale du travail intérimaire en avril, reprise partielle par après(données mensuelles, en milliers d’heures)
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
700
750
800
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
16Sources: Actiris, Forem, VDAB, dernières données disponibles: décembre 2020.
VDABActiris
L’évolution des opportunités d’emplois suit les mesures de(dé)confinement(moyenne mensuelle des offres d’emplois reçues par les services publics de l’emploi régionaux via le circuit ordinaire)
Forem
0
500
1 000
1 500
2 000
2 500
3 00020
20 M
120
20 M
220
20 M
320
20 M
420
20 M
520
20 M
620
20 M
720
20 M
820
20 M
920
20 M
1020
20 M
1120
20 M
12
2019
2020
0
5 000
10 000
15 000
20 000
25 000
30 000
2020
M1
2020
M2
2020
M3
2020
M4
2020
M5
2020
M6
2020
M7
2020
M8
2020
M9
2020
M10
2020
M11
2020
M12
2019
2020
0
1 000
2 000
3 000
4 000
5 000
6 000
7 000
8 000
2020
M1
2020
M2
2020
M3
2020
M4
2020
M5
2020
M6
2020
M7
2020
M8
2020
M9
2020
M10
2020
M11
2020
M12
2019
2020
17Source: Federgon, dernières données disponibles (séries dessaisonalisées): décembre 2020.
Les prévisions d’emplois issues des enquêtes de conjonctureégalement(données désaisonnalisées et lissées)
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
IndustrieConstruction (gros œuvre de bâtiments)CommerceServices aux entreprises
Série dessaisonalisée et lissée Série dessaisonalisée
Mass redundancy procedures: above 2019 average(workers concerned)
18
0
500
1 000
1 500
2 000
2 500
Janu
ary
Febr
uary
Mar
ch
April
May
June July
Augu
st
Sept
embe
r
Oct
ober
Nov
embe
r
Dece
mbe
r
2020 2021 pm monthly average 2019
Source: Federal Public Service Employment, Labour and Social Dialogue (FPS ELSD), latest data available: 22 January 2021.
19Source: NEO, latest available data: November 2020.
Annual variation(monthly data, thousands of people)
Limited rise in unemployment for the time being …
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Flanders Wallonia Brussels Belgium
◆ Peak observed in May: +38 000, situation in November: +22 000
20
… concentrated on men and medium and highly-educated peopleAnnual variation(monthly data)
-20-15-10-505
1015202530
Men
Wom
en
Less
than
6 m
onth
s
6-12
mon
ths
1 yea
r and
mor
e
Youn
ger t
han
20
20-3
0 ye
ars
30-5
0 ye
ars
50 a
nd o
lder
Low-
educ
ated
Med
ium
-edu
cate
d
High
ly-ed
ucat
ed
In thousands of people In %
Source: NEO, latest available data: December 2020.
21Source: NAI, NEO, NBB, latest available data: December 2020.
Temporary unemployment: following lockdown measures
93429%
1 15537%
92229%
56218%
34111%
31110%
2438%
35711%
39313%
1 033
1 233
986
615
410331 281
423518
386
0
200
400
600
800
1 000
1 200
1 400
March April May June July August September October November December
Payments pm Employer's request (DRS) pm highest level recorded during the financial crisis
Average number of days per worker
March April May June July August September October November8.8 15.8 10.9 9.4 8.3 8.3 8.6 8.2 10.6
Monthly effective use and access demands(payments linked to COVID-19, thousands of people and % of private salaried employment, p.m. DRS linked to COVID-19, thousands of people,monthly data)
22Source: Federal Public Service Social Security, confidential data, NAI, NBB, latest available data: December 2020.1 Data related to payments.
Bridging right, provisional data1(thousands of people and % of self-employed in principal activity)
Self-employed: unprecedent use of financial support
396(48 %)
414(50 %) 379
(46 %)
144(17 %) 121
(15 %)119
(14 %) 85(10 %)
108(13 %)
151(18 %)
105(13 %)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
March April May June July August September October November December
Before the crisis, about 90 self-employed benefited of the bridging right.At the peak of the crisis, in April, they were 414 000.
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
2016
T120
16T2
2016
T320
16T4
2017
T120
17T2
2017
T320
17T4
2018
T120
18T2
2018
T320
18T4
2019
T120
19T2
2019
T320
19T4
2020
T120
20T2
2020
T3
2020
M10
e20
20M
11 e
Trimestriel Mensuel
23Source: Statbel, dernières données disponibles: en trimestriel: 3ème trimestre - en mensuel: novembre 2020.1 Les indicateurs mensuels sont sujets à de plus fortes fluctuations aléatoires que les résultats trimestriels et annuels car ils reposent sur un douzième de l’échantillon annuel. Les variations d’une
période à l’autre doivent être interprétés avec prudence.
Taux de chômage(15-64)
Taux d’emploi(20-64)
La crise sanitaire a interrompu une dynamique positive(taux harmonisés issus des enquêtes force de travail1)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2016
T120
16T2
2016
T320
16T4
2017
T120
17T2
2017
T320
17T4
2018
T120
18T2
2018
T320
18T4
2019
T120
19T2
2019
T320
19T4
2020
T120
20T2
2020
T3
2020
M10
e20
20M
11 e
24
ERMG survey
The ERMG survey has been monitoring the COVID-19 impact oncompanies and self-employed since the beginning of the crisis¹◆ Surveys conducted by (selection of) the following federations:
25
Round Period Federations Replies Comment1 23-24 March BECI, UWE, VOKA 1 700 Results not published2 30-31 March BECI, UNIZO, UWE, VOKA 4 725 First press release3 6-7 April BECI, BOERENBOND, NSZ, UNISOC, UNIZO, UWE, VOKA 6 900 UNISOC was analysed separately4 14-15 April BECI, NSZ, UNIZO, UWE, VOKA 5 5005 20-21 April BECI, NSZ, UNIZO, UWE, VOKA 3 5286 27-28 April BECI, NSZ, UNIZO, UWE, VOKA 4 2087 5-6 May BECI, BOERENBOND, UNIZO, UWE, VOKA 2 6758 12-13 May BECI, UNIZO, UWE, VOKA 2 1859 25-27 May BECI, NSZ, UNIZO, UWE, VOKA 2 99310 8-10 June BECI, NSZ, UNIZO, UWE, VOKA 2 36511 22-24 June BECI, NSZ, UNIZO, UWE, VOKA 3 13612 17-19 August BECI, NSZ, UCM, UNIZO, UWE, VOKA 4 43013 21-23 September BECI, NSZ, UNIZO, UWE, VOKA 2 86814 19-21 October BECI, UCM, UNIZO, UWE, VOKA 5 13115 9-10 November BECI, NSZ, UCM, UNIZO, UWE, VOKA 5 63116 7-9 December BECI, UCM, UNIZO, UWE, VOKA 3 79817 11-13 January BECI, NSZ, UCM, UNIZO, UWE, VOKA 5 358
Source: ERMG survey, latest available data: 12 January 2021.¹ Note that changes over time should be interpreted with care as the companies participating to the survey and the composition of the sample can differ from one week to another.
-33 -33-36
-33 -34 -32-29 -31
-26-23
-17-13 -14 -14
-17-14 -12
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
23 M
arch
30 M
arch
6 Ap
ril
13 A
pril
20 A
pril
27 A
pril
5 M
ay
12 M
ay
26 M
ay
9 Ju
ne
23 Ju
ne
18 A
ugus
t
22 S
epte
mbe
r
20 O
ctob
er
10 N
ovem
ber
8 De
cem
ber
12 Ja
nuar
y
Recovery
26Source: ERMG survey, latest available data: 12 January 2020.¹ This approach excludes the human health industry, the public sector and firms that were identified as belonging to a miscellaneous ‘other’ industry.² 2022 revenue expectations were not asked in the survey rounds before December.
Expected impact on turnover in 2021 / 2022(in %, weighted average based on revenues and industry value added¹)
COVID-19 impact on weekly turnover(in %, weighted average based on revenues and industry value added¹)
-10 -10-11 -12-9
-6-9
-4
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
2021 2022Expectation of Survey 18 AugustExpectation of Survey 22 SeptemberExpectation of Survey 20 OctoberExpectation of Survey 10 NovemberExpectation of Survey 8 DecemberExpectation of Survey 12 January
While the current revenue loss and the outlook have further improved,the recovery is still expected to remain slow and only partial
Lockdown I StagnationLockdown
II Recovery
NA²
NA²
NA²
NA²
-100
-90
-80
-70
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
Arts,entertainmentand recreation
Accommodationand foodservices
Transportationand logistics
Support services Construction Wholesale Manufacturing Information andcommunication
Retail sales(non-food)
Real estateactivities
Financial andinsuranceactivities
Agriculture Retail sales(food)
March-April (Lockdown I)(Rounds 2-6)
May-June(Rounds 7-11)
August-October(Rounds 12-14)
November 10 (Lockdown II)(Round 15)
December 8(Round 16)
January 12(Round 17)
27
While stable in most industries, revenues rise in January in non-foodretail, wholesale and real estate, but partly due to temporary factors¹
Source: ERMG survey, latest available data: 12 January 2021.¹ Temporary factors in January include the high discounts at the start of the sales period and pent-up demand after the November lockdown.
COVID-19 impact on weekly turnover(in %, weighted average based on revenues)
28Source: ERMG survey, latest available data: 12 January 2021.² The results for these industries are based on only a few respondents and should therefore be interpreted with caution.
Impact of the COVID-19 crisis on company turnover by industry(in %, weighted average based on revenues)
< -50 %
0 to -10 %
-10 to -20 %
-20 to -50 %
March-April(Lockdown I)(Rounds 2-6)
May-June(Rounds 7-11)
August-October(Rounds 12-14)
November(Lockdown II)
(Round 15)December(Round 16)
January(Round 17)
Events and recreation -85 -83 -79 -77 -79 -79Accommodation and food service activities -89 -78 -49 -66 -78 -70Aviation² -51 -60 -27 -15 -85 -41Road transport (persons) -55 -57 -15 -13 -23 -20Manufacture of food products -18 -19 -9 -12 -9 -18Human Resources -35 -30 -13 -11 -19 -17Liberal professions -23 -18 -10 -12 -13 -16Manufacture of textiles, wearing apparel and shoes -61 -43 -6 -19 -10 -12Manufacture of machinery and electrical equipment -29 -24 -14 -10 -11 -12Logistics -22 -26 -11 -11 -8 -11Construction -45 -20 -10 -9 -7 -10Wholesale -49 -31 -10 -19 -15 -9Engineering services -33 -15 -19 -12 -16 -8Information and communication -20 -29 -13 -13 -4 -8Retail sales (non-food) -80 -28 -15 -51 -24 -7Real estate activities -36 -26 -15 -37 -13 -7Consultancy -17 -20 -11 -14 -9 -7Manufacture of plastic and non-metallic products -19 -19 -12 -10 -8 -7Metallurgy -23 -30 -23 -10 -6 -6Manufacture of pharmaceutical and chemical products -16 -20 -11 -8 -10 -5Financial and insurance activities -13 -11 -8 -10 -1 -5Manufacture of transport equipment² -54 -36 -12 -21 -12 -5Manufacture of wood and paper products, and printing -36 -27 -11 -14 -10 -4Agriculture and fishing -14 -14 -6 -12 -10 -3Manufacture of furniture -66 -31 -13 -7 -3 -2Retail sales (food) -4 -8 -4 -9 1 -1Manufacture of computer, electronic and optical products -28 -19 -25 -11 -5 -1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Accommodationand
food services
Arts,entertainmentand recreation
Retail sales(non-food)
Transportationand logistics
Real estateactivities
Retail sales(food)
Support services Wholesale Manufacturing Information andcommunication
Construction Agriculture Financial andinsurance activities
Revenue decline by 100% Revenue decline by 75 - 99% Revenue decline by 50 - 75% Revenue decline by 20 - 50%Revenue decline by 0 - 20% No impact on revenues Positive impact on revenues
29
In addition to cross-sectoral differences, the revenue loss of firmsalso differs strongly within each industry
Source: Round 17 of ERMG survey, latest available data: 12 January 2021.¹ The results on this slide are not weighted by the 2019 revenue. Given that for most industries, the smaller firms report a larger loss, these unweighted results represent a larger average revenue loss
compared to the average revenue loss weighted by firm size, which is shown on the previous slides.
COVID-19 impact on current turnover (survey 12 January)(in % of responding firms; unweighted¹)
-70
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
March- April(Lockdown I)(Rounds 2-6)
May-June(Rounds 7-11)
August-October(Rounds 12-14)
November 10(Lockdown II)(Round 15)
December 8(Round 16)
January 12(Round 17)
Self-employed 1 - 10 10 - 20 20 - 50 50 - 250 250 - 1000 > 1000
30Source: ERMG survey, latest available data: 12 January 2021.¹ Results are not stratified by industry, but the observations of Boerenbond are excluded (to avoid an overrepresentation of the agriculture industry in the sample).
Reported COVID-19 impact on weekly turnover, by number of employees(in %, unweighted average¹)
Throughout the pandemic the self-employed and smallest firmshave been suffering the greatest losses
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
Self-employed 1 - 10 10 - 20 20 - 50 50 - 250 250 - 1000 > 1000
Flemish Region Walloon Region Brussels-Capital Region
31Source: Round 17 of ERMG survey, latest available data: 12 January 2021.¹ Results are not stratified by industry.
Reported impact on weekly turnover by number of employees (survey 12 January)(in %, unweighted average¹)
The January revenue loss of the self-employed and the smallest firmsis larger in Wallonia and Brussels
-100
-90
-80
-70
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
Arts,entertainmentand recreation
Accommodationand foodservices
Transportationand logistics
Support services Construction Wholesale Manufacturing Information andcommunication
Retail sales(non-food)
Real estateactivities
Financial andinsuranceactivities
Agriculture Retail sales(food)
All firms (weighted average based on revenues) Self-employed (unweighted average) 1-10 employees (unweighted average)
32
Also within each industry, average revenue losses are much larger forthe self-employed and the smallest firms
Source: ERMG survey, latest available data: 12 January 2021.
COVID-19 impact on current turnover (survey 12 January)(in %)
-100-90-80-70-60-50-40-30-20-10
0
Arts,entertainmentand recreation
Accommodationand foodservices
Transportationand logistics
Support services Construction Wholesale Manufacturing Information andcommunication
Retail sales(non-food)
Real estateactivities
Financial andinsuranceactivities
Agriculture Retail sales(food)
Week of January 12 2021 expectation 2022 expectation
33
Revenues are expected to improve in 2021 and 2022 in most industriesbut a persistent loss remains, especially for the worst-hit ones
Source: Round 17 of ERMG survey, latest available data: 12 January 2021,
Expected COVID-19 impact on current turnover and on turnover in 2021 and 2022 (survey 12 January)(in %, weighted average based on revenues)
34Source: ERMG survey, latest available data: 12 January 2021.¹ Weighted average based on industry value added. Please note that there are no results for the surveys in May and June.² Liquidity problems was not included in the surveys of March and April.
Reasons for the current revenue loss(in % of responding firms¹, multiple reasons are possible)
Lack of demand and the forced closure remain the key reasons for thecurrent revenue loss, even though they are cited slightly less in January
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Lack of demand Forced closure Social Distancing Supply chain problems Staff shortage Liquidity problems Other Not applicable:no revenue loss
March-April (Lockdown I)(Rounds 2-6)
August-October(Rounds 10-14)
November 10 (Lockdown II)(Round 15)
December 8(Round 16)
January 12(Round 17)
NA²
5,5
6,0
6,5
7,0
7,5
March- April(Lockdown I)(Rounds 2-6)
May-June(Rounds 7-11)
August-October(Rounds 12-14)²
November 10(Lockdown II)(Round 15)²
December 8(Round 16)²
January 12(Round 17)²
Self-employed 1 - 10 employees >10 employees
35Source: ERMG survey, latest available data: 12 January 2021.¹ Results are not stratified by industry; the observations of Boerenbond are excluded (to avoid an overrepresentation of the agriculture industry in the sample).² The degree of concern for the smallest firms and self-employed as of August is lower when excluding companies of the federation UCM, which only participated in the surveys as of August.
Degree of concern, by number of employees(in %, unweighted average¹)
Degree of concern has further declined, but it remains elevated forthe self-employed and smallest firms
36
The average firm expects its investment to be about 20 % belownormal in 2021 and still about 10 % below normal in 2022
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
Arts,entertainmentand recreation
Accommodationand foodservices
Transportationand logistics
Real estateactivities
Wholesale andretail trade
Manufacturing Supportservices
Information andcommunication
Construction Agriculture Financial andinsuranceactivities
2021 Investment 2022 Investment Belgium² 2021 Belgium² 2022
COVID-19 impact on expected investment in 2021 and 2022 (survey 12 January)(in %, unweighted average¹)
36Source: Round 17 of ERMG survey, latest available data: 12 January 2021.¹ The unweighted average does not take into account the size of the company. Since the large firms report a smaller decrease in their investments on average, the overall decrease in investment is smaller.² Weighted average based on the industry value added.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
No additionalfunding
Capital injectionby the owner,
family or friends
Increase inbank credit
Longerpayment terms
to suppliers
Intra-groupfinancing
Reduction ofpayment termsto customers
Capital injectionby a publicinvestmentcompany
Capital injectionby a privateinvestmentcompany
Capital injectionby another
non-financialcompany
Other
Self-employed 1 - 10 10 - 20 20 - 50 50 - 250 250 - 1000 >1000
37Source: Round 17 of ERMG survey, latest available data: 12 January 2021.¹ Results are not stratified by industry.
Additional financing sources (in addition to support measures) used since March 2020 (survey 12 Jan.)(in % of responding firms¹, who can select multiple sources; by staff size)
Additional financing sources since March differ by firm size
38
Many small firms still need additional financing in the short run andmany also expect to go bankrupt
Source: Round 17 of ERMG survey, latest available data: 12 January 2021.¹ Results are not stratified by industry..
How long can you still meet your currentfinancial obligations without having to relyon additional capital injections oradditional loans? (survey 12 January)(in % of responding firms¹, by staff size)
Do you expect bankruptcy proceedings withinthe next 6 months? (survey 12 January)(in % of responding firms¹, by staff size)
0102030405060708090
100
Self-
empl
oyed
1 - 10
10 -
20
20 -
50
50 -
250
250
- 100
0
> 10
00
0123456789
10
Self-
empl
oyed
1 - 10
10 -
20
20 -
50
50 -
250
250
- 100
0
> 10
00
Yes, within 6 monthsYes, within 3 monthsYes, within 1 monthYes, already in bankruptcy process
< 1 month1 – 3 months3 – 6 months6 - 12 months> 12 months
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
No Yes, due to revenue loss Yes, due to late payments Yes, due to insufficientcredit lines
Yes, due to delayedgovernment payments
March-April (Lockdown I)(Rounds 2-6)
May-June(Rounds 7-11)
August-October(Rounds 12-14)
November 10 (Lockdown II)(Round 15)
December 8(Round 16)
January 12(Round 17)
39
One in three firms faces liquidity problems, even though this hasimproved after the deterioration in November
Source: ERMG survey, latest available data: 12 January 2021.¹ Weighted average based on the industry value added.
Do you have liquidity problems?(in % of responding firms¹, multiple answers are possible)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Belgium² Accommodationand food services
Arts,entertainmentand recreation
Transportationand logistics
Retail sales(non-food)
Real estateactivities
Support services Information andcommunication
Wholesale Retail sales(food)
Construction Manufacturing Agriculture Financial andinsuranceactivities
Survey August 18(Round 12)
Survey October 20(Round 14)
Survey November 10(Round 15)
Survey December 8(Round 16)
Survey January 12(Round 17)
40
Bankruptcy risk has decreased in January but remains elevated …
Source: ERMG survey, latest available data: 12 January 2021.¹ The results of the September survey were left out as the sample was not representative (small firms based in Wallonia and Brussels, which regard the risk of bankruptcy as higher, were much less
represented in that survey).² Weighted average based on the industry value added.
Firms that consider bankruptcy to be likely or highly likely¹(in % of responding firms)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Belgium¹ Accommodationand food services
Arts,entertainmentand recreation
Transportationand logistics
Retail sales(non-food)
Real estateactivities
Support services Information andcommunication
Wholesale Retail sales(food)
Construction Manufacturing Agriculture Financial andinsuranceactivities
Survey 18 August Survey 22 September Survey 20 October Survey 10 November Survey 8 December Survey 12 January
41
… and firms estimate that almost 10 % of companies in their industryare currently in a bankruptcy process or already went bankrupt
Source: ERMG survey, latest available data: 12 January 2021.¹ Weighted average based on the industry value added.
Estimate of respondents on the proportion of companies in their sector that already are currentlyin a bankruptcy process or that already went bankrupt(in %, unweighted average)
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
Belgium¹ Accommodationand foodservices
Arts,entertainmentand recreation
Transportationand logistics
Retail sales(food)
Retail sales(non-food)
Real estateactivities
Support services Agriculture Financial andinsuranceactivities
Information andcommunication
Wholesale Manufacturing Construction
2020 2021
42Source: Round 17 of ERMG survey, latest available data: 12 January 2021.1 Average, weighted by the number of private sector employees in the industries.
Expected change in staff size in 2020 and 2021 (survey 12 January)(in % of total staff size of the firms in the survey, excluding self-employed)
After a decline in 2020, the number of employees in the private sectoris expected to remain stable in 2021 in net terms …
-60 000
-50 000
-40 000
-30 000
-20 000
-10 000
0
10 000
20 000
Accommodationand foodservices
Transportationand logistics
Wholesale andretail trade
Arts,entertainmentand recreation
Real estateactivities
Agriculture Financial andinsuranceactivities
Information andcommunication
Construction Support services Manufacturing
2020 2021
43Source: Round 17 of ERMG survey, latest available data: 12 January 2021.1 Average, weighted by the number of private sector employees in the industries.
Expected change of staff size in 2020 and 2021 (survey 12 January)(in number of employees, excluding self-employed)
... as net lay-offs in 2021 in some industries can be offset by plannednet hiring in other industries
-60 000
-50 000
-40 000
-30 000
-20 000
-10 000
0
10 000
20 000
Belgium¹
44Source: ERMG survey, latest available data: 12 January 2021.¹ Average, weighted by the number of the private sector employees of the industries in the Belgian economy.
Workforce organisation over time, Belgium¹(in % of total staff size of the firms in the survey, excl. self-employed)
The number of employees in full-time telework has further increased,while the number of temporary unemployed has declined
0
20
40
60
80
10020
Apr
il
27 A
pril
5 M
ay
12 M
ay
26 M
ay
9 Ju
ne
23 Ju
ne
18 A
ugus
t
22 S
epte
mbe
r
20 O
ctob
er
10 N
ovem
ber
8 De
cem
ber
12 Ja
nuar
y
temporarily unemployed telework mix telework/workplace at workplace sick leave on leave
0
20
40
60
80
100
Acco
mm
odat
ion
and
food
serv
ices
Arts,
ent
erta
inm
ent a
ndre
crea
tion
Tran
spor
tatio
n an
d lo
gisti
cs
Reta
il sale
s (no
n-fo
od)
Who
lesa
le
Man
ufac
turin
g
Reta
il sale
s (fo
od)
Supp
ort s
ervic
es
Info
rmat
ion
and
com
mun
icatio
n
Cons
truct
ion
Real
esta
te a
ctivi
ties
Finan
cial a
nd in
sura
nce
activ
ities
Agric
ultu
re
Workforce organisation by industry (survey 12 Jan.)(in % of total staff size of the firms in the survey, excl. self-employed)
45Source: ERMG survey of 12 January 2021.¹ Weighted average based on the industry value added.
The productivity loss due to the current teleworking is traced backto different elements
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Not applicable: noproductivity loss
Fewer ideas orless networking
No productiveworking
environment athome
Service is morequalitative when itis done physically
Insufficientphysical
infrastructure
Insufficientmanagement
control
Insufficient skills Insufficient digitalinfrastructure
Other
Reasons for reduced employee productivity due to teleworking in its current form (survey 12 January)(in % of responding firms (excl. firms without telework)¹; firms can select multiple reasons
46
Credit indicatorshouseholds
47Bron: NBB, laatste beschikbare gegevens: november 2020 (laatste bijwerking: 25 januari 2021).1 Andere activa bevatten vnl. verzekeringsproducten en niet-genoteerde aandelen en worden niet geraamd op maandelijkse basis.
Waardeverminderingen in 2020Q1 van de financiële activa van departiculieren hersteld tegen einde 2020 – verhoogd sparen in 2020
Financiële activa van de particulieren:transacties(in € miljard)
Financiële activa van de particulieren:revaluaties(in € miljard)
◆ In 2020Q1 veroorzaakte de sterke daling in de beurskoersen waardedalingen in de financiëleactiva van de particulieren voor 62,8 miljard euro.Door het herstel van de beurzen in 2020Q2, 2020Q3 en vooral in november zijn dewaardedalingen uit het eerste kwartaal zo goed als volledig hersteld tegen einde 2020.Negatieve prijseffecten waren beduidend hoger tijdens de financiële crisis van 2008.
◆ p.m. de totale financiële activa van de particulieren bedroegen 1 419 miljard eindseptember 2020.
-80-60-40-20
020406080
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
e
2020
Q1
2020
Q2
2020
Q3
2020
Oct
2020
Nov
Financiële rekeningen jaarlijks (raming tot november) 2020 perkwartaal
Schatting
Andere activa¹ Deposito's Beleggingsfondsen Schuldbewijzen Genoteerde aandelen Totaal
-5
0
5
10
15
20
2019
Q1
2019
Q2
2019
Q3
2019
Q4
2020
Q1
2020
Q2
2020
Q3
2020
Okt
2020
Nov
Financiële kwartaalrekeningen Schattingen
◆ De transacties in financiële activa van de particulieren in2020Q2 tonen forse investeringen voor totaal 18,4 miljard euro,voornamelijk door de stijging van de deposito’s, illustratief voorhet “geforceerd sparen” van de gezinnen tijdens delock down. De netto-investeringen in beleggingsfondsenen vooral in genoteerde aandelen bleven ook op eenhoog niveau in 2020Q3, evenals in de maandnovember.
48Bron: Schema A, laatste beschikbare gegevens: november 2020.
Alle deposito’s(Maandelijkse nettogroei, € miljoen)
Deposito’s Belgische huishoudens(€ miljard, sector, maandelijkse gegevens)
Deposito’s van Belgische huishoudens
150
200
250
300
350
400
450jan
-15
jun-
15
nov-
15
apr-
16
sep-
16
feb-
17
jul-1
7
dec-
17
mei
-18
okt-
18
mrt-
19
aug-
19
jan-2
0
jun-
20
nov-
20
Alle deposito's Spaarboekje
-2 000
0
2 000
4 000
6 000
8 000
10 000
jan-1
9fe
b-19
mrt-
19ap
r-19
mei
-19
jun-
19ju
l-19
aug-
19se
p-19
okt-
19no
v-19
dec-
19jan
-20
feb-
20m
rt-20
apr-
20m
ei-2
0ju
n-20
jul-2
0au
g-20
sep-
20ok
t-20
nov-
20
Negatieve saldi op rekeningen / kredietkaarten
49
Negatieve saldi op rekeningen(stock, in € miljoen, maandelijkse gegevens)
Bron: Ad hoc rapportering, Febelfin, op basis van 7 banken, laatst beschikbaregegevens: 28 december 2020.Bron: Schema A, voorschotten rekening courant, laatste beschikbare gegevens: november 2020.
Aantal rekeningen “teveel in het rood”(aantal, in duizend, wekelijkse gegevens)
1 000
1 500
2 000
2 500
3 000
3 50012
/201
4
05/2
015
10/2
015
03/2
016
08/2
016
01/2
017
06/2
017
11/2
017
04/2
018
09/2
018
02/2
019
07/2
019
12/2
019
05/2
020
10/2
020
0
50
100
150
200
250
W 13
/4W
20/
4W
27/
4W
4/5
W 11
/5W
18/5
W 2
5/5
W 1/
6W
8/6
W 15
/6W
22/
6W
29/
6W
6/7
W 13
/7W
20/
7W
27/
7W
3/8
W 10
/8W
17/8
W 2
4/8
W 3
1/8
W 7
/9W
14/9
W 2
1/9
W 5
/10
W 19
/10
W 2
/11
W 16
/11
W 3
0/11
W 14
/12
W 2
8/12
Bankkredieten van Belgische huishoudens
50Bron: Schema A, laatste beschikbare gegevens: november 2020.
Groeivoet(op jaarbasis, %)
Stock(€ miljard)
150
170
190
210
230
250
270
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020-3
0
3
6
9
12
15
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Belgium Euro area
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
35020
0720
0820
0920
1020
1120
1220
1320
1420
1520
1620
1720
1820
1920
20
51Bron: Centrale voor Kredieten aan Particulieren (CKP), laatste beschikbare gegevens: 22 januari 2020
Wanbetalingsgraad(Aantal uitstaande achterstallige contracten, % van alle uitstaandecontracten in CKP/ENR)
Nieuwe leningen(geregistreerd bedrag per werkdag in CKP, in € miljoenen)
Hypotheekleningen: nieuwe leningen en wanbetalingsgraad
Gemiddelde per werkdag over de laatste 12 maandenGemiddelde per werkdag over de laatste maandGemiddelde per werkdag over de laatste 5 werkdagen
07/0
330
/03
22/0
415
/05
07/0
630
/06
23/0
715
/08
07/0
930
/09
23/1
015
/11
08/1
231
/12
0,0%
0,2%
0,4%
0,6%
0,8%
1,0%
1,2%
1,4%
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
05101520253035404550
24/0
318
/04
13/0
507
/06
02/0
727
/07
21/0
815
/09
10/1
004
/11
29/1
124
/12
18/0
1
Aantal uitstaande achterstallige contracten(dagelijkse gegevens, rechterschaal in duizenden)
Aantal uitstaande achterstallige contracten(maandelijkse gegevens, rechterschaal in duizenden)
Wanbetalingsgraad(dagelijkse gegevens, linkerschaal in %)
Wanbetalingsgraad(maandelijkse gegevens, linkerschaal in %)
07/0
330
/03
22/0
415
/05
07/0
630
/06
23/0
715
/08
07/0
930
/09
23/1
015
/11
08/1
231
/12
52Bron: CKP, laatste beschikbare gegevens: 22 januari 2021.1 Leningen en verkopen op afbetaling (uitgezonderd kredietopeningen).
Wanbetalingsgraad(Aantal uitstaande achterstallige contracten, % van alle uitstaandecontracten in CKP/ENR)
Nieuwe leningen(geregistreerd bedrag per werkdag in CKP, in € miljoenen)
Consumentenkredieten1: nieuwe leningen en wanbetalingsgraad
Gemiddelde per werkdag over de laatste 12 maandenGemiddelde per werkdag over de laatste maandGemiddelde per werkdag over de laatste 5 werkdagen
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
7020
0720
0820
0920
1020
1120
1220
1320
1420
1520
1620
1720
1820
1920
200
50.00 0
10 0.000
15 0.000
200.0 00
250.0 00
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
0
50
100
150
200
250
24/0
323
/04
23/0
522
/06
22/0
721
/08
20/0
920
/10
19/1
119
/12
18/0
1
Aantal uitstaande achterstallige contracten(dagelijkse gegevens, rechterschaal in duizenden)
Aantal uitstaande achterstallige contracten(maandelijkse gegevens, rechterschaal in duizenden)
Wanbetalingsgraad(dagelijkse gegevens, linkerschaal in %)
Wanbetalingsgraad(maandelijkse gegevens, linkerschaal in %)
◆ Aantal consumentenleningen die genieten ofgenoten hebben van een moratorium zoalsgeregistreerd in de Centrale voor Kredieten aanParticulieren (op 17 januari)
◇ 8 247 leningen
◇ waarvan 7 991 leningen op afbetaling(0,4 % van alle leningen op afbetaling)
53Bronnen: CKP, Febelfin.
Aantal hypotheekleningen onder moratorium
Moratoria voor leningen aan gezinnen
4,4 %
0,5 %
Aantal hypotheekleningen met een lopend moratoriumwaarvan: verlenging van eerder verleende moratoria
Aantal hypotheekleningen die genieten of genoten hebben van een moratoriumzoals geregistreerd in de Centrale voor Kredieten aan Particulieren
Febelfincijfers voor de 7 grootste banken
0
20 000
40 000
60 000
80 000
100 000
120 000
140 000
160 000
03/0
510
/05
17/0
524
/05
31/0
507
/06
14/0
621
/06
28/0
605
/07
12/0
719
/07
26/0
702
/08
09/0
816
/08
23/0
830
/08
06/0
913
/09
20/0
927
/09
11/1
025
/10
08/1
122
/11
06/1
220
/12
03/0
117
/01
54Bron: Febelfin, laatste beschikbare gegevens: 11 januari 2021.
Achterstanden bij leningen aan huishoudens stabiel sinds juni
0,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
2,0
2,5
3,0
3,5
4,0
4,513
/420
/427
/4 4/5
11/5
18/5
25/5 1/6
8/6
15/6
22/6
29/6 6/7
13/7
20/7
27/7 3/8
10/8
17/8
24/8
31/8 7/9
14/9
21/9
5/10
19/1
02/
1116
/11
30/1
114
/12
28/1
211
/1
Hypothecaire leningen Consumentenkredieten
Betalingsachterstand (1-30 dagen) op hypothecaire leningen en consumentenleningen(wekelijkse gegevens, aantal leningen met een betalingsachterstand van 1-30 dagen als % van het totaal aantal leningen)
55
Credit indicatorscorporates
56Sources: ECB, NBB.
Impact of the COVID-19 crisis on lending to non-financialcorporations (NFCs)◆ Credit developments: (see next slides)
◇ While annual NFC growth of utilised loans had accelerated in March and April (in large part due todrawdowns of credit lines by multinationals), it has slowed since May.
◇ The annual growth rate of authorised (granted) credit is now lower than that observed before the pandemic◇ The annual growth rate of used credits in September and in October are influenced by a base effect due to a
large one-off transaction that took place one year earlier (only in the Central Corporate Credit Register data)◇ Monthly growth rates of utilised and authorised loans have been low since June, with some monthly growth
rates being negative◇ Loan arrears have been stable since May◇ Small or medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) have larger proportions of loans in moratorium than larger firms
◆ According to the January 2021 Bank lending survey:◇ Declining demand for loans from Belgian enterprises in 2020Q4 was driven by a fall in fixed investment and
less need for inventories and working capital. Banks expect that this trend will go on in 2021Q1◇ No change regarding tightening in credit standards, but risk perception is still higher
57Sources: ECB, NBB.
Firms perceived less favorable credit conditions◆ Belgian firms reported a slight improvement of their credit conditions in 2020Q3 compared to
2020Q2◇ Slight improvement in the assessment of the general credit conditions by firms
- Mainly due to the industry sector and large firms- From 2020, the balance of the opinions (favorable vs unfavorable) is below the historical average
◇ Small deterioration with respect to 2020Q2 regarding requirements for collateral(source: NBB survey on credit conditions)
◆ SMEs feared a significant impact on bank loan availability in 2020Q4 and 2021Q1◇ Small deterioration regarding obstacles impeding access to bank financing between April and September
2020 compared to the previous six months- Proportion of SMEs not applying for bank credit because of possible rejection, or applying for a loan but only
receiving a limited part of the amount requested, refusing credit because the cost was too high, or having theirapplication rejected = 7.2 % (against 5,9 % on average in 2017-2019 and 5.2 % from October 2019 to March 2020)
◇ But SMEs expected a sharp deterioration in availability of bank loans over the next six months(October 2020-March 2021)- Widespread across sectors(source: SAFE survey, conducted between 7 September and 16 October 2020)
58
Non-financial corporations
NFC credit growth in Belgium: slowdown after the peak in March andApril(year-on-year % changes1, up to November 2020)
Sources: European Central Bank (ECB), NBB (Balance Sheet Items), latest available data: 30 November 2020.1 Loans granted by resident MFIs to residents, including securitised loans and loans otherwise transferred.
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Belgium Euro area
Reduced contribution of multinational corporations to total creditgrowth, after massive drawdowns of credit lines in March and April …
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
2017 2018 2019 2020
Local corporations Multinational corporations¹ Total
59Sources: NBB (Central Corporate Credit Register), latest available data: 30 November 2020.1 Firms with direct investment abroad or at least partially owned by foreign investors (10 % threshold), identified by SX.
Year-on-year growth rates for utilised credit(%)
Year-on-year growth rates for authorised credit(%)
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
2017 2018 2019 2020
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
2017 2018 2019 2020
Up to one year (or undefined) One to two years Two to five years Over five years Total
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
2017 2018 2019 2020
60Source: NBB (Central Corporate Credit Register), latest available data: 30 November 2020.
Decomposition of YoY used corporate creditgrowth by maturity(%)
… which also translates into a lower contribution of short-term loans
Decomposition of YoY authorized corporatecredit growth by maturity(%)
-2
-1
0
1
2020m5 2020m6 2020m7 2020m8 2020m9 2020m10 2020m11
utilised authorised
Slightly positive growth of authorised and utilised loans inNovember
61Source: NBB (Central Corporate Credit Register), latest available data: November 2020.
Monthly growth rates of loans for Novemberof previous years(in %)
Monthly growth rates of authorised andutilised loans(in %)
0
1
2
3
2017m11 2018m11 2019m11 2020m11
- 4- 2 0 2 4 6 8
10 12
Arts,
ent
erta
inm
ent
and
recr
eatio
n
Hore
ca
Who
lesa
le a
ndre
tail t
rade
Real
esta
te a
ctivi
ties
Cons
truct
ion
Man
ufac
turin
g
Tran
spor
tatio
nan
d sto
rage
Info
rmat
ion
and
com
mun
icatio
n
Supp
ort s
ervic
es
Agric
ultu
re, f
ores
try
and
fishi
ngFin
ancia
l and
insu
ranc
eac
tiviti
es
Oth
erMar-Nov 2020 4-y avg Mar-Nov
-4-202468
1012
Arts,
ent
erta
inm
ent
and
recr
eatio
n
Hore
ca
Who
lesa
le a
ndre
tail t
rade
Real
esta
te a
ctivi
ties
Cons
truct
ion
Man
ufac
turin
g
Tran
spor
tatio
nan
d sto
rage
Info
rmat
ion
and
com
mun
icatio
n
Supp
ort s
ervic
es
Agric
ultu
re, f
ores
try
and
fishi
ngFin
ancia
l and
insu
ranc
eac
tiviti
es
Oth
er
62Source: NBB (Central Corporate Credit Register), latest available data: November 2020.Note: Sectors are ordered based on the initial fall in sales due to the crisis (greater declines from right to left). “Other” contains all other sectors in the economy.
March-November growth rates of utilisedloans(in %)
March-November growth rates of authorisedloans(in %)
Growth in authorised and utilised loans since start of crisis is belowhistorical averages for many vulnerable sectors
60
98
56
91
45
81
18
91
47
88
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
ShortTerm
LongTerm
ShortTerm
LongTerm
ShortTerm
LongTerm
ShortTerm
LongTerm
ShortTerm
LongTerm
Self-employed(1)
SMEs(2)
Corporates(3)
Public(4)
Sum of(1) to (4)= total
63
Loan developments - weeklyNFCs in weekly reporting = Self-employed + SMEs + Corporates + Public Sector Entities
Utilisation rate (=utilised/authorized)(last weekly observation, in %)
Evolution of total loans to NFCs(in %)
99,6
97,3
80
85
90
95
100
10531
/05
14/0
6
28/0
6
12/0
7
26/0
7
09/0
8
23/0
8
06/0
9
20/0
9
11/1
0
08/1
1
06/1
2
03/0
1
Authorised Utilised
Total loans to NFCs represented as an indexnormalized to 100 % by end May stock of loans
Source: NBB/Febelfin ad hoc weekly reporting, latest available data: 3 January 2021.Note: Firm classification was provided by the banks on a best effort basis. It may differ from the official firm classification.
103,3
102,0
9092949698
100102104
31/0
507
/06
14/0
621
/06
28/0
605
/07
12/0
719
/07
26/0
702
/08
09/0
816
/08
23/0
830
/08
06/0
913
/09
20/0
927
/09
11/1
025
/10
08/1
122
/11
06/1
220
/12
03/0
1
96,7
92,29092949698
100102104
31/0
507
/06
14/0
621
/06
28/0
605
/07
12/0
719
/07
26/0
702
/08
09/0
816
/08
23/0
830
/08
06/0
913
/09
20/0
927
/09
11/1
025
/10
08/1
122
/11
06/1
220
/12
03/0
1Authorised Utilised
101,1
99,5
9092949698
100102104
31/0
507
/06
14/0
621
/06
28/0
605
/07
12/0
719
/07
26/0
702
/08
09/0
816
/08
23/0
830
/08
06/0
913
/09
20/0
927
/09
11/1
025
/10
08/1
122
/11
06/1
220
/12
03/0
1
Total loans to NFCs represented as an index normalized to 100 % by end May stock of loans64
Stable loans for firms except for a decline for corporatesNFCs in weekly reporting = Self-employed + SMEs + Corporates + Public Sector Entities
Evolution of total loans to SMEsLatest observation (authorized) 83 billion EUR
Evolution of total loans to self-employedLatest observation (authorized) 23 billion EUR
103,0
102,2
9092949698
100102104
31/0
507
/06
14/0
621
/06
28/0
605
/07
12/0
719
/07
26/0
702
/08
09/0
816
/08
23/0
830
/08
06/0
913
/09
20/0
927
/09
11/1
025
/10
08/1
122
/11
06/1
220
/12
03/0
1
Total loans to public sector entitiesLatest observation (authorized) 37 billion EUR
Evolution of total loans to corporatesLatest observation (authorized) 139 billion EUR
Source: NBB/Febelfin ad hoc weekly reporting, latest available data: 3 January 2021.Note: Firm classification was provided by the banks on a best effort basis. It may differ from the official firm classification.
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
03/0
510
/05
17/0
524
/05
31/0
507
/06
14/0
621
/06
28/0
605
/07
12/0
719
/07
26/0
702
/08
09/0
816
/08
23/0
830
/08
06/0
913
/09
20/0
927
/09
11/1
025
/10
08/1
122
/11
06/1
220
/12
03/0
1
Self-employed SMEs Corporates Public
65
Number of loans in arrears or in default are not increasing (yet?)(arrears – weekly)
Number of loans in arrears or in default(in thousands of people)
Amounts in arrears or in default(in € millions)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
03/0
510
/05
17/0
524
/05
31/0
507
/06
14/0
621
/06
28/0
605
/07
12/0
719
/07
26/0
702
/08
09/0
816
/08
23/0
830
/08
06/0
913
/09
20/0
927
/09
11/1
025
/10
08/1
122
/11
06/1
220
/12
03/0
1
Source: NBB/Febelfin ad hoc weekly reporting, latest available data: 3 January 2021.Note: Firm classification was provided by the banks on a best effort basis. It may differ from the official firm classification.
The observed increase for SMEs on 20th September is due to a technical correction.The increase of arrears for the corporate segment is linked to end-of-year operational events.
4%
55%
39%
2%
Self-employed SMEs Corporates Public
8%
30%
49%
13%
66
Total loan amounts by type of counterpartyLoan amounts in moratorium by type of counterparty
SMEs are the main beneficiaries of moratorium relative to their shareof total loans(moratorium – weekly)
Source: NBB/Febelfin ad hoc weekly reporting, latest available data: 3 January 2021.Note: Firm classification was provided by the banks on a best effort basis. It may differ from the official firm classification.
67
0,1
1,0
0,1
3,5
0,2
3,3
0,0 0,2 0,1
2,5
Short Term Long Term Short Term Long Term Short Term Long Term Short Term Long Term Short Term Long Term
Self-employed(1)
SMEs(2)
Corporates(3)
Public(4)
Sum of(1) to (4) = total
Long term loans are the main type of loans in moratorium(moratorium – weekly)
% of exposures in moratorium(last weekly observation)
Source: NBB/Febelfin ad hoc weekly reporting, latest available data: 3 January 2021.Note: Firm classification was provided by the banks on a best effort basis. It may differ from the official firm classification.
68
Total loan amounts by type of counterpartyLoan amounts under state guarantee by type ofcounterparty
Take-up of the state guarantee - by type of counterpartyResults, taking into account only state guarantee I(weekly data)
4,21%
43,37%52,22%
0,21%
Self-employed SMEs Corporates Public
Source: NBB/Febelfin ad hoc weekly reporting, latest available data: 3 January 2021.Note: Firm classification was provided by the banks on a best effort basis. It may differ from the official firm classification.
8%
30%
49%
13%
69
Bankruptcies andnew business registrations
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Sep 2020 Oct 2020 Nov 2020 Dec 2020 Mid-Jan 2021(current month)
70
Source: Statbel, latest available data: 12 January 20211 Declaration of bankruptcy by the company court.2 Although the moratorium on filings for bankruptcies came to an end on 17 June 2020, the tax administration and the ONSS applied a de facto moratorium on tax and social security debts.
Other measures taken were the deferment of payment of the annual company contribution (until 31 October 2020) and the social security contributions (until 15 December 2020), and the reintroduction of a temporarysuspension of seizures. On Friday 6 November 2020, a new moratorium on bankruptcies until 31 January 2021 was approved towards businesses forced to close temporarily following the emergency measures takento limit COVID-19 and a further extension to 31 December for the payment of the annual company contribution. A new draft judicial reorganisation procedure is expected by 31 January 2021. For employersstruggling with the crisis, the ONSS agrees to an exceptional amicable payment plan with a maximum duration of 24 months for the settlement of sums due for the year 2020 (a.o. holiday pay for the 2019financial year, the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th quarters of 2020). At the level of the FPS Finance, companies in difficulty as a result of the coronavirus can apply for support measures until 31 March 2021 by meansof a payment plan, exemption from interest on arrears and remission of fines for non-payment regarding several taxes..
(# by activity)Bankruptcies(# by region)
The number of bankruptcies1 decreases further in December 2020and remains far below the 2019 level …... since several provisions adopted to support businesses are still in place2
◆ About 96 % of bankruptcies are within the ‘0 to 9 workers’company size class
0
200
400
600
800
1 000
1 200
1 400
Jan2020
Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan2021
2020 VLA 2020 BRU 2020 WAL 2019 Belgium Transport & other servicesTradeIndustries & energy
Hotel & restaurantBuildingAgriculture & fisheries
71
(# by activity)Bankruptcies1(# by region)
2021: weekly bankruptcies figures increase since end-2020 accordingto seasonal patterns …… but remain below the 2015-19 average
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
3-9
10-16
17-2
324
-30
31 A
ug-6 7-13
14-2
021
-27
28 Se
pt-4 5-11
12-18
19-2
526
Oct-
12-
89-
1516
-22
23-2
930
Nov
-6 7-13
14-2
021
-27
28 D
ec-3 4-10
11-17
August September October November December January
VLA BRU WAL Avg 2015-19 Belgium
◆ Since August 31, the number of bankruptcies remains 35 % below the2015-19 average while in August, declared bankruptcies were close to it
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
3-9
10-16
17-2
324
-30
31 A
ug-6 7-13
14-2
021
-27
28 Se
pt-4 5-11
12-18
19-2
526
Oct-
12-
89-
1516
-22
23-2
930
Nov
-6 7-13
14-2
021
-27
28 D
ec-3 4-10
11-17
August September October November December January
Transport & other servicesTradeIndustries & energy
Hotel & restaurantBuildingAgriculture & fisheries
Source: Statbel, latest available data: 12 January 2021.1 Declaration of bankruptcy by the company court.
72
New businesses1
Business startups rise in October according to seasonal patterns… and are still higher than in 2019
0
2 000
4 000
6 000
8 000
10 000
12 000
14 000
16 000
18 000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
VLA BRU WAL 2019 Belgium
Source: Statbel, latest available data: October 2020.1 Business creation as measured by entities registering (first registrations & re-registrations) as a VAT unit in the Crossroads Bank for Enterprises.
73
Financial markets
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
VIX VSTOXX
Financial markets reflect optimism, but remain at risk of setback
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
04/2
018
07/2
018
10/2
018
01/2
019
04/2
019
07/2
019
10/2
019
01/2
020
04/2
020
07/2
020
10/2
020
01/2
021
BEL 20 Euro Stoxx 50 FTSE 100 S&P 500
◆ Recent events, including the ratification of the Brexit deal, vaccine regulatory approvals, and new US government, helped unravel some of theaccumulated volatility. However, uncertainty remains over unresolved issues, such as the full impact of Brexit, new virus variants and new lockdowns,as well as sluggish vaccine rollout in some countries
◆ Confirmation of accommodative monetary stance and the prospect of new US fiscal stimulus have supported stock prices. The continueddepreciation of the dollar and encouraging US PMI data contributed to the S&P’s rally
74Source: Refinitiv, latest available data: 22 January 2021.
Major stock market indices(01/2018=100)
Implied stock market volatility(in %)
-80-60-40-20
020406080
100120140160
07/2
019
08/2
019
09/2
019
10/2
019
11/2
019
12/2
019
01/2
020
02/2
020
03/2
020
04/2
020
05/2
020
06/2
020
07/2
020
08/2
020
09/2
020
10/2
020
11/2
020
12/2
020
01/2
021
Crude Oil WTI Metals index
Copper Gold
◆ Oil price reached its highest level since the beginningof the crisis. However, prices remain extremelyvulnerable:◇ With global demand still affected by mobility
restrictions◇ Recent disagreement over production: Saudi
Arabia supported prices by pledging to cutproduction, while Russia and Kazakhstan are callingto increase production
◆ Gold price remains high in an uncertain environment,supported by weak dollar and rising inflationexpectations
◆ Prices of industrial metals have risen due to increaseddemand (partly linked to green recovery) andsupply disruptions◇ Copper trading near eight-year high
75Source: Datastream, latest available data: 22 January 2021.Note: the metals index includes aluminium, copper, lead, iron ore, tin, nickel and zinc.
Commodity price indices(01/07/2019 = 100)
Oil price recovery continues, amid disagreement within OPEC+
Corporate spreads stabilise and draw closer to their pre-crisis level
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
90007
/201
908
/201
909
/201
910
/201
911
/201
912
/201
901
/202
002
/202
003
/202
004
/202
005
/202
006
/202
007
/202
008
/202
009
/202
010
/202
011
/202
012
/202
001
/202
1US BBB Euro BBB US BB Euro BB
◆ Supportive measures by the ECB and the US Fed havehelped lower corporate yields and improved financingconditions for firms.
◆ Spreads of investment-grade corporate bonds havereturned to pre-pandemic levels.
◆ The decline in corporate spreads also reflectsinvestors’ confidence that companies will endure thepandemic.
76Source: BofA Merrill Lynch from Datastream, latest available data: 22 January 2021.
Corporate bond spreads (€ or $ denominated)(Difference vis-à-vis sovereign, basis points)
0,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
2,0
2,5
3,0
3,501
/201
803
/201
805
/201
807
/201
809
/201
811
/201
801
/201
903
/201
905
/201
907
/201
909
/201
911
/201
901
/202
003
/202
005
/202
007
/202
009
/202
011
/202
001
/202
1
Belgium Spain France Italy Netherlands
Sovereign bond spreads remain low, close to pre-pandemic levels
◆ Despite the appearance of new virus variants andreintroduction of related mobility restrictions,sovereign spreads stabilised close to their pre-crisislevels, helped by ECB’s reconfirmation of itsaccommodative monetary policy stance
◆ Recent rise in Italian spreads can be linked to marketconcerns over political uncertainty
77Source: Refinitiv, latest available data: 22 January 2021.
10-year spreads vis-à-vis Germany (EA)(%)
78
International outlook
79
Composite mobility indicator1(% change from pre-COVID-19 baseline; 7-day moving average)
Second wave: mobility less affected than in the spring
Sources: Google, Apple. Construction of mobility composite inspired by Capital Economics.1 Composite indicator is a simple average of changes in Google mobility report scores for categories “retail and recreation”, “workplaces”, and “transit stations”, and changes in Apple routing requests for
driving. Pre-COVID-19 baseline is the median value (for the corresponding day of the week) of each sub-indicator over the period January – 6 February 2020. Latest values are for 19 January 2021.
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
4022
/02/
2020
29/0
2/20
2007
/03/
2020
14/0
3/20
2021
/03/
2020
28/0
3/20
2004
/04/
2020
11/0
4/20
2018
/04/
2020
25/0
4/20
2002
/05/
2020
09/0
5/20
2016
/05/
2020
23/0
5/20
2030
/05/
2020
06/0
6/20
2013
/06/
2020
20/0
6/20
2027
/06/
2020
04/0
7/20
2011
/07/
2020
18/0
7/20
2025
/07/
2020
01/0
8/20
2008
/08/
2020
15/0
8/20
2022
/08/
2020
29/0
8/20
2005
/09/
2020
12/0
9/20
2019
/09/
2020
26/0
9/20
2003
/10/
2020
10/1
0/20
2017
/10/
2020
24/1
0/20
2031
/10/
2020
07/1
1/20
2014
/11/
2020
21/1
1/20
2028
/11/
2020
05/1
2/20
2012
/12/
2020
19/1
2/20
2026
/12/
2020
02/0
1/20
2109
/01/
2021
16/0
1/20
2123
/01/
2021
Netherlands France Germany Spain UK Sweden US Japan Belgium
80
GDP growth1 correlates positively with changes inmobility3, even after taking into account lockdownstringency2 and COVID deaths
No clear relationship between GDP growth1 andlockdown stringency2 once changes in mobility3and COVID deaths are taken into account
GDP growth: actual mobility has a stronger impact than thestringency of containment measures
BE Q1BE Q2
BE Q3
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80
Resid
ual r
eal G
DP
grow
th (q
oq%
)
Oxford stringency index (qoq change)
BE Q1
BE Q2
BE Q3
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60
Resid
ual r
eal G
DP g
rowt
h (q
oq%
)
Google mobility retail/recreation (qoq change)
2020Q12020Q22020Q3
Sources: OECD, OxCGRT, Google.1 Country sample consists of 45 OECD and major non-OECD countries over 2020Q1-Q3. Each dot represents a country-quarter. Y-axes represent partial residuals from regression of real GDP growth
on lockdown stringency, mobility, COVID deaths and quarter dummies.2 Oxford Stringency index codifies 9 types of containment measures. Index levels take values between 0 (no restrictions) and 100 (hard nationwide lockdown).3 Google mobility report scores for category “retail and recreation”. Level scores indicate percentage deviation from pre-COVID baseline. China is excluded due to lack of data.
81Source: Refinitiv.
Service sector PMIs(diffusion index; 50+ signals expected expansion)
Manufacturing PMIs(diffusion index; 50+ signals expected expansion)
Second wave: lockdowns weigh on sentiment in services
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
6512
/201
9
1/20
20
2/20
20
3/20
20
4/20
20
5/20
20
6/20
20
7/20
20
8/20
20
9/20
20
10/2
020
11/2
020
12/2
020
1/20
21
Euro area US Japan China(Caixin) UK
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
12/2
019
01/2
020
02/2
020
03/2
020
04/2
020
05/2
020
06/2
020
07/2
020
08/2
020
09/2
020
10/2
020
11/2
020
12/2
020
01/2
021
82
Euro area: extra-EA-19 goods export volumes2(% change yoy)
World goods trade volumes1(average of exports and imports, % change yoy)
International trade: World is back to pre-COVID levels, EA lags behind
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
1/20
183/
2018
5/20
187/
2018
9/20
1811
/201
81/
2019
3/20
195/
2019
7/20
199/
2019
11/2
019
1/20
203/
2020
5/20
207/
2020
9/20
2011
/202
0World Advanced economiesEmerging economies Euro areaChina
-40-35-30-25-20-15-10-505
101520
1/20
18
3/20
18
5/20
18
7/20
18
9/20
18
11/2
018
1/20
19
3/20
19
5/20
19
7/20
19
9/20
19
11/2
019
1/20
20
3/20
20
5/20
20
7/20
20
9/20
20
11/2
020
Consumer goods (excl. transport eqp.)
Intermediate goods
Capital goodsSources: Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis (CPB), Eurostat, Refinitiv.1 Latest available data: November 2020.2 Latest available data: October 2020.
Chinese exportsboosted by demandfor COVID-19-relatedproducts, incl. PPE,medical equipment,work-from-homeelectronics.
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2019 2020
GDP Industry Construction Services
83Source: CEIC.
More balanced between sectors(% change, yoy)
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2019 2020
Consumption Investment
Net exports GDP growth (in %, YoY)
Equally driven by consumption andinvestment(contribution to growth in percentage points, yoy)
China: Q4 growth back to pre-crisis levels
84Sources: IMF.1 Data cover 73,8 % of world GDP.
Contributions of consumption and investment to world GDP growth1(percentage points, yoy)
Chinese investment pulls global growth out of the through
Strong rebound in private consumption in 2020Q3 suggestsrelease of pent-up demand and adjustments to telework
Investment picked up relatively slowly, except in China
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3
2017 2018 2019 2020
Other EMDEs investmentOther EMDEs private consumptionAEs investmentAEs private consumptionChina investmentChina private consumptionTotal private consumption and investmentWorld GDP growth
85
Selected European countries: Real GDP1(index, 2019Q4 = 100)
Major blocs: Real GDP1(index, 2019Q4 = 100)
Recovery across countries: my way …
7580859095
100105110115
2019
Q4
2020
Q1
2020
Q2
2020
Q3
2020
Q4
2021
Q1
2021
Q2
2021
Q3
2021
Q4
Euro areaUSChinaJapanConsensus forecast (8/1/2021, average of last 8+ revisions)
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
2019
Q4
2020
Q1
2020
Q2
2020
Q3
2020
Q4
2021
Q1
2021
Q2
2021
Q3
2021
Q4
GermanyFranceSpainUKConsensus forecast (8/1/2021, average of last 8+ revisions)
Sources: US Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), Consensus Economics, Destatis, Eurostat, Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques (INSEE), Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE),Japanese Cabinet Office (JP CAO), National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBS), Office for National Statistics (ONS), Refinitiv.
1 Consensus levels implied from forecasted yoy changes.
86
Real GDP forecasts for 20211(%)
Latest IMF forecasts for 2021World Economic Outlook: “Two Shots in the Arm: Stimulus and Vaccines“
Revisions to forecasts for 2021 sinceOctober reflect:
◆ Base effects: somewhat less severecollapse in 2020 than previouslyexpected
◆ Expectations of vaccine-poweredstrengthening of activity later in theyear
◆ Additional policy support in a fewlarge economies (notably US, Japan)
◆ Assumption that new virusoutbreaks remain contained andvaccine rollout proceeds relativelysmoothly
0
2
4
6
8
10
World Euroarea
DE FR IT ES NL BE UK US JP CN
IMF World Economic Outlook Jan 2021 IMF World Economic Outlook Oct 2020
Consensus Jan 2021 (survey mean) Consensus Oct 2020 (survey mean)
Sources: IMF, OECD, Consensus Economics.1 IMF WEO of January 2021 does not include forecasts for BE and NL.
87Source: Consensus Economics. Forecasts up to 25 January 2021.
Euro area: Real GDP growth forecasts, 2021(%)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
13/0
1/20
20
13/0
2/20
20
13/0
3/20
20
13/0
4/20
20
13/0
5/20
20
13/0
6/20
20
13/0
7/20
20
13/0
8/20
20
13/0
9/20
20
13/1
0/20
20
13/1
1/20
20
13/1
2/20
20
13/0
1/20
21
Monthly survey mean Mean on replacement basis Moving average of latest 8+ changes
Belgium: Real GDP growth forecasts, 2021(%)
Consensus forecasts for 2021: not so fast …Latest downgrades for Euro Area growth due to new COVID infections and lockdowns
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
13/0
1/20
20
13/0
2/20
20
13/0
3/20
20
13/0
4/20
20
13/0
5/20
20
13/0
6/20
20
13/0
7/20
20
13/0
8/20
20
13/0
9/20
20
13/1
0/20
20
13/1
1/20
20
13/1
2/20
20
13/0
1/20
21
88
Total number of vaccination doses administered per 100 people in the total population1(Situation as of 23 January 2021)
Vaccination kicked off at different speeds
0,8
1,0
1,5
1,5
2,0
2,2
2,5
3,5
6,2
10,1
40,0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Netherlands
China
France
Belgium
Germany
Italy
Spain
Denmark
US
UK
Israel
Source: Our World in Data (OWID).1 Cumulative count of single doses; this may not equal the total number of people vaccinated (which may require receiving multiple doses).
In Belgium, population defined as adult population (those 18 years and older).
89Source: IMF.1 Data are from 13 advanced economies with varying coverage during 1990Q1-2020Q3. Lines are averages across recession types. For the great lockdown, quarter 0 is 2019Q4 for all countries; for
the global financial crisis, quarter 0 is country-specific peak of real GDP during 2007-2008; Other recessions are country-specific episodes of at least two consecutive quarters of negative growthduring 1990-2006 and 2009-2019.
Firms: Zombification or creative destruction?Too early to tell, as temporary measures protect against destruction
Advanced economies: Number of bankruptcies1(index, last pre-recession quarter = 100)
Decline in bankruptcies during great lockdown driven by:
◆ Transfers to firms, credit guarantees and funding-for-lending programmes
◆ Implementation of moratoria on bankruptcy filings insome countries
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
-8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8Recession quarter
Great Lockdown, 2020Global financial crisis, 2007–2008Other recessions
90
NBB online surveysin cooperation with the
Microsoft Innovation Center
91
NBB Survey on impact on households’ income
7-24 May
Press releasePerscommuniquéCommuniqué de presse
https://www.nbb.be/en/articles/coronavirus-crisis-having-heavy-impact-some-households-income-bringing-even-bigger-losseshttps://www.nbb.be/nl/artikels/de-coronacrisis-heeft-een-aanzienlijke-negatieve-impact-op-de-inkomens-van-bepaaldehttps://www.nbb.be/fr/articles/la-crise-du-coronavirus-un-impact-negatif-imp