40
COURT CANVAS TENNIS IN ART ON

Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Through artistic representations, Court On Canvas guides us from the origins of the game as a genteel pastime for the upper classes, through its codification as a sport, to the international high-earning power game of today.

Citation preview

Page 1: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

COURT CANVASTENNIS IN ART

COURT ON CANVAS TENNIS IN ART

ON

This is the first publication to consider in depth the

representation of lawn tennis in art. Court on Canvas

contains a survey of images, illustrating the wide ranging

developments of the game from the 1870s to the present

day. The history of tennis in art is studded with contributions

from famous artists drawn to the game, including John

Lavery, L. S. Lowry, Christopher Wood, Eric Ravilious and

more recently David Hockney and Tom Phillips. This book

includes a wealth of these attractive images, as well as

many by lesser known yet highly accomplished artists of

the 1920s and 30s whose work deserves wider recognition,

including Percy Shakespeare and Marjorie Watherston.

Detailed examinations of the works are placed in a wider

social, historical and art historical context. The publication

comprises five essays: two by Ann Sumner (Director of the

Barber Institute of Fine Arts, University of Birmingham)

covering a range of themes including the representation

of women in tennis; a chapter by Kenneth McConkey on

John Lavery and his many works inspired by tennis; Robert

Holland writes on the history of tennis in Birmingham, the

West Midlands and Wales, and Sue Elks provides a history

of tennis costume. Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art appeals to

tennis enthusiasts and art historians alike.

Ann

Sum

ner

Front cover: John Lavery, A Rally, 1885

Back cover: Lawrence Stephen Lowry,

The Tennis Player, 1927

Philip Wilson Publishers

The Timber Yard

109 Drysdale Street

London N1 6ND

Distributed throughout the world

(excluding North America) by

I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd

6 Salem Road

London W2 4BU

Distributed in North America by

Palgrave Macmillan, a division of

St Martin’s Press

175 Fifth Avenue

New York NY 10010

ISBN 978-0-85667-706-9

Tennis Covers film.indd 1 30/03/2011 17:08

Page 2: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 1 30/03/2011 15:11

Page 3: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

COURT CANVASTENNIS IN ART

ON

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 3 30/03/2011 15:11

Page 4: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 4 30/03/2011 15:11

Page 5: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

Ann Sumner with

Kenneth McConkeySusan J. Elks Robert Holland

Philip Wilson Publishers

COURT CANVASTENNIS IN ART

ON

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 5 30/03/2011 15:11

Page 6: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

© Barber Institute of Fine Arts, 2011

First published in 2011 by

Philip Wilson Publishers

109 Drysdale Street

London N1 6ND

Distributed throughout the world

(excluding North America) by

I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd

6 Salem Road

London W2 4BU

Distributed in North America by

Palgrave Macmillan, a division of

St Martin’s Press

175 Fifth Avenue

New York NY 10010

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be

reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any

form by any means mechanical, electronic, photocopying or

otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher.

Edited by Greg Smith

For PWP: Bruno Burton

Designed by Webb & Webb Design

Printed and bound in China by Everbest

Front cover: John Lavery, A Rally, 1885

Endpapers: Helen Wills, A Game of Tennis, 1927, crêpe de

Chine, Victoria and Albert Museum

Frontispiece: Christopher Wood, Tennis Players, c. 1925–6

Back cover: Lawrence Stephen Lowry, The Tennis Player, 1927

ISBN 978-0-85667-706-9

Accompanies an exhibition at The Barber Institute of Fine

Arts, University of Birmingham (27 May-18 September, 2011)

Exhibition Organising Committee:

Chezzy Brownen

Michael Cullen

Christopher Elks

Susan J. Elks

Honor Godfrey

Robert Holland

Kenneth McConkey

Neil Maybury

Greg Smith

Ann Sumner

Robert Wenley

In memory of my father Tim Sumner who died during

Wimbledon fortnight 1996 and Tessa Sidey, a colleague and

fellow tennis enthusiast who sadly did not live to see this

exhibition, dying on the 1st January 2011.

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 6 30/03/2011 15:11

Page 7: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

Preface and Acknowledgements

Chapter One From Pat-ball Tennis to the Fury of the Modern Game: The Changing Image of Lawn Tennis in BritainAnn Sumner

Chapter TwoEdgbaston’s Gem of a Game: The Origins of Lawn TennisRobert Holland

Chapter ThreeTennis Parties Kenneth McConkey

Chapter FourTennis and the Artist, 1870 – 2010Ann Sumner

Chapter FiveTennis Fashions in the FrameSusan J. Elks

Artists’ BiographiesKatie Robson

Bibliography

Photographic Credits

Index

Authors’ Biographies

8

11

35

47

83

125

140

155

158

161

167

Contents

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 7 30/03/2011 15:11

Page 8: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

83

Chapter FourTennis and the Artist, 1870 – 2010Ann Sumner

Numerous artists painted tennis scenes, and several played the game themselves. Initially, many of the artists who depicted tennis came from well-off upper middle-class families where the game was part of their upbringing, and those that did not were attracted to tennis because of their patrons. Tennis was an outdoor sport which provided a variety of style, strokes and tactics that challenged painters who wanted to capture the movement of the game and reflect this modern pastime. It was played in well-kept gardens with active and fashionable young people participating, so artists tried to adapt their styles of painting – whether portraiture, landscape, genre or still life – to include it. The game enjoyed its greatest popularity in Britain in the 1920s and ‘30s and, not surprisingly, many of the most innovative and inspiring artistic responses date from this period.1 As we shall see, certain key themes associated with the sport are persistent throughout the history of tennis art.

‘A new and interesting game ... Full of healthy excitement’: early artistic responses to lawn tennis2

The first tennis paintings often reflect the novelty of female players participating in sport. Women had not previously been seen exercising on immaculately rolled lawns in the heat of the summer. The first tennis paintings date from the late 1870s and early 1880s and the artists cannot always be identified (fig. 4.1). Yet, Jemima Blackburn, the Scottish artist who painted the first dated watercolour of players in action, was well known for her drawings of birds and observations of life in the West Highlands. She recorded other sporting pastimes such as riding, curling, skating and swimming.3 Her work reflected her upper middle-class life, and it was in this context that she painted a charming watercolour of a tennis game (fig. 4.2).Detail from Edith Hayllar, A Summer Shower (fig. 4.6)

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 83 30/03/2011 15:13

Page 9: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

84

TENNIS AND THE ARTIST, 1870 – 2010

Fig. 4.1 Anonymous (‘E R’), Girl with a Ball, Stafford Lodge,

1877, watercolour on paper, Wimbledon Lawn Tennis Museum

Although this work is dated 25 April 1877 and is of high

quality, as well as being signed with a monogram, the

name of the artist is still unknown. The watercolour shows

a young girl (under the age of sixteen because of her

shortened skirt) about to serve underarm. It is the earliest

known artistic image inspired by lawn tennis. There is

another unattributed drawing in the Wimbledon Lawn

Tennis Museum which shows a group of players in action.

Other early tennis pictures produced in Scotland include a watercolour of around 1879–80 by Alexander Carlyle Bell (1823–1900), The Tennis Party at the Pirn (private collection), showing his family home south of Edinburgh,4 and Lawn Tennis by landscape painter David Murray (1849–1933) exhibited at the Royal Glasgow Institute of the Fine Arts in 1880 (private collection). The best known paintings of tennis subjects are of course those by the ‘Glasgow Boys’ and most especially by John Lavery (see chapter three). Arthur Melville and James Guthrie gave Lavery encouragement while he was painting his The Tennis Party (fig. 3.1), in which he pioneered the elongated landscape format, enabling him better to suggest the length of the court. It is not known whether any of the ‘Glasgow Boys’ joined in the tennis at Cartbank, where the work was painted in the summer of 1885. Tennis rackets do appear in photographs of Lavery’s studio in the 1890s, but they look ornamental (fig. 3.13). Indeed, there is no firm evidence that Lavery actually played the game. His Tennis Party was widely exhibited however, and had a lasting influence on other artists who attempted the subject such as Charles March Gere and Robert Ponsonby Staples (figs. 3.22–23).

In the pretty Cotswold village of Broadway later that same summer, a number of American artists including Edwin Austin Abbey, John Singer Sargent, Francis Davis Millet and George Boughton were living in a bohemian artistic colony, avidly playing tennis.5 Tennis was extremely popular in America and they no doubt all learnt to play before coming to Britain.6 In September, Sargent began work on his most famous painting, Carnation, Lily, Lily, Rose (Tate Britain). Each day at 4 pm, the friends would finish their painting and relax playing tennis in the garden of Farnham House. Just as light was fading,

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 84 30/03/2011 15:13

Page 10: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

85

TENNIS AND THE ARTIST, 1870 – 2010

Fig. 4.2 Jemima Blackburn, Tennis Match at

Dalvey near Forres: Wedderburns v. Blackburns, 1878,

watercolour on paper, private collection

Blackburn’s only training was a few informal lessons

with Edwin Landseer, but her work was admired by

the critic John Ruskin, and her drawings of birds were

widely published. Blackburn often included herself in her

watercolours and here she visits the Dalvey estate – she is

probably the figure on the far right. The watercolour shows

a match played in 1878 between two families who knew

each other well. Jemima had been born a Wedderburn

and had known her husband, Hugh Blackburn, since

childhood – he may be one of the male spectators.

Sargent insisted on pausing the game and would bound across the lawn to where his easel had been set up to paint the two little girls with their lanterns amid the lilies. For ten minutes he would furiously paint away in a most athletic manner. Then he would stop, dash back to the court and ‘join us again, so long as the twilight permitted, in a last turn of lawn tennis’.7 Although Frank Millet sketched Sargent as he worked (fig. 4.3), none of these artists actually painted tennis subjects.

Meanwhile in the tranquil Berkshire countryside in the early 1880s, the Hayllar sisters, Edith and the younger Mary, painted genre and still life scenes in which tennis featured. The girls and their siblings

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 85 30/03/2011 15:13

Page 11: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

86

TENNIS AND THE ARTIST, 1870 – 2010

were taught to paint by their father, the artist James Hayllar (1829–1920), at their home, Castle Priory, on the banks of the river Thames at Wallingford. Their paintings were inspired by the domestic bliss they enjoyed together and show the interiors and the leisurely pursuits in their garden. Mary Hayllar is best known for her still-life painting and she adapted her style to include tennis.8 The Tennis Party, 1880 (fig. 1.1), and The Lawn Tennis Season, 1881 (fig. 4.4, right) both show distant games of mixed doubles, accurately depicted through a window and a detailed foreground with still-life observations. A further work, Marking the Court, is now lost.9

The green lawns of the tennis court itself, empty of players, became a popular theme for artists. Another female painter, Olive Wheeler Smith (active 1878–83), whose work can be somewhat sentimental, produced one of her best paintings on such a theme in A Garden Border by a Tennis Court of 1883 (private collection). She emphasises the setting of the beautifully kept grass court – the luxuriant flowers and distant view with ominous rain clouds. The Victorian watercolourist Albert Goodwin, who was a favourite of the art critic John Ruskin, also painted a deserted tennis lawn at the family home of Charles Darwin, Down House, Kent in 1880 (fig. 4.5). The first Wimbledon runner-up William Cecil Marshall, who was at Cambridge with one of Darwin’s sons, played on this grass court. Darwin himself was not a player, but his son Frank wrote that ‘He much enjoyed wandering idly in the garden with my mother or some of his children. He used to like to watch us playing at Lawn Tennis and often knocked up a stray ball for us with the curved handle of his stick’.10 Goodwin presents us with the moment after the Darwin family has left the court, having returned to the house to take tea. The theme of empty tennis courts would continue into

Fig. 4.3 Francis Davis Millet, Mr Sargent at Work on

‘Carnation, Lily, Lily, Rose’, c. 1885, ink on paper, Archives

of American Art, Smithsonian Institute, Washington

In the late summer of 1885, Sargent painted his most

famous work Carnation, Lily, Lily, Rose (Tate Britain) in

Broadway in the Cotswolds while staying with the colony

of American artists there. The large painting shows the

daughters of the illustrator Frederick Barnard at dusk

in the garden of Farnham House. Sargent painted the

work outside in the twilight to capture the moment the

girls lit their lanterns. Each evening he would break off

from his game of tennis to work on the painting for a few

minutes and then return to the match. Millet captures

him furiously painting away in this little sketch.

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 86 30/03/2011 15:13

Page 12: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

87

TENNIS AND THE ARTIST, 1870 – 2010

Fig. 4.4 Mary Hayllar, The Lawn Tennis Season, 1881,

oil on canvas, Southampton City Art Gallery

Hayllar lovingly depicts such tennis necessities as an

open parasol to protect fair female skin from the sun,

tennis rackets, tennis slippers and six white balls in

the dark-panelled interior of Castle Priory, her family

home. These items seem to have been discarded by the

players who have retired for a break indoors. Others

continue their game and are visible through the window.

After her marriage to Henry Wells, Mary ceased to paint

oils and restricted herself to miniatures of children.

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 87 30/03/2011 15:13

Page 13: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

88

TENNIS AND THE ARTIST, 1870 – 2010

Fig. 4.5 Albert Goodwin, Down House, 1880, watercolour

on paper, Down House, English Heritage

There are no players in sight at the Kent home of Charles

Darwin’s family, just a discarded racket with a boater

nearby. Darwin himself did not play, but his children were

exceptionally keen. William Cecil Marshall, the runner-up

at the first ever Wimbledon final, and a family friend, noted

on a visit to Down House: ‘I was one day playing lawn

tennis with his sons in the front of his house when [Darwin]

looked out of an upper window and explained with obvious

distress, “This confounded Drosera has gone all wrong this

morning, upsetting my theories and spoiling a year’s work”’.

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 88 30/03/2011 15:13

Page 14: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

89

TENNIS AND THE ARTIST, 1870 – 2010

the twentieth century with Harold Speed’s deserted grass court of 1925 and Stanley Spencer’s corner of the court at Cookham in 1938 (fig. 4.19).11

Love All: The Romance of TennisThe social aspects of lawn tennis account in part for its rapid growth in popularity in the 1880s and ‘90s. It provided the ideal opportunity for upper and middle class young couples to meet and many attachments began with a gentle game of mixed doubles at the lawn tennis club. Although the game was gradually transformed from the garden party environment to the public tournament, with vast crowds of spectators, it still maintained an air of romance. This is reflected within tennis paintings well into the twentieth century. The most famous example of blossoming young love is depicted in Edith Hayllar’s A Summer Shower, 1883 (fig. 4.6). In the comfort of a dry hallway, a young male player has the opportunity to pay attention to his female tennis partner. Her flushed cheeks suggest that her admirer’s conversation is having an impact, although the colour may reflect her recent exertions on court and the dash in from the rain. Hayllar adapts her style of genre painting to include this new sporting craze much associated with rain breaks and the uncertainties of British summers.12

There are no chaperones in William Hatherall’s pencil drawing titled Tennis Romance (fig. 4.7) in which a languid young lady rests in a wicker chair, tennis racket beside her, and with her head tilted as if in flirtatious conversation with a mysterious man. More typically, both John Lavery (figs. 3.10–11) and John Scott (fig. 4.8) depicted couples resting after play in the presence of somewhat awkward looking female chaperones. Gwen Raverat, granddaughter of Charles Darwin, reveals that as a child she was sometimes required to be a ‘chaperone to courting couples’. In her autobiography

Fig. 4.6 Edith Hayllar, A Summer Shower, 1883,

oil on panel, private collection

The panelled hall at Castle Priory appears in a number of

the Hayllar sisters’ paintings. The river Thames is seen

beyond with a woman holding an open umbrella indicating

rain and in the middle distance a male player in whites

pours lemonade. A racket rests against the panelled

archway with tennis balls scattered on the black and white

tiled floor, all meticulously depicted. In the foreground a

seated, wistful young lady with her racket resting upon

her pink tennis apron, is admired by her male partner.

Edith married the Revd. Bruce Mackay in 1900 and she

ceased painting, never mentioning her art in later life.

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 89 30/03/2011 15:13

Page 15: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

90

TENNIS AND THE ARTIST, 1870 – 2010

Fig. 4.7 William Hatherall, Tennis Romance,

1880s, pencil on paper, private collection

William Hatherall was a successful illustrator who

occasionally exhibited historic pictures at the Royal

Academy. The young lady is shown full face as in

Hayllar’s Summer Shower, but her suitor, with cigarette

in hand, is shown mysteriously only from the back. There

are no chaperones in sight and this couple sitting in

their wicker chairs, common on the side of the tennis

lawn, have taken a break under the shade of a tree to

conduct their flirtation. The drawing may well be an

illustration, though the subject has not been identified.

she depicts herself charmingly in such a pose (titled Conscientious Chaperone), as a tiny girl on a stool, with a young man seated by his tennis racket and a lady in a hammock, with a large fan. Her mother, Maud de Puy, noted of the English: ‘the upper middle-class think they are acting rightly by over-protecting their daughters ... When Gwen grows up it will be very hard to know how to treat her. If I let her be as independent as a girl at home, people will say in Cambridge that she is fast’.13 Gradually such behaviour relaxed: Charles March Gere in his The Tennis Party of 1900 (fig. 3.22), illustrates a more informal gathering of young fashionable players who, just a few years later, were able to mix with greater freedom.

Paintings were limited in their capacity to capture all of the nuances of court romances. The tensions between love rivals at tennis parties and the pressure to play well, is rarely conveyed in artistic representations. In Gere’s accomplished work, painted at his affluent family home in Leamington Spa and depicting his sister and her future husband, the undercurrents of competitiveness and the desire to win both match and sweetheart are not apparent. The literature of the period better reflects the complex role tennis played in romantic attachments. In P. G. Wodehouse’s Love Among the Chickens (1906), the young writer Jeremy Garnet falls for a beautiful brunette, Phyliss Derek, while staying in Devon. With Phyliss looking on he is thrashed 6–0 by a dashing naval captain. ‘I felt a worm and no man. Phyliss, I thought, would probably judge my entire character from this exhibition. A man, she would reflect, who could be so feeble and miserable a failure at tennis, could not be good for much in any department of life’.14

A suitor’s ability to play good tennis is further emphasised in E. M. Forster’s A Room with a View, published in 1908. Tennis plays a key role in the

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 90 30/03/2011 15:13

Page 16: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

91

TENNIS AND THE ARTIST, 1870 – 2010

Fig. 4.8 John Scott, After the Tennis Match, c. 1885,

oil on canvas, Wimbledon Lawn Tennis Museum

These beautifully dressed figures are shown in a leafy

bower protected from the sun. The couple seem awkward

in front of their chaperone, however, and there seems to

be little chemistry between them. The artist, John Scott,

originally came from Carlisle but he was living in London

by 1879. His working day started at nine and he painted

until lunchtime when he would generally indulge in one

of his favourite recreational sports – tennis, boating or

billiards. This is one of his most successful paintings.

breakup of the romance between Lucy Honeychurch and her fiancé Cecil Vyse. When Cecil refuses to play tennis with her younger brother Freddie, Lucy makes up the foursome. She is immediately struck by George Emerson’s competitive spirit and is irritated when her fiancé reads aloud from his book as they play. On calling off their engagement, Lucy is direct with Cecil: ‘If you want to know, quite a little thing decided me to speak to you – when you wouldn’t play tennis with Freddy’. Thus ended her unsuitable relationship with Cecil and her eyes were opened to the potential of George Emerson.15

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 91 30/03/2011 15:13

Page 17: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

92

TENNIS AND THE ARTIST, 1870 – 2010

The young Scottish artist Duncan Grant was an accomplished tennis player and a member of the Bloomsbury Group, a set of artists, writers, philosophers, novelists (including Forster) and intellectuals who met informally.16 Grant’s graceful tennis playing, combined with his complicated love-life, apparently inspired the first tennis ballet, Jeux (Games), performed by the Ballet Russes in 1913. The Russian dancer and choreographer Vasily Nijinsky watched Grant with Leon Bakst, the artist and stage painter for the Ballets Russes, who exclaimed ‘Quel décor!’ at the sight of the beautiful young man playing on court in Bedford Square.17 The plot of Jeux involved three young athletic people, dressed for tennis, who meet in a park at twilight. The male figure has lost a tennis ball, but when he discovers two young ladies he forgets about the ball and before long all three are kissing passionately. The poet Rupert Brooke thought of the ballet as a ‘Post-Impressionist picture put in motion’.18 There is a drawing associated with the ballet by Grant (fig. 4.9), though he was not responsible for the set designs. He also made two tennis-themed murals at 38, Brunswick Square, and much later produced a drawing of a nude man with a tennis racket (fig. 4.14).

Throughout tennis art there are numerous individual studies of young girls with rackets that have romantic, sensuous overtones, such as Frank Miles’ Pause in the Match of 1883 (Wimbledon Lawn Tennis Museum) or the mysterious Scottish Girl, attributed to Samuel Reid (fig. 4.10). This work shows a pretty young woman clutching her racket and standing wistfully beside prominent foxgloves. Another beautiful portrait of a single female is La Thangue’s poetic Resting after the Game, 1888 (fig. 3.16). This is a tender study of the artist’s wife, Kate, an actress, sitting on a wicker chair in dappled sunlight with her racket on her lap. A further wistful example is James Guthrie’s Tennis of 1890 (fig. 3.15).

Fig. 4.9 Duncan Grant, Tennis Player, 1913, pencil and

bodycolour on paper, Courtauld Institute of Art, London

The society hostess, Lady Ottoline Morrell, recalled Grant

playing tennis so gracefully that he inspired Vaslav Nijinsky

(1890–1950), the Russian dancer and choreographer, to create

the first tennis ballet Jeux (Games). This was performed by the

Ballets Russes in 1913 with music by Claude Debussy. Although

Grant inspired the ballet, he did not paint the scenery and this

work may have been an early idea when he hoped he might

get more involved. Wearing vibrant colours – the player is not

sporting the traditional whites – he reaches for an overhead shot.

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 92 30/03/2011 15:13

Page 18: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

93

TENNIS AND THE ARTIST, 1870 – 2010

The penchant for male artists to portray individual girls with rackets continued into the twentieth century with different sexual undercurrents. For instance, L. S. Lowry, who had a complicated relationship with women, produced a series of studies of young girls on the beach at Lytham St Annes, which had tennis courts nearby.19 One tiny oil shows a young teenage girl from behind, holding a tennis racket (fig. 4.11). These studies of girls have been described as his ‘Lolita’ pictures and they appear to repeat an idealised girl who does not grow to maturity. She was called Ann and sported a thick long black plait of hair. A more worldly tennis girl was painted by Dudley-born Percy Shakespeare, about ten years later (fig. 4.12). With her cropped dark hair, ample bust and direct gaze, she is shown with her legs crossed, revealing much of her thigh. A more complex but equally sensual image by Miguel Mackinlay of 1930 shows two young women relaxing under a rug together in a garden after a game of tennis (fig. 4.13). Mackinlay was working in a thriving artistic community in Bushey, Hertfordshire at this time. Here, the iris flower beds probably symbolise cherished friendship. In the same vein, the subject of Duncan Grant’s sketch of a nude male figure with a racket (fig. 4.14) from the 1950s is the young poet and teacher Paul Roche who became Grant’s close friend. Grant particularly enjoyed making nude studies of the much younger Roche. The reference to tennis is tenuous: the racket was a prop, a leftover from Grant’s younger days as a player.

Tennis was a particularly inspiring subject for the printmakers of the interwar years, including Gwen Raverat who is now best known for her distinctive wood engravings. This delightful image of 1937 (fig. 4.15) shows a young couple with rackets aloft, perhaps more akin to the author’s childish ‘pat-ball’ tennis. It beautifully illustrates the artist’s mastery of light and shade and bold sense of design, with

Fig. 4.10 Attributed to Samuel Reid, Scottish Girl, c. 1887,

oil on canvas, Wimbledon Lawn Tennis Museum

This work, much influenced by John Everett Millais,

may originally have been exhibited under the title The

Queen of Lawn Tennis in 1887. The girl has a certain

regal quality about her. She wears a typical straw hat

and a tennis apron with large pockets for tennis balls.

Holding her racket, she stands by prominent purple

foxgloves which can have both positive and negative

connotations: sometimes they can heal, sometimes they

are poisonous and they can therefore be seen as symbols

for the ups and downs of a romantic relationship.

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 93 30/03/2011 15:14

Page 19: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

94

TENNIS AND THE ARTIST, 1870 – 2010

Fig. 4.11 Lawrence Stephen Lowry, The Tennis

Player, 1927, oil on board, private collection

Lowry’s series of studies of young girls on the beach at

Lytham St Annes includes one who holds a tennis racket.

The resort, a classic seaside town on the Fylde coast south

of Blackpool, was where the Lowry family enjoyed what

holidays they could afford in the 1920s. Tennis was by then

a mainstream sport and a popular holiday activity so that

girls walking by with tennis rackets would have been an

everyday sight. However, the girl here is highly idealised;

with her thick black plait she appears many times in Lowry’s

work over a long period and she was known as Ann.

Fig. 4.12 Percy Shakespeare, The Tennis Player, the 1930s,

oil on canvas, Dudley Museum and Art Gallery

Tennis was an important theme in Shakespeare’s work in

the 1930s when he also produced the larger canvas of a

game in progress (fig. 1.19). His interest in tennis may have

been aroused as a boy, as, although he came from a working

class area of Dudley, the family lived close to municipal

courts. In the 1930s Dorothy Round, who also came from

Dudley, won Wimbledon twice, and this must also have

encouraged his interest in the sport. It was once thought

that this was a portrait of Dorothy herself, but her features

were quite unlike those of the young lady shown here.

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 94 30/03/2011 15:14

Page 20: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

95

TENNIS AND THE ARTIST, 1870 – 2010

Fig. 4.13 Miguel Mackinlay, Tête-à-Tête, 1930, oil

on canvas, Bushey Museum and Art Gallery

These two elegant young ladies relax in sensuous languid

poses after playing a match. One is still in her tennis clothes,

the other has changed into more elegant attire. They have

just enjoyed their tea, an informal affair compared with

the Victorian tea parties recorded by the Hayllars. As the

Saturday Evening Post noted in 1932: ‘The feminine mind

in sports reflects the general trend of feminine thinking

of the day. The ideas and ... the inhibitions imposed upon

us by previous generations are being dispelled’. The

rug may be keeping the ladies warm, or, as has been

suggested, it may also hint at a sexual relationship.

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 95 30/03/2011 15:14

Page 21: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

96

TENNIS AND THE ARTIST, 1870 – 2010

the figures swinging out to right and left. Although Raverat produced some delightful tennis images, she was actually not a keen player, recalling in her autobiography that during her upbringing in Cambridge she was ‘not very good at sport’ and ‘was very bad indeed ... at tennis’.20 Nonetheless, Gwen still fondly recollected her visits to Down House (fig. 4.5), to visit her grandmother, noting that ‘the place of all others, where the essence of the whole house was concentrated, was in the cupboard under the stairs, by the garden door. It was full of ancient tennis rackets, smaller than those we use now ... and it was there that the exquisite, special smell of the house was strongest’.21

Whilst in Britain tennis was not always associated with the most athletic of men, in America it had a different reputation. The macho and athletic American artist George Bellows, a semi-professional baseball player, wooed his wife Emma over games of tennis in New York and later portrayed them playing together in the early days of their marriage.22 His atmospheric The Tournament (Tennis at Newport) c. 1921 (fig. 4.16) has a romantic element. In the foreground a young man in black tie is more interested in paying his respects to a woman, though she turns away and watches the tennis instead of responding to him.

In Britain it was Marjorie Watherston who poignantly captured the atmosphere of a crowded Wimbledon Centre Court in her 1923 Ladies’ Wimbledon Singles Final (fig. 1.5), whilst actually producing a romantic image. The scene is dominated in the foreground by a striking couple. A suave sophisticated male figure and a chic woman in a fashionable hat have eyes only for each other, rather than the exciting match taking place below. The Irish portrait painter William Orpen also enjoyed tennis. Coming from a solidly middle-

Fig. 4.14 Duncan Grant, Nude Tennis Player, the

1950s, charcoal, pen and coloured pencil on

paper, Wimbledon Lawn Tennis Museum

This work is part of a series of studies of male nudes (none

of the others have tennis rackets) and appears to show the

poet Paul Roche, twenty years Grant’s junior, whom he met

in 1946. By the time this drawing was made Grant’s playing

days were probably over and the racket simply acted as a

prop rather than being evidence of nude tennis (fig. 4.31).

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 96 30/03/2011 15:14

Page 22: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

97

TENNIS AND THE ARTIST, 1870 – 2010

Fig. 4.15 Gwendolen Mary Raverat, Tennis, 1937, wood

engraving, Wimbledon Lawn Tennis Museum

Gwen Raverat was the granddaughter of Charles Darwin

and daughter of a Cambridge University professor. She

was raised playing tennis on the court her father had laid

out at their home, Newman Grange, though she was no

star player. Gwen’s sister Margaret recalls that ‘a punt was

frequently needed to rescue balls hit into the river from the

lawn above’. This distinctive wood engraving has a lightness

of touch typical of Raverat’s work and, although dated

1937, it harks back to the innocent ‘pat-ball’ of her youth.

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 97 30/03/2011 15:14

Page 23: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

98

TENNIS AND THE ARTIST, 1870 – 2010

Fig. 4.16 George Bellows, The Tournament (Tennis at

Newport), c. 1920, oil on canvas, private collection

In the summer of 1919 Bellows and his family stayed at

Middletown, Rhode Island and travelled to see world class

tennis at the nearby Casino Country Club in the famous

Newport invitation tournament. A keen tennis player, Bellows

watched his favourite players such as Bill Tilden (1893–1953)

and sketched avidly, capturing the lavish social life around the

courts too. Back in his New York studio he produced a number

of large oils based on his sketches including this richly coloured

example. The player approaching the net is thought to be Tilden.

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 98 30/03/2011 15:14

Page 24: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

99

TENNIS AND THE ARTIST, 1870 – 2010

class Irish family, he played at the famous Fitzwilliam Lawn Tennis Club in Dublin, when young.23 He often illustrated his letters and one example shows a sketch of himself and his wife Grace playing tennis together on holiday in around 1910.24 And in another letter, to his wife dating from 1907, he depicts a tennis tournament.25 Orpen’s most famous tennis image, however, is this captivating portrait from 1923 of John McCormack wearing his tennis kit (fig. 4.17). The popular Irish tenor was a romantic figure whose magnificent voice made him a fortune. In this portrait he looks relaxed with his costume crumpled, having just come in from the tennis lawn and nonchalantly picking up a sheet of music. Although this appears a romantic image of the ‘Pavarotti of the era’,26 McCormack’s wife records that he and Orpen talked politics throughout the sittings.27

The atmosphere is very different in Richard Carline’s tense Gilbert and Janet Pairing up for Tennis (fig. 4.18), painted in 1922. Gilbert Spencer, artist brother of Stanley, stands against a gate pillar with the Carlines’ maid Janet Piggott in a mustard-coloured dress. The female wearing a visor and red socks, seen from the back, is unidentified – Gilbert stares at her directly with flushed cheeks. Carline’s picture is set at 47, Devonshire Hill, his family home, where the Hampstead Circle of artists gathered. Stanley Spencer was amongst the group and he actually moved into the house in 1925, later marrying Hilda Carline. Their marriage gradually became unhappy and they quarrelled over many issues, including tennis. When they moved to Chapel View, Burghclere in 1930, Stanley purchased a tennis net, hoping that they could live a more conventional life and play together. However, Hilda was not convinced by the plan and in the end trees were planted on the spot designated for the court and the net was used to protect strawberries from the birds.28 Spencer did illustrate part of a court

Fig. 4.17 William Orpen, John McCormack, 1923, oil

on canvas, National Gallery of Ireland, Dublin

The popular Irish tenor was painted by Orpen, himself

a tennis player, in 1923. Orpen considered a number of

costumes including evening dress and a dressing gown.

One day he saw McCormack come in from a game of

tennis, pick up a piece of music and go straight to the

piano. Orpen decided that this was how McCormack should

be portrayed, in tennis whites with a piece of music in

his hand. The link between tennis and music had been

established in 1914 when Eric Satie included a piano piece

called Le Tennis in his Les Sports et Divertissements.

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 99 30/03/2011 15:14

Page 25: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

100

TENNIS AND THE ARTIST, 1870 – 2010

Fig. 4.18 (left) Richard Carline, Gilbert and Janet Pairing up

for Tennis, 1922, tempera on canvas, private collection

Richard Carline is probably best known as the brother-in-law

of Stanley Spencer, who married his elder sister Hilda, and

for his war art. He was a member of the Hampstead Circle of

artists which included Robert Bevan, Mark Gertler, Paul and

John Nash, as well as Stanley and Gilbert Spencer. The latter

is shown here, racket in hand. This work not only shows how

the group spent their leisure time, but it also reflects social

changes: the Carlines’ maid, Janet Piggott, is the central figure.

Fig. 4.19 Stanley Spencer, View from the Tennis Court,

Cookham, oil on canvas, 1938, private collection

Spencer moved back to his home village of Cookham on the

river Thames in 1932 with his wife Hilda and two daughters.

Although Hilda remained the love of his life, they were divorced

in 1937. He remarried just four days later, but that relationship

quickly foundered. In this wistful work he follows a tradition

of depicting unpopulated courts, though in this case its

emptiness may be a symbolic reference to his failed marriages.

As with many of Spencer’s interwar landscapes, he shows the

foreground in detail with a sharp plunge into the distance. It also

beautifully illustrates his idealisation of the English countryside.

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 100 30/03/2011 15:14

Page 26: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

101

TENNIS AND THE ARTIST, 1870 – 2010

in View from the Tennis Court, Cookham (fig. 4.19) in 1938 (perhaps the lack of players reflects his wife’s uninterest in the game) and he later sketched a group of portly male tennis players (private collection).

Tennis remained important to the middle classes and continued to be associated with romance, as John Betjeman’s famous poem, A Subaltern’s Love Song (1941), illustrates:

What strenuous singles we played after tea,We in the tournament – you against me!Love-thirty, love-forty, oh! Weakness of joy,The speed of a swallow, the grace of a boy.

Nevertheless, the game failed to inspire artists to create images of tennis romance after the 1940s. Perhaps this is not surprising. There was no Wimbledon during the Second World War and the grounds themselves suffered bomb damage. Although the tournament recommenced in 1946, it was unable to capture the glamour of the interwar years, with strict rationing impacting on all aspects of British society. The golden era of British tennis was over. The 1950s were dominated by American players and the 1960s and early 70s by Australians, until Ann Jones revived interest in Britain. The sport was simply no longer a mainstream British pastime and, as such, British artists were rarely inspired by it as a subject.

Urban TennisLawn tennis is more closely associated in artistic representations with the British countryside rather than with inner cities. Mary Adshead’s poster Country Joys on London’s Underground of 1927 has a tennis court and players at the centre and it appears to confirm the assumption that one needs to travel out of the city to enjoy the game. Yet tennis was played in cities from the moment it

was invented. There are early glimpses of tennis in London in a watercolour by an unknown artist of Sydenham (private collection), and in Paris in Jacques-Emile Blanche’s Partie de Tennis (fig. 3.21). London witnessed the foundation of clubs at Ealing in 1882 and The Queen’s Club in 1887. Initially a general sports club in Kensington, the latter soon became dominated by lawn tennis. Municipalities also began to recognise that leafy city parks could accommodate courts for a growing urban population eager to play. This was especially the case in London: home to a number of tournaments in addition to the Wimbledon Championships, and in this way enabling a broader base of spectators to enjoy the sport.

In the modern metropolis that was Edwardian London, the game was played in Hyde Park and other open spaces away from the bustle of city life. This was the subject of James Wallace’s tiny sketch, A Game of Tennis in Battersea Park (fig. 4.20), dating from early in his career in 1904. The drawing was slipped into a letter sent to friends back home in Berwick (a group known as The Quintet) as part of a report on the pleasures of city life.29 A few years later Spencer Frederick Gore also painted a number of pictures of tennis in London. Gore had been in contact with Lucien Pissarro, who had settled in London, and learned from him about the techniques of the French Impressionists.30 Gore was tall and athletic and, as the son of the first winner of Wimbledon, he was a keen sportsman who enjoyed cricket and tennis. He painted more traditional tennis scenes such as Tennis at Hertingfordbury (fig. 4.21) at his mother’s home in Hertfordshire, but it was the series of paintings from the front room he had leased at 31 Mornington Crescent that was to make his most important contribution to tennis art. The courts at Mornington Crescent, one of Camden Town’s principal thoroughfares, were open to a wide

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 101 30/03/2011 15:14

Page 27: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

102

TENNIS AND THE ARTIST, 1870 – 2010

Fig. 4.20 James Wallace, A Game of Tennis

in Battersea Park, 1904, watercolour on paper,

Berwick-on-Tweed Museum and Art Gallery

James Wallace exhibited a number of views of London parks

at the turn of the century such as Autumn in Kensington

Gardens and In the Park. This tiny sketch, dating from

1904, was made in Battersea Park and was slipped in with

a letter back home to The Quintet – a group of friends

in Berwick, Wallace’s home town. It shows Londoners

enjoying vigorous exercise, from a pretty young girl in

the foreground to an energetic male player reaching for

an ambitious overhead shot. A further black and white

drawing made in 1900 by Wallace is entitled Tennis in

London (Berwick-on-Tweed Museum and Art Gallery).

community as the area was not as exclusive as it is today. In the summer months Gore painted a series of works which captured young women playing the game with the occasional passer-by stopping to observe (fig. 4.22). After Gore’s premature death his friend Walter Sickert praised these views looking ‘down on the garden’ where the ‘trees rise and droop in fringes, like fountains, over the little well of greenness and shade where parties of young people are playing at tennis’.31 Sadly, the leafy gardens Gore painted were swept away in 1926 to build a cigarette factory. Laura Knight, likewise influenced by Impressionist art, observed life from an upstairs room. In this case she views a court in a neighbouring garden from her home in exclusiveSt John’s Wood (fig. 4.23).

During the interwar years it was in seaside towns that public tennis courts were most common. Whereas such courts had been exclusive to expensive hotels, now the ordinary holiday maker staying at a

boarding house, as well as local residents, could enjoy the sport. And this was the environment in which Eric Ravilious was raised in Eastbourne. He was naturally athletic, enjoyed boxing and playing hockey, croquet, bowls and football, but his favourite sport was tennis which he was able to watch at Devonshire Park, the home of the annual ladies’ tournament.32 Tennis inspired a number of his engravings as new municipal courts became available to the people of Eastbourne in the grounds of the Towner Art Gallery. A wood engraving, Manor Garden (fig. 4.24) of 1927, shows three players walking to or from a match there. Although Ravilious produced many other tennis subjects for publications, including a number of calendars,33 his best known image of the sport is his triptych, Tennis in the Park (fig. 4.25) of 1930. It has been assumed that the scene was inspired by one of the public courts in the grounds of the Towner. However, despite appearances, Ravilious’s wife recalls that the scene was based on a private court belonging to the wealthy patron, Sir Geoffrey

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 102 30/03/2011 15:14

Page 28: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

103

TENNIS AND THE ARTIST, 1870 – 2010

Fig. 4.21 Spencer Frederick Gore,

Tennis at Hertingfordbury, c. 1909, oil

on canvas, private collection

Gore was initially influenced by the

Impressionists, especially Camille Pissarro

through his friendship with his son Lucien.

Via his friend, Walter Sickert, he also learnt

about the art of Degas. In this work, which

was almost certainly painted en plein air, he

uses broad brushstrokes of unmediated

colour for the grass. Gore regularly visited

his mother’s house at Hertingfordbury and

found artistic inspiration in the garden,

painting the paths and flower beds. This

is the only image of the grass tennis court

though. The graceful female player in her

blue skirt may be his future wife Mary Kerr.

Fig. 4.22 Spencer Frederick Gore, Tennis

in Mornington Crescent Gardens, 1909,

oil on canvas, private collection

Spencer Gore began a series of paintings

from the front room he had leased at 31

Mornington Crescent showing the surrounding

houses, gardens, tube station and the grass

tennis courts in the communal gardens. This

was then a much more working class area

of London and the courts were open to a

wide community. In a ‘particularly fresh and

sumptuous’ June he followed the lead of the

Impressionist masters and painted the city

landscape, with its tennis courts, from above.

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 103 30/03/2011 15:14

Page 29: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

104

TENNIS AND THE ARTIST, 1870 – 2010

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 104 30/03/2011 15:14

Page 30: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

105

TENNIS AND THE ARTIST, 1870 – 2010

Fry, who commissioned the work. She recalled: ‘The scene was a garden formally arranged behind a tennis court, on which people were playing tennis. The garden was founded on the Fry’s country house at Oare, Kent, where Eric made drawings of their hard court’.34 The steps up to the grassy bank and the trees are reminiscent of the features in the Manor Garden (fig. 4.24) and the work may be an amalgam of the two sites.

The ambiguities of this scene, which was painted for a central London flat in Portman Square – presumably to remind the patron of his weekend home – epitomises the challenge of painting urban tennis. Since the game was played in parks, surrounding trees perhaps inevitably give the impression of a rural setting.

Fig. 4.23 Laura Knight, Spring in St John’s Wood, 1933, oil on

canvas, National Museums Liverpool, Walker Art Gallery

Like Spencer Gore, Knight observed tennis from the window

of her London home. However, she prepared the composition

with two careful drawings in which she records the everyday

activity of the street and the presence of the tennis court. In

the final work, there are more foreground figures and the

hard court is populated by two players. They are accurately

observed, suggesting Knight was familiar with the game.

It is not entirely clear whether this is a public or a private

court, however because it is a single court it probably

belonged to the garden of one of the houses she overlooked.

Fig. 4.24 Eric Ravilious, Manor Garden, 1927,

wood engraving, Towner Art Gallery, Eastbourne

Wood engraving was very popular in the 1920s and Ravilious

made his reputation in this medium before he became

better known as a painter. He was influenced by Thomas

Berwick and Samuel Palmer. In this work three tennis

players make their way to (or from) a match. They appear

to be in the grounds of the Towner Art Gallery (founded

1923) in his native Eastbourne walking by the grassy

mound. A small, carefully worked drawing appears to show

the same figures in action on court (private collection).

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 105 30/03/2011 15:14

Page 31: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

106

TENNIS AND THE ARTIST, 1870 – 2010

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 106 30/03/2011 15:14

Page 32: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

107

TENNIS AND THE ARTIST, 1870 – 2010

Fig. 4.25 Eric Ravilious, Tennis in the Park, 1930, oil

on board, Bristol City Museum and Art Gallery

This dynamic game is captured in triptych format. It

was originally intended to decorate the panels of the

music room door of the London flat of Sir Geoffrey

Fry. The athletic poses of the women with their bare

arms and stockingless legs illustrates how much

convention had changed to accommodate the modern

woman. The men look somewhat static, but Ravilious

demonstrates his knowledge of the game in the way

that their eyes follow the ball. The elongated shadows

suggest an evening game, but who is the girl leaving the

court – a spectator off in search of a lost tennis ball?

Going to FranceFrance had a long association for the British as a destination to play tennis. The first lawn tennis club was established in Paris in 1877, set up by a group of Englishmen who lived in the capital at the time.35 The Prince of Wales (later Edward VII) himself played the game in the French capital. It is therefore not surprising that a number of British artists created works inspired by tennis in France, particularly on the Riviera where the game became very popular. Paris was the artistic capital of Europe at the end of the nineteenth and the beginning of the twentieth century and it was a great attraction for many British and American painters travelling to train there. John Lavery was one of the first artists associated with tennis subjects to travel to France and he later sent his The Tennis Party (fig. 3.1) to the Paris Salon in 1888 where it received a gold medal.36

The Scottish Colourists found in French art a crucial point of reference for the development of their confident and vibrant style. Samuel Peploe attended

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 107 30/03/2011 15:14

Page 33: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

108

TENNIS AND THE ARTIST, 1870 – 2010

Fig. 4.26 Samuel John Peploe, A Game of

Tennis, Luxembourg Gardens, c. 1906, oil on

board, Scottish National Gallery of Modern Art

The Scottish Colourist Samuel Peploe was

one of many British artists who trained

in Paris. Previously he had painted in an

Impressionistic style, but here he begins to

move away, favouring a more hard edged

approach based on flatter blocks of colour and

cropped compositions under the influence

of Andre Derain and Henri Matisse. This

stunning small oil sketch, with a typically

tight composition full of movement and

colour, captures a game of mixed doubles

in the Luxembourg Gardens in Paris. It was

probably made on one of Peploe’s earlier trips

to France before he moved there in 1909.

Fig. 4.27 John Duncan Fergusson, At the

Net, Tennis Party, Royan, 1910, crayons

on paper, private collection

In 1910, Ferguson and Peploe spent their first

summer in France together, working on the

south-west Atlantic coast at the fashionable

resort of Royan. Here they produced fresh oil

studies of sailing boats, which were so much

a part of the attraction of the town. Fergusson

also made at least two sketches of tennis

mixed doubles with boats in the distance. This

suggests that he might have worked from the

Royal Ocean Club which overlooked the sea.

In this example, the woman in the foreground

has her arm and racket cropped at the top,

suggesting the influence of photography.

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 108 30/03/2011 15:14

Page 34: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

109

TENNIS AND THE ARTIST, 1870 – 2010

Fig. 4.28 Christopher Wood, Tennis Players,

c. 1925-6, oil on canvas, private collection

Tennis made a great impact on Wood and

female tennis players at that, having seen and

admired Suzanne Lenglen in action in 1921. This

uncharacteristically large work was probably

painted on the Riviera. There he observed

the English at leisure, and he would also have

been aware of the much hyped match played

in Cannes in 1926 between Suzanne Lenglen

and the young American Helen Wills. Wood’s

serene work concentrates on two calm and

dignified female figures; they may simply be two

wealthy English ladies, but they perhaps refer

to the two great tennis stars about to do battle.

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 109 30/03/2011 15:14

Page 35: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

110

TENNIS AND THE ARTIST, 1870 – 2010

the Académie Julian in Paris in 1893 and was influenced greatly by Manet’s art. He and his friend and fellow Colourist, John Duncan Fergusson, made many visits to France and both were attracted to the café society and tennis scenes. Peploe’s stunning tiny oil sketch (fig. 4.26), which depicts a game of mixed doubles in the Luxembourg Gardens in Paris, is full of movement and luminous colour. Peploe returned to Paris in 1909, spending his first summer working with Fergusson at Royan. Fergusson made some energetic sketches of mixed-doubles players with sailing boats in the distance; in this example, the unexpected croppings are reminiscent of photography (fig. 4.27). Peploe returned to Britain in 1912 and Fergusson, having met his long term partner (the dancer Margaret Morris), followed in 1914.

Christopher Wood first visited Paris in 1921 when he enrolled at the Académie Julian. There he met the wealthy Chilean diplomat Antonio de Gandarillas (1886–after 1940) with whom he would have a lifelong relationship. It was Gandarillas who ensured that he

met the leading artists of the day, like Picasso. The young Wood was a keen follower of tennis. In a letter home in 1921 he wrote of his trip to the World Hard Court Championship: ‘Today, Saturday afternoon, I have been to lunch with ... Porce ... the amateur tennis champion for Paris for several years. Afterwards we motored to St Cloud to watch the tennis tournament. Suzanne Lenglen played brilliantly ... She is a very wonderful girl and one can only scarcely believe she is only twenty-two’.37 His Tennis Players (fig. 4.28) was probably painted when he travelled with Gandarillas to the Riviera. Wood’s monumental, calm, still figures seem engrossed in their own thoughts, deep in contemplation perhaps, over their match.

Eric Ravilious’s connection with France came about with his work on the 1937 Paris International Exhibition which was organised under the shadow of the growing threat of European dictatorships. He contributed a model of Lawn Tennis to the sporting section of the British pavilion (fig. 1.17).38 Whilst the German, Italian and Soviet Union pavilions all

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 110 30/03/2011 15:14

Page 36: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

111

TENNIS AND THE ARTIST, 1870 – 2010

Fig. 4.29 Eric Ravilious, Preparatory Design on

a Grand Theme for ‘Sport’, for the British Pavilion

of the Paris International Exhibition of 1937, 1937,

watercolour on paper, private collection

Ravilious originally suggested that football and cricket be

included in the plans for his stand in the sports section of

the British pavilion, but Oliver Hill, the overall organiser

was keen that he should concentrate on his favourite sport,

tennis. This watercolour shows Ravilious’s first thoughts. In

the next stage (see fig. 1.17), the artist made four plywood

cutout figures convincingly poised for play in front of a

background of spectators in stands. A grass roller was

shown on a large scale above with giant tennis rackets below.

made clear political statements and the Spanish used art to protest against the rise of fascism, displaying Picasso’s Guernica, the British were characteristically understated, promoting their pastimes and sense of ‘fair play’. There were displays on the picturesque countryside and on cricket, golf, fishing, football and, of course, tennis. Originally, Ravilious thought he would combine football and tennis (fig. 4.29), but in the end he was asked to concentrate on tennis. For many visitors, however, the official British desire to distance the country from outright propaganda failed and a concentration on leisure and sport seemed trivial. Storm clouds were growing over France and Britain as another world war loomed. For Shakespeare and Ravilious the consequences would be tragic and the easy links between the two countries were interrupted for a generation.

Tennis Art and Photography‘Comparisons, odious or doubtful, have been made frequently between art and photography. Only recently, with us at least, photography has come to

be considered individually, apart from its recognised value as a medium for portraiture. Today we do not withhold from it the title of an “art in itself ”’, wrote Paul Nash, the landscape and surrealist painter in 1932 (fig. 4.34).39 Artists originally had the advantage over photographers in that they could record the movement involved in a sport such as tennis more convincingly, as well as capturing the game’s atmosphere and lively colours. But developments in the photographic process meant that by the 1920s black and white still photography could illustrate the energetic shots of tennis stars such as Fred Perry (fig. 1.8). Photographers now packed tournaments, eager for action shots, and newspapers widely reproduced these images. Despite the increasing sophistication of sports photography in the 1920s and ‘30s, this period also saw some of the most innovative and outstanding examples of tennis art as artists adapted to the new possibilities offered by photography, using it whenever possible as a tool to further enhance their ability to capture the game on canvas, on paper, or

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 111 30/03/2011 15:14

Page 37: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

112

TENNIS AND THE ARTIST, 1870 – 2010

in bronze. As Paul Nash observed, ‘the camera’s “eye” proves its incalculable power ... its importance lies, surely, in the wealth of matter it places at the disposal of the modern sculptor or painter’.40

The sculptor Charles Jagger was one such artist who used photographs as an aid; in this case with his informal bronze statuette of the Prince of Wales (later Edward VIII) holding a racket (fig. 4.30). He was accorded a number of sittings, but did not have the chance to observe the prince in his tennis flannels and therefore resorted to using photographs. Jagger based the prince’s pullover on a photograph of him in The Prince of Wales’ Book: A Pictorial Record of the Voyages of H. M. S. ‘Renown’, 1919–1920, though he was in fact dressed for playing squash rather than tennis.41 This image of the relaxed prince is much more sensitively realised than similar commissions such as Orpen’s contemporary portrait of him dressed for golf, in which he looks uneasy and uncomfortable.42

Eric Gill the sculptor, draughtsman and typographer, produced a very different kind of tennis image that same year, also using a photographic source. The Tennis Player (fig. 4.31) is a simple, classic white line wood engraving, based on an image which appeared in The Daily Mirror. The main difference between the photograph and the Gill engraving is that the female player is clothed in the newspaper image. The player’s balletic pose recalls the inspiration that Duncan Grant’s movements on the court had provided for the choreographer, Nijinsky, in 1913. Nude tennis was something of a recurring artistic theme at this time (fig. 4.14).

In 1938 Harold Edgerton, using a stroboscopic flash, succeeded in creating several exposures in a single second, and so produced images which showed glimpses of the middle movements the

Fig. 4. 30 Charles Sargeant Jagger, The Prince

of Wales (later Edward VIII) Dressed for Tennis, 1923,

bronze, National Museum of Wales, Cardiff

This informal portrait of the Prince of Wales is one of

Jagger’s finest works. Commissioned by Lord Esher, a

trusted adviser of the Royal Family, the sculptor was

requested to show the prince in uniform, but he eventually

decided on more informal tennis flannels, smoking a cigar.

The prince knew Jagger and had purchased his work and

this enabled the sculptor to gain a number of sittings. The

prince was a keen player and, like other members of the

royal family, frequently attended Wimbledon. This cast

was donated to the National Museum of Wales in the

artist’s memory in 1936 by Sir William Goscombe John.

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 112 30/03/2011 15:15

Page 38: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

113

TENNIS AND THE ARTIST, 1870 – 2010

human eye usually could not perceive. The result was an extraordinary image, The Tennis Player, which shows the detailed movement involved in playing a forehand (fig. 4.32). Photography had finally triumphed in capturing the full range of movement on court, even if artists such as the Futurist printmaker Cyril Power had foreseen this eventuality. His innovative linocuts such as Tennis, c. 1933 (fig. 4.33), convey the movement and dynamism of the game through fractured images. This work was inspired by the ‘Bounding Basque’: Jean Borotra, two-times winner of Wimbledon in 1924 and 1926. Power and his partner Sybil Andrews were both fascinated by sport. Between 1929 and 1937 they were invited to produce seven designs for posters advertising sporting events which could easily be reached by train including Wimbledon (fig. 1.16).

While the capacity of photography to capture subtleties of movement inspired some artists to respond with even greater energy, other painters instead reflected on its other quality, stillness. In 1931, Paul Nash’s wife gave him his first camera and one of his most haunting images was a photograph of a tennis ball surrounded by the bark of a tree (fig. 4.34) taken in 1934. The son of a successful lawyer, Nash was educated at St Paul’s School where he probably first played tennis (he also seems to have indulged with his artist friends in Hampstead in the 1920s) so he would have been familiar with the ‘lost ball’ of a tennis match. The photograph also surely relates to his famous Surrealist painting, Event on the Downs, produced the same year on the Isle of Purbeck in Dorset (fig. 4.35). The stillness of the giant ball in the painting corresponds to the repose of his photographic study where the same subject is combined with wooden playing blocks, possibly remembered from his childhood. Nash

Fig. 4.31 Eric Gill, The Tennis Player, 1923,

wood engraving, Tate Britain, London

This print is based on a photograph published in The

Daily Mirror in 1923 and it was included in Eric Gill’s

Book of Engravings (1929). This classic simple white line

wood engraving captures a balletic image of the sport

typical of the new generation of sports photography. The

photograph in The Daily Mirror is of a clothed female

tennis player and since it is unlikely that nude tennis was

actually practiced it therefore represents a male fantasy,

the logical outcome of the continuing shift towards less

and less restrictive clothing on court and an interesting

new domain in which to study the human form.

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 113 30/03/2011 15:15

Page 39: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

114

TENNIS AND THE ARTIST, 1870 – 2010

Fig. 4.32 Harold Edgerton, Swirls and Eddies of a

Tennis Stroke, 1938, gelatine silver print, Birmingham

Central Library, Archives and Heritage

Photographers had been interested in capturing the movement

of a single tennis stroke since the 1870s, as a callotype print by

Edweard Muybridge illustrates. However, early photography

struggled with capturing this movement. It was the American

Harold Edgerton who made the breakthrough when he

first used a stroboscophic flash. As a result, he succeeded

in creating several exposures a second, thus capturing

movements which the eye could not usually perceive. This,

one of his most famous images, was first published in Flash!

Seeing the Unseen by Ultra High-Speed Photography, 1939.

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 114 30/03/2011 15:15

Page 40: Court on Canvas: Tennis in Art

115

TENNIS AND THE ARTIST, 1870 – 2010

Fig. 4.33 Cyril Power, Tennis, c. 1933, linocut,

Wimbledon Lawn Tennis Museum

Using a bold design suited to the medium of linocut, Power

conveys the movement and dynamism of the game in a

vibrant way, the like of which no other artist achieved.

During this period Power left his wife to join the young artist

Sybil Andrews with whom he had a personal and artistic

partnership. The couple lived and worked together in a small

studio in Hammersmith between 1928–38. They collaborated

under the name Andrew Power to produce striking posters as

can be seen in their design for Wimbledon in 1933 (fig. 1.16).

Tennis in Art 3 text film.indd 115 30/03/2011 15:15