11
FORMAT : QP09 KCE/DEPT. OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH COURSE PLAN COURSE OBJECTIVE 1. To enable the students to create an awareness on Engineering Ethics and Human Values. 2. To insist Moral and Social Values, Loyalty and to appreciate the rights of others. 3. To develop their personality with relevant to the globalization environment. 4. To enhance individual and social integrity with relevant to national &international. 5. To improve their level of Tolerance as of the need. TEXT BOOKS T1. Mike W. Martin and Roland Schinzinger, “Ethics in Engineering”, Tata McGraw Hill, New Delhi, 2003. T2. Govindarajan M, Natarajan S, Senthil Kumar V. S, “Engineering Ethics”, Prentice Hall of India, New Delhi, 2004. REFERENCE BOOKS R1. Charles B. Fleddermann, “Engineering Ethics”, Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2004. R2. Charles E. Harris, Michael S. Pritchard and Michael J. Rabins, “Engineering Ethics – Concepts and Cases”, Cengage Learning, 2009 R3. John R Boatright, “Ethics and the Conduct of Business”, Pearson Education, New Delhi, 2003 PEE KCE/ENG/QB/III YR/PEE Sub. Code : GE 6075 Branch / Year / Sem : B.E MECH/III/V Sub.Name : PROFESSIONAL ETHICS IN ENGINEERING Batch

Course Plan II

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

professional ethics course plan

Citation preview

FORMAT : QP09 KCE/DEPT. OF ENGLISH

DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISHCOURSE PLAN

COURSE OBJECTIVE1. To enable the students to create an awareness on Engineering Ethics and Human Values.

2. To insist Moral and Social Values, Loyalty and to appreciate the rights of others.3. To develop their personality with relevant to the globalization environment.4. To enhance individual and social integrity with relevant to national &international.

5. To improve their level of Tolerance as of the need.TEXT BOOKST1. Mike W. Martin and Roland Schinzinger, Ethics in Engineering, Tata McGraw Hill,

New Delhi, 2003.

T2. Govindarajan M, Natarajan S, Senthil Kumar V. S, Engineering Ethics, Prentice Hall of

India, New Delhi, 2004.REFERENCE books

R1. Charles B. Fleddermann, Engineering Ethics, Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2004.

R2. Charles E. Harris, Michael S. Pritchard and Michael J. Rabins, Engineering Ethics Concepts and Cases, Cengage Learning, 2009

R3. John R Boatright, Ethics and the Conduct of Business, Pearson Education, New Delhi,

2003

R4. Edmund G Seebauer and Robert L Barry, Fundametals of Ethics for Scientists and

Engineers, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001R5. Laura P. Hartman and Joe Desjardins, Business Ethics: Decision Making for Personal

Integrity and Social Responsibility Mc Graw Hill education, India Pvt. Ltd.,New Delhi

2013.

R6. World Community Service Centre, " Value Education", Vethathiri publications, Erode,

2011

R7. Jayshree Suresh and B.S Raghavan, Human Values and Professional Ethics, S.CHAND- Second Edition-2007.WEB RESOURCESW1. http://www.onlineethics.org/Education.aspx (Topic.No:10,28)W2. www. http://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics (Topic.No:1-34)W3.www.http://www.globalethics.org/?gclid=CKr4kanCwMUCFVUnjgodEE4Aaw

(Topic.No:39,40)W4. http://www.ethics.org/ (Topic.No:33)Topic NoTopicBooks for ReferencePage No.Teaching MethodologyNo. of Hours RequiredCumulative No. of periods

UNIT I HUMAN VALUES (10)

1. Morals, values and Ethics R319-21BB11

2. Integrity Work ethic T143-45BB12

3. Service learning Civic virtueDEMO3

4. Respect for others Living peacefullyT146-47BB14

5. Caring SharingT2;R755-57;5-6BB15

6. Honesty CourageT144-45BB16

7. Valuing time CooperationR76-7BB17

8. Commitment EmpathyR77-8BB18

9. Self confidence CharacterT162-66BB19

10. Spirituality Introduction to Yoga and

meditation for professional excellence and stress management.W1PPT110

LEARNING OUTCOME

At the end of unit, students should be able to

Understand the basic terms of Morals, Values and Ethics. Examine relationship between the above mentioned terms.

Understand how principles of ethics are related to Human Values.

Identify the different human values and understand its importance.

UNIT II ENGINEERING ETHICS (9)

11. Senses of Engineering EthicsT12-5BB111

12. Variety of moral issues Types of inquiryT15-9BB112

13. Moral dilemmas Moral

Autonomy T116-18BB113

14. Kohlbergs theory T118-23BB114

15. Gilligans theory T243-45BB115

16. Consensus and ControversyT122-23BB116

17. Models of

professional rolesT132-33BB117

18. Theories about right action Self-interestR733-34BB118

19. Customs and Religion Uses of Ethical Theories

R3206-208BB119

LEARNING OUTCOME

At the end of unit, students should be able to

Understand the concepts of Engineering Ethics. Identify Types of Inquiry.

Known about Moral dilemmas.

Outline Theories of Moral Development- Kohlberg & Gilligan.

To understand the concept of Self interest.

UNIT III ENGINEERING AS SOCIAL EXPERIMENTATION (9)

20. Engineering as Experimentation R115-19BB221

21. Engineers as responsible ExperimentersR183-87BB223

22. Codes of EthicsR120-24BB326

23. A Balanced Outlook on LawT1113-114BB228

LEARNING OUTCOME

At the end of unit, students should be able to

To understand what is Social Experimentation? Role of Code Ethics. Importance of Law. The Challenger Case Study.

Topic NoTopicBooks for ReferencePage No.Teaching MethodologyNo. of Hours RequiredCumulative No. of periods

UNIT IV SAFETY, RESPONSIBILITIES AND RIGHTS (9)

24. Safety and Risk Assessment of Safety and Risk T1& W1129-133BB129

25. Risk Benefit Analysis and Reducing RiskT1153-161BB

1

30

26. Respect for Authority Collective BargainingT2;T187-89 202-204BB31

27. ConfidentialityT1208-212BB132

28. Conflicts of Interest T1& W1216-221BB133

29. Occupational CrimeT1224-226BB134

30. Professional Rights Employee RightsR190-92BB135

31. Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)R3393-396BB136

32. Discrimination

T1273-276BB137

LEARNING OUTCOME

At the end of unit, students should be able to

Understand the concept of safety and risk. Analyze- Three Mile Case Study.

Know the responsibilities of engineers as employees.

Know the rights employee engineer.

UNIT V GLOBAL ISSUES (8)

33. Multinational Corporations R3 & W4424-426BB138

34. Environmental EthicsT1304-318BB139

35. Computer EthicsR7157-159BB140

36. Weapons Development

Engineers as ManagersT1332-338BB141

37. Consulting Engineers Engineers as Expert Witnesses and AdvisorsT1359-365BB142

38. Moral LeadershipT1375-382BB143

39. Code of ConductR3&W3156-162BB

144

40. Corporate Social ResponsibilityR3&W3384-393BB145

LEARNING OUTCOME

At the end of unit, students should be able to

Acquire knowledge about Multinational Corporations Understand the ethical issues and issues related to environment.

Aware of tools for solving international ethical issues.

Aware of code of ethics of national & international associations.

Aware of Engineers Bill, 2003.

COURSE OUTCOME

At the end of the course, the students will be able to

Budding Engineers can bride of their profession. They can understand their social responsibilities. They can evolve the human values. Engineers can feel the strength of integrity. Graduates can upgrade themselves according to the Industrial exposures.

CONTENT BEYOND THE SYLLABUS

1. Case studies Ethical Problem Solving Techniques.A state-of-the-ArtTermination.INTERNAL ASSESSMENT DETAILS

ASST. NO.IIIMODEL

Topic Nos.1-1516-231-40

Date

ASSIGNMENT DETAILSASSIGNMENTIII

Topic Nos for reference1-151-40

Deadline13-07-1510-08-15 & 15-09-15

ASSIGNMENT I (10)ASSIGNMENT II (20)

Descriptive Questions

1.Write a short notes on the

following terms:

a. Work Ethics.

b. Honesty.

c. Civic Virtue.

d. Caring and Sharing.

2.Define the following terms:

a. Empathy.

b. Commitment.

c. Integrity.

d. Moral Dilemmas.

3. Explain the Kohlbergs Theory in detail.4.Define the variety of moral

issues with examples.

5. Explain the Gilligans Theory

with example

1. Discuss and demonstrate the various human values and in what way it will help engineers by analyzing todays industries performance?

2. What are codes of ethics? State and explain the functions of codes of ethics. In what ways the engineering societies can promote ethics-define and demonstrate.3. What are the safety measures you have learnt from Bhopal and Chernobyl case studies?-give a demonstration in your own style.4. Write brief notes on Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and explain different types of rights of Engineers? And give a lecture on IPR.5. Write briefly & demonstrate on:

a. a. Engineers as expert witness.b. b. Engineers as good managers.

c. c. Engineers with social responsibilities. d.

Prepared by

Verified ByApproved by

PRINCIPALREVIEW SHEETAfter Completion of syllabus

Faculty experience in handling / covering syllabus

Unit I :

Unit II :

Unit III :

Unit IV :

Unit V :

Difficulties (if any)

Feedback on University Question Paper

SIGNATURE OF STAFF HOD/MECH

GENERAL GUIDELINES Course Objectives are brief, clear statements that describe the desired learning of instruction; i.e., the specific skills, values, and attitudes students are intended to acquire. Three learning objectives are

What do you want your graduates to know? What do you want your graduates to think or care about?, What do you want your graduates to be able to do? Learning Outcome are set of statements setting out what the participants should be able to do / understand by the end of the Unit. Learning Outcomes are statements that describe significant and essential learning that learners have achieved, and can reliably demonstrate at the end of a course or programLearning outcome muse be clear and precise, learner-oriented, realistic and achievable. (Words such as State, Describe, Explain, Use, Identify, Analyze, Compare, Demonstrate, Plan, Develop can be used) Course Outcome are set of statements setting out what the participants should be able to do / understand at the end of the course. Teaching Methodology includes

BB- Black board

CBT- Computer Based

Tutorial

PPT- Power Point

V- Video

Demo- Demonstration

OHP- Over Head Projector usage (OHP slides)

Sem- Seminar

GL- Guest Lecture

IV- Industrial visit based learning

CS - Case study

Tut - Tutorial NPTEL- National Programme on Technology Enabled Learning

Minimum of 1 NPTEL class per course should be included and executed. Assignment dates shall be fixed in consent with all 6 subject faculties so as to give equal time slot balance for the students. Assignment dates should be prior to Assessment & Model Exams. Course plan Pages 1 to 6 shall be included in Question bank Review sheet is experience summary sheet to be included in the course file for future reference (staff has to fill in the sheet after completing the course) & need not be included in Question Bank. Updated Question Bank shall be given appropriate version numbers GUIDELINES FOR ASSIGNMENT1. Student Groups shall be formed (Eg. Class strength :50, each group comprising 10 members, totaling 5 groups). As per the number of groups, Assignment question I, II has to be identified by faculty. (5 groups means, 5 questions for Assignment I, II). Group 1 shall be allotted Qn 1 from Assignment I & Qn. 1 from Assignment II and likewise the other groups.2. For Assignment I, each group has to attend 1 question in detail (Min. of 8 pages). Marks will be credited for Assessment I.3. For Assignment II, as per the specification mentioned student groups has to develop model/simulate the assigned task. Work has to documented individually (Title, Objective, Description, Requirement, Implementation details, Inference).

4. Award of marks :Document-05, Presentation-05, Demo-105. Marks secured in Document, Presentation will be credited for Assessment-II.

6. Work has to be Demonstrated to the faculty in-charge for award of marks & credited for Model exam.7. Progress of Assignment II will be monitored through faculty-batch interaction.Sub. Code: GE 6075 Branch / Year / Sem : B.E MECH/III/V

Sub.Name: PROFESSIONAL ETHICS IN ENGINEERING Batch : 2012-2016

Staff Name: Mr.R.SENGUTTUVAN Academic Year : 2015-16 (ODD)

PEE KCE/ENG/QB/III YR/PEE

_1491141370.psd