Course outline culture and history

SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE, BUILDING & DESIGN Centre for Modern Architecture Studies in Southeast Asia (MASSA)______________________________________________________________________

Bachelor of Science (Honours) in Architecture

Module: ARCHITECTURE CULTURE & HISTORY 2 (ARC 60203)Prerequisite: ARCHITECTURE CULTURE & HISTORY 1Credit Hours: 3Instructor: Norita Johar([email protected]), Norhayati Ramli ([email protected]),

Shahrianne Mohd Shah ([email protected]) & Ida Marlina([email protected])

Module Synopsis

“Dates are much more than isolated markers of events. Organised into a chronology, dates establish sequence and synchronicity” ~ Clint Twist, 1999.

Architecture Culture & History 2 [ARC 60203] is a continuation of the investigation of architecture history development that began in Architecture Culture & History 1 [ARC 1313]. Lectures will provide detailed accounts of the principal developments in the Western world from the revolutionary period to the present day. Buildings will be explored with reference to major contemporary examples and the work and philosophy of significant exponents. Students will undertake a major research of a significant building, complete with investigation of the major influences that led to its development and in turn its influence in other architectural aspects.

The lectures and projects are tailored to support the need of Architectural Design Studio 2 in timely manner to ensure that the students can identify specific features of Modern Masters prior to the design process in the Studio Design 2.

Module Teaching Objectives

The teaching objectives of the module are:1. To deepen students’ understanding of architectural theory through a consideration of intentions, concepts,

patterns, disciplines, architectural language and contextual relationships.2. To examine a detailed account of the principal developments in the western world from the Industrial Revolution to

post-World War 2.

Module Learning Outcomes

Upon successful completion of this module, students will be able to:1. Describe the development of the main strands of western architecture over the last 200 years. 2. Identify some of the issues involved in the interrelationship between theory and design as exemplified in various historical periods and places.3. Interpret architectural language in relation to the development of Western architecture between Industrial Revolution and post World War 2. 4. Differentiate the way in which many varied factors contribute to the development of form.5. Compare how architects have used architectural language in various historical periods and places.6. Analyze the broad issues which inform the development of architecture between Industrial Revolution and post World War 2.

TU Bachelor of Science (Honours) (Architecture) ( AUGUST 2014 ) 1 | P a g e

mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

Modes of Delivery

This is a 3 credit hour module conducted over a period of 14 weeks. The modes of delivery will be in the form of lectures, tutorials, and self-directed study. The breakdown of the contact hours for the module is as follows:

• Lecture: 2 hours per week• Tutorial: 2 hours per week• Self-directed study: 4 hours per week

Office Hours

You are encouraged to visit the instructor/lecturer/tutor concerned for assistance during office hours. If the office hours do not meet your schedule, notify the instructor and set appointment times as needed.

TIMeS

TIMeS will be used as a communication tool and information portal for students to access module materials, project briefs, assignments and announcements.

Taylor’s Graduate Capabilities (TGC)

The teaching and learning approach at Taylor’s University is focused on developing the Taylor’s Graduate Capabilities (TGC) in its students; capabilities that encompass the knowledge, cognitive capabilities and soft skills of its graduates.


General Rules and Regulations


Discipline Specific KnowledgeTGCs Acquired Through Module

Learning Outcomes

1.0 Discipline Specific Knowledge

1.1 Able to put theories into practice. 2, 3,5

1.2 Understand ethical issues in the context of the field of studies. 1

1.3 Understand professional practice within the field of studies. -

Cognitive Capabilities

2.0 Lifelong Learning

2.1 Learn independently. 2

2.2 Locate, extract, synthesise and utilise information effectively. 3,4

2.3 Be intellectually engaged. 1

3.0 Thinking and Problem Solving Skills

3.1 Think critically and creatively. 1, 2

3.2 Define and analyse problems to arrive at effective solutions. 3, 6

Soft Skills

4.0 Communication Skills

4.1 Communicate appropriately in various setting and modes. -

5.0 Interpersonal Skills

5.1 Understand team dynamics and mobilise the power of teams. -

5.2 Understand and assume leadership. -

6.0 Intrapersonal Skills

6.1 Manage one self and be self-reliant. -

6.2 Reflect on one’s actions and learning. -

6.3 Embody Taylor's core values. -

7.0 Citizenship and Global Perspectives

7.1 Be aware and form opinions from diverse perspectives. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

7.2 Understand the value of civic responsibility and community engagement. -

8.0 Digital Literacy

8.1Effective use of information and communication (ICT) and related technologies.

-

Late Submission Penalty

The School imposes a late submission penalty for work submitted late without a valid reason e.g. a medical certificate. Any work submitted after the deadline (which may have been extended) shall have the percentage grade assigned to the work on face value reduced by 10% for the first day and 5% for each subsequent day late. A weekend counts as one (1) day.

Individual members of staff shall be permitted to grant extensions for assessed work that they have set if they are satisfied that a student has given good reasons.

Absenteeism at intermediate or final presentation will result in zero mark for that presentation.

The Board of Examiners may overrule any penalty imposed and allow the actual mark achieved to be used if the late submission was for a good reason.

Attendance, Participation and Submission of Assessment Components

Attendance is compulsory. Any student who arrives late after the first half-hour of class will be considered as absent. The lectures and tutorials will assist you in expanding your ideas and your assessments. A minimum of 80% attendance is required to pass the module and/or be eligible for the final examination and/or presentation.

Students will be assessed based on their performance throughout the semester. Students are expected to attend and participate actively in class. Class participation is an important component of every module.

Students must attempt all assessment components. Failure to attempt assessment components worth 20% or more, the student would be required to resubmit or resit an assessment component, even though the student has achieved more than 50% in the overall assessment. Failure to attempt all assessment components, including final exam and final presentation, will result in failing the module irrespective of the marks earned, even though the student has achieved more than 50% in the overall assessment.

Plagiarism (Excerpt from Taylor’s University Student Handbook 2013, page 59)

Plagiarism, which is an attempt to present another person’s work as your own by not acknowledging the source, is a serious case of misconduct which is deemed unacceptable by the University.

"Work" includes written materials such as books, journals and magazine articles or other papers and also includes films and computer programs. The two most common types of plagiarism are from published materials and other students’ works.

1. Published Materials

In general, whenever anything from someone else’s work is used, whether it is an idea, an opinion or the results of a study or review, a standard system of referencing should be used. Examples of plagiarism may include a sentence or two, or a table or a diagram from a book or an article used without acknowledgement.

Serious cases of plagiarism can be seen in cases where the entire paper presented by the student is copied from another book, with an addition of only a sentence or two by the student.

While the former can be treated as a simple failure to cite references, the latter is likely to be viewed as cheating in an examination.

Though most assignments require the need for reference to other peoples’ works, in order to avoid plagiarism, students should keep a detailed record of the sources of ideas and findings and ensure that these sources are clearly quoted in their assignment. Note that plagiarism also refers to materials obtained from the Internet too.

2. Other Students’ Work


Circulating relevant articles and discussing ideas before writing an assignment is a common practice. However, with the exception of group assignments, students should write their own papers. Plagiarising the work of other students into assignments includes using identical or very similar sentences, paragraphs or sections. When two students submit papers that are very similar in tone and content, both are likely to be penalised.

Student Participation

Your participation in the module is encouraged. You have the opportunity to participate in the following ways:

Your ideas and questions are welcomed, valued and encouraged. Your input is sought to understand your perspectives, ideas and needs in planning subject revision. You have opportunities to give feedback and issues will be addressed in response to that feedback. Do reflect on your performance in Portfolios. Student evaluation on your views and experiences about the module are actively sought and used as an

integral part of improvement in teaching and continuous improvement.

Student-centered Learning (SCL)

The module uses the Student-centered Learning (SCL) approach. Utilization of SCL embodies most of the principles known to improve learning and to encourage student’s participation. SCL requires students to be active, responsible participants in their own learning and instructors are to facilitate the learning process. Various teaching and learning strategies such as experiential learning, problem-based learning, site visits, group discussions, presentations, working in group and etc. can be employed to facilitate the learning process. In SCL, students are expected to be:

• active in their own learning;• self-directed to be responsible to enhance their learning abilities;• able to cultivate skills that are useful in today’s workplace;• active knowledge seekers;• active players in a team.

Types of Assessment and Feedback

You will be graded in the form of formative and summative assessments. Formative assessments will provide information to guide you in the research process. This form of assessment involves participation in discussions and feedback sessions. Summative assessment will inform you about the level of understanding and performance capabilities achieved at the end of the module.

Assessment Plan

Assessments Type Learning outcomes

Marks (Submission)

Project 1 : Precedent Studies

Group & Individual 2,4,5 20% Week 4

Mid Term Exam Individual 1,2,3 20% Week 7

Project 2: Web Book Group & Individual 2,4,5 30 % Week 11

Final Examination Individual 1-6 30%Exam Week

Portfolio Individual Pass/Fail Week 14

Total 100%


Assessment Components

1. Projects

Both projects are designed to enhance students understanding of the module.

Project 1 is about understanding the Modern Masters of Architecture in the West. Students are to conduct a research on the Modern Masters and assigned specific buildings. For group submission, students are required to conduct research and compose their findings using a presentation board that include general information, concept and the architectural details in the form of plan, elevation, section, perspective and short annotations which have to be manually done using any of the chosen mediums. Computers can be used for composing the layout. For individual submissions, each member of the group are required to submit A4 analytical sketches on one chosen aspect of the building such as massing, form, structure, material, construction or any other prominent components of the chosen building.

Project 2 is about applying the knowledge in Malaysian context. Students will be assigned a Modern building in Kuala Lumpur for research and required to document the architecture of the assigned building. The output is to be compiled in a web book and uploaded in the internet. The group components include layout design and general information such as history, fast facts of the building, the Architect involved and conclusion. For the individual components, each member of the group needs to document the architecture, structure, material, construction or any other prominent components of the building.

2. Mid Term Exam

Questions will be provided based on lectures and findings of projects to further increase students’ architectural theory vocabulary and enhance the understanding of the subject.

3. Final Examination

This final examination is designed to assess whether the students have achieved the module learning outcome such as knowing the catalyst of modern movement, understanding of modern architectural concepts, identifying modern architectural features and relating concepts and form. The format of the assessment will be informed later.

4. Taylor’s Graduate Capabilities Portfolio

The Taylor’s Graduate Capabilities (TGC) Portfolio is a document that collates all assessments produced in a module and reflects a student’s acquisition of the Module Learning Outcomes and Taylor’s Graduate Capabilities.

• For students enrolled in the 2011 Programme Structure

The TGC portfolio is an edited A3-size bound document that includes all the assessments produced in the module. Visual diary and process of work (packaged) are to be included as part of the portfolio submission. Students must reflect on their learning through the TGC Portfolio Form.

• For students enrolled in the 2012 Programme Structure onwards

Each students is to develop an ePortfolio, a web-based portfolio in the form of a personal academic blog. The ePortfolio is developed progressively for all modules taken throughout Semesters 1 to 5, and culminates with a final Portfolio in printed form produced in the final semester. The printed Portfolio must encapsulates the acquisition of Programme Learning Outcomes and Taylor’s Graduate Capabilities, and showcase the distinctiveness and identity of the student as a graduate of the programme.


Marks and Grading Table (Revised as per Programme Guide 2013)

Assessments and grades will be returned within 2 weeks of your submission. You will be given the grades and necessary feedback for each submission. The grading system is shown below:

Grade MarksGrade Points

Definition Description

A 80 – 100 4.00 ExcellentEvidence of original thinking; demonstrated outstanding capacity to analyze and synthesize; outstanding grasp of module matter; evidence of extensive knowledge base.

A- 75 – 79 3.67 Very GoodEvidence of good grasp of module matter; critical capacity and analytical ability; understanding of relevant issues; evidence of familiarity with the literature.

B+ 70 – 74 3.33Good

Evidence of grasp of module matter; critical capacity and analytical ability, reasonable understanding of relevant issues; evidence of familiarity with the literature.B 65 – 69 3.00

B- 60 – 64 2.67

PassEvidence of some understanding of the module matter; ability to develop solutions to simple problems; benefitting from his/her university experience.

C+ 55 – 59 2.33

C 50 – 54 2.00

D+ 47 – 49 1.67

Marginal FailEvidence of nearly but not quite acceptable familiarity with module matter, weak in critical and analytical skills.

D 44 – 46 1.33

D- 40 – 43 1.00

F 0 – 39 0.00 FailInsufficient evidence of understanding of the module matter; weakness in critical and analytical skills; limited or irrelevant use of the literature.

WD - - WithdrawnWithdrawn from a module before census date, typically mid-semester.

F(W) 0 0.00 Fail Withdrawn after census date, typically mid-semester.

IN - - Incomplete

An interim notation given for a module where a student has not completed certain requirements with valid reason or it is not possible to finalise the grade by the published deadline.

P - - Pass Given for satisfactory completion of practicum.

AU - - AuditGiven for a module where attendance is for information only without earning academic credit.

Hurdle Assessment Guideline for Architectural Design Studio Hurdle assessments are compulsory requirements within individual modules that must be met in order to achieve satisfactory results in those modules. The hurdle assessment for final submission of Architectural Design Studio modules is set at 40%. Students who obtain a D grade (40 - 49) for final submission and overall D grade or higher for


the module will be permitted a resubmission assessment. Students are required to obtain a minimum C grade in the resubmission to pass the module. Students who obtain a Fail grade (0 - 39) for the final submission will fail the module, regardless of his/her overall grade for the module. Failure of the module may impede student progression.

Module Schedule

Week/Date Topics/ReadersLecture Tutorial

Self-directed Study

Hours Hours Hours

Week 127/ 8/2014

Lecture 1Subject IntroductionOverview of Subject OutlineBriefing Project 1 ( Precedent Studies )

Project 1 Discussion

Library Research

2 2 2

Week 23/9/2014

Lecture 2Modern Architecture Part 1:Bauhaus & Masters of Architecture 1 (Gropius & FLW)

Data AnalysisProject

2 2 2

Week 310/9/2014

Lecture 3Modern Architecture Part 2:Masters of Architecture 2 ( Corb & Mies)

Board Proposal Project

2 2 2

Week 417/9/2014

Project 1 Review & Submission (20%)Briefing Project 2 (Web Book)

Project 2 Discussion

Library Research

2 2 2Week 524/9/2014

Lecture 4Architecture in the Age of Enlightenment Student

Lecture 1Enlightenment

Library Research

2 6Week 61/10/2014

Lecture 5Industrial Revolution & Its Reactions

Student Lecture 2Industrial

Revolution

Library Research

2 2 2Week 78/10/2014

Mid Term Exam [ Online] ( 20% )--

2 2 2Week 815/10/2014

Project 2 Discussion & Tutorial

22/10/2014 Mid Term Break: Site Visit for Project 2Week 929/10/2014

Lecture 6Arts & Crafts Movement Progress Project

2 2 2Week 105/11/2014

Lecture 7The American ArchitectureWeb Book demonstration

Draft report and layout

Project

2 2 2


Week 1112/11/2014

Project 2 Review & Submission (30%)- - -

- - 2

Week 1219/11/2014

Lecture 8German Futurists and Russian Constructivists, Expressionism, De Stijl & Cubism

-Student

Lecture 3Modern Arts

-

- 2 -

Week 1326/11/2014

Lecture 9Bauhaus & The International Style

-Student

Lecture 4World War 1

-

- 2 -

Week 143/12/2014

Preparation of TGCOnline Revision

- -- TGC portfolio

- - -

Week 1510/12/2014

Study WeekSubmission: TGC Portfolio

- - -

- - -

Week 16 Final Examination (30%)

Note: This module outline is subject to change with short notice.

References

Text Books1. Curtis, William J.R. 2002. Modern Architecture since 1900. New York: Phaidon.2. Fazio, M., Moffet, M., Wodehouse,L., 2009. A World History of Architecture. London: Lawrence King Publishing3. Frampton, Kenneth. 2000. Modern Architecture: A Critical History. London: Thames and Hudson.4. Weston, R. 1996. Modernism. London: Phaidon Press

Recommended Reading1. Blaser, Werner. Mies Van Der Rohe . Berlin: Birkhauser Verlag Carter2. Ghirardo, Diane. 1996. Architecture after Modernism. Thames and Hudson Ltd.3. Gossel, Peter. Leuthauser, Gabriele. 2005. Architecture in the 20th Century. Berlin: Taschen4. Jencks, Charles. 2000. Le Corbusier and the Continual Revolution in Architecture. New York: The Monacelli

Press5. Kostoff, Spiro. 1985. A History of Architecture: Settings and Rituals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.6. Mc Carter, Robert. 2001, . Frank Llyod Wright Architect. New York: Phaidon7. Norberg-Schulz, Christian. 1976. Meaning in Western Architecture. New York: Praeger Publishers.8. Peter. 2005. Mies Van Der Rohe at Work . New York: Phaidon9. Ray, Katerina R. 2010. Bauhaus Dream- House: Modernity and Globalization. New York : Routledge10. Scully, Vincent Jr. 1975. Modern Architecture. New York: George Braziller, Inc.11. Snibble, Patricia. M, Richard W. 1999. The New Modernist in World Architecture. New York: McGraw Hill12. Watkinson, Gordon. 2009. Bauhaus Twenty-21. An ongoing Legacy. Boston: Birkhauser


Week 1112/11/2014

Project 2 Review & Submission (30%)- - -

- - 2

Week 1219/11/2014

Lecture 8German Futurists and Russian Constructivists, Expressionism, De Stijl & Cubism

-Student

Lecture 3Modern Arts

-

- 2 -

Week 1326/11/2014

Lecture 9Bauhaus & The International Style

-Student

Lecture 4World War 1

-

- 2 -

Week 143/12/2014

Preparation of TGCOnline Revision

- -- TGC portfolio

- - -

Week 1510/12/2014

Study WeekSubmission: TGC Portfolio

- - -

- - -

Week 16 Final Examination (30%)

Note: This module outline is subject to change with short notice.

References

Text Books1. Curtis, William J.R. 2002. Modern Architecture since 1900. New York: Phaidon.2. Fazio, M., Moffet, M., Wodehouse,L., 2009. A World History of Architecture. London: Lawrence King Publishing3. Frampton, Kenneth. 2000. Modern Architecture: A Critical History. London: Thames and Hudson.4. Weston, R. 1996. Modernism. London: Phaidon Press

Recommended Reading1. Blaser, Werner. Mies Van Der Rohe . Berlin: Birkhauser Verlag Carter2. Ghirardo, Diane. 1996. Architecture after Modernism. Thames and Hudson Ltd.3. Gossel, Peter. Leuthauser, Gabriele. 2005. Architecture in the 20th Century. Berlin: Taschen4. Jencks, Charles. 2000. Le Corbusier and the Continual Revolution in Architecture. New York: The Monacelli

Press5. Kostoff, Spiro. 1985. A History of Architecture: Settings and Rituals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.6. Mc Carter, Robert. 2001, . Frank Llyod Wright Architect. New York: Phaidon7. Norberg-Schulz, Christian. 1976. Meaning in Western Architecture. New York: Praeger Publishers.8. Peter. 2005. Mies Van Der Rohe at Work . New York: Phaidon9. Ray, Katerina R. 2010. Bauhaus Dream- House: Modernity and Globalization. New York : Routledge10. Scully, Vincent Jr. 1975. Modern Architecture. New York: George Braziller, Inc.11. Snibble, Patricia. M, Richard W. 1999. The New Modernist in World Architecture. New York: McGraw Hill12. Watkinson, Gordon. 2009. Bauhaus Twenty-21. An ongoing Legacy. Boston: Birkhauser


Documents

Course outline culture and history