Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Course Data Programme Meeting: Opportunity to ask questions about Stage2 Implementation Plans
Tues 15th Nov 14:00 - 16:00
15 Nov 2011
#jiscxcri
Who are we?
Ruth Drysdale – JISC e-Learning team Programme manager
– Lead for Course Data programme
Rob Englebright – JISC e-Learning team Programme manager
– Technical lead for Course Data programme
Alan Paull – Information management consultant
Kirstie Coolin – eBusiness Analyst
Programme drivers
There are 3 main drivers for making it easier for people to find and compare courses:
1. prospective fee paying students want to know more about the academic experience a course will provide and be able to compare this with other courses;
2. better informed students are more likely to choose a course that they will complete, and be more motivated to achieve better results;
3. increased scrutiny by quality assurance agencies and the Government’s requirement for transparency of publicly funded bodies.
Course Data Programme scope
The Course Data programme will support the sector to prepare for the increasing demand for course information, and increase the availability of high-quality, accurate information about part-time, online and distance learning opportunities offered by UK institutions teaching HE by:
– funding institutions to make the process and technical innovations necessary to release a structured, machine-readable feed of their course-related information
– create a demonstrator aggregator to bring together this course information and enable prospective students to search it.
Programme Outcomes
There will be increased usage of appropriate technology to streamline course data processes leading to:
– More standardised, and therefore comparable, course information in a consistent location making discovery easier.
– Improved quality and therefore more efficient and effective course data.
– Increased ease in finding and comparing courses, especially types of courses that are currently hard to find, such as ones delivered by distance learning.
Institutions are able to make appropriate and informed decisions about their processes for managing course-related data, leading to a reduced administrative data burden, cost-effective working, and better business intelligence.
Programme structure
This differs from other JISC programmes – 2 stages:
Stage 1: Review and Planning Sept 2011 – 21 Nov 2011
– 95 Institutions, 58 Universities 35 Colleges 2 Institutes
– A list of institutions is on JISC website
Stage 2: Implementation Jan 2012 - Mar 2013
– Between £40-80,000 each project
– JISC will select about 80 stage1 implementation plans to go into Stage 2. They will represent a range of states of preparedness.
– Implementation plan selection criteria same as normal bid.
Stage 1
Stage 1 Deliverables from Review and Planning Projects are invited to use the XCRI Self Assessment
Framework to review their processes that manage their course data. This will create a readiness review output. These will be aggregated and thus anonymous to create public baseline measures.
A project implementation plan which includes the production of an XCRI-CAP feed with COOL URI for certain types of courses and other proposed work to be carried out in Stage 2 such as how to improve course data flows and processes within the institution to produce feeds for external agencies and to address national initiatives such as KIS and the HEAR
Templates for Project Plan, Appendix A. Project Budget, Appendix B. Workpackages at: www.jisc.ac.uk/fundingopportunities/projectmanagement.aspx
Stage 2 Implementation Plans
Stage 2 Project Implementation Plans Jan 2012 – March 2013 Between £40-80,000
Implementation plans must include the production of a system generated XCRI-CAP feed with a COOL URI of their course provision, especially part time, online/distance, post graduate and CPD.
Up to 80 institutions will be selected for Stage 2 on the basis of these plans, to represent a range of states of preparedness.
10 Man days assigned to JISC programme level engagement (eg attending programme meetings and JISC training courses)
Stage 1
Stage 1: JISC Support Project Management
http://www.jisc.ac.uk/fundingopportunities/projectmanagement.aspx
JISC Infonet: promoting good practice, inspiring innovation with infoKits contain a wealth of 'self-help' material, from simple methodologies to manage projects, risks, change and processes. http://www.jiscinfonet.ac.uk/
www.xcri.co.uk forum for adding comments, questions
eNewsletter to [email protected]
Course Data Programme support team
Stage 2 Implementation Plans
Example JISC Bid and Project Plan
SHED is a JISC project with a good plan
http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/elearning/ltig/shed.aspx
#jiscxcri
Any questions?
Implementation plan and Stage 2 deliverables
Complete the JISC template Project (implementation) plan and make sure you factor the listed stage 2 deliverables into Appendix B Work plan, and show how the deliverables will emerge from your proposed activities, plus costs in the Appendix A Budget plan
Make your work plan as clear as possible
– Mix of narrative and tables/diagram is usually clearest
– Include all the requested activities as per grant letter (Web page) and meetings
– Who’s doing what
– Who’s your high-level champion, and how will you work with them in practice, project board, steering group, existing committees?
– Include project management , IPR and risk assessment
– Make sure it’s understandable and unambiguous to someone outside the planning team
Implementation plan and Stage 2 deliverables
Appendix A Budget see eg on
www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/elearning/coursedata/stage1.aspx
Ask your finance team, and search JISC Home page for other JISC projects your institution has run before, then ask that project team for advice and possibly read your plans for comments
If the Hardware/software cost is above 10% of the total project cost, add a comment that your institution contribution will be used to cover this
Institutional Contribution – more than 0% , likely about 10-20%, if even higher then project should give better Value For Money , as JISC will infer the institution will have more vested interest in ensuring the success of the project
Where to put different Staff time: Basically anyone that is doing significant work on the project and they would not have done this work otherwise, goes in Directly Incurred. Whilst staff who are doing some work for the project but its more of their ‘day job’ type activities, put their time in Directly allocated
Implementation plan and Stage 2 deliverables
A ‘reasonable’ number of courses in 1 or more types listed below – but as this depends on institution, no upper or lower number given, but this is a MINIMUM. The more course types and number of each type, the better
Types of Courses of interest:
– Hard to find (FT UG are expected to be easy to find) and therefore compare
– Short Courses, CPD, 100% Online delivery at a distance (ie Student doesn’t attend institution ) Post Graduate, - does anyone have any other types?
Implementation plan and Stage 2 deliverables
No page limit but .... make your work plan clear and concise – what information is going to be useful TO YOU in Jan to really get the project started?
OK to use Excel spreadsheet instead of Word Doc for WP
Work Packages eg
– Project Management,
– Creating the XCRI-Cap feed before March 2013
– Process changes to create the xcri-cap, KIS, HEAR or other external feeds
– Infrastructure changes needed to support new processes
Stage 2 Deliverables
Stage 2 Project Management WP include:
Any Stage 2 project plan changes by end of Feb
Website with regularly-maintained blog or wiki by end of Feb which can be consumed as an RSS feed
Interim reports 25th May and 24th Nov
Final report Draft 28th Jan, due 10th March 2013
Completion report 28th April 2013
Attending JISC meetings
Internal meetings and communication
Stage2 Programme meetings
JISC meetings in London and Leeds 10:30-16:00
2012
7th and 8th Feb
20th and 21st June Dev Days
14th and 15th Nov
2013
16th and 17th Jan
Stage2 Online meetings
JISC Online meetings 14:00-16:00
2012
Fri 20th Jan Start-up
Fri 30th Mar
Fri 18th May
Fri 13th July
Fri 19h Oct
2013
Fri 15th Feb
Meetings
Stage 2: other JISC meetings
Assembly meeting – organised by projects around a programme theme of their choosing
REQUEST BUDGET UNDER DISSEMINATION
Workshops on various approaches and techniques, such as XCRI-CAP, Service Design and Business Intelligence, Enterprise Architecture
XCRI-CAP Middlesex University course
How, What, Who, Why, When, Where, Which ...
Stage 2 Other Work Packages include:
How will the system-generated standard course feed for agreed types and number of courses be created?
What other things have you said will be delivered?
How will they be created?
Stage 2 selection criteria
Fit to programme objectives and overall value to JISC-HE community 25% (see Programme outcomes slide)
Quality of work plan 25% (To include production of all deliverables, and project management WP)
Engagement with the HE and FE Community 5% (which meetings could you host, present at etc)
Value for Money 25% (how will the sector benefit)
Previous experience of the project team 20% (name key project team and their RELEVANT experience)
Important dates
Deadline for Stage 2 submission:
12:00 noon UK time Monday 21st November 2011 afterwards the computer will say no ...
Projects will need to start from
Mon 12th January 2012 and end before March 2013
| slide 22
CC-BY [email protected]
XCRI SAF Report
Deadline for completing XCRI SAF review: 12:00 noon on 21st Nov
At 12:00 noon 22nd Nov we’ll take a snapshot of the SAF database (to give a 24 hour grace period)
We’re aiming to have the reports ready around 4:00pm 22nd Nov
Once they’re ready we’d like to show you the reports (pre-release) for a quick sanity check before we publish them to the live web site
Assuming you’re happy with the pre-release reports, we’ll publish them over night/out of hours on the 22nd
9:00am 23rd Nov, baseline reports are available on the XCRI SAF website
XCRI SAF
Comments about the XCRI SAF;
– How useful was it at identifying your ‘AS IS’ state?
– Were you then able to plan your ‘TO BE’ state?
– What else might have helped you during Stage1 achieve the desired outputs?
#jiscasess
Thank you for participating in Stage 1 of the Course Data programme
For any further queries please contact:
Ruth Drysdale [email protected]
Rob Englebright [email protected]
Laura Holloway l.holloawyjisc.ac.uk
