Upload
felcia
View
20
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Dyadic Concordance Types Frequent Psychological Aggression (50 th & 80 th Percentile) by 6,002 Couples in 2 nd National Family Violence Survey. Female. Male. 50th Percentile. Couple Prevalence: 62%. Couple Prevalence: 17%. %. Dyadic Concordance Types Type. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Mal
e-on
ly
Femal
e-on
lyBot
h0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1923
58
1922
59
80th Percentile
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
139
78
913
78
1
Straus, Murray A. (2014). Dyadic Concordance Types And Discordance In Three Partner Abuse Behaviors And Other Problematic Behavior By Male And Female Partners In A National Sample Of American Couples. Family Research Laboratory, University of New Hampshire. Durham, NH. (For sample description, see Gelles, R., & Straus, M. A. (1988). Intimate violence: The causes and consequences of abuse in the American family. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.)
Couple Prevalence: 62%
Dyadic Concordance Types Frequent Psychological Aggression (50th & 80th Percentile) by 6,002 Couples in 2nd National Family Violence Survey
%
Dyadic Concordance Types Type
Couple Prevalence: 17%
50th Percentile
Male Female
Male-Only Female-Only
Both-Assault
Male-Only Female-Only
Both-Assault
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
23
45
32
24
41
35
Chart Title
Male Respondents Female Respondents
%
Dyadic Types for Psychological Aggression As Reported By 481 University Students
2
Hines, D. A., & Saudino, K. J. (2003). Gender Differences in Psychological, Physical, and Sexual Aggression Among College Students using the revised Conflict Tatics Scales. Violence & Victims, 18(2), 197-217.
Prevalence Men: 11%Women: 9%
Male-Only Female-Only
Both-Assault
Male-Only Female-Only
Both-Assault
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1.4 2.8
96
0.5 2.7
97
Chart Title
Male Respondents Female Respondents
%
Dyadic Assault Types for Psychological Aggression As Reported By 5,219 Spanish High School Students
3
Fernández-González, L., O’Leary, K. D., & Muñoz-Rivas, M. J. (2014). Age-Related Changes in Dating Aggression in Spanish High School Students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(6), 1132-1152. doi: 10.1177/0886260513506057 dy Of Social Problems annual meeting, New York 8 August 2013. .
Prevalence Men= 92%Women= 96%
Male-Only Female-Only Both-Assault0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
16
23
60Chart Title
%
Dyadic Types of Psychological Aggression By 202 CouplesIn First Year Of Marriage
4
Prevalence 36%
Prevalence and DTs based on of the partner who reported a greater frequency of psychological aggression
Cut point for Psychological Aggression: 3 or more times in past year
Panuzio, J., & DiLillo, D. (2010). Physical, Psychological, and Sexual Intimate Partner Aggression Among Newlywed Couples: Longitudinal Prediction of Marital Satisfaction. Journal of Family Violence, 25(7), 689-699. doi: 10.1007/s10896-010-9328-2
Male-Only Female-Only
Both-Assault
Male-Only Female-Only
Both-Assault
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2.14.9
93
1.74.9
93
Chart Title
Short Form Full Form
%
Dyadic Types for Any Psychological Aggression As Reported By 1,157 University Students
5
Straus, M. A. and E. M. Douglas (2004). "A short form of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, and typologies for seventy and mutuality." Violence and Victims 19: 507-520.
Prevalence Short: 62%Full: 79%
Male-Only Female-Only
Both-Assault
Male-Only Female-Only
Both-Assault
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
33
19
48
19
26
56
Chart Title
Short Form Full Form
%
Dyadic Types for Severe Psychological Aggression As Reported By 1,157 University Students
6
Straus, M. A. and E. M. Douglas (2004). "A short form of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, and typologies for seventy and mutuality." Violence and Victims 19: 507-520.
Prevalence Short: 7%Full: 17%
7
Volpe, Ellen M., Thomas L. Hardie, and Catherine Cerulli. 2012. "Associations among Depressive Symptoms, Dating Violence, and Relationship Power in Urban, Adolescent Girls." Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing:n/a-n/a.
Low income, adolescent girls (n = 155), ages 14–18.
8
194 pairs of questionnaires were included for consideration
Has data on mutual as reported by males and females, but DTs need to be figured out if possible
The Status and Characteristics of Couple Violence in ChinaJuan Hou & Li Yu & Siu-Man Raymond Ting &Yee Tak Sze & Xiaoyi Fang
Male-Only Female-Only Both-Assault0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
67
8
25
Chart Title
Female Respondents
%
Dyadic Types for Sexual Coercion As Reported By National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health
9
Hess, K. L., Javanbakht, M., Brown, J. M., Weiss, R. E., Hsu, P., & Gorbach, P. M. (2013). Intimate Partner Violence and Anal Intercourse In Young Adult Heterosexual Relationships. [Article]. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 45(1), 6-12. doi: 10.1363/4500613
Prevalence Couple: 11%
Male-Only Female-Only Both-Assault0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
28
11
61Chart Title
%
Dyadic Types For Sexual Coercion By 202 CouplesIn First Year Of Marriage
10
Prevalence 55%
Prevalence and DTs based on of the partner who reported a greater frequency of coercion
Panuzio, J., & DiLillo, D. (2010). Physical, Psychological, and Sexual Intimate Partner Aggression Among Newlywed Couples: Longitudinal Prediction of Marital Satisfaction. Journal of Family Violence, 25(7), 689-699. doi: 10.1007/s10896-010-9328-2
Male-Only
Female-Only
Both-Coerce
Male-Only
Female-Only
Both-Coerce
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
32
13
55
41
8
51Chart Title
Male Respondents Female Respondents
%
Dyadic Concordance Types for Past Year Sexual Coercion Probability sample of 3,496 adults Age 18-64 In Six European Cities
11
Costa, Diogo, Hatzidimitriadou, Eleni, Ioannidi-Kapolou, Elli, Lindert, Jutta, Soares, Joaquim, Sundin, Örjan, . . . Barros, Henrique. (2014). Intimate partner violence and health-related quality of life in European men and women: findings from the DOVE study. Quality of Life Research, 1-9. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0766-9
Couple Prevalence According to: Men: 23%Women: 19%
Male-Only
Female-Only
Both-Coerce
Male-Only
Female-Only
Both-Coerce
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
29
11
60
42
6
52
Chart Title
Male Respondents Female Respondents
%
Dyadic Concordance Types for Sexual Coercion, Lifetime Probability sample of 3,496 adults Age 18-64 In Six European Cities
12
Costa, Diogo, Hatzidimitriadou, Eleni, Ioannidi-Kapolou, Elli, Lindert, Jutta, Soares, Joaquim, Sundin, Örjan, . . . Barros, Henrique. (2014). Intimate partner violence and health-related quality of life in European men and women: findings from the DOVE study. Quality of Life Research, 1-9. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0766-9
Couple Prevalence According to: Men: 14%Women: 11%
Male-Only Female-Only
Both-Assault
Male-Only Female-Only
Both-Assault
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
31
11
58
45
13
42
Chart Title
Male Respondents Female Respondents
%
Dyadic Assault Types for Sexual Coercion As Reported By 2016 Spanish High School Students
13
Fernández-González, L., O’Leary, K. D., & Muñoz-Rivas, M. J. (2014). Age-Related Changes in Dating Aggression in Spanish High School Students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(6), 1132-1152. doi: 10.1177/0886260513506057 dy Of Social Problems annual meeting, New York 8 August 2013. .
Prevalence Men= 27%Women= 11%
Male-Only Female-Only Both-Assault0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
23
18
58
Chart Title
%
Dyadic Types for Sexual Coercion As Reported By 388 Married Couples in China
14
Hou, J., Yu, L., Ting, S.-M., Sze, Y., & Fang, X. (2011). The Status and Characteristics of Couple Violence in China. Journal of Family Violence, 26(2), 81-92. doi: 10.1007/s10896-010-9343-3
Prevalence Couple: 55%
Male-Only Female-Only Both-Assault0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
20
1
79Chart Title
Female Respondents
%
Dyadic Types for Sexual Coercion As Reported By Project HOW: Health Outcomes of Women
15
Temple, J. R., Weston, R., & Marshall, L. L. (2005). Physical and Mental Health Outcomes of Women in Nonviolent, Unilaterally Violent, and Mutually Violent Relationships. Violence and Victims, 20(3), 335-359. doi: 10.1891/088667005780997947
Prevalence Women: %
Male-Only Female-Only
Both-Assault
Male-Only Female-Only
Both-Assault
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
18 18
64
29
11
60Chart Title
Short Form Full Form
%
Dyadic Types for Any Sexual Coercion As Reported By 1,157 University Students
16
Prevalence Short: 13%Full: 20%
Straus, M. A. and E. M. Douglas (2004). "A short form of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, and typologies for seventy and mutuality." Violence and Victims 19: 507-520.
Male-Only Female-Only
Both-Assault
Male-Only Female-Only
Both-Assault
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
28 28
45
28
13
59Chart Title
Short Form Full Form
%
Dyadic Types for Severe Sexual Coercion As Reported By 1,157 University Students
17
Prevalence Short: 2.3%Full: 4.6%
Straus, M. A. and E. M. Douglas (2004). "A short form of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, and typologies for seventy and mutuality." Violence and Victims 19: 507-520.
Male-Only Female-Only
Both-Assault
Male-Only Female-Only
Both-Assault
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
21
6
73
50
11
39
Chart Title
Male Respondents Female Respondents
%
Dyadic Types for Sexual Coercion As Reported By 481 University Students
18
Hines, D. A., & Saudino, K. J. (2003). Gender Differences in Psychological, Physical, and Sexual Aggression Among College Students using the revised Conflict Tatics Scales. Violence & Victims, 18(2), 197-217.
Prevalence Men: 31%Women: 27%
Male-Only Female-Only
Both-Assault
Male-Only Female-Only
Both-Assault
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
32
53
15
84
107
Chart Title
Male Respondents Female Respondents
%
Dyadic Types for Lifetime Forced-Sex By High School Students(1997 South Carolina Youth Risk Behavior Survey, N = 2,923)
19
Prevalence Men 14%Women 26%
Coker, A. L., McKeown, R. E., Sanderson, M., Davis, K. E., Valois, R. F., & Huebner, E. S. (2000). Severe dating violence and quality of life among South Carolina high school students. American journal of preventive medicine, 19(4), 220-227.
NOTE: These data do not refer to dating couples and therefore are not DTsHigh rates because of lifetime and not restricted to partners. But check what is forced sex
Male-Only Female-Only
Both-Assault
Male-Only Female-Only
Both-Assault
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
32
53
15
84
107
Chart Title
Male Respondents Female Respondents
%
Dyadic Types for Any Sexual Coercion by Male and Female University Students IN 32 Nations
20
Prevalence Men %Women %
Male-Only Female-Only
Both-Assault
Male-Only Female-Only
Both-Assault
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
32
53
15
84
107
Chart Title
Male Respondents Female Respondents
%
21
Prevalence Men 14%Women 26%
Dyadic Types for Verbal Sexual Coercion by Male and Female University Students IN 32 Nations
22
Self-Only Partner-Only Both-Abuse*0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Women
Men
% of childhood
sexual abuse
Childhood Sexual Abuse
Dyadic Abuse Type
Prevalence % Men WomChildhood sexual abuse 8% 5%Partner abuse 43% 50%
* Perpetration of one or more of the following: threatened assault, assaulted, insisted on sex, injured partner
Renner, L. M., & Whitney, S. D. (2012). Risk factors for unidirectional and bidirectional intimate partner violence among young adults. Child Abuse & Neglect, 36(1), 40-52. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.07.007Table 2.
23
Self-Only
Partner-Only
Both-Abuse*
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Women
Men
% of childhood
sexual abuse
Childhood Sexual Abuse
Dyadic Abuse Type * Perpetration of one or more of the following: threatened assault, assaulted, insisted on sex, injured partner
Renner, L. M., & Whitney, S. D. (2012). Risk factors for unidirectional and bidirectional intimate partner violence among young adults. Child Abuse & Neglect, 36(1), 40-52. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.07.007Table 2.
Grades 9-12)
Coker 2000 NOTE: THESE DATA DO NOT REFER TO DATING COUPLES AND THERE FORE CANNOT BE PART OF THE DT TABULATION
25
194 pairs of questionnaires were included for consideration
Has data on mutual as reported by males and females, but DTs need to be figured out if possible
The Status and Characteristics of Couple Violence in ChinaJuan Hou & Li Yu & Siu-Man Raymond Ting &Yee Tak Sze & Xiaoyi Fang
Chronicity Fathers and Mothers: When violence between parents occurred
• Violent fathers: 75% - two or more times that year• Violent mothers: 73% - two or more times that year.
Dyadic Aggression Types •Father-Only type: 65 % assaulted two or more times•Mother-Only type: 59% two or more times that year• Both-Violent type: 80% of the fathers and 80% of
mothers
Typical pattern Two or more times rather than an isolated incident
26
Straus, M.A . and Michel-Smith, Y. 2012. "Mutuality, Severity, And Chronicity Of Exposure To Violence Between Parents Of University Students In 15 Nations." Presented at International Family Violence And Child Victimization Research Conference. Sheraton Harborside Hotel, Portsmouth, New Hampshire, 9 July 2012. IPS02
27
Mean Frequency of Behavior By Men and Women In Each Dyadic TypeInternational Dating Violence Study
BehaviorSex of Participanta
Male-Only DT
Female-Only DT
Both DT F test for:DT=
DT x SEX =Male Female
Initiated MaleFeml
Assault Any MaleFeml
3.5-
-5.1 11.42 14.8 123.87***
5.84**Assault, Severe Male
FemlInjury, Any
etc
Dyadic Types Can be Important For Understanding and TreatingAlmost All Types Of Relationship Behaviors
(Results for 14,282 University Student Dating Couples in 32 Nations)_
Dyadic Type Gender of
Respondent% Male
Only% Female
Only
% Both Any Assault Female 9 25 67 Severe Assault Female 16 31 53Any Injury-Perpetration Female 21.1 13.8 65.1Severe Injury-Perpetration Female 39 10 51 Any Psych Aggression Female 9 17 74 Severe Psych Aggression Female 13 31 55 Any Sexual Coercion Female 33 10 57 Verbal Sexual Coercion Female 44 9 47 Physical Sexual Coercion Female 43 15 43 Intransigent Female 13 9 78
Percentages are similar when based on reports by male students
Dyadic Types Can be Important For Understanding and TreatingAlmost All Types Of Relationship Behaviors
(Results for `14,282 University Student Dating Couples)_
Dyadic Type Gender of
Respondent% Male
Only% Female
Only
% Both Any Assault Female 9 25 67 Severe Assault Female 16 31 53Any Injury-Perpetration Female 21.1 13.8 65.1Severe Injury-Perpetration Female 39 10 51 Any Psych Aggression Female 9 17 74 Severe Psych Aggression Female 13 31 55 Any Sexual Coercion Female 33 10 57 Verbal Sexual Coercion Female 44 9 47 Physical Sexual Coercion Female 43 15 43 Intransigent Female 13 9 78
Percentages are similar when based on reports by male students
Taylor Study
I think the three bar charts were made from one of these two Tables, but I am not sure. In addition, I am not sure it is correct
33
Taylor, C. A., Lee, S. J., Guterman, N. B., & Rice, J. C. (2010). Use of Spanking for 3-Year-Old Children and Associated Intimate Partner Aggression or Violence. Pediatrics, 415-424.
34
Taylor, C. A., Lee, S. J., Guterman, N. B., & Rice, J. C. (2010). Use of Spanking for 3-Year-Old Children and Associated Intimate Partner Aggression or Violence. Pediatrics, 415-424.
FA MO FA MO FA MO0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Use of Alcohol or Other Drugs
%
Father-Only Mother-Only Both-Violent
FA MO FA MO FA MO0
5
10
15
20
25
Depression Rates
%
Father-Only Mother-Only Both-Violent
FA MO FA MO FA MO0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Father Ever In JailAs Reported By Father’s and Mother’s
%
Father-Only Mother-Only Both-Violent